scholarly journals Erythromycin for Promoting the Postpyloric Placement of Feeding Tubes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Qing-Jun Jiang ◽  
Cai-Feng Jiang ◽  
Qi-Tong Chen ◽  
Jian Shi ◽  
Bin Shi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Intravenous Route ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement

Background. Critically ill patients can benefit from enteral nutrition with postpyloric feeding tubes, but the low success rate limits its wide use. Erythromycin could elevate the success rate of tube insertion, but its clinical efficiency still remains controversial. Methods. Included studies must be RCTs which assessed the success rate of postpyloric feeding tube insertion using erythromycin. Results. 284 patients were enrolled in six studies. Meta-analysis showed that erythromycin significantly increases the rate of successful postpyloric feeding tube placement (RR 1.45, 95% CI (1.12, 1.86)) and did not increase the risk of adverse effects (RR 2.15, 95% CI (0.20, 22.82)). Subgroup analysis showed that unweighted feeding tubes (RR 1.47, 95% CI (1.03, 2.11)) could significantly increase the success rate. Country of study, intravenous route of erythromycin, and year of participant enrollment did not influence these results. Conclusions. Erythromycin significantly increases the success rate of postpyloric feeding tube placement. This suggests that erythromycin can be used as an auxiliary method to improve the success rate of bedside insertion.

scholarly journals Intravenous Metoclopramide to Improve the Success Rate of Blind Bedside Post-pyloric Placement of Feeding Tube in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirima Ketsuwan ◽  
Pornthep Tanpowpong ◽  
Nichanan Ruangwattanapaisarn ◽  
Supatra Phaopant ◽  
Nattanicha Suppalarkbunlue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement

Objective: Impaired gastric emptying is a common cause of delayed feeding in critically ill children. Post-pyloric feeding may help improve feeding intolerance and nutritional status and, hence, contribute to a better outcome. However, post-pyloric feeding tube insertion is usually delayed due to a technical difficulty. Therefore, prokinetic agents have been used to facilitate blind bedside post-pyloric feeding tube insertion. Metoclopramide is a potent prokinetic agent that has also been used to improve motility in adults and children admitted to intensive care units. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of intravenous metoclopramide in promoting the success rate of blind bedside post-pyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill children.Design: The design of this study is randomized, double blind, placebo controlled.Setting: The setting of the study is a single-center pediatric intensive care unit.Patients: Children aged 1 month−18 years admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with severe illness or feeding intolerance were enrolled in this study.Intervention: Patients were randomly selected to receive intravenous metoclopramide or 0.9% normal saline solution (the placebo) prior to the tube insertion. The study outcome was the success rate of post-pyloric feeding tube placement confirmed by an abdominal radiography 6–8 h after the insertion.Measurements and Main Results: We found that patients receiving metoclopramide had a higher success rate (37/42, 88%) of post-pyloric feeding tube placement than the placebo (28/40, 70%) (p = 0.04). Patients who received sedative drug or narcotic agent showed a tendency of higher success rate (p = 0.08).Conclusion: Intravenous metoclopramide improves the success rate of blind bedside post-pyloric placement of feeding tube in critically ill children.Trial Registration: Thai Clinical Trial Registry TCTR20190821002. Registered 15th August 2019.

Rapid Placement of Transpyloric Feeding Tubes: A Comparison of pH-assisted and Standard Insertion Techniques in Children

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-248
Author(s):  
Brian Krafte-Jacobs ◽  
Melody Persinger ◽  
Jeannean Carver ◽  
Lori Moore ◽  
Richard Brilli
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Caloric Intake ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Cost Comparison ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement ◽  
Placement Technique

