scholarly journals Effect of Hemifacial Spasm on Intraocular Pressure Measurement

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Erdogan Cicik ◽  
Rengin Yildirim ◽  
Ceyhun Arici ◽  
Funda Dikkaya ◽  
Osman Sevki Arslan
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Hemifacial Spasm ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Applanation Tonometer ◽  
Iop Measurement ◽  
And Gender

Purpose. To evaluate the effect of hemifacial spasm (HFS) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. Methods. Twenty-four consecutive patients with HFS and 25 age- and gender-matched randomly selected eyes of healthy volunteers underwent corneal pachymetry and IOP measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and noncontact tonometer (NCT). IOP measurements were performed before (during HFS) and 2 weeks after Botox injections in HFS patients and in healthy volunteers without Botox injections. Results. There was no statistical difference between involved eye side and uninvolved eye side of HFS patients in measured central corneal thickness. Similarly, no difference was found between involved eye side of HFS patients and controls. There were no statistically significant differences comparing IOP values before treatment and levels measured at 2 weeks of Botox injections, either with GAT (p=0.33, 0.11) or NCT (p=0.80, 0.43) devices in the involved eyes and uninvolved eyes of patients with HFS, respectively. There were also no significant differences in these parameters (GAT (p=0.63) and NCT (p=0.54)) in controls. Conclusions. Contractions in facial muscles may not lead to significant increase in IOP in HFS patients. This result may help clinical decision making in the treatment of glaucoma patients with HFS. This trial is registered with NCT03390803.

Comparison of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometry versus non-contact tonometry in eyes with high-viscosity silicone oil

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dionysios D Pagoulatos ◽  
Zoi G Kapsala ◽  
Olga E Makri ◽  
Ilias G Georgalas ◽  
Constantinos D Georgakopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Applanation Tonometry ◽  
Applanation Tonometer ◽  
Iop Measurement ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Silicone Oil Tamponade

Background: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and air tonometer (non-contact tonometry [NT]) in vitrectomized eyes with high-viscosity silicone oil tamponade, as well as in normal eyes. Patients and Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 32 eyes with silicone oil tamponade of high viscosity (5700 CS) and 32 normal fellow eyes were included. IOP was measured by GAT and air tonometer 30 ± 12 days after vitrectomy, while measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) were also obtained. Results: In eyes with silicone oil, IOP was 20.09 ± 4.91 mmHg and 16.75 ± 3.86 mmHg using contact tonometer and air tonometer, respectively ( p < 0.0001). In normal eyes, IOP was 16.41 ± 2.15 mmHg and 16.31 ± 2.49 mmHg using the same tonometry techniques and this difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.598). In addition, no significant correlation was detected between IOP measurements using both techniques and age, gender, CCT, and type of lens. Conclusions: It seems that GAT overestimates IOP in eyes with high-viscosity silicone oil compared with NT, while both IOP measurement techniques in normal eyes provide similar values. Further assessment of available IOP measurement methods could possibly establish the most accurate technique for IOP estimation in vitrectomized eyes with silicone oil tamponade.

scholarly journals Intraocular pressure and choroidal thickness postural changes in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maddalena De Bernardo ◽  
Giulio Salerno ◽  
Marco Gioia ◽  
Luigi Capasso ◽  
Maria Claudia Russillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Multiple System Atrophy ◽  
Choroidal Thickness ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Standing Position ◽  
Sitting Position ◽  
Postural Changes ◽  
Iop Measurement

AbstractTo evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) and choroidal thickness (ChT) postural changes in multiple system atrophy (MSA), Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients and healthy controls (HC). 20 MSA patients, 21 PD patients and 14 HC, were examined. All subjects underwent a complete examination, including corneal thickness, ChT, IOP and axial length (AL) measurements. IOP measurement was performed in supine, sitting, and standing positions, whereas ChT in sitting and standing positions. Supine to standing IOP variations were significantly higher in MSA vs PD(p = 0.01) and in MSA vs HC (p < 0.0001), whereas no significant differences were observed between PD and HC (p = 0.397). Mean sub-foveal ChT in MSA was 240 ± 92 μm in sitting position, and 215 ± 94 μm in standing position with a significant reduction (p = 0.008). Mean sub-foveal ChT in PD was 258 ± 79 μm in sitting position, and 259 ± 76 μm in standing position (p = 0.887). In HC it was 244 ± 36 μm in sitting position, and 256 ± 37 μm in standing position with a significant increase (p = 0.007). The significant IOP and ChT postural changes can be considered additional hallmarks of autonomic dysfunction in MSA and further studies are needed to consider them as biomarkers in the differential diagnosis with PD.

scholarly journals The Influence of a Vitrectomy on the Diurnal Intraocular Pressure

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Woo Lee ◽  
Joon Mo Kim ◽  
Seong Hee Shim ◽  
Da Yeong Kim ◽  
Jeong Hun Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Diurnal Fluctuation ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Diurnal Iop ◽  
Maximum Minimum ◽  
Normal Controls ◽  
Healthy Eyes

Purpose. To evaluate the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes after vitrectomy compared to that of healthy eyes.Methods. Twenty-one patients who had undergone vitrectomy and 21 age- and gender-matched normal controls were enrolled during the same period. We measured the diurnal IOP every two hours between 9 a.m. and 11 p.m. in all patients who were admitted for cataract surgery. Patients with a history of eye surgery (not including vitrectomy) or use of a medication that is associated with IOP were excluded. The IOP and ocular parameters of patients were compared with the same patients’ fellow healthy eyes and with normal eyes of age- and gender-matched controls.Results. There were no significant differences between vitrectomized eyes and normal fellow eyes with regard to all IOP parameters including the maximum, minimum, and IOP fluctuation values. Diurnal fluctuation of IOP (or the difference between the maximum and minimum IOP) was larger in vitrectomized eyes than it was in age- and gender-matched control eyes.Conclusions. Vitrectomy did not markedly affect the IOP. Although there were no severe complications after vitrectomy, the IOP fluctuation was wider in vitrectomized eyes than it was in normal eyes.

