scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Nonerosive Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Xiao ◽  
Yunfeng Yang ◽  
Yuanrong Zhu ◽  
Yan Qin ◽  
Yifan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Western Medicine ◽  
Total Effective Rate ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Nonerosive Reflux Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Objectives. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapy for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM regimens in NERD treatment. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCM treatment for NERD through September 31, 2017, were systematically identified in PubMed, Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP, CBM, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment was performed by employing the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. Results. A total of 725 and 719 patients in 14 RCTs were randomly divided into TCM alone and conventional Western medicine groups, respectively. The clinical total effective rate of the TCM group was markedly higher than that of the single proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or Prokinetics therapy group (RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.07–1.31, and P = 0.0008), while it was comparable to that of the combination of PPIs and Prokinetics therapy group (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.00–1.29, and P = 0.05). Compared with Western medicine group, the TCM group showed improved symptom relief through a reduced RDQ score (SMD = −0.91; 95% CI = −1.68–−0.15; and P = 0.02). Additionally, TCM clearly decreased the recurrence rate (RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.28–0.52, and P < 0.00001). Adverse events, such as constipation, sickness, fever, abdominal distension, and stomach noise, were slight for both the TCM and Western medicine groups and disappeared after the easement of pharmacological intervention; in particular, TCM possessed fewer side effects. Conclusion. Compared with PPIs or Prokinetics therapy alone, TCM single therapy can better improve the clinical total effective rate and symptom relief and decrease the recurrence rate and adverse events in the treatment of NERD. Our results suggest that TCM will be a promising alternative therapy for NERD patients in the future.

scholarly journals Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Shensong Yangxin Capsule-Amiodarone Combination on Heart Failure Complicated by Ventricular Arrhythmia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinfu Cao ◽  
Mingxue Zhou ◽  
Hongxu Liu ◽  
Xiufen Chen ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmia ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Total Effective Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background: Shensong Yangxin capsule (SSYX) is a well-known traditional Chinese patent medicine for treating arrhythmia. Recently, a flurry of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SSYX combined with amiodarone (SSYX-amiodarone) was reported in the treatment of heart failure (HF) complicated by ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in China. However, these RCTs have not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SSYX-amiodarone in the treatment of heart failure complicated by ventricular arrhythmia (HF-VA).Methods: Seven electronic literature databases (the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China Biomedical database web, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Databases, Chinese Scientific Journal database and Wanfang database) were searched from their inceptions to June 1, 2020 to identify RCTs of SSYX-amiodarone in the treatment of HF-VA. The primary outcomes included the total effective rate and adverse events (ADRs). The secondary outcomes included the frequency of ventricular premature complexes, left ventricular ejection fraction, N terminal pro Btype natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and QT dispersion (QTd). The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. All data was analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. The registration number of this protocol is PROSPERO CRD42020196689.Results: There are Eighteen trials involving 1,697 patients were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed that SSYX-amiodarone group was superior to the amiodarone group in improving the total effective rate [RR = 1.21; 95%CI (1.16, 1.27); p &lt; 0.01], meanwhile reducing the ADRs [RR = 0.65; 95%CI (0.45, 0.95); p = 0.03], VPCs [MD = 170.96; 95%CI (159.88, 182.04); p &lt; 0.01] and QTd [MD = 8.39; 95%CI (6.91, 9.87); p &lt; 0.01]. No significant difference of enhancing LVEF [MD = 4.32; 95%CI (−0.56, 9.20); p = 0.08] and reducing NT-proBNP [SMD = 0.17; 95%CI (−0.81, 1.14); p = 0.73] was observed between SSYX-amiodarone and amiodarone group.Conclusions: Despite the apparent positive findings reported, the evidence provided by this meta-analysis was still insufficient to support the routine use of SSYX-amiodarone for HF-VA due to the poor methodological quality of included studies. The overall effect should to be verified in further through more well-design clinical studies with reasonable sample and good methodological quality.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Lianhua Qingwen) for Coronavirus Disease 2019: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
YongHong He ◽  
Li Qiang ◽  
SongPing Wang ◽  
Jun Deng ◽  
Lan Huan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Western Medicine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Disappearance Rate ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cardinal Symptom

