scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Different Maintenance Doses of Caffeine Citrate for Treatment of Apnea in Premature Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Chen ◽  
Lu Jin ◽  
Xiao Chen
Keyword(s):  
Premature Infants ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
High Dose Group ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Caffeine Citrate

Background. Caffeine is widely used for the treatment of neonatal apnea, but there is no agreement on the optimum maintenance dose for preterm infants. Objective. The aims of this meta-analysis were to compare the efficacy and safety of high versus low maintenance doses of caffeine citrate for the treatment of apnea in premature infants. Methods. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature, Weipu Journal, Wanfang, and CNKI databases up to September 2018. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of caffeine citrate for apnea treatment in premature infants were included. Trials were divided into those testing high maintenance doses (10−20 mg/kg daily) and low maintenance doses (5−10 mg/kg daily) for comparison. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards. Results. Among the 345 studies initially identified, thirteen RCTs involving 1515 patients were included. Compared to the low-dose group, the high-dose group exhibited greater effective treatment rate (RR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.18 to 1.60, P<0.0001) and success rate for ventilator removal (RR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.04 to 2.90, P=0.03), but higher incidence of tachycardia (RR: 2.02, 5%CI: 1.30 to 3.12, P=0.002). The high-dose group also demonstrated lower extubation failure rate (RR: 0.5, 95%CI: 0.35 to 0.71, P=0.0001), frequency of apnea (WMD: -1.55, 95%CI: -2.72 to -0.39, P=0.009), apnea duration (WMD: -4.85, 95%CI: -8.29 to -1.40, P=0.006), and incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.68 to 0.91, P=0.002). There were no significant group differences in other adverse events including in-hospital death (P>0.05). Conclusions. Higher maintenance doses of caffeine citrate appear more effective and safer than low maintenance doses for treatment of premature apnea, despite a higher incidence of tachycardia.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Linaclotide for Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jiao Yang ◽  
YanChang Lei
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Analysis ◽  
Chronic Constipation ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Responder Rate ◽  
High Dose Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Medium Dose

Background. It is ambiguous whether a higher dose of linaclotide provides higher efficacy for chronic constipation (CC) patients. The meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of linaclotide doses ranging from 62.5 μg to 600 μg for CC patients. Methods. A comprehensive search was conducted, and STATA16 software was used for data analysis. Results. Seven studies with 4,107 patients were eligible. A significantly enhanced number of completely spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) responders were found in the extremely low-dose group (OR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.98–4.34; p < 0.001 ), the low-dose group (OR: 3.24; 95% CI: 2.44–4.31; p < 0.001 ), the medium-dose group (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.46–6.50; p = 0.003 ), and high-dose group (OR: 4.79; 95% CI: 3.04–7.54; p < 0.001 ). Bayesian analysis showed the high-dose group obtained the maximum CSBM responder rate (OR: 4.94; 95% credible interval (CrI): 3.22–7.79; probability rank = 0.87) indirectly compared with extremely low-dose, low-dose, and medium-dose groups. However, no significant difference presented in the CSBM responder rate by pairwise comparisons of the different dose groups. Additionally, no more any adverse events occurred in the higher linaclotide dose group (RR: 0.91; 95% CrI: 0.60–1.38) indirectly compared with other dose groups. Conclusions. High dose of linaclotide could be more effective and safer for CC patients, which need more trials to confirm in the future.

scholarly journals Recombinant Human Thyrotropin-Stimulated Radioiodine Therapy in Patients with Multinodular Goiters: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 841-849
Author(s):  
Chunmei Xu ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Huikai Miao ◽  
Tianyue Xie ◽  
Xiaojun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Radioiodine Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Dose Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Recombinant Human Thyrotropin

AbstractA potential reduction of goiter volume (GV) of recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) on multinodular goiters (MNG) was previously reported but controversial. Hence we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the effect of rhTSH-stimulated radioiodine therapy in patients with MNG. PubMed, Cochrane, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were derived by using an inverse variance random-effects model and fixed-effects model, respectively. Six studies (n=237) were involved in the analysis. For 12 months follow up, high dose (>0.1 mg) of rhTSH significantly reduced GV (MD=17.61; 95% CI=12.17 to 23.04; p<0.00001) compared with placebo. No effective pooled results of low dose of rhTSH (<0.1 mg) were applicable for only one study included. For 6 months follow up, the source of heterogeneity was determined by subgroup and sensitivity analysis. High dose group showed vast improvement in GV reduction (MD=16.62; 95% CI=1.34 to 31.90; p=0.03). The reduction of low dose group compared with placebo was inferior to high dose group. No available data were obtained to assess the influence of rhTSH after 36 months follow up for the only included study. Hypothyroidism incidence was higher for rhTSH group. No publication bias was seen. High dose of rhTSH treatment-stimulated radioactive 131I therapy after 6 months and 12 months follow up had a better effect in reducing GV, but with higher incidence of hypothyroidism. Owing to the limited methodological quality, more clinical researches are warranted in the future.

