scholarly journals Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Translation, and Validation of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score for Extremity Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Patients in Netherlands

Sarcoma ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie J. Willeumier ◽  
C. W. P. G. van der Wal ◽  
Robert J. P. van der Wal ◽  
P. D. S. Dijkstra ◽  
Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Toronto Extremity Salvage Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Extremity Salvage

Purpose. The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) to Dutch and to validate the translated version. Methods. The TESS lower and upper extremity versions (LE and UE) were translated to Dutch according to international guidelines. The translated version was validated in 98 patients with surgically treated bone or soft tissue tumors of the LE or UE. To assess test-retest reliability, participants were asked to fill in a second questionnaire after one week. Construct validity was determined by computing Spearman rank correlations with the Short Form- (SF-) 36. Results. The internal consistency (0.957 and 0.938 for LE and UE, resp.) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.963 and 0.969 for LE and UE, resp.) were good for both questionnaires. The Dutch LE and UE TESS versions correlated most strongly with the SF-36 physical function dimension (r=0.737 for LE, 0.726 for UE) and the physical component summary score (r=0.811 and 0.797 for LE and UE). Interpretation. The Dutch TESS questionnaire for lower and upper extremities is a consistent, reliable, and valid instrument to measure patient-reported physical function in surgically treated patients with a soft tissue or bone tumor.

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the Kujala Score for Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712092294
Author(s):  
Edi Mustamsir ◽  
Krisna Yuarno Phatama ◽  
Arimurti Pratianto ◽  
Ananto Satya Pradana ◽  
William Putera Sukmajaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome ◽  
Patellofemoral Pain ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Kujala Score ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: The Kujala score is a useful diagnostic tool to evaluate patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). However, no validated Indonesian version of the Kujala score has been available. Purpose: To develop and validate an Indonesian version of the Kujala score. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study to develop an Indonesian version of the Kujala score by using a forward-backward translation protocol. The resulting questionnaire was given to 51 patients diagnosed with PFPS. The validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by correlating the final score with the Indonesian version of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Reliability was measured by evaluating the internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]). Results: The Indonesian version of the Kujala score had a positive correlation with the physical components of the SF-36. The internal consistency was fairly high (α = .74), and the test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC, 0.996). Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the Kujala score was proven to be a valid and reliable tool to diagnose PFPS. Future epidemiological studies could implement this score to find the prevalence of PFPS in Indonesia. Further, ensuing studies could explore the application of this scoring system in posttreatment and postoperative settings.

scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaption, translation and validation of the Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) for patients in German-speaking countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Trost ◽  
Christoph Hofer ◽  
Tanja Stamm ◽  
Reinhard Windhager ◽  
Gerhard M. Hobusch
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Physical Component Score ◽  
Limb Salvage Surgery ◽  
Cultural Adaption ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Toronto Extremity Salvage Score ◽  
Extremity Salvage

Summary Objective The preferred treatment for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors is limb salvage surgery; the Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) is commonly used to measure physical functioning of the affected extremity. The aims of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the German version of the TESS, as well as to explore its convergent reliability, validity and re-test reliability. Study design Patients (n = 50) 32 lower extremity (LE) and 18 upper extremity (UE) were asked to fill out the German TESS two times (t1: clinical visit, t2: regular email) and the SF-36 once. Methods The TESS questionnaires were translated from English into German, back translated into English, and culturally adapted. The reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha (α). The validity was measured with the SF-36 physical component score and TESS using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r). Furthermore, the test-retest reliability was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Internal consistency for both questionnaires was excellent (LE t1: α = 0.924, t2: α = 0.952; UE t1: α = 0.957, t2: α = 0.898). A statistically significant correlation was found between the SF-36 physical component scale and the German TESS (LE r = 0.741, UE r = 0.713). The ICC between baseline (t1) and re-test (t2) was 0.952 and 0.871 for the lower and upper extremities, respectively. Conclusion Initial evidence demonstrated that the German TESS is a valid and reliable instrument for use with patients after surgical treatment of malignant bone or soft tissue sarcoma.

