scholarly journals Paired-Pulse Parietal-Motor Stimulation Differentially Modulates Corticospinal Excitability across Hemispheres When Combined with Prism Adaptation

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selene Schintu ◽  
Elisa Martín-Arévalo ◽  
Michael Vesia ◽  
Yves Rossetti ◽  
Romeo Salemme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Prism Adaptation ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
The Right

Rightward prism adaptation ameliorates neglect symptoms while leftward prism adaptation (LPA) induces neglect-like biases in healthy individuals. Similarly, inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) induces neglect-like behavior, whereas on the left PPC it ameliorates neglect symptoms and normalizes hyperexcitability of left hemisphere parietal-motor (PPC-M1) connectivity. Based on this analogy we hypothesized that LPA increases PPC-M1 excitability in the left hemisphere and decreases it in the right one. In an attempt to shed some light on the mechanisms underlying LPA’s effects on cognition, we investigated this hypothesis in healthy individuals measuring PPC-M1 excitability with dual-site paired-pulse TMS (ppTMS). We found a left hemisphere increase and a right hemisphere decrease in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials elicited by paired as well as single pulses on M1. While this could indicate that LPA biases interhemispheric connectivity, it contradicts previous evidence that M1-only MEPs are unchanged after LPA. A control experiment showed that input-output curves were not affected by LPAper se. We conclude that LPA combined with ppTMS on PPC-M1 differentially alters the excitability of the left and right M1.

scholarly journals Prism Adaptation Modulates Connectivity of the Intraparietal Sulcus with Multiple Brain Networks

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 4747-4758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selene Schintu ◽  
Michael Freedberg ◽  
Stephen J Gotts ◽  
Catherine A Cunningham ◽  
Zaynah M Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Prism Adaptation ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Imaging Studies ◽  
Resting State Functional Connectivity ◽  
Frontoparietal Network ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
The Right

Abstract Prism adaptation (PA) alters spatial cognition according to the direction of visual displacement by temporarily modifying sensorimotor mapping. Right-shifting prisms (right PA) improve neglect of left visual field in patients, possibly by decreasing activity in the left hemisphere and increasing it in the right. Left PA shifts attention rightward in healthy individuals by an opposite mechanism. However, functional imaging studies of PA are inconsistent, perhaps because of differing activation tasks. We measured resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in healthy individuals before and after PA. When contrasted, right versus left PA decreased RSFC in the spatial navigation network defined by the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC), hippocampus, and cerebellum. Within-PA-direction comparisons showed that right PA increased RSFC in subregions of the PPCs and between the PPCs and the right middle frontal gyrus and left PA decreased RSFC between these regions. Both right and left PA decreased RSFC between the PPCs and bilateral temporal areas. In summary, right PA increases connectivity in the right frontoparietal network and left PA produces essentially opposite effects. Furthermore, right, compared with left, PA modulates RSFC in the right hemisphere navigation network.

Paired pulse TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial perception

2006 ◽  
Vol 247 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigida Fierro ◽  
Filippo Brighina ◽  
Giuseppe Giglia ◽  
Antonio Palermo ◽  
Margherita Francolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Visuospatial Perception ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
The Right

scholarly journals Right-hemispheric dominance for visual remapping in humans

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1564) ◽  
pp. 572-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Pisella ◽  
N. Alahyane ◽  
A. Blangero ◽  
F. Thery ◽  
S. Blanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Hemispheric Dominance ◽  
Cortical Lesion ◽  
Constructional Apraxia ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
The Right ◽  
Transfer Of Information

We review evidence showing a right-hemispheric dominance for visuo-spatial processing and representation in humans. Accordingly, visual disorganization symptoms (intuitively related to remapping impairments) are observed in both neglect and constructional apraxia. More specifically, we review findings from the intervening saccade paradigm in humans—and present additional original data—which suggest a specific role of the asymmetrical network at the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) in the right hemisphere in visual remapping: following damage to the right dorsal posterior parietal cortex (PPC) as well as part of the corpus callosum connecting the PPC to the frontal lobes, patient OK in a double-step saccadic task exhibited an impairment when the second saccade had to be directed rightward . This singular and lateralized deficit cannot result solely from the patient's cortical lesion and, therefore, we propose that it is due to his callosal lesion that may specifically interrupt the interhemispheric transfer of information necessary to execute accurate rightward saccades towards a remapped target location. This suggests a specialized right-hemispheric network for visuo-spatial remapping that subsequently transfers target location information to downstream planning regions, which are symmetrically organized.

scholarly journals Effects of rTMS Conditioning over the Fronto-parietal Network on Motor versus Visual Attention

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Rounis ◽  
Kielan Yarrow ◽  
John C. Rothwell
Keyword(s):  
Visual Attention ◽  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Preparation ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Spatial Orienting ◽  
Left Dlpfc ◽  
The Right