scholarly journals Does propofol ameliorate occurrence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction after general anaesthesia? A protocol of systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Zhao ◽  
Ze-qing Huang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure

Abstract Background Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common condition after general anesthesia (GA). Previous studies have reported that propofol can ameliorate the occurrence of such disorder. However, its results are still inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review will assess the efficacy and safety of propofol on POCD after GA. Methods Literature sources will be sought from inception to the present in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the administration of propofol on POCD after GA. All searches will be carried out without limitations to language and publication status. Outcomes comprise of cognitive impairments changes, impairments in short-term memory, concentration, language comprehension, social integration, quality of life, and adverse events. Cochrane risk of bias tool will be utilized to assess study quality. We will evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A narrative synthesis or a meta-analysis will be undertaken as appropriate. Discussion This study will systematically and comprehensively search literature and integrate evidence on the efficacy and safety of propofol on POCD after GA. Our findings will be of interest to clinicians and health-related policy makers. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020164096

scholarly journals Tuina for spasticity of poststroke: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e038705
Author(s):  
Qiongshuai Zhang ◽  
Guangcheng Ji ◽  
Fang Cao ◽  
Yihan Sun ◽  
Guanyu Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Quality Of Life Scale

IntroductionSpasticity is a common complication of poststroke, tuina is a widely used rehabilitation treatment, although there is a lack of supportive evidence on efficacy and safety for patients with poststroke spasticity. The aim of this systematic review is to assess and synthesis evidence of efficacy and safety of tuina for spasticity of poststroke.Methods and analysisA comprehensive electronic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley, Springer, PEDro, Chinese Science Citation Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientific and Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Database (Wanfang), Japanese medical database (CiNii), Korean Robotics Institute Summer Scholars and Thailand Thai-Journal Citation Index Centre will be conducted to search literatures of randomised controlled trials of tuina for spasticity of poststroke survivors range from the establishment to 1 January 2020.There is no time of publication limitations. The primary outcome will be measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the second outcome will include Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, surface electromyogram RMS value, the Modified Barthel Index, Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale, quality of life 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and Visual Analogue Scale. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions will be used to assess the risk of bias, and GRADE will be used to access the confidence in cumulative evidence. The protocol will be conducted according to approach and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be required, for no primary data of individual patients were collected. We will publish the findings in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020163384.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of iguratimod combined with methotrexate vs. methotrexate alone in rheumatoid arthritis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.-J. Chen ◽  
Y.-J. Zhou ◽  
Z.-H. Wen ◽  
F. Tian ◽  
J.-Y. Li
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
The Cochrane Collaboration

AbstractThe current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iguratimod (IGU) combined with methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX alone in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Two independent investigators searched for original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the combination of IGU and MTX in RA published before November 1, 2019, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and WanFang Data. Additionally, we searched clinical trial registry websites. We assessed the methodological quality of the included trials using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the seven-point Jadad scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Meta-regression and publication bias analyses were performed using Stata version 14 software (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). A total of 7 RCTs consisting of 665 participants, with 368 participants in the active arm and 297 in the placebo arm, were included in the meta-analysis. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) value was better in the IGU + MTX group than in the MTX alone group, with a pooled relative risk (RR) for ACR20 (American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria), ACR50, and ACR70 of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.13–1.74), 2.09 (95% CI, 1.67–2.61), and 2.24 (95% CI, 1.53–3.28), respectively. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no statistical significance in adverse events (1.06 (95% CI, 0.92–1.23)). The combined treatment is an effective, safe, and economical treatment option for patients who do not respond well to methotrexate alone or for patients who cannot afford expensive biologics that have no confirmed efficacy.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Keluoxin Capsule in the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingxin Zhou ◽  
Wenhua Zhang ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Qiaoqiao Liu ◽  
Yizhen Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Diabetic Kidney Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Diabetic Kidney

Abstract Background: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which is a serious complication of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, becomes a major health concern worldwide. Keluoxin capsule, a Chinese patent medicine used for DKD, has been widely used in diabetic kidney disease, but its efficacy and safety have not yet been clarified. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the efficacy and safety of Keluoxin capsule in the treatment of DKD. Methods: A systematic literature search will be conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, VIP, SinoMED, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) to ensure all possible randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies on K eluoxin capsule to November 1, 2021. The primary outcome to be assessed will include the change in albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), while secondary outcomes will be serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides, etc and adverse events. The quality of the included studies and the risk of bias will be independently assessed by two reviewers using the risk of bias assessment tool from Cochrane Handbook. We will conduct random-effects model meta-analysis using Review Manager software (Revman5.3). Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will objectively evaluate the effect of Keluoxin capsule for DKD, and provide evidence for Keluoxin capsule in the treatment of DKD. Ethics and dissemination : Ethics approval is not required for this study. We aim to publish the results of this systematic review in a peer-reviewed journal. INPLASY registration number: INPLASY 2021110067.

