scholarly journals Temporary CBD Stenting with a Nelaton Tube Is a More Practical and Safer Option Than T-Tube Drainage after Conventional CBD Exploration for Choledocholithiasis

HPB Surgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ashraf M. Abdelkader ◽  
Ahmed M. Zidan ◽  
Mohamed T. Younis
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Tube Drainage ◽  
T Tube ◽  
Drain Removal ◽  
Stay Time ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Drainage Group ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Objective. We are trying to investigate the possibility, safety, and benefits of replacing the role of T-tube by another more safe and effective procedure for biliary decompression in the case of common bile duct (CBD) exploration. Methods. Our present study includes fifty consecutive patients who underwent a traditional CBD exploration due to choledocholithiasis. Patients were divided into 2 equal groups. In the 1st group, a spontaneously expelled Nelaton tube is placed in the CBD to aid in bile drainage to the duodenum, while in the 2nd group, a conventional T-tube is placed to decompress the CBD in the early postoperative (PO) days to a drainage bag. Operative and PO data as well as PO hospital stay time were recorded. All data were collected and statistically analyzed. Results. The mean operative time and PO hospital stay days were significantly low (p value < 0.05) in the Nelaton tube drainage group compared with the T-tube drainage group. On the other hand, the mean time needed for the abdominal drain removal was significantly higher in the T-tube drainage group (p value < 0.05). Conclusion. Nelaton tube with internal biliary drainage is effective and safer than T-tube drainage and it helps in reduction of the PO hospital stay time. In addition, it avoids all short-term complications of T-tube.

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Primary Closure for Management of Choledocholithiasis: A Retrospective Analysis and Comparison with Conventional T-tube Drainage

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Wei Zhang ◽  
Ya-Jin Chen ◽  
Chang-Hao Wu ◽  
Wen-Da Li
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Tube Drainage ◽  
T Tube ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) had become one of the main options for management of choledocholithiasis. This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate on the feasibility and advantages of primary closure versus conventional T-tube drainage of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic choledochotomy. In this retrospective analysis, 100 patients (47 men and 53 women) with choledocholithiasis who underwent primary closure of the CBD (without T-tube drainage) after LCBDE (Group A) were compared with 92 patients who underwent LCBDE with T-tube drainage (Group B). Both groups were evaluated with regard to biliary complications, hospital stay, and recurrence of stones. The mean operation time was 104.12 minutes for Group A and 108.92 minutes for Group B ( P = 0.069). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A than that in Group B (6.95 days and 12.05 days, respectively; P < 0.001). In Group A, bile leakage occurred in two patients on postoperative Day 2 and Day 3, respectively. In Group B, bile leakage noted in one patient after removal of the T-tube on Day 14 after operation ( P = 1.000). With a median follow-up time of 40 months for both groups, stone recurrence was noted in two patients in Group A and three patients in Group B ( P = 0.672). Primary closure of the CBD is safe and feasible in selected patients after laparoscopic choledochotomy. It results in shorter duration of hospital stay without the need for carrying/care of a T-tube in the postoperative period and similar stone recurrence as that of the conventional method.

scholarly journals Outcomes following Boerhaave’ syndrome

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 557-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
CL Connelly ◽  
PJ Lamb ◽  
S Paterson-Brown
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Good Survival ◽  
Boerhaave’S Syndrome ◽  
Direct Closure ◽  
Tube Drainage ◽  
T Tube ◽  
Boerhaave's Syndrome ◽  
The Mean

Introduction Boerhaave’s syndrome is associated with high mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to assess outcome following treatment in a specialist upper gastrointestinal surgical unit. Methods Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database (Lothian Surgical Audit) and their records reviewed. Primary outcomes were mortality and serious morbidity. Secondary outcomes included time to theatre, operation undertaken and length of hospital stay. Results Twenty patients with Boerhaave’s syndrome were identified between 1997 and 2011. Four patients (20%) died in hospital. The mean time to theatre from symptom onset was 2.4 days. This was 7.3 days in the patients who died compared with 1.5 days in survivors. Five patients underwent primary repair of rupture, eleven underwent direct closure over a T-tube and one rupture was irreparable. Three patients were managed non-operatively and all survived. Outcomes were similar for the different surgical groups. There was one death following primary closure (20%) and two after T-tube drainage (18%). The mean length of hospital stay was 35.7 days after T-tube drainage and 20.5 days after primary repair. The 3 patients with small, self-contained leaks had a mean length of stay of 5.7 days. Conclusions Aggressive surgical management with direct repair is associated with good survival in patients with Boerhaave’s syndrome. Delayed time to theatre is associated with increased mortality. Patients with small, contained leaks without signs of sepsis can be managed non-operatively with a good outcome.

