scholarly journals Arthroscopic Treatment for Primary Septic Arthritis of the Hip in Adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Hartmut Schröder ◽  
David Krüger ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Martin Hufeland
Keyword(s):  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Rare Differential Diagnosis

Purpose.Primary septic arthritis is a rare differential diagnosis of acute hip pain in adults. Inspired by the success of all-arthroscopic treatment in pediatric patients, we developed a diagnostic and surgical pathway for our adult patients.Methods.Seven patients, average age44±13.7years with acute hip pain since4.4±2.9days in the average, were included. Septic arthritis was confirmed by joint aspiration and dissemination was excluded by MRI and standard radiographs. Surgical treatment consisted of immediate arthroscopic lavage using 4 portals for debridement, high-volume irrigation, partial synovectomy, and drainage.Results.Patients were treated in hospital for12.4±3.1days (range 7–16 days). WBC and CRP returned to physiological levels. During the mean follow-up of26.4±19.4months (range 13–66 months) no patient showed recurrence of infection. The 5 patients with an unimpaired hip joint prior to the infection had a mean modified Harris Hip Score of94±5.6points (range 91–100) at final follow-up.Conclusions.Arthroscopic therapy using a minimally invasive approach with low perioperative morbidity for the treatment of primary septic arthritis of the adult hip is able to restore normal hip function in acute cases without dissemination of the infection.Level of Evidence.IV.

Endoscopy-Assisted Achilles Tendon Reconstruction With a Central Turndown Flap and Semitendinosus Augmentation

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1333-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant N. Gedam ◽  
Faizaan M. Rushnaiwala
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Wound Complication ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
The Mean

Background: The objective of this study was to report the results of a new minimally invasive Achilles reconstruction technique and to assess the perioperative morbidity, medium- to long-term outcomes, and functional results. Methods: Our series was comprised 14 patients (11 men and 3 women), with a mean age of 45.6 years at surgery. Each patient had a chronic Achilles tendon rupture. The mean interval from rupture to surgery was 5.5 months (range, 2-10). The mean total follow-up was 30.1 months (range, 12-78). All patients were operated with a central turndown flap augmented with free semitendinosus tendon graft and percutaneous sutures in a minimally invasive approach assisted by endoscopy. The patients underwent retrospective assessment by clinical examination, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score, and the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS). Paired t tests were used to assess the preoperative and postoperative AOFAS scores, ATRS scores, and ankle range of motion. Results: The length of the defect ranged from 3 to 8 cm (mean, 5.1), while the length of the turndown flap ranged from 8 to 13 cm (mean, 10.1). The mean AOFAS score improved from 64.5 points preoperatively to 96.9 points at last follow-up. The mean ATRS score improved from 49.4 preoperatively to 91.4 points at last follow-up. None of the patients developed a wound complication. No patient had a rerupture or sural nerve damage. Conclusion: All patients in our study had a favorable outcome with no complications. We believe that with this triple-repair technique, one can achieve a strong and robust repair such as in open surgery while at the same time reducing the incidence of complications. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement

Joints ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 67-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Fiorentino ◽  
Alberto Fontanarosa ◽  
Riccardo Cepparulo ◽  
Alberto Guardoli ◽  
Luca Berni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Correct Selection ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Purpose: the aim of this study was to evaluate preliminary clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Methods: thirty-eight patients underwent hip arthroscopy for cam-type FAI between 2009 and 2012. Preoperative assessment was based on clinical examination, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and radiographic examination with anteroposterior pelvis, frogleg and Lequesne views. The patients’ clinical conditions at follow-up were assessed using the mHHS administered as a telephone survey. Radiographic outcome measurements evaluated pre and postoperatively were the alpha angle and femoral head-neck offset. Results: the patients were clinically evaluated at a mean follow-up of 36 months. Radiographic follow-up was performed at an average of 12.7 months. Thirty of the 38 patients (79%) were satisfied with the results of the arthroscopic procedure. A total of nine patients subsequently underwent a total hip replacement. All 30 patients who declared themselves satisfied recorded an mHHS increase; in particular, the mHHS increased from a mean of 52.9 preoperatively (range: 27.5-82.5) to a mean of 85.6 postoperatively (range: 45.1-100.1). Three significant differences between the two groups of patients (satisfied and not satisfied) were recorded: mean age, alpha angle and BMI were all significantly greater in the patients who were not satisfied with the treatment. Conclusions: a crucial aspect in order to obtain good clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of camtype impingement is correct selection of patients who are likely to benefit from this kind of surgery. Hip arthroscopy should be avoided in patients aged over 50 years with risk factors for early osteoarthritis (high BMI and a significantly increased alpha angle). Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

scholarly journals Functional Outcome for Arthroscopic Treatment of Septic Arthritis of the Wrist

