scholarly journals Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery, First Egyptian Academic Center Experience, RCT

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasser Debakey ◽  
Ashraf Zaghloul ◽  
Ahmed Farag ◽  
Ahmed Mahmoud ◽  
Inas Elattar
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Distal Margin ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Background. Undoubtedly, robotic systems have largely penetrated the surgical field. For any new operative approach to become an accepted alternative to conventional methods, it must be proved safe and result in comparable outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term operative as well as oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal cancer resections. Methods. This is a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted on patients with rectal cancer undergoing either robotic-assisted or laparoscopic surgery from April 2015 till February 2017. Patients’ demographics, operative parameters, and short-term clinical and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Results. Fifty-seven patients underwent permuted block randomization. Of these patients, 28 were assigned to undergo robotic-assisted rectal surgery and 29 to laparoscopic rectal surgery. After exclusion of 12 patients following randomization, 45 patients were included in the analysis. No significant differences exist between both groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, ASA score, clinical stage, and rate of receiving upfront chemoradiation. Estimated blood loss was evidently lower in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (median: 200 versus 325 ml, p= 0.050). A significantly more distal margin is achieved in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (median: 2.8 versus 1.8, p< 0.001). Although the circumferential radial margin (CRM) was complete in 18 patients (85.7%) in the robotic group in contrast to 15 patients (62.5%) in the laparoscopic group, it did not differ statistically (p=0.079). The overall postoperative complication rates were similar between the two groups. Conclusion. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomized trial of robotic rectal surgery in the Middle East and Northern Africa region. Our early experience indicates that robotic rectal surgery is a feasible and safe procedure. It is not inferior to standard laparoscopy in terms of oncologic radicality and surgical complications. Organization number is IORG0003381. IRB number is IRB00004025.

scholarly journals Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Robotic-Assisted Rectal Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer Undergoing Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Wen Huang ◽  
Wei-Chih Su ◽  
Tsung-Kun Chang ◽  
Cheng-Jen Ma ◽  
Tzu-Chieh Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Previous Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Background: The application of minimally invasive surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and a history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) remains controversial. This retrospective study with propensity score matching (PSM) investigated the impact of PAS on robotic-assisted rectal surgery outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).Methods: In total, 203 patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative CCRT and robotic-assisted rectal surgery between May 2013 and December 2019 were enrolled. Patients were categorized into PAS and non-PAS groups based on the PAS history. The PSM caliper matching method with 1-to-3 match was used to match PAS patients with non-PAS.Results: Of the 203 enrolled patients, 35 were PAS patients 168 were non-PAS patients. After PSM, 32 PAS patients and 96 non-PAS patients were included for analysis. No significant between-group differences were noted in the perioperative outcomes, including median console time [165 min (PAS) vs 175 min (noon-PAS), P = 0.4542)] and median operation time [275 min (PAS) vs 290 min (non-PAS), P = 0.5943)] after PSM. Postoperative recovery and overall complication rates were also similar (all P > 0.05). Moreover, the between-group differences in pathological or short-term oncological outcomes were also nonsignificant (all P > 0.05). No 30-day postoperative deaths were observed in either group.Conclusion: The current results indicate that robotic-assisted surgery is safe and feasible for PAS patients with rectal cancer undergoing preoperative CCRT. However, future prospective randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings.