scholarly journals Is Nasogastric Tube essential in abdominal surgeries? Randomized controlled trail.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1397-1400
Author(s):  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
Viqar Aslam ◽  
Zaheeruddin ◽  
Waqas Jan
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Nasogastric Tube ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trail ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting ◽  
Tube Study

Objective: Objective was to compare mean hospital stay in patients with abdominal surgeries with and without Nasogastric tube. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trail study. Setting: DHQ Charsadda. Period: Jan to Nov 2018. Material & Methods: One hundred and thirty two patients who underwent abdominal surgeries according to a preset inclusion criteria were in this study. These Patients were randomly assigned using sealed opaque envelopes containing computer‐generated random numbers into with and without NG tube. Mean hospital stay was noted in both groups. Student ‘t’ test was used to compare the mean hospital stay of both groups. Results: Mean age of patients in group A was 28.50 ± 9.28 years and for group B was 30.12+_9.09 years. Mean hospital stay for group A was 5.64+_2.32days and for group B was 8.73+_3.43 days with a p-value of < 0.000. Conclusion: Patient with nasogastric tube stay longer in hospital than without tube.

scholarly journals The Impact of Preemptive Perianal Anaesthetic Block in Open Haemorrhoidectomy – a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2165-2167
Author(s):  
Wajeeha I. Andrabi ◽  
M Asadullah Khawaja ◽  
K. Fatima ◽  
S I. Hussain Andrabi ◽  
A. Shafique ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
P Value ◽  
Open Hemorrhoidectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Time

Background: the study was conducted to analyze the efficacy of 0.75% ropicaine at perianal block for open haemrrhoidectomy with regards to pain intensity, first demand of analgesia and hospital stay. Method: 50 patients were selected for open haemrrhoidectomy under GA which were divided into two groups.it was a randomized control trial in which sealed envelope method was used for the group delegation in which Group A was designated to the patients having the perianal block with 0.75% ropivacaine while the group B was the placebo group having normal saline injected in the perianal region. The variables compared were the first demand of analgesia, pain intensity and the duration of the hospital stay. In order to make the site of injection more authentic the injections were sited under ultrasound guidance. Results: The pain intensity which was analyzed with the visual analogue score (VAS) had a median of 3.8 (high=6, low=3) in group A while 5.5 (high=8, low=4) in the Group B with the p value of < 0.05. The mean time recorded for the first demand of analgesia was 6.20 ± 1.20 hours in the Group A which had improved from 1.20 ± 1.0 hours in the Placebo Group while the p value was < 0.001, while the mean time of hospital stay got reduced from 22.5±3.30 hours to 12.4 ± 3.10 hours with the significant p value of < 0.002. Conclusion: It was observed that with preemptive analgesia with 0.75% ropivacaine administered led to a substantial reduction in pain perception, request for an analgesic and hospital stay. Therefore it is appropriate to administer it before open hemorrhoidectomy. Keywords: preemptive anaesthesia, local anesthesia, postoperative pain, ropivacaine, open hemorrhoidectomy

Outcome of Dynamic Compression Plate versus Interlock Intramedullary Nail for Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3387-3389
Author(s):  
Mudassar Nazar ◽  
Gauhar Nawaz Khan ◽  
Hassan Raza Khosa ◽  
Rizwan Anwar ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Hanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Dynamic Compression ◽  
P Value ◽  
Shoulder Impingement ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Humerus Shaft

Objective: To compare outcomes of interlock intramedullary nails with Dynamic compression plates for the treatment of humerus shaft fractures in terms of hospital stay time and shoulder Impingement. Subjects and Methods: In this comparative study, a total number of 74 patients having age 20-60 years who presented with closed and open Gustilo type I or II in middle third of humerus were included. Study was conducted in Islam hospital Sialkot and and Rajib Tayyip Erdogan Hospital, Muzaffargarh from June-2019 to June-2020. Group A (n=37) patients underwent dynamic compression plating (DCP) for treatment of fractures and group B (n=37) underwent interlocking intramedullary nailing (ILN) for humerus shaft fractures. We noted post-operative hospital stay, shoulder impingement and bone union rate in all patients. Results: The mean of patients included in this study was 42.45 (SD 9.89) years. There were 57 (77.03%) males and 17 (22.97%) females. The mean duration of fracture at the time of surgery was 39.98±7.23 days. Mean hospital stay was 4.72±1.23 days in in group A and 4.89±1.40 days in group B (p-value 0.60). There were 4 (10.8%) patients in group B in whom shoulder impingement occurred but there was no patient in group A with shoulder impingement (p-value 0.04). Complete union occurred in 35 (94.6%) patients in DCP group and in 34 (91.8%) patients in ILN group (p-value 0.64). Conclusion: Both DCP and ILN are associated with high bone union rates. The complications rate of ILN is higher in comparison to DCP group. Keywords: Humerus shaft fractures, dynamic compression plates, interlocking intramedullary nailing.

