scholarly journals Familial Mediterranean Gene (MEFV) Mutation in Parents of Children with Familial Mediterranean Fever: What Are the Exceptions?

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Shahbaznejad ◽  
Sayed-Reza Raeeskarami ◽  
Raheleh Assari ◽  
Abbas Shakoori ◽  
Hamidreza Azhideh ◽  
...  

Objectives. Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is one of the most prevalent periodic fever syndromes; MEFV, the responsible gene for the disease, is in the short arm of chromosome16. In the considerable count of the FMF patients, only one mutation is found in the MEFV and parents, who were the obligatory carriers for that mutation, were asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to evaluate these asymptomatic parents in regard to mutation in MEFV gene and similarity between parents and offspring patients. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, asymptomatic parents of FMF patients enrolled the study were referred to periodic fever clinic or pediatric rheumatology clinic of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The patients should have at least one mutation in MEFV gene and none of them had any family history of autoinflammatory disease. Twelve mutations in MEFV gene were assessed in the parents by Vienna Lab FMF Strip Assay kit by MAS PCR/Reverse hybridization. Results. Forty-three patients and their parents participated in the study. Sixty-three percent (27) of patients were male. Onset of disease symptoms in 31 patients (72%) was before 4 years of old. Nine (21%) of the patients had homozygote, 16 (37%) compound heterozygote, and 17(40%) heterozygote for MEFV mutation; there was a case of complex alleles mutations (2%). M694V/M694V in 4 patients (9%) was the most homozygote genotype, and M694V/R761H in 4 (9%) and E148Q in 7 (16%) were the most compound heterozygote and heterozygote genotype, respectively. M694V, M680I, and E148Q were the most mutation in the parents. Overall, 41 patients had mutations similar to their parents’ mutation, except 2 whose parents had no mutation, but a patient did. Conclusion. It seems that occurrence of new mutations in offspring is not prevalent among FMF patients and there are other reasons for different clinical presentation in similar mutation carriers. On the other hand, in ethnicities with high prevalence of FMF, new mutation in descendant may occur, infrequently.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Tomonobu Sato ◽  
Shunichiro Takezaki ◽  
Takeru Goto ◽  
Shinichi Ishikawa ◽  
Kazumi Oura ◽  
...  

Periodic fever syndromes are heterogeneous diseases. Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is one of the hereditary periodic fever diseases caused by a Mediterranean fever (MEFV) gene abnormality. FMF can be categorized as typical or atypical, based on clinical findings and genetic screening. Atypical FMF has a wide variation of clinical findings and disease-causing mutations of MEFV. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose an unknown fever as FMF. To date, a large number of various typical and atypical FMF cases have been reported in Japan. Here, we describe a Japanese boy with heterozygous MEFV p.Ser503Cys exon 5 variant who developed periodic fever. He was treated with colchicine; a complete eradication of his fever and various accompanying symptoms have been subsequently achieved for more than a year. Given that there have been a few reports about patients with this variant, little is known about the genetic and phenotypic role of heterozygous MEFV p.Ser503Cys exon 5 variant. It is therefore imperative to consider atypical FMF as a differential diagnosis when a periodic fever is encountered. Furthermore, we suggest that it is worthwhile to integrate MEFV gene analysis with the potential effects of colchicine treatment in patients with periodic fever.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1509.1-1510
Author(s):  
T. Klein ◽  
S. Tiosano ◽  
A. Chohen ◽  
H. Amital

