scholarly journals Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Pattern of Mechanical Tactile Stimulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Kojima ◽  
Hideaki Onishi ◽  
Shota Miyaguchi ◽  
Shinichi Kotan ◽  
Ryoki Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
Stimulus Probe ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Finger Pad ◽  
Dorsal Interosseous Muscle

We investigated the effects of different patterns of mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) on corticospinal excitability by measuring the motor-evoked potential (MEP). This was a single-blind study that included nineteen healthy subjects. MS was applied for 20 min to the right index finger. MS intervention was defined as simple, lateral, rubbing, vertical, or random. Simple intervention stimulated the entire finger pad at the same time. Lateral intervention stimulated with moving between left and right on the finger pad. Rubbing intervention stimulated with moving the stimulus probe, fixed by protrusion pins. Vertical intervention stimulated with moving in the forward and backward directions on the finger pad. Random intervention stimulated to finger pad with either row protrudes. MEPs were measured in the first dorsal interosseous muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left motor cortex before, immediately after, and 5–20 min after intervention. Following simple intervention, MEP amplitudes were significantly smaller than preintervention, indicating depression of corticospinal excitability. Following lateral, rubbing, and vertical intervention, MEP amplitudes were significantly larger than preintervention, indicating facilitation of corticospinal excitability. The modulation of corticospinal excitability depends on MS patterns. These results contribute to knowledge regarding the use of MS as a neurorehabilitation tool to neurological disorder.

scholarly journals The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Kojima ◽  
Shota Miyaguchi ◽  
Ryoki Sasaki ◽  
Shota Tsuiki ◽  
Kei Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Function ◽  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Index Finger ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Somatosensory Stimulation ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Finger Pad

Abstract Somatosensory stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability. Mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) activates cortical activity depending on tactile stimulation patterns. In this study, we examined whether the effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on different pin protrusions patterns. This single-blind study included 18 healthy subjects. Two types of MS interventions were used: repetitive global stimulus (RGS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, and sequential stepwise displacement stimulus (SSDS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of 6 pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. MS interventions were applied to the right index finger for 20 min (stim on/stim off, 1 s/5 s) at a frequency of 20 Hz. After RGS intervention, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by transcranial magnetic stimulation were observed to be significantly smaller than pre-intervention MEPs; however, motor function using the grooved pegboard task remained unchanged. After SSDS intervention, MEPs were significantly larger and motor function significantly improved compared with pre-intervention values. Our results demonstrated that MS intervention can modulate corticospinal excitability and motor function and that the effects of MS intervention depend on MS intervention patterns.

Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex

Neurology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willibald Gerschlager ◽  
Hartwig R. Siebner ◽  
John C. Rothwell
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Premotor Cortex ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hand Area ◽  
Dorsal Interosseous Muscle

Objective: To study whether trains of subthreshold 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over premotor, prefrontal, or parietal cortex can produce changes in excitability of motor cortex that outlast the application of the train.Background: Prolonged 1 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex can suppress the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) for several minutes after the end of the train. Because TMS can produce effects not only at the site of stimulation but also at distant sites to which it projects, the authors asked whether prolonged stimulation of sites distant but connected to motor cortex can also lead to lasting changes in MEP.Methods: Eight subjects received 1500 magnetic stimuli given at 1 Hz over the left lateral frontal cortex, the left lateral premotor cortex, the hand area of the left motor cortex, and the left anterior parietal cortex on four separate days. Stimulus intensity was set at 90% active motor threshold. Corticospinal excitability was probed by measuring the amplitude of MEP evoked in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle by single suprathreshold stimuli over the left motor hand area before, during, and after the conditioning trains.Results: rTMS over the left premotor cortex suppressed the amplitude of MEP in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. The effect was maximized (approximately 50% suppression) after 900 pulses and outlasted the full train of 1500 stimuli for at least 15 minutes. Conditioning rTMS over the other sites did not modify the size of MEP. A control experiment showed that left premotor cortex conditioning had no effect on MEP evoked in the left first dorsal interosseous muscle.Conclusions: Subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS of the left premotor cortex induces a short-lasting inhibition of corticospinal excitability in the hand area of the ipsilateral motor cortex. This may provide a model for studying the functional interaction between premotor and motor cortex in healthy subjects and patients with movement disorders.