Objective. To compare transpyloric feeding tube placement using a pH-assisted placement technique versus a standard placement technique in pediatric patients requiring enteral nutrition. Methods. Critically ill children younger than 4 years were prospectively and randomly assigned to either a pH-assisted or a standard feeding tube placement group. Identical pH-assisted feeding tubes were used in both groups; however, feeding tubes in the standard group were not attached to a portable pH meter. Successful transpyloric placement was confirmed by radiography before beginning feedings. If placement was not successful, a second placement attempt was made after metoclopramide administration. Information regarding tube placement success, number of radiographs, time to initiaction of feedings, and daily caloric intake was collected. A cost comparison between the two groups was performed. Results. Thirty-four patients were enrolled in the pH-assisted group, and 34 were enrolled in the standard feeding tube group. Ninety-seven percent of patients in the pH-assisted group had successful placement after the first attempt, compared with 53% of patients in the standard group. The average time to successful placement of pH-assisted feeding tubes was 6 minutes. All patients in the pH-assisted group had successful placement after the second attempt, compared with 78% of patients in the standard group. A pH of greater than 5.6 accurately predicted transpyloric placement in 97% (33 of 34) of individuals in the pH-assisted group. Children in the pH-assisted group required significantly fewer radiographs than those in the standard group. Hospital costs were $114 per patient in the pH-assisted group and $135 per patient in the standard group. Conclusions. Our findings indicate that bedside transpyloric placement of pH-assisted feeding tubes can be accomplished rapidly and with a high success rate. This method is associated with decreased radiation exposure and economic savings when compared with a standard placement technique.

scholarly journals A Novel Technique for Post-pyloric Feeding Tube Placement in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Young ◽  
M. J. Chapman ◽  
R. Fraser ◽  
R. Vozzo ◽  
D. P. Chorley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Insertion Time ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement

Delivery of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients is often hampered by gastric stasis necessitating direct feeding into the small intestine. Current techniques for placement of post-pyloric feeding catheters are complex, time consuming or both, and improvements in feeding tube placement techniques are required. The Cathlocator™ is a novel device that permits real time localisation of the end of feeding tubes via detection of a magnetic field generated by a small electric current in a coil incorporated in the tip of the tube. We performed a pilot study evaluating the feasibility of the Cathlocator™ system to guide and evaluate the placement of (1) nasoduodenal feeding tubes, and (2) nasogastric drainage tubes in critically ill patients with feed intolerance due to slow gastric emptying. A prospective study of eight critically ill patients was undertaken in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. The Cathlocator™ was used to (1) guide the positioning of the tubes post-pylorically and (2) determine whether nasogastric and nasoduodenal tubes were placed correctly. Tube tip position was compared with data obtained by radiology. Data are expressed as median (range). Duodenal tube placement was successful in 7 of 8 patients (insertion time 12.6 min (5.3–34.4)). All nasogastric tube placements were successful (insertion time 3.4 min (0.6–10.0)). The Cathlocator™ accurately determined the position of both tubes without complication in all cases. The Cathlocator™ allows placement and location of an enteral feeding tube in real time in critically ill patients with slow gastric emptying. These findings warrant further studies into the application of this technique for placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes.

scholarly journals Jejunostomy Feeding Tube Placement in Gastrectomy Procedures: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 52-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Bazzi ◽  
John Lahoud ◽  
Charbel Sandroussi ◽  
Jerome Martin Laurence ◽  
Sharon Carey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement ◽  
Jejunostomy Feeding

Cortrak-Assisted Feeding Tube Insertion: A Comprehensive Review of Adverse Events in the MAUDE Database

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette M. Bourgault ◽  
Lillian Aguirre ◽  
Joseph Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Electromagnetic Devices ◽  
User Expertise ◽  
User Facility ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement

Background Electromagnetic devices to guide feeding tube placement such as the CORTRAK Enteral Access System have shown promising results; however, researchers in recent studies have expressed concern that a higher level of user expertise may be required for safe use. Objectives To review adverse events related to CORTRAK-assisted feeding tube insertion reported in the Food and Drug Administration’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Methods A retrospective, secondary analysis of the MAUDE database was performed to evaluate adverse events (ie, injury or death of patient) related to CORTRAK. Results Fifty-four adverse events between January 1, 2006 and February 29, 2016 were identified and reviewed. Most events (98%) involved feeding tube placement in the lungs (37%, left lung; 46%, right lung; 15%, not specified). Lung complications included pneumothorax (77%) and pneumonitis (21%). Death occurred in 17% of lung placements. Clinicians failed to recognize placement in 89% of CORTRAK insertion tracings reviewed. Conclusions Lung placement is not unique to CORTRAK and is an inherent risk of all feeding tube insertions. In known or suspected lung placement, feeding tubes should be removed and radiography performed to assess for pneumothorax. Clinicians must observe closely for lung placement and discriminate lung from gastric placement on insertion tracings. Clinicians require specialized training and experience to develop competency in using the CORTRAK device, although the exact amount of experience needed is unknown.

