scholarly journals A Prospective Evaluation of Two Rapid Phenotypical Antimicrobial Susceptibility Technologies for the Diagnostic Stewardship of Sepsis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesira Giordano ◽  
Elena Piccoli ◽  
Veronica Brucculeri ◽  
Simona Barnini
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Maldi Tof Ms ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Tof Ms

Rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens by MALDI-TOF MS and the recently introduced rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (rAST) directly from positive blood cultures allow clinicians to promptly achieve a targeted therapy, especially for multidrug resistant microorganisms. In the present study, we propose a comparison between phenotypical rASTs performed in light-scattering technology (Alfred 60AST, Alifax®) and fluorescencein situhybridization (Pheno™, Accelerate) directly from positive blood cultures, providing results in 4–7 hours. Blood samples from 67 patients admitted to the Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana were analyzed. After the direct MALDI-TOF MS identification, the rAST was performed at the same time both on Alfred 60AST and Pheno. Alfred 60AST provided qualitative results, interpreted in terms of clinical categories (SIR). Pheno provided identification and MIC values for each antibiotic tested. Results were compared to the broth microdilution assay (SensiTitre™, Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to EUCAST rules. Using Alfred 60AST, an agreement was reached, 91.1% for Gram-negative and 95.7% for Gram-positive bacteria, while using Pheno, the agreement was 90.6% for Gram-negative and 100% for Gram-positive bacteria. Both methods provided reliable results; Alfred 60AST combined with MALDI-TOF MS proved itself faster and cheaper. Pheno provided identification and MIC determination in a single test and, although more expensive, may be useful whenever MIC value is necessary and where MALDI-TOF MS is not present.

scholarly journals Multicenter Evaluation of Rapid BACpro® II for the Accurate Identification of Microorganisms Directly from Blood Cultures Using MALDI-TOF MS

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2251
Author(s):  
Marina Oviaño ◽  
André Ingebretsen ◽  
Anne K. Steffensen ◽  
Antony Croxatto ◽  
Guy Prod’hom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Species Level ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Maldi Tof Ms ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Level Identification ◽  
Tof Ms

The identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS has been shown to be the most impacting application of this methodology. In this study, a novel commercial method was evaluated in four clinical microbiology laboratories. Positive blood culture samples (n = 801) were processed using a rapid BACpro® II kit and then compared with the routine gold standard. A subset of monomicrobial BCs (n = 560) were analyzed in parallel with a Sepsityper® Kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and compared with the rapid BACpro® II kit. In addition, this kit was also compared with two different in-house methods. Overall, 80.0% of the monomicrobial isolates (609/761; 95% CI 71.5–88.5) were correctly identified by the rapid BACpro® II kit at the species level (92.3% of the Gram negative and 72.4% of the Gram positive bacteria). The comparison with the Sepsityper® Kit showed that the rapid BACpro® II kit generated higher rates of correct species-level identification for all categories (p > 0.0001), except for yeasts identified with score values > 1.7. It also proved superior to the ammonium chloride method (p > 0.0001), but the differential centrifugation method allowed for higher rates of correct identification for Gram negative bacteria (p > 0.1). The percentage of accurate species-level identification of Gram positive bacteria was particularly noteworthy in comparison with other commercial and in-house methods.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the rapidBACpro® II kit for the rapid identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Oviaño ◽  
André Ingebretsen ◽  
Anne K Steffensen ◽  
Antony Croxatto ◽  
Guy Prod’hom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Species Level ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Maldi Tof Ms ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Level Identification ◽  
Tof Ms

AbstractObjectivesIdentification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures (BCs) using MALDI-TOF MS has shown to be the application with most impact in this methodology. In this study, a novel commercial method, the rapidBACpro® II, was evaluated in four clinical microbiology laboratories.MethodsPositive blood culture samples (n=801) were processed using the rapidBACpro® II kit and then compared with routine gold standard. A subset of monomicrobial BCs (n=560) were analyzed in parallel with the Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and compared with the rapidBACpro® II kit. In addition, the rapidBACpro® II kit was also compared with two different in-house methods.ResultsOverall, 80.0% of the monomicrobial isolates (609/761) were correctly identified by the rapidBACpro® II kit at the species level (92.3% of the Gram negative and 72.4% of the Gram positive bacteria). The comparison with the Sepsityper® kit yielded higher rates of correct species-level identification provided by the rapidBACpro® II kit for all categories (p>0.0001) except for yeasts identified with score values >1.7. It also proved superior to the ammonium chloride method (p>0.0001) but the differential centrifugation method allowed higher rates of correct identification for Gram negative bacteria (p>0.1).ConclusionsThe rapidBACpro® II kit allowed a high rate of microorganisms correctly identified. The percentage of accurate species-level identification of Gram positive bacteria was particularly noteworthy in comparison with other commercial and in-house methods. This fact was especially interesting in the case of Staphylococcus sp. and Streptococcus sp. in order to elucidate their clinical impact, for example in device-associated bacteremia.