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 190-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther M. W. Chow ◽  
Jimmy K. Y. Lau ◽  
Lucci L. C. Liyeung ◽  
W. W. Chau ◽  
Michael C. K. Mak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Arthroscopic Lavage ◽  
Open Treatment

Abstract Background Septic arthritis is a potentially joint-destructing condition if not treated properly. Septic wrist accounts for ∼5% of all septic arthritis. Arthroscopic lavage is a well-documented treatment for septic arthritis of the knee, hip, or shoulder only. Previous studies on septic wrist were limited to case reports or retrospective studies focusing on open treatment, and functional outcome was seldom documented. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment and to investigate the functional outcome. Materials and Methods Patients were retrospectively reviewed over a period of 10 years. Parameters including age, gender, history of prior injury, duration of symptoms, joint aspirates and intraoperative tissue culture, radiological and arthroscopic findings, antibiotics used, number of operations, and hospital stay were reviewed. Functional outcomes were evaluated with QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand) score. Results From 2007 to 2016, 14 patients (15 septic wrists) underwent arthroscopic surgery. One patient had bilateral involvement. The average age was 63.9 years and the average duration of symptoms was 6.08 days. Average follow-up time was 10 months. All except two patients (85.7%) responded to single arthroscopic treatment. Two required subsequent operations for concomitant tenosynovitis. There were no major complications. The most common isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus. Only one case had severe joint erosion during follow-up. The average QuickDASH score was 19.7. Duration of symptoms 5 days or more before admission was associated with higher QuickDASH score (p = 0.04). Conclusion Early arthroscopic treatment should be considered for all patients admitted for septic arthritis of the wrist if not contraindicated. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, retrospective review.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis in adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0017
Author(s):  
Gonzalo J. Magi ◽  
Juan Pablo Carucci ◽  
Sebastián Bergués
Keyword(s):  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Functional Impairments ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score

Introduction: Septic arthritis of the hip (SAH) is a serious condition. Prompt diagnosis and management are essential to avoid functional impairments and life-threatening complications.The many treatments advocated to date include repeated non-operative needle aspiration, open surgical synovectomy, and arthroscopic management by joint lavage with or without synovec-tomy. The indications of arthroscopic treatment in septic arthritis of native joints remain ill-defined. Objective: Describe clinical results, complicactions and recurrence rate of arthroscopic treatment of SAH. Methods: We included all adult patients treated with arthroscopy for SAH between March 2010 and March 2017. Patients with less than a year of follow up and previous surgery on the hip were excluded. We performed arthroscopic debridement and lavage of the joint according to Byrd´s technique followed by antiobiotic treatment. We registered modified Harris hip score (MHHS), Hip outcome score activity of daily living (EHOSDL), patients satisfaction, recurrence rate and complications. Results: Four patients were included, two women and two men. Average follow up was 2 years (range 1-3 years). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 3 cases and Staphylococcus epidermidis in the remaining. MMHS improved from preoperative average score of 48 to postoperative average of 90. Average EHOSDL improvement was 40% (from 35% preoperative to 75% postoperative). All patients had excellent results. All patients were satisfied with the treatment. We had no recurrence or complications. Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment of SAH in adults allowed us to obtain very good clinical results with no complications or recurrences with a minimum 1 year follow up.

scholarly journals Clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular revision surgery with trabecular titanium cups in Paprosky type II and III bone defects

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Loris Perticarini ◽  
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi ◽  
Marta Medetti ◽  
Francesco Benazzo
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Prospective Case Series ◽  
Acetabular Components

Abstract Background This prospective study aims to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes and radiographic stability of two different types of cementless trabecular titanium acetabular components in total hip revision surgery. Methods Between December 2008 and February 2017, 104 cup revisions were performed using trabecular titanium revision cups. Mean age of patients was 70 (range 29–90; SD 11) years. The majority of revisions were performed for aseptic loosening (86 cases, 82.69%), but in all the other diagnoses (18 cases), a significant bone loss (Paprosky type II or III) was registered preoperatively. Bone defects were classified according to Paprosky acetabular classification. We observed 53 type II defects and 42 type III defects. Cups were chosen according to the type of defect. Results Average follow-up was 91 (range 24–146) months. Mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 43.7 (range 25–70; SD 9) preoperatively to 84.4 (range 46–99; SD 7.56) at last follow-up. One (1.05%) cup showed radiographic radiolucent lines inferior to 2 mm and was clinically asymptomatic. One (1.05%) cup was loose and showed periacetabular allograft reabsorption. Kaplan–Meier survivorship was assessed to be 88.54% (95% CI 80.18–93.52%) at 71 months, with failure of the cup for any reason as the endpoint. Conclusion Trabecular titanium revision cups showed good clinical and radiographic results at mid-term follow-up in Paprosky type II and III bone defects. Level of evidence Level IV prospective case series

