scholarly journals Durable Clinical Benefit in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma after Discontinuation of Anti-PD-1 Therapies Due to Immune-Related Adverse Events

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umang Swami ◽  
Varun Monga ◽  
Aaron D. Bossler ◽  
Yousef Zakharia ◽  
Mohammed Milhem
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cutaneous Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Ocular Tissue ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Prognostic Information

Introduction. Anti-PD-1 therapies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, are currently the standard of care for treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Treatment is usually continued until toxicity or disease progression. Though these therapies are well tolerated, some patients discontinue them due to immune-related adverse events (irAE). Discontinuation of therapy brings challenges to their management due to limited treatment options and lack of long-term prognostic information for these patients. Herein, we reviewed patients at our institution to analyze their clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods. Charts of 1264 consecutive patients enrolled between 8/1/2012 and 7/31/2017 at Melanoma Skin & Ocular Tissue Repositories at Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic were reviewed. Eligible patients were those who received single-agent anti-PD-1 therapy and subsequently discontinued it due to irAE. Reviewed data included patient demographics, prior medical history, baseline disease parameters, and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was done to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results. Overall 169 patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic cutaneous melanoma received anti-PD-1 therapy of which 16 (9.5%) white, non-Hispanic patients with median age of 64.5 (range 35 to 81 years) discontinued treatment due to irAE. Fifteen patients received pembrolizumab and one received nivolumab. The median duration of treatment was 4.7 (range 0.7 to 11.5) months. Median follow-up was 30.3 (range 4.6 to 49.4) months. Median PFS was 24.6 months and median OS was not reached. Durable clinical benefit (time to progression or next treatment of more than 6 months from last treatment) was observed in 13 (81.2%) patients. At the time of analysis, 8 patients had progressed and 4 patients died (all-cause). Discussion. Our results suggest that advanced melanoma patients discontinuing anti-PD-1 therapy due to irAE usually experience durable clinical benefit. However, caution is needed with these agents in patients with underlying autoimmune diseases.

scholarly journals Management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma: updates in clinical practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Schvartsman ◽  
Patricia Taranto ◽  
Isabella C. Glitza ◽  
Sanjiv S. Agarwala ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cutaneous Melanoma ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1

In recent years, several drugs have been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma, completely reshaping the landscape of this aggressive disease. Immune therapy with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death-1 inhibitors yielded significant and durable responses, achieving long-term disease control in up to 40% of the patients. BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), in combination with MEK inhibitors, also resulted in improved overall survival compared with single-agent BRAFi in patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma. The optimized sequencing and duration of treatment, however, is yet to be found. In this article, we thoroughly review current data and discuss how to best sequence the various treatment modalities available at present, based on four distinct clinical presentations commonly seen in clinic. In addition, we review treatment options beyond checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy, which may be required by patients failing such effective treatments.

High-Dose Cyclophosphamide: An Effective Non-Transplant Salvage Option in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4947-4947
Author(s):  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Michael Keng ◽  
Eddie Thara ◽  
Andrew Hendifar ◽  
Tanya Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Stage Disease