The Use of Patterned Neuromuscular Stimulation to Improve Hand Function Following Surgery for Ulnar Neuropathy

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 430-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. PETTERSON ◽  
G. P. SMITH ◽  
J. A. OLDHAM ◽  
T. E. HOWE ◽  
R. C. TALLIS
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Neuromuscular Stimulation ◽  
Single Motor Unit ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
Hand Muscle ◽  
The Right ◽  
Dorsal Interosseous Muscle

A 60-year-old man with wasting and weakness of the right hand following ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow was referred for electrotherapy. An ulnar nerve transposition had been performed 2 years previously. This had produced some improvement in nerve conduction without significantly improving hand muscle function. The right first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) was stimulated for 4 hours per day over a 6-week period with a stimulus pattern replicating the discharge of a single motor unit from a healthy, fatigued FDI (patterned neuromuscular stimulation or PNMS). The response was assessed using a single case design. Significant improvements in the strength and fatigue resistance of the FDI were observed, associated with improvements in general hand function. PNMS may be useful in restoring hand function in patients with muscle atrophy following entrapment neuropathy.

scholarly journals Early Right Motor Cortex Response to Happy and Fearful Facial Expressions: A TMS Motor-Evoked Potential Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Borgomaneri ◽  
Francesca Vitale ◽  
Simone Battaglia ◽  
Alessio Avenanti
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Facial Expressions ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
The Body ◽  
Emotional Facial Expressions ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Emotional Faces ◽  
The Right

The ability to rapidly process others’ emotional signals is crucial for adaptive social interactions. However, to date it is still unclear how observing emotional facial expressions affects the reactivity of the human motor cortex. To provide insights on this issue, we employed single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate corticospinal motor excitability. Healthy participants observed happy, fearful and neutral pictures of facial expressions while receiving TMS over the left or right motor cortex at 150 and 300 ms after picture onset. In the early phase (150 ms), we observed an enhancement of corticospinal excitability for the observation of happy and fearful emotional faces compared to neutral expressions specifically in the right hemisphere. Interindividual differences in the disposition to experience aversive feelings (personal distress) in interpersonal emotional contexts predicted the early increase in corticospinal excitability for emotional faces. No differences in corticospinal excitability were observed at the later time (300 ms) or in the left M1. These findings support the notion that emotion perception primes the body for action and highlights the role of the right hemisphere in implementing a rapid and transient facilitatory response to emotional arousing stimuli, such as emotional facial expressions.

scholarly journals Global Corticospinal Excitability as Assessed in A Non-Exercised Upper Limb Muscle Compared Between Concentric and Eccentric Modes of Leg Cycling

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Walsh ◽  
Paul J. Stapley ◽  
Jonathan B. H. Shemmell ◽  
Romuald Lepers ◽  
Darryl J. McAndrew
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Physiological Variables ◽  
Leg Cycling ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
The Right

AbstractThis study investigated the effects of eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) semi-recumbent leg cycling on global corticospinal excitability (CSE), assessed through the activity of a non-exercised hand muscle. Thirteen healthy male adults completed two 30-min bouts of moderate intensity ECC and CON recumbent cycling on separate days. Power output (POutput), heart rate (HR) and cadence were monitored during cycling. Global CSE was assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle before (‘Pre’), interleaved (at 10 and 20 mins, t10 and t20, respectively), immediately after (post, P0), and 30-min post exercise (P30). Participants briefly stopped pedalling (no more than 60 s) while stimulation was applied at the t10 and t20 time-points of cycling. Mean POutput, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) did not differ between ECC and CON cycling and HR was significantly lower during ECC cycling (P = 0.01). Group mean MEP amplitudes were not significantly different between ECC and CON cycling at P0, t10, t20, and P30 and CON (at P > 0.05). Individual participant ratios of POutput and MEP amplitude showed large variability across the two modes of cycling, as did changes in slope of stimulus-response curves. These results suggest that compared to ‘Pre’ values, group mean CSE is not significantly affected by low-moderate intensity leg cycling in both modes. However, POutput and CSE show wide inter-participant variability which has implications for individual neural responses to CON and ECC cycling and rates of adaptation to a novel (ECC) mode. The study of CSE should therefore be analysed for each participant individually in relation to relevant physiological variables and account for familiarisation to semi-recumbent ECC leg cycling.

