scholarly journals Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in a Patient with HIV-Negative Relapsed Plasmablastic Lymphoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Akce ◽  
Elaine Chang ◽  
Mohammad Haeri ◽  
Mike Perez ◽  
Christie J. Finch ◽  
...  

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), often associated with HIV infection. We present a case of a 53-year-old HIV-negative man with untreated hepatitis C viral infection who presented with abdominal pain and lymphadenopathy. Lymph node and bone marrow biopsies were consistent with plasmablastic lymphoma. He had partial response (PR) to 6 cycles of EPOCH but disease progressed seven weeks later. Repeat biopsy was consistent with plasmablastic lymphoma. Three cycles of bortezomib, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (B-ICE) chemotherapy resulted in a partial response (PR). Five months later, he presented with widespread lymphadenopathy and tumor lysis syndrome with circulating blasts. Flow cytometry revealed a different population of lymphoma cells, this time positive for CD5, CD19, CD20, and CD22, with dim expression of CD45 and CD38. The patient died on the first day of ESHAP chemotherapy. There are no treatment recommendations or standard of care for plasmablastic lymphoma. A literature search yielded 10 cases in which bortezomib was administered in either HIV-positive or HIV-negative PBL. Six reported a partial response, 3 reported a complete response, and 1 was a near-complete response. Bortezomib, in combination with chemotherapy, may be an effective treatment option in PBL as reported here.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5354-5354
Author(s):  
Imran K Tailor ◽  
Bilal Btoosh ◽  
Shaimaa Hamdy ◽  
Shanker Raja ◽  
Mohammed O Alharbi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Baseline (PETb) and end of therapy (PETe) FDG PET is standard of care in the management of hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The role of interim PET (PETi) in HL is well established while its role in DLBCL is not well defined. We evaluated the utility of triPET (PETb, PETi and PETe ) in management of these two lymphomas. Methods: Retrospective review of PET archives revealed a total of 37 pts (HL=22, DLBCL=15). TriPET were acquired per accepted protocol. SUVmax and Deauville scores (DSc) were obtained from five target lesions, the average i.e. composite SUVmax & DSc were computed for each pt. Statistical analyses were performed with the composite maxSUV (cSUV) and Deauville scores (cDSc) (using EXCEL). Following statistics were performed (separately and combined in HL and DLBCL); mean+SD, PPV and NPV for complete response (CR) Vs. progressive disease (PD) on PETi using the following variables 1. cSUV and 2. cDSc and 3. delta change (DELT). Median progression free survival (PFS) was the clinical endpoint for response. Results: The mean PFS in our group was 17 and 15 months in HL and DLBCL respectively. Using cut off thresholds for intP to predict CR at cSUV<=2.0, , cDSC<=2.0 and DELT >=80%,. In HL: for cSUV- PPV 67%, NPV 95%; for DELT of cSUV PPV 100%, NPV 95%; for cDSC-PPV 30%, NPV 100%. In DLBCL: for cSUV- PPV 25%, NPV 100%; for DELT of cSUV PPV 33%, NPV 100%; for cDSC- PPV 50%, NPV 100%. Conclusion: The results from our series suggest that PETi has a role not only in HL but in DLBCL as well. Our modest cohort suggests that a negative PETi in DLBCL had a NPV of 100% across cSUV, cDSc and DELT, with regards to CR. Our data also suggests that PETe is not needed if PETi is -ve. While in HL subset, our results concur with results from other groups, this needs to be validated in a larger series. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4 (oct 2020 - dec 2020)) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiza Rehman Lodhi ◽  
Amjad Zafar ◽  
Muhammad Abbas Khokhar ◽  
Ali Waheed Goraya ◽  
Sobia Yaqub