scholarly journals Validation of a menstrual pictogram and a daily bleeding diary for assessment of uterine fibroid treatment efficacy in clinical studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Haberland ◽  
Anna Filonenko ◽  
Christian Seitz ◽  
Matthias Börner ◽  
Christoph Gerlinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Uterine Fibroid ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Response Options ◽  
Patient Global Impression ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background To evaluate the psychometric and measurement properties of two patient-reported outcome instruments, the menstrual pictogram superabsorbent polymer-containing version 3 (MP SAP-c v3) and Uterine Fibroid Daily Bleeding Diary (UF-DBD). Test-retest reliability, criterion, construct validity, responsiveness, missingness and comparability of the MP SAP-c v3 and UF-DBD versus the alkaline hematin (AH) method and a patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) were analyzed in post hoc trial analyses. Results Analyses were based on data from up to 756 patients. The full range of MP SAP-c v3 and UF-DBD response options were used, with score distributions reflecting the cyclic character of the disease. Test-retest reliability of MP SAP-c v3 and UF-DBD scores was supported by acceptable intraclass correlation coefficients when stability was defined by the AH method and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) scores (0.80–0.96 and 0.42–0.94, respectively). MP SAP-c v3 and UF-DBD scores demonstrated strong and moderate-to-strong correlations with menstrual blood loss assessed by the AH method. Scores increased in monotonic fashion, with greater disease severities, defined by the AH method and PGI-S scores; differences between groups were mostly statistically significant (P < 0.05). MP SAP-c v3 and UF-DBD were sensitive to changes in disease severity, defined by the AH method and PGI-S. MP SAP-c v3 and UF-DBD showed a lower frequency of missing patient data versus the AH method, and good agreement with the AH method. Conclusions This evidence supports the use of the MP SAP-c v3 and UF-DBD to assess clinical efficacy endpoints in UF phase III studies replacing the AH method.

scholarly journals Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Spanish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS (KOOS-PF)

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Pablo Martinez-Cano ◽  
Daniel Vernaza-Obando ◽  
Julián Chica ◽  
Andrés Mauricio Castro
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Patellofemoral Pain ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Minimal Important Change ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to translate to Spanish the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS-PF) and validate this Spanish version of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patellofemoral pain. Results The KOOS-PF was translated to Spanish and sixty patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis accepted to complete the questionnaire. 1-week later 58 patients answered the questions again for the test–retest reliability validation and finally 55 patients completed 1-month later for the responsiveness assessment. The Spanish version showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.93) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.82). Responsiveness was confirmed, showing a strong correlation with the global rating of change (GROC) score (r 0.64). The minimal detectable change was 11.1 points, the minimal important change was 17.2 points, and there were no floor or ceiling effects for the score.

scholarly journals Test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF for the measurement of physical function in psoriatic arthritis

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210175
Author(s):  
Ying Ying Leung ◽  
William Tillett ◽  
Pil Hojgaard ◽  
Ana-Maria Orbai ◽  
Richard Holland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Reliability Performance ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objective Due to no existing data, we aimed to derive evidence to support test-retest reliability for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form-36 item physical functioning domain (SF-36 PF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods We identified datasets that collected relevant data for test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF; and evaluated them using OMERACT Filter 2.1 methodology. We calculated intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) as a measure of test-retest reliability. We then conducted a quality assessment and evaluated the adequacy of test-retest reliability performance. Results Two datasets were identified for HAQ-DI and one for SF-36 PF in PsA. The quality of the datasets was good. The ICCs for HAQ-DI were excellent in both datasets: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.97) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.97). The ICC of SF-36 PF was good (0.89, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.95). The performance of test-retest reliability for both instruments was judged to be adequate. Conclusion The new data derived support good and reasonable test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF in PsA.

scholarly journals Cross-cultural translation, adaptation and validation of a Japanese version of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (J-FIHOA)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Nakagawa ◽  
Shigeru Kurimoto ◽  
Emmanuel Maheu ◽  
Yuichiro Matsui ◽  
Yuri Kanno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Hand Osteoarthritis ◽  
Functional Index ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Stable Conditions ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: Hand osteoarthritis (OA) has a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and physical function is one of the core domains where patients suffer. The Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) is a leading assessment tool for hand OA-related functional impairment. Our objective was to make a Japanese version of FIHOA (J-FIHOA) and validate it among Japanese hand OA patients. Methods: Forward and backward translation processes were completed to create a culturally adapted J-FIHOA. A prospective, observational multicenter study was undertaken for the validation process. Seventeen collaborating hospitals recruited Japanese hand OA patients who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria. A medical record review and responses to the following patient-rated questionnaires were collected: J-FIHOA, Hand20, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), numerical rating scale for pain (NRS pain) and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). We explored the structure of J-FIHOA using factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and item-total correlations were calculated. Correlations between J-FIHOA and other questionnaires were evaluated for construct validity. Participants in clinically stable conditions repeated J-FIHOA at a one- to two-week interval to assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate responsiveness, symptomatic patients who started new pharmacological treatments had a 1-month follow-up visit and completed the questionnaires twice. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated with pre- and post-treatment data sets. We assessed responsiveness, comparing ES and SRM of J-FIHOA with other questionnaires (construct approach). Results: A total of 210 patients participated. J-FIHOA had unidimensional structure. Cronbach’s alphas (0.914 among females and 0.929 among males) and item-total correlations (range, 0.508 to 0.881) revealed high internal consistency. Hand20, which measures upper extremity disability, was strongly correlated with J-FIHOA (r=0.82) while the mental and role-social components of SF-36 showed no correlations (r=−0.24 and −0.26, respectively). Intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.83 and satisfactory. J-FIHOA showed the highest ES and SRM (−0.68 and −0.62, respectively) among all questionnaires, except for NRS pain. Conclusions: Our results showed J-FIHOA had good measurement properties to assess physical function in Japanese hand OA patients both for ambulatory follow-up in clinical practice, and clinical research and therapeutic trials.