Comparing Midterm Outcomes of High-Level Athletes Versus Nonathletes Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Propensity-Matched Comparison With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110417
Author(s):  
Andrew E. Jimenez ◽  
Peter F. Monahan ◽  
David R. Maldonado ◽  
Benjamin R. Saks ◽  
Hari K. Ankem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
High Level

Background: High-level athletes (HLAs) have been shown to have better short-term outcomes than nonathletes (NAs) after hip arthroscopy. Purpose: (1) To report midterm outcomes of HLAs after primary hip arthroscopy and (2) to compare their results with a propensity-matched cohort of NA patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed between February 2008 and November 2015 for HLAs (professional, college, or high school) who underwent primary hip arthroscopy in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). HLAs were included if they had preoperative, minimum 2-year, and minimum 5-year follow-up data for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and Hip Outcome Score Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS). Radiographic and intraoperative findings, surgical procedures, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and return to sport were reported. The HLA study group was propensity-matched to a control group of NA patients for comparison. Results: A total 65 HLA patients (67 hips) were included in the final analysis with mean follow-up time of 74.6 ± 16.7 months. HLAs showed significant improvement in all PROs recorded, achieved high rates of MCID and PASS for mHHS (74.6% and 79.4%, respectively) and HOS-SSS (67.7% and 66.1%, respectively), and returned to sport at high rates (80.4%). When compared with the propensity-matched NA control group, HLAs reported higher baseline but comparable postoperative scores for the mHHS and NAHS. HLA patients achieved MCID and PASS for mHHS at similar rates as NA patients, but the HLA patients achieved PASS for HOS-SSS at higher rates that trended toward statistical significance (66.1% vs 48.4%; P = .07). NA patients underwent revision arthroscopic surgery at similar rates as HLA patients (14.9% vs 9.0%, respectively; P = .424). Conclusion: Primary hip arthroscopy results in favorable midterm outcomes in HLAs. When compared with a propensity-matched NA control group, HLAs demonstrated a tendency toward higher rates of achieving PASS for HOS-SSS but similar arthroscopic revision rates at minimum 5-year follow-up.

scholarly journals Return to Play After Hip Arthroscopy Among Tennis Players: Outcomes with Minimum Five-Year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Maldonado ◽  
Mitchell J. Yelton ◽  
Philip J. Rosinsky ◽  
Jacob Shapira ◽  
Mitchell Meghpara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Cartilage Damage ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Tennis Players ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background: Playing tennis is associated with various movements that can lead to labral injuries and may require arthroscopic surgery. While hip arthroscopies have demonstrated good outcomes in athletes, there is limited literature reporting Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and return to play in competitive or recreational tennis players after hip arthroscopic surgery. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to (1) report minimum five-year PROs and return to sport in tennis players who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery and (2) compare outcomes between recreational and competitive tennis players.Methods: Data for patients who underwent hip arthroscopy surgery in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears between March 2009 and January 2014 and who played tennis at any level within one-year of surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with preoperative and minimum five-year postoperative scores for the following PROs were included: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Patients with preoperative Tönnis osteoarthritis Grade >1, Workers’ Compensation claims, age > 60 years old, or previous ipsilateral hip surgeries or conditions were excluded. Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for mHHS and HOS-SSS were calculated. Results: Of 28 patients, 31 hips met all inclusion and exclusion criteria of which 28 (90.3%) had minimum 5-year follow-up (mean: 72.8 ± 13.9 months). There were 3 professional, 3 collegiate, 2 high school, 2 organized amateur, and 18 recreational level tennis players. All PROs significantly improved at latest follow-up: mHHS from 67.0 to 86.7 (P < 0.001), NAHS from 65.9 to 87.2 (P < 0.001), HOS-SSS from 50.0 to 77.9 (P = 0.009), and VAS from 5.4 to 1.8 (P < 0.001). There was a 75.0% return to sport rate. Additionally, 66.7% of patients achieved MCID and 83.3% achieved PASS for mHHS, and 63.6% achieved MCID and 58.3% achieved PASS for HOS-SSS.Conclusion: Regardless of the level of participation, tennis players who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery reported statistically significant PRO improvements. A favorable rate of return to sport was also achieved by players with a continued interest in playing. The severity of cartilage damage was shown to not influence rate of returned to sport nor PROs in this population. The data here may be useful in counseling tennis players of various levels who are considering arthroscopic treatment of a hip injury. Level of Evidence: IV

scholarly journals Arthroscopic treatment of internal snapping hip

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0017
Author(s):  
Gonzalo J. Magi ◽  
Juan Pablo Carucci ◽  
Sebastián Bergués
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Iliopsoas Muscle ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Iliopsoas Tendon ◽  
Snapping Hip ◽  
Endoscopic Release

