scholarly journals False Negative Cell-Free DNA Screening Result in a Newborn with Trisomy 13

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Yang Cao ◽  
Nicole L. Hoppman ◽  
Sarah E. Kerr ◽  
Christopher A. Sattler ◽  
Kristi S. Borowski ◽  
...  

Background.Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is revolutionizing prenatal screening as a result of its increased sensitivity, specificity. NIPS analyzes cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) circulating in maternal plasma to detect fetal chromosome abnormalities. However, cffDNA originates from apoptotic placental trophoblast; therefore cffDNA is not always representative of the fetus. Although the published data for NIPS testing states that the current technique ensures high sensitivity and specificity for aneuploidy detection, false positives are possible due to isolated placental mosaicism, vanishing twin or cotwin demise, and maternal chromosome abnormalities or malignancy.Results.We report a case of false negative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening due to fetoplacental mosaicism. An infant male with negative cfDNA screening result was born with multiple congenital abnormalities. Postnatal chromosome and FISH studies on a blood specimen revealed trisomy 13 in 20/20 metaphases and 100% interphase nuclei, respectively. FISH analysis on tissues collected after delivery revealed extraembryonic mosaicism.Conclusions.Extraembryonic tissue mosaicism is likely responsible for the false negative cfDNA screening result. This case illustrates that a negative result does not rule out the possibility of a fetus affected with a trisomy, as cffDNA is derived from the placenta and therefore may not accurately represent the fetal genetic information.

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1490-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam ◽  
Lieve Page-Christiaens ◽  
Nicola Flowers ◽  
Michael D Bonifacio ◽  
Katie M Battese Ellis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minyue Dong ◽  
Liwei Deng ◽  
Huan Jin ◽  
Jinsen Cai ◽  
Huan Shang ◽  
...  

AbstractThe demand of non-invasive prenatal testing for autosomal aneuploidy using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma is a highly sought-after diagnostic, with a rapidly growing market. Current approaches developed by next generation sequencing (NGS) need PCR amplifcation during sample preparation, which results in amplification bias in GC-rich areas of the human genome. With these approaches, the minimum fetal fraction in maternal plasma is 4% for the small differences in circulating cfDNA between trisomic and disomic pregnancies to be detectable. In this paper, we performed single molecule sequencing of cell-free DNA from maternal plasma for noninvasive trisomy 13, 18 and 21 detections using the GenoCare platform. We found that single molecule sequencing is sensitive enough to detect these chromosome abnormalities when the fetal DNA fraction is as low as 2%. Compared to the Hiseq2500 platform, no significant GC bias was observed. The improved sensitivity and unbiased GC readout make GenoCare a promising platform for autosomal aneuploidy detections, even in the very early stage of pregnancy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 1399-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A Sillence ◽  
Llinos A Roberts ◽  
Heidi J Hollands ◽  
Hannah P Thompson ◽  
Michele Kiernan ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Noninvasive genotyping of fetal RHD (Rh blood group, D antigen) can prevent the unnecessary administration of prophylactic anti-D to women carrying RHD-negative fetuses. We evaluated laboratory methods for such genotyping. METHODS Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and Streck® Cell-Free DNA™ blood collection tubes (Streck BCTs) from RHD-negative women (n = 46). Using Y-specific and RHD-specific targets, we investigated variation in the cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) fraction and determined the sensitivity achieved for optimal and suboptimal samples with a novel Droplet Digital™ PCR (ddPCR) platform compared with real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). RESULTS The cffDNA fraction was significantly larger for samples collected in Streck BCTs compared with samples collected in EDTA tubes (P < 0.001). In samples expressing optimal cffDNA fractions (≥4%), both qPCR and digital PCR (dPCR) showed 100% sensitivity for the TSPY1 (testis-specific protein, Y-linked 1) and RHD7 (RHD exon 7) assays. Although dPCR also had 100% sensitivity for RHD5 (RHD exon 5), qPCR had reduced sensitivity (83%) for this target. For samples expressing suboptimal cffDNA fractions (<2%), dPCR achieved 100% sensitivity for all assays, whereas qPCR achieved 100% sensitivity only for the TSPY1 (multicopy target) assay. CONCLUSIONS qPCR was not found to be an effective tool for RHD genotyping in suboptimal samples (<2% cffDNA). However, when testing the same suboptimal samples on the same day by dPCR, 100% sensitivity was achieved for both fetal sex determination and RHD genotyping. Use of dPCR for identification of fetal specific markers can reduce the occurrence of false-negative and inconclusive results, particularly when samples express high levels of background maternal cell-free DNA.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2085-2085
Author(s):  
Yvonne Daniel ◽  
Julia Van Campen ◽  
Lee Silcock ◽  
Michael Yau ◽  
Joo Wook Ahn ◽  
...  