Abstract Background: The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) had become an epidemic and spread across the world, lead to severe respiratory failure and death. Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Such as Lianhua Qingwen has been widely used in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19, This systematic review and meta-analysis will assess the effects of traditional Chinese herbal medicine(Lianhua Qingwen) in COVID-19 pneumonia from the randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and case control studies(CCSs).Method: we search the literatures in databases inculding PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), setting the date from December 1, 2019, to June 1, 2021, Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials. All analyses were conducted by Stata 14.0.Results: nine studies with 1163 patients(616males) were included, six were RCTs, three are CCSs. Compared with patients treated by western medicine alone, patients treated by Lianhua Qingwen combined with western medicine have a higher overall effective rate[RR=1.20, 95%CI1.20(1.11, 1.31), P=0.000], cardinal symptom disappearance rate[disappearance rate of fever: OR:3.64, 95%CI(1.57, 8.47), P=0.001;disappearance rate of cough: OR:1.97, 95%CI(1.45, 2.68), P=0.001; disappearance rate of fatigue: OR:2.55, 95%CI(1.09, 5.99), P=0.032] and CT recovery rate[RR:1.25, 95%CI(1.13,1.38), P=0.000], reduce the rate of the progress into severe diseases of COVID-19 patients[RR:0.43, 95%CI(0.30, 0.62), P=0.000], with more shorter duration of fever[WMD=-1.07，95%CI(-1.77, -0.37), P=0.003], The including studies described that Lianhua Qingwen did not increase the adverse drug reactions.Conclusion: Lianhua Qingwen may have advantages in improving the clinical effective rate and cardinal symptom disappearance rate. Besides, it also had an excellent effect on the improvement of the chest CT and the proportion reducing of progress into severe clinical disease, which could be used as an effective therapy for COVID-19.

Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of epilepsy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongrong Chen ◽  
Chenxi Feng ◽  
Keer Wang ◽  
Huawei Zhao ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Licorice Root ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Treatment Of Epilepsy

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the treatment of epilepsy. Methods: A comprehensive search of database in both Chinese and English was performed. Data from the selected studies was extracted and analyzed independently by two authors. Results: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1773 patients. Among them, three trials (n=166) focused on TCM monotherapy, while the other 19 trials (n=1607) assessed the benefit of TCM add-on therapy to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). For the efficacy, meta-analysis found (1) TCM monotherapy had a higher effective rate compared with AEDs (OR=6.007, 95%CI: 2.570-14.037, Z=6.007, P<0.001); (2) the add-on of TCM increased the effective rate (OR=3.123, 95%CI: 2.356, 4.140), Z=7.916, P<0.001). In terms of safety, the add-on of TCM reduced the rate of total AEs (OR = 0.407, 95%CI: 0.274-0.605, P <0.0001) as well as AEs regarding the gastrointestinal and nervous system. Nineteen different TCM prescription was used in these RTCs. Among them, the five most frequently used herbs were Acorus tatarinowii (14 out of 19), Wolfiporia Cocos (10 out of 19), Pinellia Ternata (9 out of 19), Licorice Root (9 out of 19) and Rhizoma Gastrodiae (8 out of 19). Conclusion: TCM is an efficacy and safety strategy for the mono- or add-on treatment of epilepsy. However, as the small sample size, the diversified composition of TCM prescriptions, and the low quality of study design, further studies remain needed.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Treatment of Crohn’s Disease with Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yue Wang ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
An-Sheng Zha
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Total Effective Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Score ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Maintenance Rate ◽  
Remission Maintenance

