scholarly journals Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Postkeratoplasty Myopia and Astigmatism

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamer H. Massoud ◽  
Osama Ibrahim ◽  
Kitty Shehata ◽  
Moones F. Abdalla
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Laser Vision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Myopic Astigmatism

Purpose. To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for treating myopia and myopic astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).Design. Case-series.Methods. Ten eyes of 10 patients with previous PKP and residual myopic astigmatism for whom pentacam imaging and thickness measurements were acceptable for laser vision correction. Manifest refraction (MR), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were obtained preoperatively and one day, one week, and one, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Cases were operated on the VisuMax® femtosecond laser platform with 500 kHz repetition rate.Results. The mean correction ratio for spherical errors was0.84±0.19 D and for the mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was0.79±0.13 D. Vector analysis showed a mean astigmatism reduction at the intended axis of67±25.25%, a correction index of0.81±0.21, and an overall mean percentage of success of astigmatism surgery of53±37.9%. The postoperative MRSE was stable throughout the 6-month follow-up period. The efficacy index was 0.93 and the safety index was 1.12.Conclusion. SMILE for correction of post-PKP myopia and astigmatism is effective, safe, and stable with moderate accuracy and predictability. Centration of the treatment within the grafts was easily performed.

Small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of high myopia

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 917-927
Author(s):  
Suphi Taneri ◽  
Saskia Kießler ◽  
Anika Rost ◽  
Tim Schultz ◽  
H Burkhard Dick
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Lenticule Extraction

Purpose: Excimer laser-based refractive procedures can have less predictable results when used for correcting high myopia than when used for moderate myopia. Small incision lenticule extraction might overcome this weakness. However, small incision lenticule extraction is only Food and Drug Administration approved for use in myopic eyes up to −8 D with astigmatism of −3 D or less. We report outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction in highly and moderately myopic eyes and compare these to modern laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Methods: Retrospective, observational consecutive case series. Inclusion criteria: attempted myopic spherical correction ⩾−8 or−3 to −7.75 D with astigmatism ⩽−3 D, and corrected distance visual acuity of 1.0 (decimal scale) or better. Results: A total of 62 highly myopic and 407 moderately myopic eyes were included. At 3 months postoperatively, the highly myopic eyes had a mean spherical equivalent refraction of −0.28 ± 0.41 D (range: −1.13 to +0.75 D). Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.0. Mean efficacy index was 0.84. Mean safety index was 1.03. Uncorrected distance visual acuity same or better than corrected distance visual acuity: 61%. Astigmatism was ⩽0.5 D in 90% and ⩽1 D in 100%. The results in the moderately myopic eyes were comparable. Conclusion: We found equally good visual and refractive outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of high and of moderate myopia combined with an astigmatic correction of up to 3 D, respectively.

scholarly journals Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction in High Myopia: 5-Year Results

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alper Ağca ◽  
İhsan Çakır ◽  
Beril Tülü Aygün ◽  
Dilek Yaşa ◽  
Yusuf Yıldırım ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
The Mean

Purpose. To report long-term visual and refractive results of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in treatment of high myopia. Materials and Methods. Medical records of patients who underwent SMILE for surgical correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with a preoperative spherical equivalent of subjective manifest refraction (SE) ≥ 6 D and a postoperative follow-up of 5 years were included in the study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and SE were analyzed preoperatively and at 1-, 3-, and 5-year postoperative periods. Results. Thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients were included in the study. The mean attempted SE was −7.47 ± 1.10 D (range −6.00 to −10.00 D). At the 5-year visit, the mean difference between achieved and attempted SE was −0.43 ± 0.47 (0.50 to −1.25 D). Mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 0.20 ± 0.18 and 0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR, respectively. At the 1-year visit, 70% and 97% of the eyes were within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D of the intended correction. At the 5-year follow-up, 59% and 92% percent of the eyes were within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D of the intended SE, respectively. At the 5-year visit, the efficacy index was 0.89 ± 0.26 and the safety index was 1.16 ± 0.20. Fifty-four percent of the eyes gained one or more lines of CDVA. Conclusion. SMILE with an intended correction of up to a spherical equivalent of 10 D is safe and effective. However, there is regression of the refractive effect over extended follow-up.

scholarly journals One year outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Ariadna Nicula ◽  
Dorin Nicula ◽  
Sorana D. Bolboacă ◽  
Adriana Elena Bulboacă
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Myopic Astigmatism

