scholarly journals Mesh Inguinal Hernia Repair and Appendectomy in the Treatment of Amyand’s Hernia with Non-Inflamed Appendices

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emin Kose ◽  
Abdullah Sisik ◽  
Mustafa Hasbahceci

Amyand’s hernia is defined as protrusion of the vermiform appendix in an inguinal hernia sac. It is a rare entity with variable clinical presentation from normal vermiform appendix to abscess formation due to perforation of acute appendicitis. Although surgical treatment includes appendectomy and hernia repair, appendectomy in the absence of an inflamed appendix and use of a mesh in cases of appendectomy remain to be controversial. The aim of this study was to review the experience of mesh inguinal hernia repair plus appendectomy performed for Amyand’s hernia with noninflamed appendices. There were five male patients with a mean age of 42.4 ± 16.1 years in this retrospective study in which Amyand’s hernia was treated with mesh inguinal hernia repair plus appendectomy for noninflamed appendices. Patients with acute appendicitis and perforated vermiform appendix were excluded. There were four right sided and one bilateral inguinal hernia. Postoperative courses were uneventful. During the follow-up period (14.0 ± 7.7 months), there was no inguinal hernia recurrence. Mesh inguinal hernia repair with appendectomy can be performed for Amyand’s hernia in the absence of acute appendicitis. However, presence of fibrous connections between the vermiform appendix and the surrounding hernia sac may be regarded as a parameter to perform appendectomy.

Author(s):  
Sabriye Dayı

INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric surgery. In parallel with the advances in the field of medicine, various laparoscopic techniques have been developed in inguinal hernia repair. The Burnia technique is one of the latest published techniques and it is the cauterization of the inguinal hernia sac laparoscopically without using sutures in girls. The aim of this study is the investigation of the use of Burnia technique in clinical practice, and its postoperative outcomes. Any article concerning the use of this technique in Turkey has not been encountered. METHODS: The demographic features of patients, preoperative, peroperative, postoperative and follow-up results of 41 patients who had been operated with Burnia technique by a single surgeon within 2 years were reviewed retrospectively. Laparoscopically, the camera was first placed at an inclination of 30 degrees to the umbilical region using Hasson technique, and then, a single port was used for cauterization of the hernia sac. The Hernia sac was pulled into the abdominal cavity and cauterized. RESULTS: Burnia technique was applied to 62 inguinal hernia sacs in 41 girls. Their ages ranged from 1.5 to 16 years (median 36 months) with body weights ranging between 3.5 kg-40 kg (median 12 kg). Preoperatively 15 patients had right (37%), 19 patients left (46%), 7 patients bilateral inguinal hernias (17%). During surgery, 14 of the unilateral inguinal hernias were found to have a hernia sac on the contralateral side, and the rate of bilateral hernia increased to 51 percent. In one patient ovary was in the inguinal canal, and after its reduction, we proceeded with the operation Unexpectedly. in one patient, right ovarian torsion was detected which was detorsioned, and hernia surgery was performed in the same session. The duration of the operation was 5-35 min (median 15 min) for unilateral and 8-45 min (median 20 minutes) for bilateral hernias. None of these patients developed peroperative and postoperative complications. Follow-up time was minimum 10 months, and maximum 3 years. Recurrence was not detected. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Burnia technique seems to be effective and safe. The contralateral side and other intra-abdominal pathologies are explored. The cosmetic appearance is its another advantage. The operation time is very short due to the fact that only the hernia sac is cauterized. Comparison of this technique with other laparoscopic techniques is planned in the future study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (189) ◽  
pp. 285-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashis Pun ◽  
Roshan Khatri

The eponym ‘Amyand hernia’ coined in recognition of Claudius Amyand, the first surgeon to successfully perform appendectomy in a hernia sac containing appendix, refers to the vermiform appendix within inguinal hernia. Here, we present a rare case, of Amyand’s hernia in an 18 month-old boy who was brought with an inguino-scortal swelling which later on exploration was left sided Amyand’s hernia with sliding component. Amyand’s hernia is not very often seen in the clinical practice and its pre-operative diagnosis is very difficult hence awareness of this disease condition is essential for preoperative suspicion and even diagnosis of the condition. Keywords: Amyand’s hernia; acute appendicitis; hernial repair.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 2748
Author(s):  
Vijeth Rai ◽  
Ranadheer Raju Cholaraju Siva ◽  
Gagan Deep

