scholarly journals A Multicenter Retrospective Survey regarding Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management in Italian Children with Type 1 Diabetes

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Zucchini ◽  
Andrea E. Scaramuzza ◽  
Riccardo Bonfanti ◽  
Pietro Buono ◽  
Francesca Cardella ◽  
...  

We conducted a retrospective survey in pediatric centers belonging to the Italian Society for Pediatric Diabetology and Endocrinology. The following data were collected for all new-onset diabetes patients aged 0–18 years: DKA (pH < 7.30), severe DKA (pH < 7.1), DKA in preschool children, DKA treatment according to ISPAD protocol, type of rehydrating solution used, bicarbonates use, and amount of insulin infused. Records(n=2453)of children with newly diagnosed diabetes were collected from 68/77 centers (87%), 39 of which are tertiary referral centers, the majority of whom (n=1536, 89.4%) were diagnosed in the tertiary referral centers. DKA was observed in 38.5% and severe DKA in 10.3%. Considering preschool children, DKA was observed in 72%, and severe DKA in 16.7%. Cerebral edema following DKA treatment was observed in 5 (0.5%). DKA treatment according to ISPAD guidelines was adopted in 68% of the centers. In the first 2 hours, rehydration was started with normal saline in all centers, but with different amount. Bicarbonate was quite never been used. Insulin was infused starting from third hour at the rate of 0.05–0.1 U/kg/h in 72% of centers. Despite prevention campaign, DKA is still observed in Italian children at onset, with significant variability in DKA treatment, underlying the need to share guidelines among centers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Alaa A. Farag ◽  
Hassan M. Hassanin ◽  
Hanan H. Soliman ◽  
Ahmad Sallam ◽  
Amany M. Sediq ◽  
...  

A great global concern is currently focused on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its associated morbidities. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency of newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) and its different types among COVID-19 patients, and to check the glycemic control in diabetic cases for three months. After excluding known cases of DM, 570 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were studied. All participants were classified as non-diabetic or newly discovered diabetic. According to hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting insulin, newly discovered diabetic patients were further classified into pre-existing DM, new-onset type 1 DM, and new-onset type 2 DM. Glycemic control was monitored for three months in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. DM was diagnosed in 77 patients (13.5%); 12 (2.1%) with pre-existing DM, 7 (1.2%) with new-onset type 1 DM, and 58 (10.2%) with new-onset type 2 DM. Significantly higher rates of severe infection and mortality (p < 0.001 and p = 0.046) were evident among diabetic patients. Among survived diabetic patients (n = 63), hyperglycemia and the need for anti-diabetic treatment persisted in 73% of them for three months. COVID-19 was associated with a new-onset of DM in 11.4% of all participants and expression of pre-existing DM in 2.1% of all participants, both being associated with severe infection. COVID-19 patients with newly diagnosed diabetes had high risk of mortality. New-onset DM persisted for at least three months in more than two-thirds of cases.


2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 1527-1541
Author(s):  
Xiaohan Tang ◽  
Xiang Yan ◽  
Houde Zhou ◽  
Xilin Yang ◽  
Xiaohong Niu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A909-A909
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Grazyna Riebandt ◽  
Rajeev Sharma ◽  
Lamya Hamad ◽  
Jordan Scott ◽  
...  

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and has become a standard of care. There are now numerous FDA approved indications for ICIs and an increasing number of patients receiving these treatments, which has led to an increase in the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including endocrinopathies. Diabetes mellitus is a rare irAE of ICI therapy with an approximate incidence of 1-2%. There is paucity of data in literature about incidence, characteristics and possible predictive factors of ICI-induced diabetes mellitus. Due to limited data on ICI-induced diabetes, we conducted a retrospective review of patients who received ICI therapy at RPCCC and developed diabetes mellitus. The goal of this study is to report incidence and characteristics of new onset and worsening of diabetes in patients treated with ICI therapy.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received ICIs treatment from January 1st, 2010 to May 15th, 2020. We identified patients with newly diagnosed diabetes and worsening of preexisting diabetes. Newly diagnosed diabetes was defined as fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5, random blood glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL with symptoms or 2-hour blood glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL on oral glucose tolerance test. Worsening of preexisting diabetes, defined as more than 0.5% increase in absolute HbA1c value in preceding 3-6 months or need for insulin in stable patients with diabetes on oral hypoglycemic agents. Subjects with pre-existing type 1 diabetes mellitus or on systemic corticosteroids for more than 1-week duration prior to diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were excluded.ResultsAmong 2,382 reviewed patients who received one or multiple ICIs, 15 patients developed new onset of diabetes and 12 patients experienced worsening of pre-existing Type 2 diabetes. In these 27 patients, 8 presented with diabetic ketoacidosis. Median time to new onset diabetes or worsening diabetes from ICI treatment initiation was 19 weeks, ranging from 2 to 320 weeks. Positive autoantibodies were found in 3 patients, among who 2 patients with positive Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD65) antibodies and one patient with positive insulin autoantibodies (IAA).ConclusionsThe incidence of new onset diabetes and worsening diabetes in patients treated with ICI therapy was 1.1%.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center‘s Ethics Board, IRB ID STUDY00001278/BDR 129520.Consent exemptReferencesAzoury SC, Straughan DM, Shukla V. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy: clinical efficacy and safety. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2015;15(6):452-462.Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the society for immunotherapy of cancer (SITC) toxicity management working group. J Immunother Cancer 2017;5(1):95.Akturk HK, Kahramangil D, Sarwal A, Hoffecker L, Murad MH, Michels AW. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2019;36(9):1075-1081.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Baszyńska-Wilk ◽  
Marta Wysocka-Mincewicz ◽  
Anna Świercz ◽  
Jolanta Świderska ◽  
Magdalena Marszał ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-83
Author(s):  
S S Ahmad ◽  
A Misra ◽  
A Glenn ◽  
R C Temple

Acute cataract is recognized as a rare complication in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and may be associated with rapid improvement in glycaemia in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes. Transient cataracts, which resolve following improved metabolic control, and irreversible cataracts requiring surgery have also previously been documented. Development or progression of retinopathy may complicate pregnancy in women with diabetes. To our knowledge, we present the first case report of an acute cataract developing postpartum in a woman with type 1 diabetes. This rare case serves to demonstrate a possible association between acute cataract and altered glycaemic control in pregnancy. Acute cataract should be considered in any woman with diabetes who develops sudden visual loss following pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document