Abstract Abstract 4947 Background Recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have significantly improved overall survival. With MM patients living longer, there is a constant need to find better therapeutic options, especially when patients are refractory to conventional agents, and are not eligible for experimental therapeutics in clinical trials. We evaluated treatment with single-agent high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy) in a cohort of heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Methods All the patients were previously treated for active MM at the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA. Cyclophosphamide was administered at 1.2 gm/m2 in D5W intravenous (IV) over 1 hour every 3 hours for a total of 4 doses. Mesna was given to prevent urinary adverse events from cyclophosphamide as 4 gm/m2 in 1000 ml D5W IV to run at 50 ml/hr for 20 hours, starting 15 minutes prior to the first dose of cyclophosphamide. Patients were given pre-medications with 5HT3 antagonists an steroids. Treatment was administered in the in-patient setting and patients were discharged after the last dose of cyclophosphamide. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks, if well-tolerated and continued response. Growth factor support was provided to the patients, as needed. Response to treatment was assessed after each 4-week cycle according to the International Uniform Response Criteria for MM. Results Seven patients (4 females, 3 males) were treated on this regimen with a median age of 53 years (range 34-61 yrs). These patients included 3 Hispanics (43%), 2 Asians (29%), 1 Caucasian (14%) and 1 African-American (14%). MM subtype was IgG disease in 3, IgA in 2, and light-chain only in 2 patients. Advanced stage disease (>stage 1) at the time of diagnosis as per the Durie Salmon (DS) staging system was present in 71% of the patients, while 3 patients (43%) had advanced stage disease as per the International Staging System (ISS). Four patients (57%) had lytic bone disease at the time of diagnosis, while only 1 patient was a non-secretor. Five of these patients (71%) never received an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as a part of their MM treatment. Median number of therapies in these patients was 5 (range 4-8), while median number of therapies prior to high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy) were 3 (range 2-7). Median number of cycles of HDCy administered to the patients was 2 (range 1-5). Overall Response Rate (ORR = CR+PR) was 29% (n=2) with 1 patient achieving CR and 1 patient achieving VGPR. Four patients (57%) had stable disease (SD) and 1 patient had progressive disease (PD). Thus, the overall clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) was seen in 6 out of the 7 patients (86%). Median time to best response was 5 weeks (range 4-10 weeks). Median time to progression was 16 weeks (range 8-24 weeks). Most common adverse events were cytopenias and fatigue, but were easily manageable with supportive care on an out-patient basis. Conclusions Despite improvement in therapeutic regimens for MM, it remains an incurable disorder. There is a constant need to develop regimens for treatment of relapsed/refractory MM patients that are efficacious and well-tolerated. We report the use of single-agent HDCy in heavily pre-treated MM patients. Despite the small number of patients studied, we have noted meaningful clinical benefit with a manageable toxicity profile. This warrants further investigation into developing therapeutic regimens with high-dose cyclophosphamide. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase II study of AZD2171 for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6570-6570
Author(s):  
Shannon Eileen O'Mahar ◽  
Alcee Jumonville ◽  
Patrick J. Flynn ◽  
Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia ◽  
Charles Erlichman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Orally Bioavailable ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

6570 Background: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) can block growth and trigger apoptosis in neoplastic cells. AZD2171 (cediranib) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, VEGFR-1/2 inhibitor. We conducted a phase II study of the efficacy of AZD2171 for the treatment of MDS. Methods: Adults with MDS (IPSS Int-2 or High) were eligible if they exhibited adequate organ function and ECOG 0-2. The primary endpoint was proportion of responses according to the IWG criteria assessed at one and every 3 months. Prior investigation of cediranib at 45 mg daily in patients with acute leukemia demonstrated toxicity concerns and therefore, the starting dose of this study was lowered to 30 mg daily. Results: A total of 16 pts with MDS (median age 73 years) were enrolled at a 30 mg starting dose, and all were evaluable. Median baseline marrow blasts were 12.0 % (range 2-18); 3 pts (18.8 %) had low, 6 (37.5 %) intermediate, and 7 (43.8 %) had high risk cytogenetics. Prior therapy included azacitidine (n=7), decitabine (n=2), cytarabine (n=2), erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) (n=2), lenalidomide (n=1), or none (n=6). Patients were treated for a median of two 28-day cycles (range 1 to 11). There were no confirmed responses. Patients with baseline blasts > 5% showed no significant reduction in the blast count at 4 and 12 weeks. Median OS was 4.7 mo (95% CI: 2.6 – 11.6). Median TTP was 3.8 mo (95% CI: 1.7 – 10.8). Grade 4 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to cediranib were neutropenia (n=2) and thrombocytopenia (n=4). Grade 3 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to study treatment included: neutropenia (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), and anemia (n=2). Grade 3 non-hematological adverse events included fatigue (n=4), dyspnea (n=3), dehydration (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), nausea (n=2), asthenia (n=1), and hypertension (n=1). Hypertension and proteinuria was uncommon with the 30 mg/day dose. Conclusions: With no confirmed response from 16 patients, cediranib was determined to be ineffective at a dose of 30 mg daily in our patient population. Supported by NCI N01-CM62205, NCI P30-CA014520 and the UW Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Effect of lenalidomide (LEN) on biochemical responses and clinical benefit (CB) as a single agent in chemotherapy-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 128-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Anand Patel ◽  
Dana Villines ◽  
Kathy Tolzien ◽  
Susan K. Kelby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Biochemical Responses ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