scholarly journals Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy: a prospective randomized study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jugendra Pal Singh Shakya ◽  
Neelabh Agrawal ◽  
Arun Kumar ◽  
Archana Agrawal ◽  
Akash Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Tube Drainage ◽  
Operative Complication ◽  
T Tube ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Traditionally laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is followed by T-tube placement because of which patients suffer problems related to T-tube thereby increasing the morbidity of patients. Primary closure of CBD following laparoscopic choledocholithotomy is now being considered as an alternative superior to the traditional method. This study is designed to analyse the outcome of primary CBD repair in terms of mean operation time, duration of hospital stay and post-operative morbidity.Methods: A prospective randomized study was done in which 40 patients at our institute and associated hospitals were divided into two groups to compare the results of primary closure to T-tube placement following laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.Results: 40 patients were included in this study. The mean operating time was observed to be 65±14.05 mins in Group A (primary closure) patients while that in case of Group B (T-tube drainage) patients was 95.25±9.66 mins with a p-value 0.0001 which is considered statistically significant. The average duration of hospital stay in Group A (primary closure) was 8.2 days which was much shorter than that of Group B (T-tube drainage) patients which was of 15.7 days. The post-operative complication was observed in 1 patient of Group A (primary closure) while post-operative complication occurred in 3 patients of Group B (T-tube drainage).Conclusions: This study indicates that primary repair following laparoscopic choledocholithotomy is a safer and more effective method than T-tube drainage and we strongly recommend this procedure in clinical practice.

Comparison of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy with conventional dressing for reducing wound complications in emergency laparotomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
ARUN GARG ◽  
SNEH JAYANT ◽  
Arun Gupta ◽  
Lalit Bansal ◽  
MOHAMMAD FAISAL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dressing Change

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the post-operative effects of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy with conventional dressing in emergency laparotomy. Methods: This study was conducted from 1st November 2018 to 31st March 2020 in ABVIMS & Dr. R.M.L. Hospital, New Delhi. The potential candidates for the study were patients of 18 years and above who were admitted in surgical emergency and underwent emergency laparotomy by a midline incision. Fifty random patients were alternatively allotted to group A (25 patients) and group B (25 patients). In the patients of group A, closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) was applied on midline closed wound after an exploratory laparotomy procedure. The patients in group B, standard dry gauze dressing was done. Results: The mean age of patients in group A and group B were 46.76±12.20 and 41.96±8.33 years, respectively (p-value-0.11). The wound infection was present in 12% of cases in group A and 32% in group B, but when we calculate the p-value, it was found to be statistically non-significant (p-value-0.08). Similarly, seroma formation and wound dehiscence were found less in group A as compared to group B but not reached up to a statistically significant limit (p-value 0.55 and 0.38 respectively). The frequency of dressing change was 1-2 per week in 92% of cases in group A while it was 3-4 per week in 68% of cases in group B. The mean time of the frequency of dressing change was 1.24±0.72 per week and 4.28±1.90 per week in both the groups respectively (p-value <0.001). There was no significant (p>0.05) difference in the duration of hospital stay between group A (mean hospital stay 8.20±2.34 days) and group B (mean hospital stay 8.21±3.37 days). Conclusion: Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy has no advantages over conventional dressing in terms of post-operative complications and hospital stay. However, it reduces the frequency of dressing change significantly, which reduces the mental stress of the patient and the burden of changing daily dressing.