The objective of the meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD). Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature, Wanfang Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched (through October 2018). The quality of randomized clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria was assessed and the data were extracted according to the Cochrane Review Handbook v5.0 by two evaluators. A meta-analysis was performed using the software Stata 12.0. Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. The studies were of low methodological quality. The meta-analysis indicated that treatment with TCM and Western Medicine (WM) was significantly superior compared to treatment with WM alone with regard to total effective rate, remission maintenance rate, reduction of C-reactive protein (CRP), reduction of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), clinical score reduction, and reduction of adverse events. Mucosal healing was improved in both the TCM-WM and WM groups; however, there were no significant differences between the two groups. There was a certain publication bias in the studies with regard to efficiency, adverse reactions, mucosal healing, and recurrence rate; however, there was no obvious publication bias with regard to other indicators. TCM, as an adjuvant therapy with WM, shows advantages in inducing remission in CD. The current evidence suggests that TCM-WM treatment might be more efficient in terms of total effective rate, remission maintenance rate, CRP reduction, ESR reduction, clinical score reduction, and reduction of adverse events than treatment with WM alone. Because of the low quality of the included RCTs, high quality confirmatory evidence is needed to assess the clinical value of TCM in the treatment of CD.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Acupoint Catgut Embedding for Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jing Wu ◽  
Qinwei Fu ◽  
Shasha Yang ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Yaofeng Li
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Western Medicine ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Irritable Bowel ◽  
Meta Analyses

In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupoint catgut embedding for the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. We searched seven online databases to collect studies published up to Feb 29th, 2020. Study quality of each included article was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were conducted based on the Cochrane systematic review method by using RevMan 5.3 software. Among the included trials, acupoint catgut embedding alone or plus oral western medicine or plus other acupoint-based therapies, or plus oral traditional Chinese medicine were the main therapies in the experimental groups. Interventions in control groups mainly include oral western medicine alone, other acupoint-based therapies alone, or other acupoint-based therapies alone. Primary outcomes in this study include recovery rate, accumulative marked effective rate, accumulative effective rate, and recurrence rate. Finally, 30 trials involving 1889 participants were included. The results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses show that acupoint catgut embedding alone or plus oral western medicine or plus other acupoint-based therapy or plus oral traditional Chinese medicine was significantly better compared with using oral western medicine alone in terms of efficacy for IBS-C and IBS-D. In addition, acupoint catgut embedding alone or plus oral western medicine or plus other acupoint-based therapy or plus oral traditional Chinese medicine could improve the effective rate and decrease the recurrence rate for IBS-D compared with using oral western medicine, other acupoint-based therapies, or oral traditional Chinese medicine alone. Adverse events of acupoint catgut embedding include local induration, redness, swelling, and itchiness, but they were all mild and disappeared swiftly with ordinary local interventions. There is an urgent need for RCTs of high quality and large sample size and with longer treatment duration and follow-up periods of acupoint catgut embedding for IBS.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Shengmai Injection for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yanping Wang ◽  
Xu Zhou ◽  
Xiaofan Chen ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Weifeng Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Western Medicine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Shengmai Injection ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. Shengmai injection (SMI) is made from purified ginseng, Radix Ophiopogonis, and Schisandra chinensis. It has cardiotonic effects and is clinically used for the adjuvant treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). However, its efficacy and safety are uncertain. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the existing efficacy and safety evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied SMI for the treatment of CHF. Methods. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched up to September 10, 2019. RCTs that compared basic Western medicine treatment with SMI + basic Western medicine were included. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the RCTs. The meta-analysis used the random effects model; the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined using the inverse variance method, and the Mantel–Haenszel method was used to combine the relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and Q tests, and the source of heterogeneity was explored by analyzing three preset subgroup hypotheses. Results. A total of 20 RCTs were included (n = 1562), with a moderate-to-high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with Western medicine alone, SMI adjuvant therapy significantly improved cardiac function indicators, including left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 6.8%, 95% CI 4.68 to 8.91), stroke volume (MD 9.81 ml, 95% CI 5.67 to 13.96), cardiac output (MD 0.96 L/min, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.25), and cardiac index (MD 0.53 L/min, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.70); heterogeneity was generally high among these outcomes. Compared with the controls, patients receiving SMI adjuvant therapy also had a higher response to treatment (RR 2.89, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.99; I2 = 0%), a greater decrease in brain natriuretic peptide levels (MD −284.66 ng/l, 95% CI −353.73 to −215.59, I2 = 0%), and a greater increase in six‐minute walk test performance (MD 70.67 m, 95% CI 22.92 to 118.42; I2 = 84%). Nine studies reported mild adverse events, such as gastrointestinal reactions, and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion. Currently, available evidence indicates that SMI, as an adjuvant for basic Western medicine treatment, can improve the cardiac function of patients with CHF with good safety outcomes. Because of the high risk of bias among the included RCTs and the large heterogeneity of partial outcomes, the findings of this study must be verified by high-quality studies with large sample sizes.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Banxia Formulae for Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Yan-Hua Lin ◽  
Cong Chen ◽  
Xiu Zhao ◽  
Yi-Fei Mao ◽  
Guang-Xin Xiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Bias Risk