128 Background: LEN has anti-angiogenesis and immunomodulatory properties making it ideal to investigate in CRPC. We report on a phase II study investigating LEN in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients (pts) Methods: Eligible pts received LEN at 25 mg daily on days 1 – 21 every 28-days until progression. Daily aspirin or coumadin were required. Responses were assessed every 2 cycles. Toxicity was assessed every cycle. Primary end point: The CB of LEN [Sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD)]. Secondary end points: Toxicity, time to radiographic and PSA progression (TTP and TTP-PSA), time to next treatment (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and LEN’s impact on quality of life (QOL). Results: 31 pts were enrolled; 27 response-evaluable (1 withdrew consent, 3 off per choice after adverse events). Median age is 74 (range 58-89) with 24 (77%) having Gleason ≥ 7 disease. Median PSA is 66 (2.1-918.6). Six pts (19%) had liver/lung involvement. Fourteen pts (51%) showed biochemical response with 4 (15%) having >50% PSA drop. TTP-PSA is 4 months (2-11). No radiographic responses seen but 17 pts had SD for a median of 4 months (2-16) (CB=55%). Median number of LEN cycles was 3 (2-15). With a median follow-up of 18 months (5-38), 17 patients (55%) remain alive; median OS of 18 months. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were most common (neutropenia 41%, leukopenia 12%, anemia 9%, thrombocytopenia 9%). Other grade 3/4 toxicities: venothromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, and dehydration (6% each). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were witnessed in 10 pts (32%) with only 1 (3%, rash) definitely related to LEN. Others were not related or possibly related. Of 27 pts, 7 (26%) had a dose reduction and 2 (7%) required two dose reductions. Dose reductions occurred after cycle 3. QOL scales suggested no adverse impact. Median TTNT is 2 months (9 pts received chemotherapy, 10 pts went onto studies, 3 pts received hormonal therapies, 4 pts received radiation, 3 pts had no therapy yet, and 2 pts remain on LEN). Conclusions: LEN is active as monotherapy in CRPC. Biochemical responses are witnessed and clinical benefit is observed. Myelosuppression is the most common toxicity.

A phase II study of single agent mocetinostat, an oral isotype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, in patients with diffuse large cell B-cell (DLBCL) and follicular (FL) lymphomas.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8535-8535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Crump ◽  
Charalambos Andreadis ◽  
Sarit E. Assouline ◽  
David Rizzieri ◽  
Amanda Copeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Hdac Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cardiac Symptoms