scholarly journals Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Robotic-assisted Rectal Surgery in Patients With Rectal Cancer Undergoing Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Wen Huang ◽  
Wei-Chih Su ◽  
Tsung-Kun Chang ◽  
Cheng-Jen Ma ◽  
Tzu-Chieh Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Previous Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Background: The application of minimally invasive surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and a history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) remains controversial. This retrospective study with propensity score matching (PSM) investigated the impact of PAS on robotic-assisted rectal surgery outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).Methods: In total, 203 patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative CCRT and robotic-assisted rectal surgery between May 2013 and December 2019 were enrolled. Patients were categorized into PAS and non-PAS groups based on the PAS history. The PSM caliper matching method with 1-to-3 match was used to match PAS patients with non-PAS.Results: Of the 203 enrolled patients, 35 were PAS patients 168 were non-PAS patients. After PSM, 32 PAS patients and 96 non-PAS patients were included for analysis. No significant between-group differences were noted in the perioperative outcomes, including median console time [165 min (PAS) vs 175 min (noon-PAS), P = 0.4542)] and median operation time [275 min (PAS) vs 290 min (non-PAS), P = 0.5943)] after PSM. Postoperative recovery and overall complication rates were also similar (all P > 0.05). Moreover, the between-group differences in pathological or short-term oncological outcomes were also nonsignificant (all P > 0.05). No 30-day postoperative deaths were observed in either group.Conclusion: The current results indicate that robotic-assisted surgery is safe and feasible for PAS patients with rectal cancer undergoing preoperative CCRT. However, future prospective randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: The Brigham and Women's Experience

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melina Shoni ◽  
Taymaa May ◽  
Allison F. Vitonis ◽  
Anjelica Garza ◽  
Michael G. Muto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Hospital Admission Rate ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Risk Reducing

Objective. To establish short-term surgical outcomes of three-port laparoscopic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Methods. The medical records of all HBOC women that underwent laparoscopic RRSO between January 2001 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, operative details, and short-term surgical outcomes were obtained and subjected to SAS. Statistical univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results. 358 patients met study criteria with 277 (77.4%) carrying a documented BRCA mutation. The predominant technique utilized three ports (two 5 mm and one 10/12 mm), a 5 mm laparoscope and a 5 mm Ligasure pulsatile bipolar device. Mean operative time was 58.3 minutes (SD 22.6, 26.0–197.0), significantly affected by BMI greater than 30 (P<0.0001) and status of adhesions (P=0.001). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was negligible in 96.9% of cases. Seven patients required conversion to laparotomy. No major intraoperative complications were recorded. One-night hospital admission rate was less than 2.0% while postoperative complication rate was 3.1%. Malignancy was revealed in 14 patients (3.9%). Conclusion. In HBOC population, three-port laparoscopic RRSO is a simple, reproducible, and safe procedure with low conversion rate, short operative time, minimal EBL, low surgical morbidity, and rapid postoperative recovery.

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Elective 2-Stage Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis in Korea: Does Laparoscopy Have Benefits?

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Woo Bong ◽  
Yong Sik Yoon ◽  
Jong Lyul Lee ◽  
Chan Wook Kim ◽  
In Ja Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Restorative Proctocolectomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Short Term

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of the open and laparoscopic approaches to 2-stage restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for Korean patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 73 patients with UC who underwent elective RPC between 2009 and 2016. Patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications within 30 days were compared between the open and laparoscopic groups.Results: There were 26 cases (36%) in the laparoscopic group, which had a lower mean body mass index (P = 0.025), faster mean time to recovery of bowel function (P = 0.004), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.004), and less pain on the first and seventh postoperative days (P = 0.029 and P = 0.027, respectively) compared to open group. There were no deaths, and the overall complication rate was 43.8%. There was no between-group difference in the overall complication rate; however, postoperative ileus was more frequent in the open group (27.7% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.043). Current smoking (odds ratio [OR], 44.4; P = 0.003) and open surgery (OR, 5.4; P = 0.014) were the independent risk factors for postoperative complications after RPC.Conclusion: Laparoscopic RPC was associated with acceptable morbidity and faster recovery than the open approach. The laparoscopic approach is a feasible and safe option for surgical treatment for UC in selective cases.

PS01.070: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ROBOTIC FUNDOPLICATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF GERD

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 69-69
Author(s):  
Mikhail Koshkin ◽  
Oleg Vasnev ◽  
Alexandr Belousov ◽  
Mikhail Mikhnevich ◽  
Magomet Baychorov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Nissen Fundoplication ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Antireflux Operations ◽  
Davinci System ◽  
Invasive Techniques ◽  
Median Operative Time

