scholarly journals Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Review and Perspectives

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Friedel ◽  
Rani Modayil ◽  
Stavros Stavropoulos

Colon capsule endoscopy utilizing PillCam COLON 2 capsule allows for visualization potentially of the entire colon and is currently approved for patients who cannot withstand the rigors of traditional optical colonoscopy (OC) and associated sedation as well as those that had an OC that was incomplete for technical reasons other than a poor preparation. We will then describe the prior experience and current status of colon capsule endoscopy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-31
Author(s):  
Junichi Sato ◽  
Masanao Nakamura ◽  
Osamu Watanabe ◽  
Takeshi Yamamura ◽  
Kohei Funasaka ◽  
...  

Background: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a procedure in which capsule swallowing facilitates observation of the lumen of the entire digestive tract. It does not require an air supply, and is a noninvasive procedure with a markedly low risk of adverse events in comparison with conventional colonoscopy (CS). It reduces patient stress, and may be acceptable to patients. A limitation of this procedure is that the entire colon observation rate (CCE excretion rate, completed CCE rate) is not 100%. In this study, we prospectively investigated clinical factors important to achieve observation of the entire colon on CCE. Methods: The participants were 70 patients for whom CCE was scheduled, and from whom written informed consent regarding participation in this study was obtained. We selected patient background/examination factors, and analyzed all factors involved in observation of the entire colon and factors for completion of the CCE within 4 h after the start of examination using multivariate analysis. Results: Of the 70 enrolled patients, 64 were analyzed, excluding 6. On multiple logistic analysis, only a water intake of ⩾12.0 ml/min during examination [ p = 0.025, odds ratio (OR): 46.753, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.630–1341.248] was identified as an independent predictive factor involved in observation of the entire colon. With respect to factors involved in the completion of CCE within 4 h, multiple logistic analysis showed that a body mass index (BMI) of ⩾25 ( p = 0.039, OR: 13.723, 95% CI: 1.135–165.913), the absence of constipation ( p = 0.030, OR: 13.988, 95% CI: 1.287–152.047), and a water intake of ⩾12.0 ml/min during examination ( p = 0.004, OR: 12.028, 95% CI: 2.225–65.029) were independent predictive factors. Conclusions: Completion of a CCE was most closely related to water intake per hour. In addition to water intake, CCE-promoting factors included a high BMI and the absence of constipation.


Author(s):  
Naoki Hosoe ◽  
Kenji J. L. Limpias Kamiya ◽  
Yukie Hayashi ◽  
Tomohisa Sujino ◽  
Haruhiko Ogata ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1842
Author(s):  
Seung Min Hong ◽  
Sung Hoon Jung ◽  
Dong Hoon Baek

Observing the entire small bowel is difficult due to the presence of complex loops and a long length. Capsule endoscopy (CE) provides a noninvasive and patient-friendly method for visualizing the small bowel and colon. Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has a critical role in the diagnosis of small bowel disorders through the direct observation of the entire small bowel mucosa and is becoming the primary diagnostic tool for small bowel diseases. Recently, colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was also considered safe and feasible for obtaining sufficient colonic images in patients with incomplete colonoscopy, in the absence of bowel obstruction. This review article assesses the current status of CE in terms of the diagnostic yield and the clinical impact of SBCE in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, who have known or suspected Crohn’s disease, small bowel tumor and inherited polyposis syndrome, celiac disease, and those who have undergone CCE.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kobaek-Larsen ◽  
R. Kroijer ◽  
A.-K. Dyrvig ◽  
M. M. Buijs ◽  
R. J. C. Steele ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB214
Author(s):  
Onofre Alarcón-Fernández ◽  
Laura Ramos ◽  
Zaida Adrián-De-Ganzo ◽  
Antonio Z. Gimeno-García ◽  
David Nicolás-Pérez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. E562-E571
Author(s):  
Tobias Möllers ◽  
Matthias Schwab ◽  
Lisa Gildein ◽  
Michael Hoffmeister ◽  
Jörg Albert ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is still unsatisfactory in many countries, thereby limiting prevention of CRC. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), a minimally invasive procedure, could be an alternative to fecal immunochemical tests or optical colonoscopy for CRC screening, and might increase adherence in CRC screening. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of CCE compared to optical colonoscopy (OC) as the gold standard, adequacy of bowel preparation regimes and the patient perspective on diagnostic measures. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register for Clinical Trials. Pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity and the diagnostic odds ratio with their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for studies providing sufficient data. Results Of 840 initially identified studies, 13 were included in the systematic review and up to 9 in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities and specificities for polyps ≥ 6 mm were 87 % (95 % CI: 83 %–90 %) and 87 % (95 % CI: 76 %–93 %) in 8 studies, respectively. For polyps ≥ 10 mm, the pooled estimates for sensitivities and specificities were 87 % (95 % CI: 83 %–90 %) and 95 % (95 % CI: 92 %–97 %) in 9 studies, respectively. A patients’ perspective was assessed in 31 % (n = 4) of studies, and no preference of CCE over OC was reported. Bowel preparation was adequate in 61 % to 92 % of CCE exams. Conclusions CCE provides high diagnostic accuracy in an adequately cleaned large bowel. Conclusive findings on patient perspectives require further studies to increase acceptance/adherence of CCE for CRC screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document