scholarly journals A meta-analysis on the curative effect and safety of high-dose flurbiprofen axetil for pain management after general surgery

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Hou ◽  
Dandan Cheng ◽  
Huang Nie
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
High Dose Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Curative Effect ◽  
Vas Scores

Abstract Background To compare the curative efficiency or tolerability of flurbiprofen axetil(FA) in a high dose with that in a standard dose for postoperative pain of general surgery. Methods Relevant RCTs were retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, CBM, and CNKI from their inceptions to July 2019. The included studies were selected according to eligibility criteria. The study design, participant characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were abstracted after assessingmethodological quality of the trials. All data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. Results 10 studies were identified, which compared the curative effect or tolerability of FA between high and standard dose group. 500 patients were involved in this meta-analysis, with 250 patients in high dose group and 250 patients in standard dose group, respectively. Pooled analysis of VAS scores at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h showed that VAS scores at 1h(P <0.00001), at 2h (P=0.003), at 4h (P = 0.0007), at 6h (P=0.0002), at 8h (P= 0.0002), at 12h (P = 0.0001), and at 24h (P = 0.0004) in the high dose group were significantly lower than that in the standard group. Pooled analysis of BCS scores at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h showed that BCS scores at 1h (P < 0.00001), at 6h (P < 0.00001), at 12h(P=0.03), and at 24h (P=0.01) in the high dose group were significantly higher than that in the standard group. Pooled analysis showed that there was no difference in the incidence of adverse events or administrating rate of analgesics after FA treatment between high and standard dose groups (P>0.05). Conclusions In our meta-analysis, we found that FA with high dose (≥1.25 mg/kg or 100 mg) was more effective than that with standard dose in postoperative pain control after general operation,while the incidence of adverse effects with high or standard dose showed no significant difference.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yichen Xuan ◽  
Hui Huang ◽  
Yiyong Huang ◽  
Duanyong Liu ◽  
Xiuwu Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Chinese Literature ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. Clinical investigators have found that the use of needling in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has a good clinical application prospect in recent years. However, these studies were insufficient to provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of simple-needling for AS. So, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simple-needling for treating AS. Methods. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wangfang database (Wanfang), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and any other gray literature sources for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used simple-needling to treat AS before June 2019 with the language restriction of Chinese and English. Researchers evaluated the retrieved literature studies and extracted valid data according to relevant requirements and used RevMan5.3 software for meta-analysis. Results. A total of 10 studies were included, all of which were Chinese literature studies, involving 729 patients. Compared with the control groups, simple-needling groups had a better effect on the clinical effective rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.11, 1.29), P<0.00001), TCM syndrome score (MD = −5.26, 95% CI (−5.99, −4.53), P<0.00001), symptom score (MD = −8.08, 95% CI (−10.18, −5.97), P<0.00001), and Schober test outcome (MD = 0.39, 95% CI (0.15, 0.64), P=0.002). Sensibility analysis was based on the leave-one-out cross-validation procedure, and the results showed no significant changes. Most studies did not describe adverse reactions. The funnel plot suggested publication bias on clinical effectiveness. Conclusions. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that simple-needling was effective as an intervention for AS. However, due to the low quality of the methodology of included studies, the designs of clinical trials were not rigorously standardized. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out multiquality RCTs for verification.

scholarly journals Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Exercise Tolerance and Quality of Life in IPF Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueqing Yu ◽  
Xuanlin Li ◽  
Liaoyao Wang ◽  
Ran Liu ◽  
Yang Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pulmonary Rehabilitation ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Single Breath

Objective. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).Methods. Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP (CQVIP), Wanfang Data, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed) were comprehensively searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of PR for IPF patients were included. Literature selection and data extraction were conducted by two review authors independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool and RevMan software (version 5.3) were used to evaluate the quality of studies and conduct statistical analysis, respectively.Results. Seven studies (190 participants) were included. PR had a significant effect on six-minute walk distance (6MWD) (MD:48.60; 95%CI: 29.03 to 68.18;Z=4.87,P<0.00001), and 6MWD was improved more in subgroup analysis including studies conducted in Asia (MD: 53.62; 95%CI: 30.48 to 76.66;Z=4.54,P<0.00001) and Europe (MD:54.10; 95% CI: 26.65 to 101.56;Z=2.23,P=0.03). Forced vital capacity (FVC%) was higher (MD: 3.69; 95%CI: 0.16 to 7.23;Z=2.05,P=0.04). St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)/IPF-specific SGRQ (SGRQ-I) total score was lower (MD: -7.87; 95% CI: -11.44 to -4.30;Z=4.32,P<0.0001). No significant effects were found for lung diffusing capacity determined by the single-breath technique (DLCO%) (MD: 3.02; 95%CI: -0.38 to 6.42;Z=1.74,P=0.08).Conclusions. This study suggests that PR may enhance exercise capacity and improve quality of life in IPF patients. Besides, PR may also delay the decline of lung function of patients with IPF. However, further research should more fully assess the efficacy and safety of PR for IPF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document