8535 Background: Mocetinostat (MGCD0103) is an orally available, isotype-selective, non-hydroxamate HDAC inhibitor targeting HDACs 1,2, 3 and 11 with single-agent activity in Hodgkin’s lymphoma and in AML and MDS (in combination with 5-azacitidine). More than 430 patients have been treated to date. Methods: This open-label, phase II trial enrolled patients with DLBCL and FL. Patients received mocetinostat at doses ranging from 70-110 mg 3x/wk every 28 days. Anticancer activity, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. Results: Sixty-nine patients with DLBCL (n=41) and FL (n=28) were enrolled for treatment at starting doses of 85-110 mg. Median age was 62 years (range: 32 to 81). Median duration of treatment was ~3 months (range: <1 to 24). Objective response rate in DLBCL and FL, respectively, was 7/41 (17%; including 2 unconfirmed PRs) and 3/28 (11%; including 1 CR). Median time to response was 2.0 mos (range 1.7-21.0) and 5.3 mos (range 4.3-6.0) respectively. Stable disease was achieved by 13/41 (32%) and 14/28 (50%), respectively, for a disease control rate of 49% and 61%, respectively. Mean duration of SD in patients with DBLCL was ~4.5 mos (range 2-12 mos), with 10 patients remaining stable for ≥3 mos. Among FL patients, mean duration of SD was approximately 4.1 mos (range 1.7-13 mos), with 9 patients remaining stable for ≥3 mos. The FL CR occurred in a 62-year-old female with paratracheal, subcarinal and portal target lesions who achieved a PR after 4 cycles and CR after 12 cycles that persisted through the remaining 4 mos on study. Study drug was discontinued for adverse events in 19/69 (28%). Fatigue, weight loss or anorexia were most common (n=4 each). A total of 26 drug-related SAEs were reported among 12 patients (17%; 1-6 events per pt). There were no drug related deaths. Enrollment is complete and final data will be presented. Conclusions: Single-agent mocetinostat has activity in DLBCL and FL. Fatigue, gastrointestinal, and cardiac symptoms are the most common adverse events resulting in discontinuation of dosing. Based on the acceptable tolerability and clinical activity further development is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT00359086.

Multicenter observational study of temsirolimus use records conducted under conditions of routine medical practice.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15610-e15610
Author(s):  
Martin Eduardo Richardet ◽  
Raul Sala ◽  
Luis Fein ◽  
Eduardo Arnoldo Richardet
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Everyday Practice ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Renal Cancer

e15610 Background: Sometimes efficacy and toxicity reported in clinical trials differs from what is later found on everyday practice. Temsirolimus was approved in Argentine on 2009. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety profile in advanced renal cancer patients treated with Temsirolimus in everyday practice conditions. Methods: Descriptive, observational, retrospective study of medical records of patients treated with Temsirolimus from 2 Argentinian centers were analyzed at IONC and IOR from April to December 2010. All patients were high risk according to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 50 patients were included, 36% (18) women and 64% (32) men, average age 53.8 years old (20 - 78). Adverse events were assessed based on the NCI CTC v3. Results: No patient showed side effects during or immediately after the infusion, related with the administration of the drug. This study included patients with extensive metastatic disease and multiple factors of adverse prognosis together with short life expectancy. All centers used the standard premedication and dose and no serious adverse events were registered. The most frequent adverse events were anemia, asthenia and mucositis. In all cases adverse events were manageable with support measures or dose reduction. Although more than 80% of patients showed some type of adverse event, the quantity and severity of them were lower than the ones reported in the literature. Disease progression (67.3% of patients) was the most frequent cause of treatment discontinuation. All patients received a dose = 25mg. A total of 52 adverse events were registered. In Terms of efficacy, 46 patients were suitable for analysis. Our rate of clinical benefit (PR 13%+SD 47.8%) is 60.8% , higher than what was reported in the pivotal phase III study (32.1%), this difference could be attributed to our limited sample size. The ORR observed (13%) is similar to the rate reported in the pivotal phase III trial (8.6%. Range 4.8 – 12.4). Conclusions: The treatment with Temsirolimus in patients with advanced renal cancer with poor prognosis factors showed an acceptable safety profile and clinical benefit, taking into account the characteristics of the target population.

Gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) in patients (pts) with refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 413-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Palacio ◽  
Ikechukwu Immanuel Akunyili ◽  
Vinicius Ernani ◽  
Jessica Macintyre ◽  
Jaime R. Merchan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Positive Interaction ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

413 Background: The combination of nab-P and Gem improves survival compared to Gem alone in first-line therapy of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Efficacy data with this doublet in previously treated pts are scant. Our group presented preliminary results on 10 pts treated with this two-drug combination in the second and third line setting and herein present updated data on 59 pts. Methods: This IRB approved analysis identified all pts diagnosed with advanced refractory pancreatic cancer, treated with second-line Gem and nab-P at University of Miami and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center between September 2010 and June 2014. Response by RECIST, CA19-9, and symptomatic improvement were assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of Gem + nab-P and were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical benefit was defined as the percentage of patients with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). Results: Data from59 pts were analyzed. The median age was 60; 55% were male; 54% received Gem + nab-P as second line therapy and 46% received it as third-line or beyond. Five (10%) pts had confirmed PR, 23 (47%) SD and 21 (43%) progressed. Among the 31 (52%) pts who received prior Gem, 18 (58%) had clinical benefit, 3 PR and 15 SD. The median OS was 3.9 months. The median PFS was 3 months. Toxicity appears similar to what has been reported on the MPACT trial with the combination. Conclusions: The clinical benefit seen withGem and nab-P in this group of pretreated pancreatic cancer pts suggests that it can be considered as an option. Additionally, prior Gem treatment appears not to decrease Gem and nab-P benefit in this population. Since nab-P monotherapy has modest activity in pre-treated pancreatic cancer pts, our data suggests a positive interaction between Gem and nab-P that may overcome resistance to Gem. [Table: see text]

Multi-institutional phase II trial of single agent regorafenib in refractory advanced biliary cancers.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS468-TPS468
Author(s):  
Heloisa P. Soares ◽  
Nishi Kothari ◽  
Amit Mahipal ◽  
Gregory M. Springett ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Drug Benefit ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center

TPS468 Background: Currently, there is no standard second line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BC) who have failed prior systemic therapy. Aberrant activation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway occurs in more than 60% of BC indicating the importance of this pathway in biliary carcinogenesis. Furthermore anti-angiogenic agents such as the VEGF-antagonist bevacizumab, and the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib have been tested in BC in the first line setting with modest activity. Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets multiple membrane-bound and intracellular kinases including VEGF, the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PDGFR- ß pathways. Given the pivotal role of these pathways in biliary cancer biology, the clinical evaluation of regorafenib represents a novel and rational approach to treat this disease. Methods: This is a multi-institutional phase II single arm single-stage design trial using regorafenib as single agent. Patients with histologically or cytologically-proven locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract carcinomas that failed no more than 2 prior line of systemic chemotherapy are eligible for this study. Patients must have measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 criteria and never been treated with VEGF inhibitors. Patients will receive regorafenib 160 mg daily (21 days on and 7 days off) and will be evaluated for response every 2 cycles (1cycle = 28 days). The study’s primary endpoint is 6 month overall survival. Secondary endpoints are to define disease control, progression-free survival and toxicity related to treatment. Correlative biomarker studies using plasma samples will be performed to investigate levels of 40 relevant proteins associated with the above-mentioned pathways in the attempt to identify predictive markers of drug benefit. As per September 2015, twelve of the 39 planned patients have been accrued for the study. In addition to Moffitt Cancer Center, this trial will enroll patients at the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and VCU Massey Cancer Center. Clinical trial information: NCT02115542.

A phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor AP23573 as a single agent in advanced endometrial cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5516-5516 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Colombo ◽  
S. McMeekin ◽  
P. Schwartz ◽  
J. Kostka ◽  
C. Sessa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Adverse Event Data ◽  
Clinical Benefit Response ◽  
Grade 3