Assessment of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF- MS) for Accurate Bacterial Identification in Clinical Labs

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S143-S143
Author(s):  
M Abdel-Rahman ◽  
M S Azab ◽  
M Meibed ◽  
A El-Kholy ◽  
A W Elmetwalli
Keyword(s):  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Bacterial Identification ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Maldi Tof Ms ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Identification Of Bacteria ◽  
Vitek 2 ◽  
Phenotypic Methods ◽  
Tof Ms

Abstract Introduction/Objective On behalf of the diagnostic Medical Laboratory rapid, and accurate identification of bacteria with their one-to-one anti-microbial susceptibility outlines is of ultimate importance for the management of infected patients. Contemporary microbial identification methods employed in routine clinical diagnostic laboratories relies on the use of conventional phenotypic methods. Phenotypic methods are time consuming with minimum turn-around times of at least 24 hrs and in many occurrences of 48hrs. With the intention of accelerate laboratory processes the MALDI-TOF MS was familiarized. MALDI-TOF MS is established on proteomic profiling and permits for rapid identification of bacteria. This technology has not been widely used in Egypt, but has been regularly used in Europe for the past few years. Methods Two hundred forty three positive non duplicate blood cultures were accrued over a period of six months. Experimental aliquots were taken from excess sample material that was collected as part of routine clinical care. 105 were positive for Gram negative bacilli, 123 were positive for Gram positive cocci, 3 positive for Gram positive bacilli, and 7 were positive for yeast. MALDI-TOF identification was compared to conventional identification. Conventional identification consisted of a combination of MALDI-TOF identification of a subcultures colony by direct smear, biochemical reactions, Vitek 2, and molecular identification. Results Ninety seven of the one hundred and five blood cultures positive for Gram negative bacilli were monomicrobial. The majority of these were identified as Escherichia coli by conventional methods, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eighty-four of these monomicrobial cultures were identified by MALDI-TOF to the species level. Eighty-one of the eighty-four were concordant with the conventional identification (96.4%). Conclusion The MALDI-TOF proved to be useful for the rapid and reliable identification of g-ve bacteria from the clinical specimens. The difference in turnaround time for bacterial identification was significant between MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2 with minimal preparation for the blood cultures.

scholarly journals Direct Rapid Identification from Positive Blood Cultures by MALDI-TOF MS: Specific Focus on Turnaround Times

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazan Zengin Canalp ◽  
Banu Bayraktar
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Pathogen Identification ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Maldi Tof Ms ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Solid Media ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Tof Ms

Using MALDI-TOF MS directly from blood culture bottles reduces the time required for pathogen identification, and the turnaround times for final identification have been compared with overnight incubation from solid media in previous studies. However, identification from a short incubation of agar plates has been increasingly accepted and successfully implemented in routine laboratories, but there is no data comparing direct MALDI-TOF MS with the short-term, incubated agar plates.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Verigene Blood Culture Test Systems for Rapid Identification of Positive Blood Cultures

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Seok Kim ◽  
Go-Eun Kang ◽  
Han-Sung Kim ◽  
Hyun Soo Kim ◽  
Wonkeun Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Resistance Genes ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Single Strain ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Susceptibility Tests

The performance of molecular tests using the Verigene Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Culture nucleic acid tests (BC-GP and BC-GN, resp.; Naosphere, Northbrook, IL, USA) was evaluated for the identification of microorganisms detected from blood cultures. Ninety-nine blood cultures containing Gram-positive bacteria and 150 containing Gram-negative bacteria were analyzed using the BC-GP and BC-GN assays, respectively. Blood cultures were performed using the Bactec blood culture system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and conventional identification and antibiotic-susceptibility tests were performed using a MicroScan system (Siemens, West Sacramento, CA, USA). When a single strain of bacteria was isolated from the blood culture, Verigene assays correctly identified 97.9% (94/96) of Gram-positive bacteria and 93.8% (137/146) of Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance genesmecAandvanAwere correctly detected by the BC-GP assay, while the extended-spectrumβ-lactamase CTX-M and the carbapenemase OXA resistance gene were detected from 30 cases cultures by the BC-GN assay. The BC-GP and BC-GN assays showed high agreement with conventional identification and susceptibility tests. These tests are useful for rapid identification of microorganisms and the detection of clinically important resistance genes from positive Bactec blood cultures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document