scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Aidi Injection Combined with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization on Primary Hepatic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Weihao Chen ◽  
Yurong Wang ◽  
Qiuer Liang ◽  
Yunfei Cai ◽  
Xudong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Response ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Hepatic Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Hepatic Carcinoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aidi Injection ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aidi injection (ADI) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for primary hepatic carcinoma (PHCC). Methods. We conducted a literature search in EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from the earliest possible year to April 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving ADI combined with TACE versus TACE alone for patients with PHCC were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was applied for quality assessment. Results. 22 studies involving 1611 participants were included. The clinical response rate (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.17-1.40; P < 0.00001), KPS score (RR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.59-2.00; P < 0.00001), survival rate (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.16-1.39; P < 0.00001), immune function (MD = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.98-1.51; P < 0.00001), and adverse effects (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68; P < 0.00001) of ADI plus TACE showed significant difference when compared with TACE alone. Conclusions. ADI combined with TACE in the treatment of PHCC improved the clinical response rate and safety compared to TACE alone. However, due to poor methodological quality of many of the included RCTs, more rigorously designed and large-scale RCTs are warranted to examine this beneficial effect in the future.

scholarly journals Anti-MRSA Cephalosporin versus Vancomycin-Based Treatment for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1020
Author(s):  
Ching-Yi Chen ◽  
Wang-Chun Chen ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
Tzu-Ping Shih ◽  
Hung-Jen Tang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Randomized Controlled

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-MRSA cephalosporin and vancomycin-based treatment in treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Turning Research into Practice, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles from inception to 15 June 2020. RCTs comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-MRSA cephalosporin with those of vancomycin-based regimens in treating adult patients with ABSSSIs were included. The primary and secondary outcomes were clinical response at the test-of-cure assessments and risk of adverse events (AEs), respectively. Eight RCTs were enrolled. The clinical response rate was not significantly different between anti-MRSA cephalosporin and vancomycin-based treatments (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90–1.23; I2 = 0%). Except for major cutaneous abscesses in which anti-MRSA cephalosporin-based treatment was associated with a lower clinical response rate than vancomycin-based treatment (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40–0.97; I2 = 0%), other subgroup analyses according to the type of cephalosporin (ceftaroline or ceftobiprole), type of infection, and different pathogens did not show significant differences in clinical response. Anti-MRSA cephalosporin-based treatment was only associated with a higher risk of nausea than vancomycin-based treatment (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07–1.85; I2 = 0%). In treating ABSSSIs, the clinical efficacy of anti-MRSA cephalosporin is comparable to that of vancomycin-based treatment, except in major cutaneous abscesses. In addition to nausea, anti-MRSA cephalosporin was as tolerable as vancomycin-based treatment.

The efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for treatment of advanced or refractory cancers: A meta-analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23075-e23075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tengfei Zhang ◽  
Ruitai Fan ◽  
Ni Shi ◽  
Wang Ma
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Antibody Treatment ◽  
Random Effects Models

e23075 Background: Immunotherapy based on anti-PD-1 (Programmed death 1)/PD-L1 (PD-1 Ligand 1) antibodies have achieved significant successes from bench to clinic. In this study, we systematically evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of current anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for treatment of patients with advanced or refractory cancer. Methods: Clinical trials reporting response or safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for advanced or refractory cancer patients published were searched in PubMed and EMBASE database. Meta-analyses using random effects models were used to calculate the overall estimate. Results: Fifty-one trials including 6,800 patients were included. The overall response rates for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were 29% (95% CI: 1.53-2.41), 21% (95% CI: 17%-25%) and 21% (95% CI: 16%-27%) respectively. While the overall adverse effects rate for melanoma, NSCLC, RCC were 16% (95% CI: 6%-28%), 11% (95% CI: 8%-14%) and 20% (95% CI: 11%-32%) respectively. Tumor PD-L1 expression and patient smoking status might serve as biomarkers to predict response of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment. Compared to tumors with negative PD-L1 expression, tumors with positive PD-L1 expression had a significantly higher clinical response rate (41.4% versus 26.5%) with RR = 1.92 (95% CI: 1.53-2.41, P< 0.001). Smoker patients also showed a significantly higher response rate (33.7%) than patients who never smoked (4.2%) with RR = 6.02 (95% CI: 1.22-29.75, P= 0.028). Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab were associated with significantly increased response rate (RR = 2.89, 95% CI: 2.46-3.40, P< 0.001), reduced death risk (HR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.57; P< 0.001), and decreased adverse effect rate (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30-0.80, P= 0.004) compared with other therapies. Conclusions: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have high response rates and low adverse effect rates for advanced or refractory cancers. PD-L1 expression was associated with better clinical response of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody based immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Sitafloxacin in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Chao-Kun Chen ◽  
I-Ling Cheng ◽  
Yu-Hung Chen ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infection ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Acute Bacterial Infections