scholarly journals SF-12 or SF-36 in pituitary disease? Toward concise and comprehensive patient-reported outcomes measurements

Endocrine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merel van der Meulen ◽  
Amir H. Zamanipoor Najafabadi ◽  
Daniel J. Lobatto ◽  
Cornelie D. Andela ◽  
Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Fair Agreement ◽  
Substantial Agreement ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pituitary Diseases ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mean Differences

Abstract Purpose Pituitary diseases severely affect patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The most frequently used generic HRQoL questionnaire is the Short Form-36 (SF-36). The shorter 12-item version (SF-12) can improve efficiency of patient monitoring. This study aimed to determine whether SF-12 can replace SF-36 in pituitary care. Methods In a longitudinal cohort study (August 2016 to December 2018) among 103 endoscopically operated adult pituitary tumor patients, physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) of SF-36 and SF-12 were measured preoperatively, and 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Chronic care was assessed with a cross-sectional study (N = 431). Mean differences and agreement between SF-36 and SF-12 change in scores (preoperative vs. 6 months) were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement, depicting 95% of individual patients. Results In the longitudinal study, mean differences between change in SF-36 and SF-12 scores were 1.4 (PCS) and 0.4 (MCS) with fair agreement for PCS (ICC = 0.546) and substantial agreement for MCS (ICC = 0.931). For 95% of individual patients, the difference between change in SF-36 and SF-12 scores varied between −14.0 and 16.9 for PCS and between −7.8 and 8.7 for MCS. Cross-sectional results showed fair agreement for PCS (ICC = 0.597) and substantial agreement for MCS (ICC = 0.943). Conclusions On a group level, SF-12 can reliably reproduce MCS in pituitary patients, although PCS is less well correlated. However, individual differences between SF-36 and SF-12 can be large. For pituitary diseases, alternative strategies are needed for concise, but comprehensive patient-reported outcome measurement.

scholarly journals Reliability and Clinically Important Improvement Thresholds for Osteoarthritis Pain and Function Scales: A Multicenter Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvinder A. Singh ◽  
Ruili Luo ◽  
Glenn C. Landon ◽  
Maria Suarez-Almazor
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Knee Arthritis ◽  
Moderate Improvement ◽  
Osteoarthritis Pain ◽  
Hip Arthritis ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective.To assess the reliability and clinically meaningful thresholds of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short-form (KOOS-PS), the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS), and the Quality of life subscales of HOOS/KOOS (HOOS-QOL/KOOS-QOL) in patients with knee or hip arthritis.Methods.One hundred and ninety-five patients (141 knee, 54 hip) seen at 2 orthopedic outpatient clinics with a diagnosis of knee or hip OA completed patient-reported questionnaires (ICOAP pain scale, KOOS-PS, HOOS-PS, KOOS-QOL, HOOS-QOL) at baseline and 2-week followup. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). We calculated minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and moderate improvement in the subgroup that reported change in the status of their affected joint.Results.The reliability as assessed by ICC was as follows: ICOAP pain scale, 0.63 (0.48, 0.74) in patients with knee arthritis, and 0.86 (0.73, 0.93) for hip arthritis; KOOS-PS, 0.66 (0.52, 0.77); HOOS-PS, 0.82 (0.66, 0.91); KOOS-QOL, 0.79 (0.69, 0.86); and HOOS-QOL, 0.67 (0.42, 0.83). MCID and moderate improvement estimates in patients with knee arthritis were ICOAP pain scale, 18.5 and 26.7; KOOS-PS, 2.2 and 15.0; and KOOS-QOL, 8.0 and 15.6. A smaller sample in patients with hip arthritis precluded MCID and moderate improvement estimates.Conclusion.We found that ICOAP pain and KOOS-PS/HOOS-PS scales were reasonably reliable in patients with hip OA. Reliability of these scales was much lower in patients with knee arthritis. Thresholds for clinically meaningful change in pain or function on these scales were estimated for patients with knee arthritis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document