Objective. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Banxia (Pinellia Tuber) formulae in the treatment of insomnia compared with those of conventional western medicines. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of Banxia formulae in the treatment of insomnia were searched from the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Wanfang database. The literature collected was from the time when the databases were established to April 2020. Quality assessment and meta-analysis were conducted by using Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and RevMan 5.2, respectively. Publication bias was assessed by Egger’s test. Results. Fourteen RCTs with 910 participants were identified. A total of 46 traditional Chinese medicines involving 2 different dosage forms were used in the included studies. Meta-analysis indicated that Banxia formulae had more significant effects on improving the total effective rate (RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.31), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, MD = −1.05, 95% CI −1.63 to −0.47), and the TCM syndrome score (SMD = −0.78, 95% CI −1.18 to −0.39). Meanwhile, on reducing adverse events, Banxia formulae also showed an advantage (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.93). Conclusion. According to the current studies, the efficacy of Banxia formulae in the treatment of insomnia is better than that of the conventional western medicines, and its safety is relatively stable. However, due to the limitations of this study, further research and evaluation are needed.

Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in Pediatric Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bohai Feng ◽  
Jueting Wu ◽  
Bobei Chen ◽  
Haijie Xiang ◽  
Ruru Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Symptom Scores

Background Allergic rhinitis (AR) has become a global health problem that constantly affects a large part of the general population, especially children. Objective Sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) has been used extensively for pediatric AR, although its efficacy and safety are often questioned. In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT), we evaluated the use of SLIT for pediatric AR. Methods A number of medical literature data bases were searched through January 2016 to identify RCTs that examined the use of SLIT for pediatric AR and that assessed clinical outcomes related to efficacy. Descriptive and quantitative information was abstracted. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated by using fixed- and random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed. Heterogeneity was assessed by using the I2 metric. A network meta-analysis was used to estimate SMDs between two SLIT protocols for pediatric seasonal AR. All data were extracted from publications or received from the authors. Results Twenty-six studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis of rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores, and 19 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis of medication scores. Descriptive and quantitative data were extracted. SLIT differed significantly from placebo in terms of symptom scores (SMD -0.55 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.86 to -0.25]; p = 0.0003, I2 = 90%) and medication scores (SMD -0.67 [95% CI, -0.96 to -0.38J; p < 0.00001, I2 = 83%). Oral pruritus was the adverse effect, which occurred most commonly in children who were receiving SLIT. Network meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between the pre-coseasonal and continuous SLIT protocols for seasonal AR in symptom scores (SMD -6.55 [95% CI, -25.38 to 12.29]; p = 0.496) and medication scores (SMD -8.83 [95% CI, -22.10 to 4.43]; p = 0.192). Conclusions Our meta-analysis results indicated that SLIT provided significant symptom relief and reduced the need for medication in pediatric patients Moreover, the safety of SLIT needs to be confirmed in RCTs with larger samples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document