Introduction: Internal snapping hip syndrome (ISHS) is caused by the iliopsoas tendon snapping over either the iliopectineal ridge or the anterior femoral head. Excellent results are achieved only with activity modification, rest, and stretching the iliopsoas muscle. The literature favors iliopsoas tendon release if conservative therapy fails. There is little evidence about the gold standard of this condition. Objective: Describe clinical results, complicactions and recurrence rate of arthroscopic treatment of ISHS. Methods: We included all patients who failed conservative treatment and were treated with arthroscopy for ISHS between March 2012 and March 2018. Patients with less than 2 years of follow up and previous surgery on the hip were excluded. We performed Ilizariturri´s technique with a transcapsular endoscopic release in central compartment. We registered modified Harris hip score (MHHS), Hip outcome score activity of daily living (EHOSDL), patients satisfaction, recurrence rate and complications. Results: Eight patients were included. Average follow up was 36 months (range 24-60 months). MMHS improved from preoperative average score of 70 (range 62-72) to postoperative average of 93 (range 92 to 96). Average EHOSDL improvement was 30% (from 55% preoperative to 85% postoperative). All patients had excellent results. Average patient satisfaction was 8 (range 7-9). We had no recurrence or complications. Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment of ISHS allowed us to obtain very good clinical results with no complications or recurrences with a minimum 2 years follow up.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712090786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Champ L. Baker ◽  
J. Ryan Mahoney
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Nonsurgical Management ◽  
Gluteal Tendinopathy

Background: Gluteal tendinopathy is a common cause of lateral hip pain. Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT) has been used successfully for the treatment of tendinopathy of the elbow, knee, and ankle, but its use in the hip has not been described. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of PUT in patients who did not respond to nonsurgical management of gluteal tendinopathy. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 29 patients with gluteal tendinopathy (mean age, 62 years) who did not respond to nonsurgical treatment were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent ultrasound-guided PUT in an outpatient setting. Patients with a history of ipsilateral hip surgery were excluded. All patients initially underwent magnetic resonance imaging or a computed tomography arthrogram demonstrating tendinopathy and/or partial tearing of the gluteus minimus or medius tendon or both tendons. Outcomes were assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Harris Hip Score evaluation, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) before the procedure and at subsequent follow-up visits or by telephone interviews at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and final follow-up (range, 18-30 months). Results: The mean final follow-up was at 22 months postoperatively. At final follow-up, VAS scores had improved from a preprocedural mean ± SD of 5.86 ± 1.73 to 2.82 ± 2.22 ( P < .01). Harris Hip Scores improved from a preprocedural mean of 60.03 ± 10.86 to 77.47 ± 14.34 ( P < .01). Total SF-12 scores improved from a mean of 29.93 ± 5.39 (51% optimal) to 34.41 ± 4.88 (64% optimal) ( P < .01). No complications were reported. At final follow-up, when asked whether they would have the procedure again, 15 patients replied “yes definitely,” 3 replied “yes probably,” 3 replied “maybe,” 1 replied “likely not,” and 2 replied “definitely not.” There were 3 patients who eventually had hip abductor tendon repair, and their PUT procedures were considered failures. Conclusion: PUT is an effective treatment, with good results for patients with gluteal tendinopathy.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Excision of Intra-Articular Osteoid Osteoma at the Elbow

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Hatta ◽  
Masami Hosaka ◽  
Munenori Watanuki ◽  
Toshihisa Yano ◽  
Shinichirou Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Osteoid Osteoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Arthroscopic Excision ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Definition Of

Osteoid osteoma (OO) apparent in the intra-articular region of the elbow is very rare. Although computed tomography-guided excision and radiofrequency ablation have been recognized as useful treatment options, arthroscopic excision has recently received focus as an alternative strategy for lesions close to neurovascular structures or intra- and juxta-articular lesions. We herein report a 17-year-old female who underwent arthroscopic treatment for intra-articular OO located at the olecranon/coronoid fossa. Her symptoms included elbow pain that was exacerbated at night and contracture of elbow flexion-extension, and she was diagnosed with intra-articular OO after 12 months of symptomatic history. Arthroscopically, thorough synovectomy for both the anterior and posterior aspects of the joint enabled definition of the tumor margin with hyperemic alteration and excision of the lesion as an en bloc specimen. At the 12-month follow-up, the patient had no recurrence of elbow limitation or pain. This case report describes the advantages of arthroscopic treatment, including a low-invasive approach and easy accessibility to the whole intra-articular space, which can provide clear visualization of the tumorous lesion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document