Abstract Background Surgical treatment is one of the most effective options for treatment of gastroesofageal reflux disease. Laparoscopic approach became is a ‘gold standard’ over the time demonstrating all advantages of minimally invasive techniques over the open procedures. However the utility of robotic antireflux operations still remains controversial. Methods Since the January till the December of 2017 thirty operations were operated on. Mean age was 57,2 (35–76), among them 21 (70%) were female and 9 (30%) were males. Mean BMI was 29,4 (24,1–41,0). Laparoscopic procedures were performed in15 patients (1st group), robotic procedures with DaVinci system were performed in 15 patients of the second group. Chernousov modified Nissen fundoplication was performed in 25 patients, Toupet fundoplication was used for 4 patients, Nissen type was performed in 4 cases. Results The median operative time in laparoscopic group was 125 min (80–200 min), in robotic group - 124 min (90–210 min). There were no statistical differences between two groups (P = 0,93).Blood loss was minimal in both groups. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (2–7 days) in the 1st group and 4 days (2–6 days) in the second. There were no statistical differences between two groups (P = 0,19). Postoperative course was uneventful in all patients of both groups. Conclusion Robotic antireflux operations are safe and effective in treatment of patients with reflux-esophagitis. There were no statistically significant differences in short-term results of laparoscopic and robotic operations. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Primary Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: Is it Safe and Beneficial?

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1614-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Akiyoshi ◽  
Hiroya Kuroyanagi ◽  
Masatoshi Oya ◽  
Tsuyoshi Konishi ◽  
Meiki Fukuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Primary Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery

scholarly journals The Role of transanal (Ta) dissection in the management of difficult primary and recurrent rectal cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Courval ◽  
Sébastien Drolet ◽  
Alexandre Bouchard ◽  
Philippe Bouchard
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Anastomosis ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Recurrent Rectal Cancer ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Final Pathology ◽  
Arterial Bleeding ◽  
History Of ◽  
Difficult Cases

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to review the postoperative and short-term oncological outcomes of our first cohort of patients having had a transanal (Ta) approach for primary or recurrent rectal cancer.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on all cases of Ta dissection occurring between 2013 and 2016. We reviewed data concerning case selection, tumour characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data and final pathology.ResultsA total of 24 males were operated for primary (92% (22/24)) or recurrent rectal cancer (8.3% (2/24)). Four patients (16.7% (4/24)) had a history of previous rectal surgery and two had a history of previous Ta total mesorectal excision (TME). A majority of patients were obese, with 58.3% (14/24) having a body mass index >30. The laparoscopic approach was used in the majority of cases (95.8% (23/24)). Most patients had a low anterior resection (95.8% (23/24)). Sixteen patients received a temporary ileostomy (66.7% (16/24)). Three patients suffered perioperative complications (including colonic ischaemia, rectal perforation and arterial bleeding). Five patients (21.7% (5/23)) had an anastomotic leak treated with Ta drainage in two patients. Final pathology revealed negative margins in 95.8% (23/24). TME was considered complete in 87.5% (21/24) overall and in 95% (21/22) when considering only primary cancer cases.ConclusionAccording to our cohort of selected difficult cases, Ta dissection approach helped achieve complete mesorectal excision in complex primary rectal cancer but also allowed for rectal resection in patients with previous rectal surgery. This technique also helped perform a primary anastomosis in these difficult cases.

scholarly journals Short-Term Outcomes of Simultaneous Laparoscopic Colectomy and Hepatectomy for Primary Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Liver Metastases

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Inoue ◽  
Mamoru Uemura ◽  
Hirofumi Yamamoto ◽  
Masayuki Hiraki ◽  
Atsushi Naito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Laparoscopic Colectomy ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Primary Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Synchronous Liver Metastases ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract Although simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases is reported to be safe and effective, the feasibility of a laparoscopic approach remains controversial. This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. From September 2008 to December 2013, 10 patients underwent simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases with curative intent at our institute. The median operative time was 452 minutes, and the median estimated blood loss was 245 mL. Median times to discharge from the hospital and adjuvant chemotherapy were 13.5 and 44 postoperative days, respectively. Negative resection margins were achieved in all cases, with no postoperative mortality or major morbidity. Simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and hepatectomy for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases appears feasible with low morbidity and favorable outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document