scholarly journals Novel Use of Silicone Sheets for Immediate Implant Placement in Fresh Molar Extraction Sockets

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-Pyo Lee ◽  
Jae-Heung Choi ◽  
Sang-Joun Yu ◽  
Byung-Ock Kim
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Barrier Membrane ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Silicone Sheet ◽  
Molar Extraction

In the recent years, the immediate placement of dental implants into fresh extraction sites has become an acceptable treatment approach. However, immediate molar implant placement presents specific challenges because of the anatomical and physiologic limitations. Such implant surgeries commonly require procedures that use a barrier membrane to generate bone and soft tissue or one that seals the molar extraction socket through a coronally advanced flap. Here, as an alternative, we report a method for treating molar extraction socket wounds in the hard and soft tissues after immediate placement of an implant using a silicone sheet.

scholarly journals Flapless immediate implant placement into fresh molar extraction socket using platelet-rich fibrin: A case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (19) ◽  
pp. 3153-3159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Lin Sun ◽  
Mahmoud Mudalal ◽  
Man-Lin Qi ◽  
Yue Sun ◽  
Liu-Yi Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Molar Extraction

Immediate Implant Placement in Fresh Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket: 8-Year Results. A Case Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory-George Zafiropoulos ◽  
Adrian Kasaj ◽  
Oliver Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Treatment Result ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Satisfactory Treatment ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Molar Extraction

Abstract Recently, successful implant placement in fresh extraction sockets has been reported. In this case report, we present the results of an immediate implant placement in a fresh extraction socket of a mandibular molar with simultaneous bone regeneration using a nonresorbable membrane and no other graft materials. Clinical and radiographic findings acquired 8 years after implant placement demonstrated a stable peri-implant situation and confirmed a satisfactory treatment result.

scholarly journals Contour Changes Following Immediate Placement of Ultra-Wide Implants in Molar Extraction Sockets without Bone Grafting

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2504
Author(s):  
André Hattingh ◽  
Hugo De Bruyn ◽  
Manù Van Weehaeghe ◽  
Geert Hommez ◽  
Stefan Vandeweghe
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Molar Extraction

The aim was to evaluate ridge reduction and mucosal recession following immediate placement of ultra-wide implants in molar sockets, without bone grafting. Impressions were taken prior to tooth extraction, 4 months and 1 year after implant placement. The casts were digitized and compared. Mucosal recessions and horizontal ridge reduction were measured. A total of 16 implants were in the maxilla and 11 in the mandible. At the buccal aspect, there was a mean reduction of 0.94 mm after 4 months and 0.89 mm after one year (p = 0.933). At the palatal/lingual aspect, this was 1.09 mm after 4 months and 0.69 mm after 1 year (p = 0.001). After 1 year, a recession of 0.59 mm was measured at the zenith, 1.04 mm at the mesial and 0.98 mm at the distal papilla. The mean midfacial horizontal ridge reduction was 1.23 mm after 4 months and 1.45 mm after 1 year. At the midpalatal/midlingual aspect, the mean horizontal reduction was 1.43 mm after 4 months and 1.16 mm after 1 year. Immediate implant placement without bone grafting in the posterior jaw yields a significant horizontal ridge reduction and minor mucosal recession. Clinicians should anticipate the amount of ridge reduction and consider augmentation at the time of implant placement.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement in Infected Sockets: A Consecutive Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Kakar ◽  
Kanupriya Kakar ◽  
Minas D. Leventis ◽  
Gaurav Jain
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

Introduction: Immediate placement of implants in a fresh post-extraction socket is an increasingly popular and established treatment option. However, active infection in the extraction site may adversely affect the outcome of this procedure. This study was designed to assess the clinical results of immediate placement of dental implants in infected extraction sockets using a standardized protocol, which included (a) the use of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser for the decontamination of the infected socket prior to implant insertion, and (b) the utilization of an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft substitute to augment the gap between the implant surface and the labial plate of bone. Patients and Methods: A retrospective record review was used to identify 68 patients who had implants placed as per the described protocol. A total of 126 implants were placed in 68 patients (65 implants in the maxilla, 61 implants in the mandible). The implants were loaded 136 ± 73 days (mean ± standard deviation; range: 37–400 days) after implant placement. Eight patients (16 implants) were subsequently lost to follow up. Results: 105 of the 110 implants (95.45%) placed immediately in the infected sites using the described protocol survived after prosthetic loading. Conclusion: Immediate implant placement in previously infected sites using the protocols mentioned in our study with laser decontamination of the socket, grafting with an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft material and non-submerged healing shows a similar survival rate to the published success rates for immediate implants placed in non-infected sites.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement by Interradicular Bone Drilling before Molar Extraction: Clinical Case Report with One-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuardo Valenzuela ◽  
José M. Olivares ◽  
Nicolás Weiss ◽  
Dafna Benadof
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Bone Drilling ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
One Year ◽  
Molar Extraction

The placement of immediate implants in the posterior sector is a widespread procedure where the success and survival rates are similar to those of traditional protocols. It has several anatomical challenges, such as the presence of interradicular bone septa that hinder a correct three-dimensional positioning of the implant and may compromise primary stability and/or cause damage of neighboring structures. The aim of this article is to present the treatment and the one-year clinical follow-up of a patient who received immediate implant placement using an interradicular bone-drilling technique before the molar extraction.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement in Anterior Maxilla

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-72
Author(s):  
John Gurung ◽  
Bhageshwar Dhami
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Incisor Tooth ◽  
Removable Partial Denture ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Operating Technique ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Extraction Site ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Maxillary Lateral Incisor ◽  
Tissue Trauma

This case report describes extraction of a fractured right maxillary lateral incisor tooth which was previously treated endodontically, followed by immediate placement of a dental implant in the prepared socket and temporisation by a removable partial denture. The tooth was extracted with minimal hard and soft tissue trauma. The socket was prepared to the required depth and implant was inserted. An impression was made after four months, and a definitive restoration was placed. The atraumatic operating technique and the immediate insertion of the implant resulted in the preservation of the hard and soft tissues at the extraction site. The patient exhibited no clinical or radiologic complications after loading.

Guidelines for Selecting the Implant Diameter During Immediate Implant Placement of a Fresh Extraction Socket: A Case Series

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariádene Pértile de Oliveira Rosa ◽  
José Martins da Rosa ◽  
Luís Pereira ◽  
Carlos Francischone ◽  
Bruno Sotto-Maior
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement: Report of Case Series

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
M. Koray ◽  
I. Ozcan ◽  
B. Alkan ◽  
O. Kesmez ◽  
H. Tanyeri
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

SUMMARYObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate postextraction implant placement. Immediate placement of dental implants have been claimed of the potential advantages such as reductions in the number of surgical interventions, a shorter treatment time, an ideal 3-dimensional implant positioning, the presumptive preservation of alveolar bone at the site of the tooth extraction and soft tissue aesthetics.Method: In this case series we reported to extract 15 teeth in 12 patients (8 males; 4 females, mean age: 46.08 years) and replace the teeth with implants immediately.Results: There were no signs of inflammation or infection and none of the patients had complaints subsequently. All implants were osseointegrated at the time of abutment connection. Postoperative healing was uneventful in all of the patients. No complications were observed.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, immediate implant placement was a predictable treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document