Objective: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a lymphoid B cells neoplasm with a diffuse pattern and high proliferation rate. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) was considered effective as other complicated regimens with more toxicity profile. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against CD20 positive B cell. It has good activity therapeutically in patients of DLBCL. It increases response rates and survivals when added to CHOP chemotherapy. Although R-CHOP is more effective but due to high cost of Rituximab it is usually not incorporated with chemotherapy in most of our patients and CHOP is still used extensively. Due to heterogeneity of disease and difference in ethnicity, there may be difference in outcomes of two regimens. This study will help us in tailoring our management plan that will result in better outcome of patients. Methods: 70 patients aged between 20-65 years having DLBCL were taken in this study. We rando-mized patients by lottery method into two groups. Group I received CHOP with dose of Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50mg/m2, Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 and prednisolone 40mg/m2.Chemotherapy was given on Day-1 while prednisolone was given for 5 days from Day-1 of chemotherapy. Group II received R- CHOP which includes same chemotherapy with same dosage. Rituximab was included in Group II with dose of Rituximab 375 mg /m2. Each cycle was given at three weeks interval. Response in terms of CR (Complete Response), PR (Partial Response), SD (Stable Disease) or PD (Progressive Disease) was evaluated as per leukemia network after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The quantitative variables were calculated by taking mean and standard deviation. The response was assessed in percentage and frequencies and compared by applying chi square test. Results: Group I had 37.1% while Group II had 68.6% complete response with p value of 0.019. Partial response was 48.6% in Group I while 20.0% in Group II. 14.3% in Group I and 8.6% in Group II either had stable disease or progressive disease. Conclusions: R-CHOP has superior response rates as compared to CHOP, therefore, whenever possible Rituximab should be added as target therapy in chemotherapy. Key Words: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma, CHOP, R- CHOP How to Cite: Lodhi F.R, Zafar A, Khokhar M.A, Goraya AW, Ashraf S, Yaqub S. Comparison of R-CHOP with CHOP in patients of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Esculapio.2020;16(04):79-82.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3119-3128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Michael D. Jain ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Jay Y. Spiegel ◽  
Armin Ghobadi ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) on the basis of the single-arm phase II ZUMA-1 trial, which showed best overall and complete response rates in infused patients of 83% and 58%, respectively. We report clinical outcomes with axi-cel in the standard-of-care (SOC) setting for the approved indication. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were collected retrospectively from all patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL who underwent leukapheresis as of September 30, 2018, at 17 US institutions with the intent to receive SOC axi-cel. Toxicities were graded and managed according to each institution’s guidelines. Responses were assessed as per Lugano 2014 classification. RESULTS Of 298 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 275 (92%) received axi-cel therapy. Compared with the registrational ZUMA-1 trial, 129 patients (43%) in this SOC study would not have met ZUMA-1 eligibility criteria because of comorbidities at the time of leukapheresis. Among the axi-cel–treated patients, grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 7% and 31%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality was 4.4%. Best overall and complete response rates in infused patients were 82% (95% CI, 77% to 86%) and 64% (95% CI, 58% to 69%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months from the time of CAR T-cell infusion, median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.0 to15.1 months), and median overall survival was not reached. Patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2-4 and elevated lactate dehydrogenase had shorter progression-free and overall survival on univariable and multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION The safety and efficacy of axi-cel in the SOC setting in patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL was comparable to the registrational ZUMA-1 trial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20067-e20067
Author(s):  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Anna Patrikidou ◽  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Jonas C. Hylton ◽  
Sandra Tong ◽  
...  

e20067 Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive and common form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, characterized by marked genetic heterogeneity. The disease is difficult to treat, and patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL often have poor outcomes. Some subsets of DLBCL have an increased reliance on B-cell receptor (BCR) activity. Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) is a signaling molecule essential for BCR activation. Fostamatinib, an oral SYK inhibitor, was evaluated for treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL in a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial1(NCT01499303), and 9 patients had clinical benefit (1 complete response, 1 partial response, and 7 stable disease). The patients with clinical benefit from fostamatinib treatment had DLBCL of germinal center B-cell (GCB) or intermediate cell of origin. We present the clinical outcomes of 2 patients from this trial who continued to benefit from fostamatinib treatment for over 6 years. Methods: Medical records for the 2 patients were retrospectively reviewed for dose regimen, clinical response, and safety data. Results: Patient A, a 63-year-old male patient with DLBCL of GCB origin, had been diagnosed with follicular lymphoma in 1996, transformation in 2002. He had undergone 1 line of treatment for follicular lymphoma and 5 treatments for DLBCL prior to fostamatinib treatment. He started fostamatinib at 100mg BID in Dec 2012, which was reduced to 100mg daily in Apr 2013, and patient continues at 100 mg QD. Patient A has maintained a complete response (CR) for > 5 years. An isolated infra-centimetric suspicious lesion was noted in Patient A in May 2019, which is stable as of January 2020 with a progressive decrease of metabolic activity. Patient B, a male with DLBCL of an intermediate cell of origin, was 69 years old at baseline with 2 DLBCL treatments prior to fostamatinib treatment since his diagnosis in Aug 2012. He started fostamatinib in May 2013 at 200 mg BID with no dose changes over the last 7 years. Patient B had a partial response (PR) per Chesson criteria since December 2014, with a sustained improved metabolic response continuing since ( > 6 years), with all but a single metastatic site no longer visible. The only serious adverse event in these 2 patients was a ventricular fibrillation and grade 4 cardiac arrest at Day 90 in Patient B, necessitating defibrillation insertion. This was deemed unrelated to treatment and resolved. Conclusions: Fostamatinib may provide durable benefit to a small subset of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. 1. Flinn, I.W., et al., Eur J. Cancer 2016; 54:11-17