Background:Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by multisystem inflammatory lesions affecting many organ systems in the body. Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive disease of chronic autoimmune inflammation characterized by frequently relapsing self-limiting fever and inflammation that may be localized in peritoneum, pleura, joint or skin.1Previous studies have described the similarity of clinical symptoms of FMF among SLE patients. However, the literature on this topic is inconsistent and based mostly on case reports.2-4Objectives:To examine the proportions of coexistence of FMF among SLE patients compared to the general population. We hypothesized that the proportion of FMF among SLE patients is higher than the general population.Methods:This cross-sectional study used the Clalit Health Services database, the largest Health Maintenance Organization in Israel, serving 4,400,000 members. SLE patients were compared to age- and sex-matched controls. Chi- was used for univariate analysis.Results:The study included4886 SLEpatients and 24430 age- and sex-matched controls. The SLE group had a significantly higher proportion of FMF patients compared to non-SLE controls (0.68% and 0.21% respectively; p < 0.001).Table 1. All study populationTable 1.SLE patients and matched controls basic characteristicsNo SLESLEp.overallN=24430N=4886Age51.2±16.551.2±16.51.000Gender: Female20100 (82.3%)4020 (82.3%)1.000FMF52 (0.21%)33 (0.68%)<0.001Table 2. StratificationTable 2.comparison of FMF patients with and without SLEFMF without SLEFMF with SLEp.overallN=52N=33Age44.6±13.750.5±17.70.106Gender: Female45 (86.5%)26 (78.8%)0.523Conclusion:FMF was found to be more common amongst SLE patients compared to matched controls.The current study results suggest that the occurrence of SLE turn patients with an appropriate genetic and environmental setting to develop also FMF. This cross-sectional study sheds light on the coexistence of these two diseases, autoimmune and autoinflammatory.References:[1]Kucuk A, Gezer IA, Ucar R, Karahan AY. Familial mediterranean fever.Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2014;57(3):97-104.[2]Lidar M, Zandman-Goddard G, Shinar Y, Zaks N, Livneh A, Langevitz P. SLE and FMF: A possible negative association between the two disease entities–report of four cases and review of the literature.Lupus. 2008;17(7):663-669.[3]Erten S, Taskaldiran I, Yakut ZI. Are systemic lupus erythematosus patients carrying MEFV gene less prone to renal involvement? report of three cases and review of the literature.Ren Fail. 2013;35(7):1013-1016.[4]Shinar Y, Kosach E, Langevitz P, et al. Familial mediterranean Fever gene (MEFV) mutations as a modifier of systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus. 2012;21(9):993-998.Disclosure of Interests: :None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1784.1-1784
Author(s):  
R. Dos Santos Sobrín ◽  
M. Martí Masanet ◽  
B. Lopez-Montesinos ◽  
L. Lacruz Pérez ◽  
I. Calvo

Background:Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a genetic autoinflammatory disorder caused mostly by mutations in MEFV gene. Its inheritance is autosomal recessive and is the most frequent periodic fever syndrome. First-line treatment is based in colchicine use, so biologics (anti-IL-1) are reserved for refractory cases1, 2.Objectives:To account for clinic and treatment features of patients with FMF in a specialized center as opposed to non-referent centers.Methods:This study was developed in the Pediatric Rheumatology Service in Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe de Valencia. Demographic, clinic and treatment data were collected from patients diagnosed of FMF since January 2004 to September 2019.Results:106 patients met last FMF criteria3. 55% had a pathogenic mutation in genetic analysis. 52% were female. Before 10 years old, 71% of patients had the diagnosis (51% before 4 years old). Arthralgia/myalgia (73%), periodic fever (62%) and abdominal pain (54%) were the most common symptoms. Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA, 6), other forms of JIA (9) and vasculitis (10) were the most prevalent comorbidities. When talking about treatment, 76,4% received Colchicine (60,5% with good response), 22,6% needed a classical disease modifying antirheumatic drug (mostly Methotrexate) and 22 patients got biologic treatment (73% anti-IL-1).Conclusion:When analyzing this case-review, JIA has a strong association with our patients, so it could explain severe disease activity and more articular involvement. This could be an illustration to the higher use of Methotrexate. Also, the most relevant symptom was arthralgia while fever is the most frequent in literature. Likewise, age of diagnosis has been earlier than other case-series (this would be more frequent in other autoinflammatory syndromes, as literature relates)1, 2, 4.References:[1]Ozdogan H, Ugurlu S. Familial Mediterranean Fever. Presse Med. (2019).[2]Ozen S, Demirkaya E, Erer B, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of familial Mediterranean fever. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:644-651.[3]Sag E, Demirel D, Demir S, et al. Performance of the new “Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria” in FMF patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;19:30369-5.[4]Rozenbaum M, Rosner I. Severe outcome of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) associated with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22:S75-8.Disclosure of Interests:Raquel Dos Santos Sobrín: None declared, Miguel Martí Masanet: None declared, B Lopez-Montesinos: None declared, Lucía Lacruz Pérez: None declared, Inmaculada Calvo Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clementia, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3846-3846
Author(s):  
Yasuko Miyahara ◽  
Kouhei Yamashita ◽  
Takashi Miyoshi ◽  
Akifumi Takaori ◽  
Masataka Sasada ◽  
...  