scholarly journals Esophagojejunostomy Feeding Tube Placement in 5 Dogs with Pancreatitis and Anorexia

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forrest Cummings ◽  
Catherine A. Daley
Keyword(s):  
Veterinary Medicine ◽  
Enteral Feeding ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Loose Stool ◽  
Neurologic Diseases ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Patient Discomfort ◽  
Enteral Feeding Tube ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement

Enteral feeding tube placement has been described in veterinary medicine for several years. Indications include oral, esophageal, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, hepatic, and neurologic diseases. In this paper, endoscopically assisted placement of an esophagojejunostomy (EJ) feeding tube in dogs with pancreatitis and prolonged anorexia is described. To the author’s knowledge there are no published reports of this procedure. Esophagojejunostomy feeding tubes provide an alternative to other forms of postgastric feeding tube placement (e.g., nasojejunal, gastrojejunostomy, and jejunostomy tubes) without the associated complications of patient discomfort, sneezing, epistaxis, and peritonitis. Tube occlusion, transient vomiting and loose stool were the most commonly reported complications.

scholarly journals Methods Used by Critical Care Nurses to Verify Feeding Tube Placement in Clinical Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette M. Bourgault ◽  
Janie Heath ◽  
Vallire Hooper ◽  
Mary Lou Sole ◽  
Elizabeth G. Nesmith
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
American Association ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Verification Methods ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement

BACKGROUNDThe American Association of Critical-Care Nurses practice alert on verification of feeding tube placement makes evidence-based practice recommendations to guide nursing management of adult patients with blindly inserted feeding tubes. Many bedside verification methods do not allow detection of improper positioning of a feeding tube within the gastrointestinal tract, thereby increasing aspiration risk.OBJECTIVESTo determine how the expected practices from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses practice alert were implemented by critical care nurses.METHODSThis study was part of a larger national, online survey that was completed by 370 critical care nurses. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.RESULTSSeventy-eight percent of nurses used a variety of methods to verify initial placement of feeding tubes, although 14% were unaware that tube position should be confirmed every 4 hours. Despite the inaccuracy of auscultation methods, only 12% of nurses avoided this practice all of the time.CONCLUSIONSImplementation of expected clinical practices from this guideline varied. Nurses are encouraged to implement expected practices from this evidence-based, peer reviewed practice alert to minimize risk for patient harm.

Verifying Placement of Small-Bore Feeding Tubes: Electromagnetic Device Images Versus Abdominal Radiographs

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Bryant ◽  
Jean Phang ◽  
Kevin Abrams
Keyword(s):  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Electromagnetic System ◽  
Lower Quadrant ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Left Lower Quadrant ◽  
Electromagnetic Device ◽  
Abdominal Radiographs ◽  
Feeding Tube Placement ◽  
Optimal Site

Background Clinicians are unsure if radiography is needed to confirm correct positioning of feeding tubes inserted with assistance from an electromagnetic system. Objectives To compare radiographic reports of feeding tube placement with images generated by an electromagnetic feeding tube placement device. Methods The medical records of 200 consecutive patients who had feeding tubes inserted with assistance from an electromagnetic feeding tube placement device were reviewed retrospectively. Radiographic reports of tube site were compared with images generated by the device. Results Radiographic evidence of tube sites was available in 188 cases: 184 tubes were located in portions of the gastrointestinal tract. Ninety of the 188 tubes were situated in the optimal site (distal duodenum or jejunum) radiographically. Images generated by the electromagnetic device were available in 176 cases; of these, 52 tubes appeared to end in the expected left lower quadrant. Tubes shown on radiographs to be in other sites also occasionally appeared to end in the left lower quadrant. Nurses using the device did not recognize 4 of the 188 tubes (2.1%) that were inadvertently placed in the lung. No consistent pattern of quadrant distribution was found for tubes positioned in the stomach or proximal duodenum. Conclusions Images generated by the electromagnetic tube placement device provided inconsistent results regarding tube location. A small percentage of seriously malpositioned tubes were not detected by using the electromagnetic device. These findings do not support eliminating radiographs to confirm correct tube placement following use of an electromagnetic tube placement device.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document