Many studies have shown that visuospatial orienting attention depends on a network of frontal and parietal areas in the right hemisphere. Rushworth et al. [Rushworth, M. F., Krams, M., & Passingham, R. E. The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: The distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 698–710, 2001] have recently provided evidence for a left-lateralized network of parietal areas involved in motor attention. Using two variants of a cued reaction time (RT) task, we set out to investigate whether high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS; 5 Hz) delivered “off-line” in a virtual lesion paradigm over the right or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) would affect performance in a motor versus a visual attention task. Although rTMS over the DLPFC on either side did not affect RT performance on a spatial orienting task, it did lead to an increase in the RTs of invalidly cued trials in a motor attention task when delivered to the left DLPFC. The opposite effect was found when rTMS was delivered to the PPC: In this case, conditioning the right PPC led to increased RTs in invalidly cued trials located in the left hemispace, in the spatial orienting task. rTMS over the PPC on either side did not affect performance in the motor attention task. This double dissociation was evident in the first 10 min after rTMS conditioning. These results enhance our understanding of the networks associated with attention. They provide evidence of a role for the left DLPFC in the mechanisms of motor preparation, and confirm Mesulam's original proposal for a right PPC dominance in spatial attention [Mesulam, M. M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309–325, 1981].

scholarly journals Asymmetries in numerical density of pyramidal neurons in the fifth layer of the human posterior parietal cortex

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 681-685
Author(s):  
Natasa Djukic-Macut ◽  
Slobodan Malobabic ◽  
Natalija Stefanovic ◽  
Predrag Mandic ◽  
Tatjana Filipovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Pyramidal Neurons ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Numerical Density ◽  
Group I ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Layer V ◽  
The Right

Background/Aim. Both superior parietal lobule (SPL) of dorsolateral hemispheric surface and precuneus (PEC) of medial surface are the parts of posterior parietal cortex. The aim of this study was to determine the numerical density (NV) of pyramidal neurons in the layer V of SPL and PEC and their potential differences. Methods. From 20 (40 hemispheres) formaline fixed human brains (both sexes; 27- 65 years) tissue blocks from SPL and PEC from the left and right hemisphere were used. According to their size the brains were divided into two groups, the group I with the larger left (15 brains) and the group II with the larger right hemisphere (5 brains). Serial Nissl sections (5 ?m) of the left and right SPL and PEC were used for stereological estimation of NV of the layer V pyramidal neurons. Results. NV of pyramidal neurons in the layer V in the left SPL of brains with larger left hemispheres was significantly higher than in the left SPL of brains with larger right hemisphere. Comparing sides in brains with larger left hemisphere, the left SPL had higher NV than the right one, and then the left PEC, and the right SPL had significantly higher NV than the right PEC. Comparing sides in brains with the larger right hemisphere, the left SPL had significantly higher NV than left PEC, but the right SPL had significantly higher NV than left SPL and the right PEC. Conclusion. Generally, there is an inverse relationship of NV between the medial and lateral areas of the human posterior parietal cortex. The obtained values were different between the brains with larger left and right hemispheres, as well as between the SPL and PEC. In all the comparisons the left SPL had the highest values of NV of pyramidal neurons in the layer V (4771.80 mm-3), except in brains with the larger right hemisphere.

scholarly journals Saccades, attentional orienting and disengagement: the effects of anodal tDCS over right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and frontal eye field (FEF)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Diana ◽  
Patrick Pilastro ◽  
Edoardo N. Aiello ◽  
Aleksandra K. Eberhard-Moscicka ◽  
René M. Müri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Gap Effect ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Attentional Orienting ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
The Right

ABSTRACTIn the present work, we applied anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and frontal eye field (FEF) of the right hemisphere in healthy subjects to modulate attentional orienting and disengagement in a gap-overlap task. Both stimulations led to bilateral improvements in saccadic reaction times (SRTs), with larger effects for gap trials. However, analyses showed that the gap effect was not affected by tDCS. Importantly, we observed significant effects of baseline performance that may mediate side- and task-specific effects of brain stimulation.

scholarly journals Revisiting Hemispheric Asymmetry in Mood Regulation: Implications for rTMS for Major Depressive Disorder

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Gibson ◽  
Andrei Vakhtin ◽  
Vincent P. Clark ◽  
Christopher C. Abbott ◽  
Davin K. Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Emotional Regulation ◽  
Emotional Processing ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Hemispheric Differences ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
The Right

Hemispheric differences in emotional processing have been observed for over half a century, leading to multiple theories classifying differing roles for the right and left hemisphere in emotional processing. Conventional acceptance of these theories has had lasting clinical implications for the treatment of mood disorders. The theory that the left hemisphere is broadly associated with positively valenced emotions, while the right hemisphere is broadly associated with negatively valenced emotions, drove the initial application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Subsequent rTMS research has led to improved response rates while adhering to the same initial paradigm of administering excitatory rTMS to the left prefrontal cortex (PFC) and inhibitory rTMS to the right PFC. However, accumulating evidence points to greater similarities in emotional regulation between the hemispheres than previously theorized, with potential implications for how rTMS for MDD may be delivered and optimized in the near future. This review will catalog the range of measurement modalities that have been used to explore and describe hemispheric differences, and highlight evidence that updates and advances knowledge of TMS targeting and parameter selection. Future directions for research are proposed that may advance precision medicine and improve efficacy of TMS for MDD.