Abstract Purpose To report the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX (SMILE) technique using VisuMax femtosecond laser in myopia and myopic astigmatism patients. Material and methods A non-randomized clinical study has been conducted on patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent ReLEX SMILE technique, using the Zeiss VisuMax Laser system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) at Oculens Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Patients older than 18 years, with ocular astigmatism up to -5 diopters (D), spherical equivalent up to -10.00 D, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.3 or better before the surgery, stable refraction for one year, and with a minimum calculated post operator residual stromal bed of 250μ were included in the study. Results The study involved a total of 25 myopic eyes (median of sphere diopters equal with -4D) and 67 myopic astigmatic eyes (median of cylinder diopters equal with -1.5 D). The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) on patients with myopic eyes reduced from -4.25D (median) to -0.5D at one month follow-up, -0.25 D at 6 and 12 months. The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) on patients with astigmatic myopic eyes reduced from-6.25 D to -0.67 D at one month, -0.62 D at six and twelve months. The value of sphere decreased postoperatively on myopic eyes with a median of -0.25D at one, six and twelve months. The value of cylinder decreased postoperatively on myopic astigmatic eyes with a median of -0.50 D at one month, -0.25 D at six months and -0.50 D at 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, 20 (80.0%) of myopic eyes were maintained within ±0.5 D and 22 (88.0%) with ±1D. On both groups (myopic eyes and myopic astigmatic eyes), statistically significant differences were observed when the keratometric baseline values were compared to each follow-up (P-values < 0.0001), without any significant differences between follow-ups (P-values>0.15). At 1-month follow-up, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was better than or equal to 0.5 in 88.0% of myopic eyes and 82.1% of myopic astigmatic eyes. UDVA remained stable in all cases of myopic eyes at six months and the percentage increased at 92.0% in myopic eyes. UDVA slightly increased at 6-months (85.1%) and remained at the same value at 12-months in myopic astigmatism eyes. Conclusions SMILE proved an effective and safe refractive corneal procedure and provided a predictable and stable correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE technique demonstrated very good outcomes in terms of keratometric, cylinder, spherical measurements.

scholarly journals Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Moderate and High Myopia: Seven-Year Outcomes of Refraction, Corneal tomography and Wavefront Aberrations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Xia ◽  
Yang Shen ◽  
Tian Han ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Hai-Peng Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Spherical Aberration ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Wavefront Aberrations ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Lenticule Extraction

Abstract Background To investigate the long-term corneal stability and wavefront aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia.Methods Prospective, non-consecutive case series. A total of 26 patients (42 eyes) who underwent SMILE from May 2010 to March 2013 at the Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital (Shanghai, China) were enrolled. The periods of follow-up were 1 month, 1 year, 5 years and 7 years after surgery. The routine eye examinations included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction and corneal topography.Results All surgeries were executed without any complications. At the final visit, a UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 42 eyes (100%), 21 eyes (50%) exhibited no change in CDVA. 15 eyes (36%) gained one line, 6 eyes (14%) gained two lines, and no eyes lost CDVA lines. 93% and 100% of eyes were within ±0.5 D and ±1.00 D of the target refraction, respectively. A mean refractive regression of -0.17 D was observed between 1 month and 7 years postoperatively. Mean corneal front curvature (KMF) were significantly increased between pre- and post-SMILE surgery (P<0.0001). Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and vertical coma were significantly increased after SMILE compared to those measured before surgery (all P<0.001). There were no significant differences in horizontal coma, trefoil and spherical aberration between pre- and post-SMILE surgery (all P>0.05).Conclusions SMILE is an effective, safe and stable procedure for myopia correction, with relatively constant corneal stability and wavefront aberrations.

scholarly journals SmartSurfACE transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr A. Gab-Alla
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Photorefractive Keratectomy ◽  
Refractive Errors ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pulse Technology