Author(s):  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
John Lamacchia ◽  
Joel Silver ◽  
Catherine A. Flynn ◽  
Shayna Sarosiek

Author(s):  
Walid Shalata ◽  
Ismaell Massalha ◽  
Kayed Al-Athamen

In this report, we describe a 38-year-old male with a very rare type of lymphoma, large B cell lymphoma with T cell-rich background and nodules lacking follicular dendritic cell meshworks (THRLBCL). In 2016 the patient presented hot flashes and night sweats (B-symptoms) and peripheral edema. He was treated with R-CHOP (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and Prednisone) chemotherapy, a Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scan was performed after four cycles of treatment which showed radiologic complete response and blood test (complete blood count (CBC)) results showed normal ranges. As of September, 2020 he patient remains in complete remission. We searched the literature for descriptions of cases spanning the diagnostic spectrum of THRLBCL and we identified only five cases worldwide. The last reported case was in 2014 with distinctive features that were difficult to classify according to the World Health Organization criteria or previously described variants. Our patient is the sixth case of THRLBCL to be reported. He is the youngest of the reported cases and the first from Israel and the Middle East.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ballotta ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Stefano Pileri ◽  
Riccardo Bruna ◽  
Monica Tani ◽  
...  

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) have a poor prognosis, with an expected survival of less than 1 year using standard salvage therapies. Recent advances in our understanding of the biology of PTCL have led to identifying B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL2) protein as a potential therapeutic target. BLC2 inhibitor venetoclax was investigated in a prospective phase II trial in patients with BCL2-positive R/R PTCL after at least one previous standard line of treatment (NCT03552692). Venetoclax given alone at a dosage of 800 mg/day resulted in one complete response (CR) and two stable diseases (SDs) among 17 enrolled patients. The majority of patients (88.2%) interrupted the treatment due to disease progression. No relationship with BCL2 expression was documented. At a median follow-up of 8 months, two patients are currently still on treatment (one CR and one SD). No case of tumor lysis syndrome was registered. Therefore, venetoclax monotherapy shows activity in a minority of patients whose biological characteristics have not yet been identified.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03552692, EudraCT number 2017-004630-29).


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29) ◽  
pp. 3377-3387
Author(s):  
Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Francesco A. D’Amore ◽  
Harry R. Koene ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Immunochemotherapy with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has become standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This randomized trial assessed whether rituximab intensification during the first 4 cycles of R-CHOP could improve the outcome of these patients compared with standard R-CHOP. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 574 patients with DLBCL age 18 to 80 years were randomly assigned to induction therapy with 6 or 8 cycles of R-CHOP-14 with (RR-CHOP-14) or without (R-CHOP-14) intensification of rituximab in the first 4 cycles. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) on induction. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. RESULTS CR was achieved in 254 (89%) of 286 patients in the R-CHOP-14 arm and 249 (86%) of 288 patients in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.36; P = .44). After a median follow-up of 92 months (range, 1-131 months), 3-year failure-free survival was 74% (95% CI, 68% to 78%) in the R-CHOP-14 arm versus 69% (95% CI, 63% to 74%) in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.61; P = .07). Progression-free survival at 3 years was 74% (95% CI, 69% to 79%) in the R-CHOP-14 arm versus 71% (95% CI, 66% to 76%) in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.55; P = .15). Overall survival at 3 years was 81% (95% CI, 76% to 85%) in the R-CHOP-14 arm versus 76% (95% CI, 70% to 80%) in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.67; P = .09). Patients between ages 66 and 80 years experienced significantly more toxicity during the first 4 cycles in the RR-CHOP-14 arm, especially neutropenia and infections. CONCLUSION Early rituximab intensification during R-CHOP-14 does not improve outcome in patients with untreated DLBCL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document