scholarly journals A Study on the Effect of Mental Practice Using Motor Evoked Potential-Based Neurofeedback

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daiki Matsuda ◽  
Takefumi Moriuchi ◽  
Yuta Ikio ◽  
Wataru Mitsunaga ◽  
Kengo Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Mental Practice ◽  
The Real ◽  
Group Feedback ◽  
Imagery Training ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
The Right

This study aimed to investigate whether the effect of mental practice (motor imagery training) can be enhanced by providing neurofeedback based on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEP). Twenty-four healthy, right-handed subjects were enrolled in this study. The subjects were randomly allocated into two groups: a group that was given correct TMS feedback (Real-FB group) and a group that was given randomized false TMS feedback (Sham-FB group). The subjects imagined pushing the switch with just timing, when the target circle overlapped a cross at the center of the computer monitor. In the Real-FB group, feedback was provided to the subjects based on the MEP amplitude measured in the trial immediately preceding motor imagery. In contrast, the subjects of the Sham-FB group were provided with a feedback value that was independent of the MEP amplitude. TMS was applied when the target, moving from right to left, overlapped the cross at the center of the screen, and the MEP amplitude was measured. The MEP was recorded in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. We evaluated the pre-mental practice and post-mental practice motor performance in both groups. As a result, a significant difference was observed in the percentage change of error values between the Real-FB group and the Sham-FB group. Furthermore, the MEP was significantly different between the groups in the 4th and 5th sets. Therefore, it was suggested that TMS-induced MEP-based neurofeedback might enhance the effect of mental practice.

scholarly journals Age-related Differences in Corticomotor Excitability and Inhibitory Processes during a Visuomotor RT Task

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1253-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakuei Fujiyama ◽  
Mark R. Hinder ◽  
Matthew W. Schmidt ◽  
Christophe Tandonnet ◽  
Michael I. Garry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Response Preparation ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
Inhibitory Processes ◽  
Age Related ◽  
The Right

This study tested the postulation that change in the ability to modulate corticospinal excitability and inhibitory processes underlie age-related differences in response preparation and generation during tasks requiring either rapid execution of a motor action or actively withholding that same action. Younger (n = 13, mean age = 26.0 years) and older adults (n = 13, mean age = 65.5 years) performed an RT task in which a warning signal (WS) was followed by an imperative signal (IS) to which participants were required to respond with a rapid flexion of the right thumb (go condition) or withhold their response (no-go condition). We explored the neural correlates of response preparation, generation, and inhibition using single- and paired-pulse TMS, which was administered at various times between WS and IS (response preparation phase) and between IS and onset of response-related muscle activity in the right thumb (response generation phase). Both groups exhibited increases in motor-evoked potential amplitudes (relative to WS onset) during response generation; however, this increase began earlier and was more pronounced for the younger adults in the go condition. Moreover, younger adults showed a general decrease in short-interval intracortical inhibition during response preparation in both the go and no-go conditions, which was not observed in older adults. Importantly, correlation analysis suggested that for older adults the task-related increases of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition were associated with faster RT. We propose that the declined ability to functionally modulate corticospinal activity with advancing age may underlie response slowing in older adults.

scholarly journals Proactive modulation of long-interval intracortical inhibition during response inhibition

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 859-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Cowie ◽  
Hayley J. MacDonald ◽  
John Cirillo ◽  
Winston D. Byblow
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Task Context ◽  
Stop Trial ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
Dorsal Interosseous Muscle