Abstract Background To evaluate predictability, stability, efficacy, and safety of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) using smart pulse technology (SPT) (SmartSurface procedure) of Schwind Amaris with mitomycin C for correction of post small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) myopic residual refractive errors. Method This study is a prospective, non-comparative case series conducted at a private eye centre in Ismailia, Egypt, on eyes with post-SMILE myopic residual refractive errors because of undercorrection or suction loss (suction loss occurred after the posterior lenticular cut and the creation of side-cuts; redocking was attempted, and the treatment was completed in the same session with the same parameters) with myopia or myopic astigmatism. The patients were followed up post-SMILE for six months before the SmartSurface procedure, and then they were followed up for one year after that. TPRK were performed using Amaris excimer laser at 500 kHz. The main outcomes included refractive predictability, stability, efficacy, safety and any reported complications. Results This study included 68 eyes of 40 patients out of 1920 total eyes (3.5%) with post-SMILE technique myopic residual refractive errors. The average duration between the SMILE surgery and TPRK was 6.7 ± 0.4 months (range 6 to 8 months). The mean refractive spherical equivalent (SE) was within ± 0.50 D of plano correction in 100% of the eyes at 12 months post-TPRK. Astigmatism of < 0.50 D was achieved in 100% of the eyes. The mean of the residual SE error showed statistically significant improvement from preoperative − 1.42 ± 0.52 D to 0.23 ± 0.10 D (P < 0.0001). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (measured by Snellen's chart and averaged in logMAR units) was improved significantly to 0.1 ± 0.07 (P < 0.0001). UDVA was 0.2 logMAR or better in 100% of the eyes, 0.1 logMAR or better in 91.2% of the eyes, and 0.0 logMAR in 20.6% of the eyes. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained unchanged in 79.4% of eyes. 14.7% of eyes gained one line of CDVA (Snellen). 5.9% of eyes gained two lines of CDVA (Snellen). Conclusion Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy using smart pulse technology with mitomycin C enhancement after SMILE is a safe, predictable, stable, and effective technique.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopic Astigmatic Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (24) ◽  
pp. 4272-4277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Xuan Hiep ◽  
Pham Thi Minh Khanh ◽  
Do Quyet ◽  
Than Van Thai ◽  
Vu Thi Nga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Control Function ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Safety Index ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Efficacy Index ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Myopic Astigmatism

BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown that there is a certain rotation of the eye in the sitting and lying position of the patient. The Visumax system used for the Refractive Lenticule Extraction-Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx SMILE) surgery lacks the rotation of eye control function. So, is the ReLEx SMILE surgery for patients with astigmatism safe and effective? AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of the ReLEx SMILE surgery in cases with myopic astigmatism. METHODS: The case series included 120 eyes with myopic astigmatism undergoing ReLEx SMILE surgery from January 2018 to November 2018. The distribution of patients for two subgroups based on the power of astigmatism, low astigmatic group (≤ 1.50D) and high astigmatic group (> 1.50D). All patients were measured UDVA, CDVA, refractive sphere, astigmatism and sphere equivalent before and after surgery one week, one month and three months carefully. The astigmatic correction was evaluated by the vectorial analysis Alpins. RESULTS: The mean efficacy index of the low and high astigmatic group was 1.035 and 1.082 (respectively); the mean safety index was 1.113 and 1.215 (respectively). 93% of eyes in the low astigmatic group had an angle of error (AE) within ± 15 degrees and 100% in high astigmatic group. There was an undercorrection in astigmatic treatment. No complications during and after surgery were recorded. CONCLUSION: ReLEx SMILE surgery for the myopic astigmatic treatment was safe and effective.

scholarly journals Small-incision lenticule extraction for correction of refractive error after 2 years of follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassenien S. Shuber ◽  
Hussein A. Alhamami ◽  
Salah Z. Alasadi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Myopic Astigmatism

Background: Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a relatively novel refractive procedure introduced to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism using femtosecond technology.Aim: The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the predictability, efficacy and safety of SMILE surgery.Setting: The study took place in Alyamama Vision Refractive Center, Baghdad, Iraq.Methods: In this prospective, non-randomised, single-centre clinical study, all patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism underwent the SMILE procedure performed by one surgeon (H.S.S.) with a targeted post-operative refraction of 0 to −0.5 dioptres (D). The procedure was performed using the VisuMax femtosecond platform. Post-operative data, including slit-lamp examination and measurements of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), objective and subjective refraction, and intraocular pressure (IOP), were recorded.Results: A total of 141 eyes of 76 patients (51 females and 25 males) were included in the study. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) (−4.37 D ± 1.65 D) ranged from −2.0 D to −10.25 D after 2 years of follow-up, and the mean post-operative SE (−0.06 D ± 0.18 D) ranged from −0.75 D to 0.63 D. A UCVA of 20/40 or better was noted in 98% of the eyes at the 2-year follow-up. Most of the surgical complications, which were seen in 30 eyes, did not result in permanent visual loss. Corneal abrasion was the most common surgical complication, constituting 10.6% of all complications, followed by adherence of the lenticule to the cap (3.5%).Conclusion: The SMILE procedure is effective with high safety and efficacy, and its complication rate will probably decrease with improvement in the surgeon experience level and refinement of the laser parameters.

Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus advanced surface ablation in low myopia

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1278-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suphi Taneri ◽  
Saskia Kießler ◽  
Anika Rost ◽  
Tim Schultz ◽  
H Burkhard Dick
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Surface Ablation ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Spherical Equivalent Refraction ◽  
Lenticule Extraction

Purpose: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction and advanced surface ablation for low myopia or myopic astigmatism. Methods: Retrospective, observational case series of our first 50 consecutive small incision lenticule extraction patients compared to refraction-matched 50 advanced surface ablation treatments with attempted spherical equivalent correction ⩽−3.5 D, astigmatism ⩽−1.5 D, and corrected distance visual acuity of 1.0 (decimal scale) or better. Only one eye per patient was included. Results: Small incision lenticule extraction: mean attempted spherical equivalent correction was −2.80 ± 0.63 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.85 and 1.0 at days 1 and 5, respectively. At 3 months, mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.02 ± 0.32 D (range: −0.5 to +0.75 D), mean cylinder was −0.24 ± 0.21 D (range: 0 to −0.75 D), mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.27, mean efficacy index was 0.96, and mean safety index was 1.05. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was same or better than corrected distance visual acuity in 96%, astigmatism ⩽0.5 D in 98% and ⩽1 D in 100% of eyes, respectively. Advanced surface ablation: mean attempted spherical equivalent correction was −2.75 ± 0.5 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.72 and 0.61 at days 1 and 5, respectively. At 3 months, mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.22 ± 0.32 D, mean cylinder was −0.27 ± 0.27 D, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.21, mean efficacy index was 1.03, and mean safety index was 1.08. Conclusion: Small incision lenticule extraction for low myopia was found to be safe and effective with outcomes at 3 months similar to those obtained with advanced surface ablation while offering a quicker visual recovery.

scholarly journals Corneal Safety and Stability in Cases of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Collagen Cross-Linking (SMILE Xtra)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihab Mohamed Osman ◽  
Hany Ahmed Helaly ◽  
Mohsen Abou Shousha ◽  
Amir AbouSamra ◽  
Islam Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Corneal Densitometry ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Safety And Stability ◽  
Collagen Cross Linking

Purpose. To assess the safety and stability in cases of small incision lenticule extraction with collagen cross-linking (SMILE Xtra). Methods. This study was a retrospective interventional comparative study that included 60 eyes of 30 patients divided equally into two groups: SMILE Xtra and SMILE alone. The inclusion criteria were patients >18 years of age, myopic error >6 D, thinner cornea <520 microns, and abnormal corneal topography. Outcome data were recorded including uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness, average keratometry, endothelial cell density, corneal resistance factor (CRF), and corneal densitometry. The follow-up period was 24 months. Results. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups regarding UDVA, CDVA, and MRSE at 1 month. In the SMILE Xtra group, 90% of eyes had postoperative UDVA of 20/20 and 97% had UDVA of 20/30 at 24 months. At 24 months, 26 eyes (87%) vs. 25 eyes (84%) were within ±0.50 D of attempted correction in SMILE Xtra and SMILE groups, respectively. Regarding stability, both groups showed improvement of MRSE at 1st month postoperatively and remained stable along the 24 months of follow-up. CRF and corneal densitometry were higher in the SMILE Xtra group along the whole follow-up period (p=0.001). Conclusion. Combining corneal cross-linking with SMILE procedure (SMILE Xtra) is a promising tool to prevent ectasia in high-risk patients. It is a safe and simple procedure that can be offered to patients undergoing SMILE with risk for ectasia. Trial registration no: PACTR201810577524718.

scholarly journals Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser Assisted in-situ Keratomileusis and Femtosecond Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Abutaleb ◽  
M G Metwally ◽  
T M Elraggal ◽  
O A Salem
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Dry Eye ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Schirmer Test ◽  
Corneal Sensation ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Breakup Time ◽  
Myopic Astigmatism

Abstract Purpose This study aimed at comparing femto-LASIK with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) as regards the safety, efficacy, accuracy and post-operative complications with special emphasis on the post-operative dry eye, corneal sensation and corneal biomechanics in cases of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Patients and Methods The study was a prospective comparative study that was conducted in a private eye hospital on 60 eyes of 30 patients with myopia or myopic astimgatism. Each patient was fully assessed preoperatively including visual acuity, refraction, tear breakup time, Schirmer test, corneal sensation & Ocular Response Analyzer®. Femto-LASIK was done to 15 patients and SMILE was done to 15 patients. Postoperative visual acuity, refraction, tear breakup time, Schirmer test, corneal sensation at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months and Ocular Response Analyzer® at 6 months were done and data was retrieved and analyzed. Results Cylindrical error was higher in SMILE group at all postoperative points. Tear breakup time was better in SMILE group in 1st month, but no significant difference in later follow ups. Corneal sensation was better in SMILE group in 1 month and 3 months, but this difference disappeared at 6 months. Corneal hysteresis & corneal resistance factor were significantly better in SMILE group. Conclusion Both techniques are safe and efficient. Femto-LASIK is more efficient in correcting cylindrical error. SMILE is better in early postoperative dry eye, corneal sensation and in corneal biomechanics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document