scholarly journals Prism adaptation modulates connectivity of the intraparietal sulcus with multiple brain networks

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selene Schintu ◽  
Michael Freedberg ◽  
Stephen J. Gotts ◽  
Catherine A. Cunningham ◽  
Zaynah M. Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Prism Adaptation ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Resting State Functional Connectivity ◽  
Frontoparietal Network ◽  
Interhemispheric Competition ◽  
Before And After ◽  
And Shifts ◽  
The Right ◽  
Parietal Cortices

ABSTRACTPrism adaptation (PA) alters spatial cognition according to the direction of visual displacement by temporarily modifying sensorimotor mapping. Right-shifting prisms (right PA) improve neglect of left space in patients, possibly by decreasing activity in the left hemisphere and increasing it in the right. Left PA shifts attention to the right in healthy individuals by an opposite mechanism. However, functional imaging studies of PA are inconsistent, perhaps because of differing activation tasks. We measured resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in healthy individuals before and after PA. Right, vs. left, PA decreased RSFC in the navigation network defined by the right posterior parietal cortices (PPCs), hippocampus, and cerebellum. Right PA, relative to baseline, increased RSFC between regions within both PPCs and between the PPCs and the right middle frontal gyrus, whereas left PA decreased RSFC between these regions. These results show that right PA modulates connectivity within the right-hemisphere navigation network and shifts attention leftward by increasing connectivity in the right frontoparietal network and left PA produces essentially opposite effects, consistent with the interhemispheric competition model. These finding explain the action of PA on intact cognition and will help optimize interventions in neglect patients.

Right- and Left-Lateralised Neglect are not Anatomically Homologous: A Voxel-Lesion Symptom Mapping Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Moore ◽  
Celine Gillebert ◽  
Nele Demeyere
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Internal Capsule ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Visuospatial Neglect ◽  
Routine Clinical Imaging ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Lesion Symptom Mapping ◽  
The Right

Visuospatial neglect is a heterogenous syndrome which can occur following damage to either right or left hemisphere areas. This study employs voxel-lesion symptom mapping to identify the neural correlates of left and right egocentric and allocentric neglect in a large acute stroke cohort.A cohort of 446 acute stroke survivors (age = 26-95, 44% female) completed neuropsychological neglect assessment and routine clinical imaging. Similar to previous investigations, left egocentric and left allocentric neglect were associated with damage to distinct clusters of voxels within the posterior parietal and temporo-parietal junction areas. Unlike previous investigations, right egocentric neglect was found to most strongly associated with damage to more posterior voxels within left occipital cortical areas. Right allocentric neglect was found to be most strongly associated with damage to the anterior limb of the left internal capsule. Interestingly, the right hemisphere homologues of the areas implicated in right-lateralised neglect were not overlapping with those associated with left neglect impairment. This dissociation was present across both egocentric and allocentric neglect impairment. The results of this investigation suggest that right egocentric/allocentric neglect should not be characterised as a consequence of damage to left-hemisphere homologues of the right hemisphere attentional systems. These findings support the characterisation of visuospatial neglect as a heterogenous cluster of impairments rather than a unitary syndrome and provide novel insight into the neural correlates of spatial attention.

scholarly journals Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selene Schintu ◽  
Catherine A. Cunningham ◽  
Michael Freedberg ◽  
Paul Taylor ◽  
Stephen J. Gotts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Superior Temporal Gyrus ◽  
Resting State Functional Connectivity ◽  
Local Inhibition ◽  
Frontoparietal Network ◽  
Attentional Network ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Neuropsychological Evidence ◽  
The Right

AbstractHemispatial neglect is thought to result from disruption of interhemispheric equilibrium. Right hemisphere lesions deactivate the right frontoparietal network and hyperactivate the left via release from interhemispheric inhibition. Support for this theory comes from neuropsychological evidence as well as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in healthy subjects, in whom right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) inhibition causes neglect-like, rightward, visuospatial bias. Concurrent TMS and fMRI after right PPC TMS show task-dependent changes but may fail to identify effects of stimulation in areas not directly activated by the specific task, complicating interpretations. We used resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) after inhibitory TMS over the right PPC to examine changes in the networks underlying visuospatial attention.In a crossover experiment in healthy individuals, we delivered continuous theta burst TMS to the right PPC and vertex as control condition. We hypothesized that PPC inhibitory stimulation would cause a rightward visuospatial bias, decrease PPC connectivity with frontal areas, and increase PPC connectivity with the attentional network in the left hemisphere. We also expected that individual differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) in white matter connections between the PPCs would account for variability in TMS-induced RSFC changes.As expected, TMS over the right PPC caused a rightward shift in line bisection judgment and increased RSFC between the right PPC and the left superior temporal gyrus. This effect was inversely related to FA in the posterior corpus callosum. Local inhibition of the right PPC reshapes connectivity in the attentional network and depends on interhemispheric connections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document