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin in treating acute bacterial infection. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to August 13, 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating sitafloxacin and comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infections were included. The outcomes were clinical and microbiological responses and the risk of adverse event (AE). Five RCTs were enrolled, including 375 and 381 patients who received sitafloxacin and the comparator, respectively. Overall, the clinical response rate of sitafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial infections was 94.6%, which was noninferior to that of the comparator (92.5%) (odds ratio (OR), 1.01; 95% CI, 0.24–4.32; I2 = 66%). For patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/acute pyelonephritis (APN), the clinical response rate of sitafloxacin and the comparator was 96.9% and 91.3%, respectively (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.35–12.44; I2 = 54%). For patients with pneumonia, the clinical response rate of sitafloxacin was 88.6%, which was comparable to that of the comparator (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.11–1.21; I2 = 0%). The microbiological response of sitafloxacin was 82.0%, which was noninferior to that of the comparator (77.8%) (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.77–3.28; I2 = 47%). The risk of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), drug-related TEAE, and all-cause mortality were similar between sitafloxacin and the comparators (TEAE, OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.64–2.01, drug-related TEAE, OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.48–2.69, mortality, OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.09–9.44). In conclusion, sitafloxacin is noninferior to other commonly used antibiotics with respect to both clinical and microbiological response rates in patients with an acute bacterial infection, including cUTI/APN and pneumonia. In addition, sitafloxacin is also as safe as the comparators.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced lower rectal cancer using SOX+Bev regimen.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 708-708
Author(s):  
Jun Higashijima ◽  
Mitsuo Shimada ◽  
Kozo Yoshikawa ◽  
Masaaki Nishi ◽  
Hideya Kashihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Predictive Factor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
Lower Rectal Cancer ◽  
Improve Response Rate ◽  
Significant Difference

708 Background: We have performed preoperative CRT for advanced lower rectal cancer patients using S-1 or UFT. To improve response rate, we are performing phase 2 trial of preoperative CRT using S-1/ Oxaliplatin /Bevacizumab (SOX+Bev) regimen. In this study, we show the results of the trial and the promising predictive factor. Methods: Twenty-five patients (SOX+Bev) and 59 patients (S-1 or UFT) were included in this study. S-1(80mg/m2), UFT(300mg/m2) were administered orally every day on radiation therapy, and S-1(80mg/m2,Oxaliplatin(40-60mg/m2),Bevacizumab(5mg/kg) were administered in SOX+Bev group. Total dose of radiation was 40Gy with four field technique. As a predictive factor, we measured miR-223 with real-time PCR using pre CRT biopsy specimens. Results: Clinical response by RECIST were as follows: SOX+Bev group: CR/PR/SD/PD = 1/21/3/0, S-1/UFT group: CR/PR/SD/PD = 1/32/26/0. Clinical response rate were 88% in SOX+Bev group, higher than 56.0% in S-1/UFT group. Pathological response grade were as follows: SOX+Bev group: 1a/1b/2/3 = 5/4/10/6,S-1/UFT group :1a/1b/2/3 = 13/16/27/3. Pathological response rate was 64% in SOX+Bev group, 51% in S-1/UFT group and there was no significant difference. The pCR rate was 24% in SOX+Bev group, significantly higher than 5% in S-1/UFT group (p < 0.05)B In S-1 group, miR-223 in responder group tended to be higher than non-responder group (p = 0.06). And in SOX+Bev group, miR-223 in Grade 3 group(8.89±9.41) was significantly higher than other group (3.19±4.64) (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Preoperative CRT with SOX+Bev regimen can improve response rate and bring high pCR rate. miR-223 may be promising predictive factor and useful to perform order made therapy. Clinical trial information: 13267.

scholarly journals Improved Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Using Warmed Miriplatin for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Yasui ◽  
Satoru Murata ◽  
Shiro Onozawa ◽  
Takahiko Mine ◽  
Tatsuo Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Alanine Transaminase ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
The Common ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using warmed and nonwarmed miriplatin for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eighty patients (117 nodules), treated between January 2010 and June 2013, were evaluated. Thirty-two and 85 nodules were treated with nonwarmed and warmed miriplatin, respectively. The efficacy of TACE was evaluated on a per nodule basis according to treatment effect (TE). Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. TE grades were significantly improved in the warmed group compared to the nonwarmed group (nonwarmed: TE 4, 12.5%; TE 3, 0%; TE 2, 15.6%; TE 1, 71.9%; warmed: TE 4, 34.1%; TE 3, 5.9%; TE 2, 9.4%; TE 1, 50.6%;P=0.017) . Multivariate analysis revealed significant impact of warming miriplatin on objective response rate (odds ratio, 12.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.90–90.0;P=0.0028). CTCAE grades of elevated aspartate and alanine transaminase after TACE were significantly higher in the warmed group (P=0.0083and 0.0068, resp.); however, all adverse events were only transient. The use of warmed miriplatin in TACE significantly improved TE without causing serious complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document