Abstract There have been few reports of the patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) in Japan, probably because FMF patients are preoccupied to be rare in Japan. We experienced 10 cases likely to be clinically diagnosed as FMF with periodic fever of unknown origin. FMF is an autosomal recessive disease resulting from the genetic mutations in the FMF gene (MEFV), which codes for a protein named Pyrin. Pyrin is expressed in mainly polymorphonuclear cells and monocytes and it is proposed that it regulates inflammation. The MEFV gene is located on chromosome 16p13.3 and comprises 10 exons. Several mutations in the MEFV gene have been identified, however the mutations are mostly located in exon 2 and 10. Therefore, we performed genetic screening of exon 2 and 10 in the 10 patient samples. The median age of the patients was 34 (17–49) years old. They are four males and six females. DNA was isolated from polymorphonuclear cells of the patients and PCR was performed with selective primers of exon 2 and 10 of MEFV gene, respectively. Thereafter, direct sequence of exon 2 and 10 of the PCR products was performed. As a result, the mutations of E148Q in exon 2 and M694I in exon 10, which are commonly observed in previous reports, were identified in seven and six out of 10 patients, respectively. All patients had either E148Q or M694I mutation. Three patients have both E148Q and M694I mutations. One 50-year-old female patient, who had a homozygous M694I mutation, suffered from severe renal AA amyloidosis. The mutation at M694 has been mostly reported as M694V, particularly in Mediterranean countries, however interestingly, all of the mutations of M694 were M694I, not M694V in our 10 Japanese patients. It is reported that healthy carrier frequency of the E148Q mutation was about 16% in Japan, so it is suggested that E148Q mutation may be profoundly involved in cause of disease, because E148Q mutation is observed among 70% of our patients. We herein report the unique genetic features of FMF patients in Japan. A further large scale of investigation would be necessary for confirming the significance of E148Q and M694I mutations in FMF patients in Japan.


Lupus ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 993-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Shinar ◽  
E Kosach ◽  
P Langevitz ◽  
G Zandman-Goddard ◽  
R Pauzner ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of the Mediterranean FeVer ( MEFV) gene mutations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and their effect on organ involvement, as well as disease activity and severity. The frequencies of three familial Mediterranean fever-related MEFV gene mutations ( M694V, V726A and E148Q) were investigated in 70 SLE patients. Organ involvement, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) damage index and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores were correlated with mutation carriage. Eleven of 70 patients (15.7%) were found to carry an MEFV mutation. A single patient harbored two mutations, E148Q and V726A, without overt familial Mediterranean fever while the rest were heterozygous carriers. Four of the 11 carried an M694V mutation, four carried V726A and two carried E148Q. The majority of MEFV mutation carriers were Sephardic while non-carriers were mainly of Ashkenazi origin (72.7% vs. 45.7% and 47.4% vs. 9.1%, respectively, p = 0.02). SLE onset was significantly earlier in MEFV carriers (27.6 ± 9.7 vs. 38.2 ± 15.5 years, in carriers vs. non-carriers, p = 0.02). Hematologic and serologic parameters were comparable among mutation carriers and non-carriers. Febrile episodes were more common among MEFV mutation carriers (45.4% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.035) and there was a trend for excess episodes of pleuritis as well (54.5% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.06 in carriers vs. non-carriers, respectively). The frequency of secondary anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome was equivalent among the groups. Conversely, compound urinary abnormalities and renal failure was not observed among MEFV carriers yet was present in 33.4% and 18.6% of non-carriers ( p = 0.027 and 0.19, respectively). SLICC damage index and SLEDAI activity index did not differ significantly between the groups. MEFV mutation carriage appears to modify the SLE disease phenotype in that it contributes to an excess of inflammatory manifestations such as fever and pleuritis on the one hand, while thwarting more severe renal involvement on the other.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-498
Author(s):  
Rabia Miray Kışla Ekinci ◽  
Sibel Balcı ◽  
Ahmet Hakan Erol ◽  
Dilek Karagöz ◽  
Derya Ufuk Altıntaş ◽  
...  

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the performance of Eurofever Registry and the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) classification criteria in pediatric patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Patients and methods:This retrospective, cross-sectional study included a total of 130 pediatric FMF patients (67 males, 63 females; mean age: 12.4±3.6 years; range, 2.5 to 17.7 years) with at least one M694V mutation in MEFV gene between July 2010 and July 2019. Demographic features and disease characteristics were recorded. The control group was consisted of 41 patients (19 males, 22 females; mean age: 7.8±4.0 years; range, 2.1 to 17.8 years) with other hereditary autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), including periodic fevers with aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis syndrome (n=30), mevalonate kinase deficiency (n=9), and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (n=2). Sensitivity and specificity of the Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria were calculated. Results: The sensitivity and specificity were 97.7% and 56.1% for Yalcinkaya-Ozen criteria, respectively and 93.1% and 90.2% for Tel Hashomer criteria, respectively. The Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria reached a sensitivity and specificity of 94.6% and 82.9% and 93.1% and 80.5%, respectively, when genetic plus clinical criteria and clinical-only criteria were applied. Conclusion: The Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria have a comparable sensitivity for avoidance of FMF underdiagnosis in childhood. The Yalcinkaya-Ozen criteria have the highest sensitivity without a significant specificity. The Tel Hashomer criteria and Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria were superior to Yalcinkaya-Ozen criteria to differentiate FMF from other AIDs, thus leading to less complications relevant to underdiagnosis of other AIDs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1048
Author(s):  
Deniz Gezgin Yıldırım ◽  
Sevcan A. Bakkaloğlu ◽  
A. Şebnem Soysal Acar ◽  
Necla Buyan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document