scholarly journals Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Lisa Ramm ◽  
Robert Herber ◽  
Eberhard Spoerl ◽  
Frederik Raiskup ◽  
Lutz E. Pillunat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Applanation Tonometry ◽  
Ocular Response Analyzer ◽  
Corvis St ◽  
Dynamic Contour Tonometer ◽  
Iop Measurement ◽  
Good Agreement

Purpose. To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), ocular response analyzer (ORA), dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), and Corvis ST (CST) in healthy subjects. Methods. In a prospective, observational study, IOP measurements with GAT (GAT-IOPc), ORA (IOPcc), DCT (DCT-IOP), and CST (bIOP) were performed and analyzed in 94 healthy subjects. Results. Mean age of the participants was 45.6 ± 17.2 years (range 18 to 81 years). Mean GAT-IOPc was 12.9 ± 2.4 mmHg, mean DCT-IOP was 16.1 ± 2.6 mmHg, and mean IOPcc was 15.6 ± 3.3 mmHg. DCT-IOP and IOPcc were significantly higher than GAT-IOPc (P<0.001). Mean bIOP was 13.5 ± 2.4 mmHg that was slightly higher but not significantly different from GAT-IOPc (P=0.146). Correlation analysis of IOP values and central corneal thickness (CCT) revealed a negative correlation between GAT-IOPc and CCT (r = −0.347; P=0.001). However, IOPcc, DCT-IOP, and bIOP showed no significant correlation to CCT. Only bIOP revealed a weak but significant age dependency (r = 0.321, P=0.002). Conclusion. All tonometry devices showed a good agreement of biomechanical corrected IOP values with GAT-IOPc. As no influence of CCT on IOPcc, DCT-IOP, and bIOP was detectable, the used correction algorithms appear to be appropriate in these tonometers in the clinical setting. The highest agreement was found between GAT-IOPc and bIOP. However, bIOP weakly correlated with participants’ age. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of bIOP for IOP measurement.

Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients’ feasibility and acceptability

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Cvenkel ◽  
Makedonka Atanasovska Velkovska ◽  
Vesna Dimovska Jordanova
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Central Corneal Thickness ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Pressure Data ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Goldmann Applanation Tonometer ◽  
Applanation Tonometer ◽  
Perception Of Self ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of self-measurement of intraocular pressure using Icare Home rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer and assess acceptability of self-tonometry in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Methods: In the study, 117 subjects were trained to use Icare Home for self-measurement. Icare Home tonometer readings were compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer, including one eye per patient. Agreement between the two methods of measurement was evaluated by Bland and Altmann analysis. Questionnaire was used to evaluate patients’ perception of self-tonometry. Results: One hundred and three out of 117 patients (88%) were able to measure their own intraocular pressure and 96 (82%) fulfilled the requirements for certification. The mean (SD) difference Goldmann applanation tonometer minus Icare Home was 1.2 (2.4) mmHg (95% limits of agreement, –3.4 to 5.9 mmHg). The magnitude of bias between the two methods depended on central corneal thickness, with greater bias at central corneal thickness <500 µm. In 65 out of 96 subjects (67.7%), Icare Home results were within 2 mmHg of the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Seventy-three out of 93 (78.5%) felt that self-tonometry was easy to use and 75 patients (80.6%) responded that they would use the device at home. Conclusion: Icare Home tonometry tends to slightly underestimate intraocular pressure compared to Goldmann applanation tonometer. Most patients were able to perform self-tonometry and found it acceptable for home use. Measurements using rebound self-tonometry could improve the quality of intraocular pressure data and optimize treatment regimen.

Variation of intraocular pressure with age and gender

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Jeelani ◽  
RH Taklikar ◽  
Anupama Taklikar ◽  
Vijayanath Itagi ◽  
Amruta Bennal
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
And Gender

Comparison of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness Measurements of Obese, Overweight, and Healthy Volunteers

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-103
Author(s):  
Mehtap Sagus Aydin ◽  
◽  
Ayse Ipek Akyuz Unsal ◽  
Sayime Aydin Eroglu ◽  
Mustafa Unubol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Central Corneal Thickness ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Thickness Measurements

Nonsuicidal Self-injury: Examining the Relationship Between Diagnosis and Gender

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Healey ◽  
Heather Trepal ◽  
Kelly Emelianchik-Key
Keyword(s):  
Counselor Training ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Counselors In Training ◽  
Counseling Professionals ◽  
Biological Sex ◽  
Normative Expectations ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Societal Expectations

This study examined the perceptions of counselors in training concerning nonsuicidal self-injurious behaviors (NSSI), diagnosis, and the influence of gender-normative expectations on clinical decision making. Participants were asked to respond to a set of questions after reading a randomly assigned case study. The purpose was to determine the process through which counseling professionals diagnosed adolescents who self-injure and whether the sex of the client influenced the decision. Cases presented were identical except that the sex of the client was altered. It appears that societal expectations associated with biological sex may influence counselor diagnostic decisions at the training level. Implications for diagnosis, counselor training, and future research are presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document