Daily activities often require sudden cancellation of preplanned movement, termed response inhibition. When only a subcomponent of a whole response must be suppressed (required here on Partial trials), the ensuing component is markedly delayed. The neural mechanisms underlying partial response inhibition remain unclear. We hypothesized that Partial trials would be associated with nonselective corticomotor suppression and that GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition within primary motor cortex might be responsible for the nonselective corticomotor suppression contributing to Partial trial response delays. Sixteen right-handed participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition task while single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to elicit motor evoked potentials in the left first dorsal interosseous muscle. Lift times, amplitude of motor evoked potentials, and long-interval intracortical inhibition were examined across the different trial types (Go, Stop-Left, Stop-Right, Stop-Both). Go trials produced a tight distribution of lift times around the target, whereas those during Partial trials (Stop-Left and Stop-Right) were substantially delayed. The modulation of motor evoked potential amplitude during Stop-Right trials reflected anticipation, suppression, and subsequent reinitiation of movement. Importantly, suppression was present across all Stop trial types, indicative of a “default” nonselective inhibitory process. Compared with blocks containing only Go trials, inhibition increased when Stop trials were introduced but did not differ between trial types. The amount of inhibition was positively correlated with lift times during Stop-Right trials. Tonic levels of inhibition appear to be proactively modulated by task context and influence the speed at which unimanual responses occur after a nonselective “brake” is applied.

scholarly journals Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reduces the Silent Period on Hand Muscle Electromyography During Force Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Matsugi ◽  
Shinya Douchi ◽  
Kodai Suzuki ◽  
Kosuke Oku ◽  
Nobuhiko Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Maximum Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
The Right

This study aimed to investigate whether cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (C-TMS) affected the cortical silent period (cSP) induced by TMS over the primary motor cortex (M1) and the effect of interstimulus interval (ISI) on cerebellar conditioning and TMS to the left M1 (M1-TMS). Fourteen healthy adult participants were instructed to control the abduction force of the right index finger to 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction. M1-TMS was delivered during this to induce cSP on electromyograph of the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. TMS over the right cerebellum (C-TMS) was conducted prior to M1-TMS. In the first experiment, M1-TMS intensity was set to 1 or 1.3 × resting motor threshold (rMT) with 20-ms ISI. In the second experiment, the intensity was set to 1 × rMT with ISI of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or 80 ms, and no-C-TMS trials were inserted. In results, cSP was significantly shorter in 1 × rMT condition than in 1.3 × rMT by C-TMS, and cSP was significantly shorter for ISI of 20–40 ms than for the no-C-TMS condition. Further, motor evoked potential for ISI40-60 ms were significantly reduced than that for ISI0. Thus, C-TMS may reduce cSP induced by M1-TMS with ISI of 20–40 ms.

scholarly journals The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation During Actual and Imagined Movements

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 689-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Lebon ◽  
Célia Ruffino ◽  
Ian Greenhouse ◽  
Ludovica Labruna ◽  
Richard B Ivry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Delayed Response ◽  
Movement Preparation ◽  
Actual Movement ◽  
Before And After ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle ◽  
Response Task ◽  
The Right ◽  
Imagined Movement

Abstract Current theories consider motor imagery, the mental representation of action, to have considerable functional overlap with the processes involved in actual movement preparation and execution. To test the neural specificity of motor imagery, we conducted a series of 3 experiments using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We compared changes in corticospinal excitability as people prepared and implemented actual or imagined movements, using a delayed response task in which a cue indicated the forthcoming response. TMS pulses, used to elicit motor-evoked responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand, were applied before and after an imperative signal, allowing us to probe the state of excitability during movement preparation and implementation. Similar to previous work, excitability increased in the agonist muscle during the implementation of an actual or imagined movement. Interestingly, preparing an imagined movement engaged similar inhibitory processes as that observed during actual movement, although the degree of inhibition was less selective in the imagery conditions. These changes in corticospinal excitability were specific to actual/imagined movement preparation, as no modulation was observed when preparing and generating images of cued visual objects. Taken together, inhibition is a signature of how actions are prepared, whether they are imagined or actually executed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document