5516 Background: There are few effective therapies for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Targeted therapies such as AP23573, a novel mTOR inhibitor, may result in clinical benefit with fewer side effects. Preliminary results of a trial of single agent AP23573 in patients with progressive endometrial cancer who may have had up to 2 prior regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy are reported. Methods: The trial is an open-label, Simon 2-stage, single-arm study enrolling patients who have advanced endometrial cancer with documented progression in the 3 months prior to entry. Patients receive 12.5mg AP23573 QDx5 as a 30-min. intravenous infusion every other week for 28-day cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint is Clinical Benefit Response (CBR), defined as a complete or partial response or prolonged stable disease (= 16 weeks) by modified RECIST guidelines. Results: Seven of the first 19 patients achieved CBR, allowing expansion to the second stage. Enrollment is now complete (45 patients). Demographic data are available for 35 (median 66 yrs.; range 46–89) patients who received treatment: 23 adenocarcinomas, 5 carcinosarcomas, 6 papillary serous carcinomas (UPSC) and 1 clear cell carcinoma. Thirty-four patients had prior chemotherapy including doxorubicin, taxanes or platinum agents. Fourteen of the 26 patients with available history had prior pelvic radiotherapy. Nine of 27 (33%) patients evaluable for response had CBRs, including 2 partial responses (PRs). One CBR had UPSC, the remaining patients, including the PRs, had adenocarcinomas. Seven of the patients achieving CBR are still on treatment. Eighteen of the 27 patients discontinued treatment before 4 cycles because of progressive disease (14), consent withdrawal (1) or unrelated adverse events (3). Adverse event data are available for 27 patients. The most common adverse events are fatigue, anemia (33% each), mouth sores and nausea/vomiting (30% each). There have been 16 grade 3/ 4 treatment related adverse events (2 hyperglycemia, 14 separate events similar to those reported in other AP23573 trials). Conclusions: AP23573 shows encouraging single-agent activity in pretreated patients with advanced, progressive endometrial cancer and is well tolerated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gemcitabine (G) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) in patients with refractory advanced pancreatic cancer (PC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 373-373
Author(s):  
Vinicius Ernani ◽  
Ikechukwu Immanuel Akunyili ◽  
Peter Joel Hosein ◽  
Jessica Macintyre ◽  
Caio Max S. Rocha Lima
Keyword(s):  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

373 Background: There is no standard chemotherapy regimen for PC patients who have progressed on G and fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. Single agent nab-P had limited activity on a second-line phase II trial in PC. Synergistic preclinical studies with G and taxanes have been reported. Nab-P targets stromal cells and leads to improved delivery of chemotherapy to PC cells. The combination of G + nab-P might be an effective approach in pretreated PC. Methods: A retrospective analysis of advanced refractory PC patients treated from Sep 2010 to Aug 2011 with the combination of G + nab-P was performed at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients received G 1000mg/m2 and nab-P 100mg/m2 on D1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment response was assessed by review of imaging studies using the RECIST criteria, CA19-9 response and symptomatic improvement. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from time of commencement of G + nab-P until documented progression or death respectively. Results: 10 patients were treated with G + nab-P; 60%, 30% and 10% of patients had received 3, 2 and 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. 90% and 80% received prior G or fluoropyrimidine-based regimen respectively. Therapy was discontinued in one patient following only one dose of G + nab-P (Cycle 1, day 1) due to grade 2 thrombocytopenia. The remaining 9 patients received a median of 4 cycles. Two (22.2%) patients had confirmed PR, 3(33.3%) patients had confirmed stable disease while 4 (44.4%) patients progressed on therapy. The median PFS was 13.7 weeks. The median PFS was 20 weeks in patients with PR or SD and 9.9 weeks in patients with PD. Recurrent malignant ascitis resolved in a patient with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Treatment was well tolerated; grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity included anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in 2, 1 and 2 patients respectively. 70% of patients required G-CSF support. Non hematologic Grade 3-4 toxicities included fatigue, peripheral neuropathy; nausea and vomiting in 3, 2 and 1 patient respectively. Conclusions: G + nab-P resulted in clinical benefit in half of this group of advanced PC patients who had previously progressed on G and fluoropyrimidine-based regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document