Right sided inguinal hernia containing vermiform appendix in its sac is called as amyand’s hernia. It accounts for ∼1% of all inguinal hernias. It is an intra operative finding during an inguinal hernia repair. A 64 years old male patient came with complains of swelling in the right inguinal region, associated with pain and vomiting. On examination of the right inguinal region there was a tender irreducible swelling palpable. Based on the characteristic finding it was diagnosed clinically as right sided irreducible obstructed inguinal hernia. Ultrasound abdomen was done which was suggestive of right inguinal hernia with herniation of bowel and omentum with features of strangulated/ obstructed hernia. Patient was taken up for right inguinal hernia repair and appendix was noted in the hernial sac intra-operatively. Although occurrence of amyand’s hernia is rare. The attendant surgeon should be vigilant about the presence of it. Preoperative diagnosis of amyand’s hernia is not common because in majority of cases objective of imaging is to exclude conditions that predispose to inguinal hernia formation. The Losanoff and Basson’s criterion is used as a guide for deciding whether to perform appendectomy and type of repair, depend on the clinical scenario.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam O’Connor ◽  
Peter Asaad

Abstract De Garengeot hernia is a rare subtype of femoral hernia whereby the vermiform appendix is located within the hernial sac. Even rarer is the presence of appendicitis within the hernia sac. De Garengeot’s hernia is difficult to diagnose pre-operatively and can prove technically difficult at operation particularly with regards to mobilization of the caecum and appendix in order to perform appendicectomy. Laparoscopic, open, with and without mesh repair of de Garengeot hernia have all been described in the literature with varying degrees of success. We present a case of an 82 year old lady presenting with an acutely painful right sided groin lump. CT scan revealed the presence of de Garengeot hernia with acute appendicitis. We describe in text and photo format our approach to the hernia repair, appendicectomy and provide a short review of the literature with regards to the different operative approaches to such a patient.


2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malek Tabbara ◽  
Laurent Genser ◽  
Manuela Bossi ◽  
Maxime Barat ◽  
Claude Polliand ◽  
...  

To review our experience and outcomes after inguinal hernia repair using the lightweight self-adhering sutureless mesh “Adhesix™” and demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this mesh. This is a 3-year retrospective study that included 143 consecutive patients who underwent 149 inguinal hernia repairs at our department of surgery. All hernias were repaired using a modified Lichtenstein technique. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Incidence of chronic pain, postoperative complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction were assessed three years postoperatively by conducting a telephone survey. We had 143 patients with a mean age of 58 years (17–84), who underwent 149 hernia repairs using the Adhesix™ mesh. Ninety-two per cent (131 patients) were males. Only 10 patients (7%) had a postoperative pain for more than three years. In our series, neither age nor gender was predictive of postoperative pain. Only one patient had a hematoma lasting for more than one month and only four patients (2.8%) had a recurrence of their hernia within three years of their initial surgery. Ninety per cent of the patient expressed their satisfaction when surveyed three years after their surgery. In conclusion, the use of the self-adhering sutureless mesh for inguinal hernia repair has been proving itself as effective as the traditional mesh. Adhesix™ is associated with low chronic pain rate, recurrence rate, and postoperative complications rate, and can be safely adopted as the sole technique for inguinal hernia repair.


1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1185-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Koulack ◽  
P. Fitzgerald ◽  
D.A. Gillis ◽  
M. Giacomantonio

2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (7) ◽  
pp. 533-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Vos ◽  
Maarten P. Simons ◽  
Jan S. K. Luitse ◽  
Dick van Geldere ◽  
Mark J. W. Koelemaij ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem Bökkerink ◽  
Giel Koning ◽  
Patrick Vriens ◽  
Roland Mollen ◽  
Willem Akkersdijk ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The preperitoneal mesh position for inguinal hernia repair showed beneficial results regarding Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain (CPIP) with low recurrence rates. Two open preperitoneal techniques, the TransREctus Sheath PrePeritoneal (TREPP) and the TransInguinal PrePeritoneal (TIPP) technique, were compared in a randomized clinical trial with the hypothesis of less patients with CPIP after TREPP due to complete avoidance of nerve contact. Materials and Methods Adult patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to either TREPP or TIPP in four hospitals. Prior to the trial’s start the study protocol was ethically approved and published. Outcomes included CPIP after 1 year (primary outcome) and recurrence rates, adverse events and Health related Quality of Life (secondary outcomes). Follow-up was performed at 2 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Pain was less often present after TREPP at 2 weeks and 6 months, but the CPIP at rest at 1 year was comparable 1.9% after TREPP vs 1.4% after TIPP, p = 0.535). The overall recurrence rate was higher in the TREPP group, 8.9% vs 4.6%, p = 0.022). Corrected for a learning curve for TREPP, no significant difference could be assessed (TREPP 5.7% and TIPP 4.8%, p = 0.591). Conclusions both the TREPP and TIPP technique resulted in a low incidence of CPIP after 1 year follow-up. The TREPP method can be considered a solid method for inguinal hernia repair if expertise is present. The learning curve of the TREPP techniques needs further evaluation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3292-3297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baukje van den Heuvel ◽  
J. A. van Jarwaarde ◽  
P. Wichers ◽  
E. S. M. de Lange de Klerk ◽  
H. J. Bonjer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document