scholarly journals A comparative study of suturing technique of intestine between extra-mucosal single layer interrupted and continuous all layers: a single center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoranjan Kar ◽  
Somu Singhal ◽  
Bismoy Mondal ◽  
Arijit Roy
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
P Value ◽  
Bowel Anastomosis ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Gastrointestinal anastomosis has been excited interest in our day to day surgical practice. We have compared efficacy, advantages, disadvantages, and complications following intestinal resection-anastomosis using extra-mucosal interrupted single layer suturing or continuous all layer suturing.Methods: This comparative study included 50 cases (either in emergency or elective undergoing bowel resection and anastomosis), comprising of 2 Groups (25 cases in each Group) between January 2019 to June 2021 at Midnapore Medical College and Hospital. Patients data, operative findings, duration of anastomosis and length of hospital stay, post-operative complications of all patients were followed till discharge.Results: Our comparative study have shown that- the mean duration for intestinal anastomosis in Group A (extra-mucosal interrupted single layer) and Group B (continuous all layers) were 21.43 minutes and 14.35 respectively. Considering duration of the anastomosis continuous all layers intestinal anastomosis appears to represent in shorter duration, anastomotic leak was noted in 3 patients (6%). Anastomotic leak was observed in 1 patient extra-mucosal interrupted single layer bowel anastomosis whereas two patients in the Group of continuous all layered bowel anastomosis had leak (p value 0.5-not significant) and the mean duration of hospital stay in the Group A and Group B were 7.32 days and 7.92 days respectively. (p value -insignificant).Conclusions: Duration required to perform a continuous all layer bowl anastomosis is lesser when compared to an extra-mucosal interrupted single layer intestinal anastomosis. There is no significant difference in complications, final outcome and duration of hospital stay between two Groups.

The Outcome Comparison of two Groups of total Extraperitoneal and Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2712-2714
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aamir Jamil ◽  
Muhammad Asif ◽  
Imran Yousaf ◽  
Muhammad Faheem Anwer ◽  
Muhammad Waseem Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Total Extraperitoneal ◽  
Outcome Comparison ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Aim: The outcome comparison of total extraperitoneal versus mesh repair for inguinal hernia. Study design: Quasi experimental study. Place and duration of study: Department of Surgery, M. Islam Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala from March 2018 to March 2019. Methodology: After the approval of hospital ethical committee, a total of 50 patients were included and randomly divided into two groups equally. Group A (Total extraperitoneal), Group B (Mesh repair). An informed consent was taken from every patient about operative procedure and the outcome. A detailed history of the patient i.e. clinical examination, routine investigations (CBC, Urine R/E, urea, creatinine) and some specific investigations (chest X-ray, ECG and ultrasound abdomen and prostate) was done for surgery. All data of patients was collected on proforma and was analyzed with the help of a computer SPSS programme 20. Results: The mean age of patients was 34.22±11.54 years in group A and 35.63±11.25 years in group B. All male and female patients included in this study in both groups. Twelve (48%) of patients were direct inguinal hernia in group A 13(22%) were in group B and 14(56%) patients were in group A and 11(44%) patients were in group B. The mean±SD postoperative hospital stay was 24.48±4.62 in group A and 34.65±12.26 hours in group B (p 0.001). The mean±SD postoperative recovery time in weeks was 2.18±0.43 in group A and 2.90±0.46 weeks in group B (p 0.001). Only 2 (4%) patient had postoperative infection on first week and 4 (8%) patients had infection respectively. No recurrence was seen in group A and only 3% recurrence was in group B. Conclusion: It is concluded that group A had shorter hospital stay, recovery time, postoperative time and less infection rate as compared to group B. In group A 13% patients had severe pain and in group B 25% patients. Keywords: Inguinal Hernia, Total extraperitoneal, Mesh repair.

scholarly journals ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 185-192
Author(s):  
TARIQ HASSAN CH ◽  
ASGHAR ALI ◽  
MUNAWAR JAMIL
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Biliary Tree ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Gallstones are common biliary pathology. The Vast majority of subjects are asymptomatic. About 0.2% of the population suffering from gallstones develop acute cholecystitis every year. In case of acute calculous cholecystitis, cholecystectomy can be performed early i.e during the same admission or interval i.e after 6 weeks of conservative management. Objective: To compare the early and interval cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis for morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and complications. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Setting: Department of Surgery Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Duration of Study: Two year study from December 2007 to December 2009. Subject and Methods: Sixty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients were managed by early cholecystectomy and group B patients by intervalcholecystectomy. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and postoperative complications. Results: The mean age of the patients in group A was 42.2 + 10.7 years and in group B was 42.2+ 10.7 years. The Male to female ratio was 1:4 in both groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay in group A was 4.0+ 1.8days and in group B was 3.8+ 1.4 days. The mean total hospital stayin group A was 6.5 + 1.7 days and in group B was 10.2 + 1.3 days. The P value was less than 0.001, which was significant. In distribution of postoperative complications, in group A there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 4(13.3%) wound infection,1(3.3%) wound haematoma, 3 (10%) seroma and 1(3.3%) wound dehiscence. While in group B there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 3(10%) wound infection,2 (6.7%) wound haematoma, 2(6.7%) & no patient of wound dehiscence. Conclusion: Our study suggests that early cholecystectomy is a better treatment option than interval cholecystectomy because it has less total hospital stay, needs single hospital visit and has no risk of developing complications during wait for surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document