scholarly journals Prediction of Lift Coefficient for Tandem Wing Configuration or Multiple-Lifting-Surface System Using Prandtl’s Lifting-Line Theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Cheng ◽  
Hua Wang

In tandem airfoil configuration or multiple-lifting-surface layouts, due to the flow interaction among their lifting surfaces, the aerodynamic characteristics can be affected by each other. In accordance with Prandtl’s classical lifting-line theory, a method to calculate the section lift coefficient for the tandem wing configuration or multiple-lifting-surface system is presented. In that method, the form of Fourier sine series is used to express the variation of the section circulation which changes continuously along the wingspan. The accuracy of the numerical solutions obtained by the method has been validated by the data obtained from computational fluid dynamics and tunnel experiment. By varying the design parameters, such as the gap, the stagger, the incidence angle, the wingspan, the taper ratio as well as the aspect ratio, a series of tandem wing configurations are tested to analyze the lift coefficient and the induced drag of each lifting surface. From the results, it can be seen that the bigger negative gap and stagger can produce better lift characteristic for tandem wing configuration. Besides, it will also be beneficial for the lift characteristic when the incidence angle and the wingspan of fore wing are appropriately declined or if the incidence angle and the wingspan of hind wing are appropriately increased.

1968 ◽  
Vol 72 (691) ◽  
pp. 623-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. C. Garner

Summary Theoretical data from lifting-surface theory are presented to illustrate (i) that the vortex drag factor is closely related to the half-wing spanwise centre of pressure on simple planforms without camber or twist, (ii) that lifting-line theory is useless for predicting the spanwise distribution of vortex drag on swept wings, (iii) that recent numerical improvements in lifting-surface theory help to reconcile the concepts of wake energy and leading-edge suction in relation to vortex drag.


1967 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Tetsuo Nishiyama ◽  
Takao Sasajima

The present paper is aimed to develop a more accurate lifting-surface theory of widely bladed propellers by applying the Scholz' technique. Curved-flow effect, which is of essential importance in the theory of widely bladed propellers, is analyzed and clarified in detail in the forms of correction coefficients to the lift-curve slope and zero lift angle of the blade element. Further, curved-flow correction to the lifting-line theory and the corresponding factor to the Ginzel's camber correction are shown by the present theory. The theoretical characteristics seem to be in good agreement with the experiment, so far as the assumption of linearization holds.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Oliverio E. Velazquez Salazar ◽  
François Morency ◽  
Julien Weiss

Author(s):  
Robert E. Spall ◽  
Warren F. Phillips ◽  
Brian B. Pincock

Solutions obtained from lifting-line, vortex-lattice, and the Euler equations are presented for a series of rigid, thin wing and sail geometries. Initial calculations were performed for an untwisted, rectangular wing. For this case, lifting line theory, vortex lattice, and Euler solutions were all in reasonable agreement. However, the lifting-line theory was the only method to predict a constant ratio of induced drag coefficient to lift coefficient squared. Similar results were found for a forward-swept, tapered wing. Additional results are presented in terms of lift and drag coefficients for an isolated mainsail, and mainsail/jib combinations with sails representative of both a standard and tall rig Catalina 27. Although experimental data is lacking, overall conclusions are that the accuracy realized from lifting-line solutions is as good as or better than that obtained from vortex-lattice solutions and inviscid CFD solutions, but at a fraction of the computational cost. The linear lifting-line results compared quite well with the nonlinear lifting-line results, with the exception of the downstream mainsail when considering jib/mainsail combinations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document