scholarly journals Complexity Measures and Models in Supply Chain Networks

Complexity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Modrak ◽  
Petri T. Helo ◽  
Dominik T. Matt
Procedia CIRP ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Modrak ◽  
Slavomir Bednar

2015 ◽  
Vol 795 ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
Vladimir Modrak ◽  
Slavomir Bednar

One of the complexity metrics that contribute towards determination of the overall complexity of supply chains is based on so called static complexity. In this article, we firstly present an architectural framework for supply chain networks. Subsequently, selected complexity indicators based on Axiomatic Design theory and Boltzmann entropy are applied. The indicators used are benchmarked based on computational experiments. Finally, relevant conclusions are formulated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 7156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Modrak ◽  
Soltysova ◽  
Onofrejova

Assembly supply chain systems are becoming increasingly complex and, as a result, there is more and more need to design and manage them in a way that benefits the producers and also satisfies the interests of community stakeholders. The structural (static) complexity of assembly supply chain networks is one of the most important factors influencing overall system complexity. Structures of such networks can be modeled as a graph, with machines as nodes and material flow between the nodes as links. The purpose of this paper is to analyze existing assembly supply chain complexity assessment methods and propose such complexity metric(s) that will be able to accurately reflect not only specific criteria for static complexity measures, but also selected sustainability aspects. The obtained results of this research showed that selected complexity indicators reflect sustainability facets in different ways, but one of them met the mentioned requirements acceptably.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Arora ◽  
Alexandra Brintrup

AbstractThe relationship between a firm and its supply chain has been well studied, however, the association between the position of firms in complex supply chain networks and their performance has not been adequately investigated. This is primarily due to insufficient availability of empirical data on large-scale networks. To addresses this gap in the literature, we investigate the relationship between embeddedness patterns of individual firms in a supply network and their performance using empirical data from the automotive industry. In this study, we devise three measures that characterize the embeddedness of individual firms in a supply network. These are namely: centrality, tier position, and triads. Our findings caution us that centrality impacts individual performance through a diminishing returns relationship. The second measure, tier position, allows us to investigate the concept of tiers in supply networks because we find that as networks emerge, the boundaries between tiers become unclear. Performance of suppliers degrade as they move away from the focal firm (i.e., Toyota). The final measure, triads, investigates the effect of buying and selling to firms that supply the same customer, portraying the level of competition and cooperation in a supplier’s network. We find that increased coopetition (i.e., cooperative competition) is a performance enhancer, however, excessive complexity resulting from being involved in both upstream and downstream coopetition results in diminishing performance. These original insights help understand the drivers of firm performance from a network perspective and provide a basis for further research.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaher Alzaman ◽  
A.A. Bulgak ◽  
Amar Ramudhin

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
John William Hatfield ◽  
Scott Duke Kominers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document