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common genetic haematological disorder worldwide. Around 300.000 affected infants are born every year, including at least 1000 in the United States. Prenatal diagnosis is currently carried out using amniotic fluid or chorionic villus sampling. These invasive procedures are perceived to have a small risk of miscarriage. The availability of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) is predicted to increase uptake of prenatal diagnosis for SCD, as it has no perceived miscarriage risk. NIPD may also be more readily implemented than invasive prenatal diagnosis in the low-resource countries in which SCD is the most prevalent. However, accurate NIPD of autosomal recessive disorders such as sickle cell disease has proven challenging as this requires detection of fetal inheritance of a maternal allele from a mixed maternal-fetal pool of cell-free DNA. We report the development of a targeted massively parallel sequencing assay for the NIPD of fetal SCD using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma. No paternal or previous offspring samples were required. 44 clinical samples were analysed, including 37 plasma samples from pregnant SCD carriers and 7 plasma samples from women with SCD due to Hb SC. We used a relative mutation dosage based approach for the 37 samples from maternal SCD carriers (Hb AS or Hb AC), integrating Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) into the analysis to improve the accuracy of wildtype and mutant allele counts. We used a separate wildtype allele detection approach for the 7 samples from women with compound heterozygous SCD, in whom the detection of wildtype cell-free DNA indicates the presence of a carrier fetus. The success of the assay was evaluated by comparing results with the established fetal sickle status as determined through either invasive prenatal diagnosis or newborn screening. During development, two key factors improved the accuracy of the results: i) Selective analysis of only smaller cell-free DNA fragments enhanced the fetal fraction for all samples, with greater effects observed in samples from earlier gestations. This approach improved diagnostic accuracy: for 3 out of 44 samples, the genotype was inconclusive or incorrect before size selection, but correct after size selection. ii) Modifications to DNA fragment hybridisation capture optimised the diversity of Unique Molecular Identifier-tagged molecules analysed. This led to improvements in the results obtained for 5 samples, with 3 previously inconclusive samples correctly called and 2 previously discrepant results moved into the inconclusive range. In total, 37 results were concordant with the established fetal sickle status; this included 30/37 samples from carrier women and 7/7 samples from women with sickle cell disease due to Hb SC. The remaining 7 carrier samples gave an inconclusive result, which for 3 samples was attributed to a low fetal fraction. Samples from as early as 8 weeks gestation were successfully genotyped. There were no false positive or false negative results. This study is the largest to use NGS-based NIPD on clinical plasma samples from pregnancies at risk of SCD. Efforts to validate the assay on a larger sample cohort and to reduce the inconclusive rate are warranted. This study shows that NIPD for SCD is approaching clinical utility and has the potential to provide increased choice to women with pregnancies at risk of sickle cell disease. Disclosures Silcock: Nonacus Ltd.: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianhua Huang ◽  
Clare Gibbons ◽  
Shamim Rashid ◽  
Megan K. Priston ◽  
H. Melanie Bedford ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prenatal screening for chromosome aneuploidies have constantly been evolving, especially with the introduction of cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) screening in the most recent years. This study compares the performance, costs and timing of test results of three cfDNA screening implementation strategies: contingent, reflex and primary. Methods We modelled enhanced first trimester screening (eFTS) as the first-tier test in contingent or reflex strategies. cfDNA test was performed contingent on or reflex from eFTS results. A comparison was made between cfDNA screening using sequencing technology and Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA)/imaging solution. All model assumptions were based on results from previous publications or information from the Ontario prenatal screening population. Results At an eFTS risk cut-off of ≥1/1000, contingent and reflex cfDNA screening have the same detection rate (DR) (94%) for trisomy 21. Reflex cfDNA screening using RCA/Imaging solution provided the lowest false positive rate and cost. The number of women requiring genetic counselling and diagnostic testing was significantly reduced and women received their cfDNA screening result 9 days sooner compared with the contingent model. While primary cfDNA screening improved the trisomy 21 DR by 3–5%, it was more costly and more women required diagnostic testing. Conclusion Reflex cfDNA screening is the most cost-effective prenatal screening strategy. It can improve the efficiency of prenatal aneuploidy screening by reducing the number of patient visits and providing more timely results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona S. Togneri ◽  
Mark D. Kilby ◽  
Elizabeth Young ◽  
Samantha Court ◽  
Denise Williams ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of foetal aneuploidy through analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood is offered routinely by many healthcare providers across the developed world. This testing has recently been recommended for evaluative implementation in the UK National Health Service (NHS) foetal anomaly screening pathway as a contingent screen following an increased risk of trisomy 21, 18 or 13. In preparation for delivering a national service, we have implemented cfDNA-based NIPT in our Regional Genetics Laboratory. Here, we describe our validation and verification processes and initial experiences of the technology prior to rollout of a national screening service. Methods Data are presented from more than 1000 patients (215 retrospective and 840 prospective) from ‘high- and low-risk pregnancies’ with outcome data following birth or confirmatory invasive prenatal sampling. NIPT was by the Illumina Verifi® test. Results Our data confirm a high-fidelity service with a failure rate of ~0.24% and a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of foetal trisomy 13, 18 and 21. Secondly, the data show that a significant proportion of patients continue their pregnancies without prenatal invasive testing or intervention after receiving a high-risk cfDNA-based result. A total of 46.5% of patients referred to date were referred for reasons other than high screen risk. Ten percent (76/840 clinical service referrals) of patients were referred with ultrasonographic finding of a foetal structural anomaly, and data analysis indicates high- and low-risk scan indications for NIPT. Conclusions NIPT can be successfully implemented into NHS regional genetics laboratories to provide high-quality services. NHS provision of NIPT in patients with high-risk screen results will allow for a reduction of invasive testing and partially improve equality of access to cfDNA-based NIPT in the pregnant population. Patients at low risk for a classic trisomy or with other clinical indications are likely to continue to access cfDNA-based NIPT as a private test.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document