scholarly journals Antimicrobial Doses in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Comparison of Dosing Strategies

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna P. Kempke ◽  
Abbie S. Leino ◽  
Farzad Daneshvar ◽  
John Andrew Lee ◽  
Bruce A. Mueller

Purpose. Drug dose recommendations are not well defined in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) due to limited published data. Several guidelines and pharmacokinetic equations have been proposed as tools for CRRT drug dosing. Dose recommendations derived from these methods have yet to be compared or prospectively evaluated.Methods. A literature search of PubMed, Micromedex, and Embase was conducted for 40 drugs commonly used in the ICU to gather pharmacokinetic data acquired from patients with acute and chronic kidney disease as well as healthy volunteers. These data and that obtained from drug package inserts were gathered for use in three published CRRT drug dosing equations. Doses calculated for a model patient using each method were compared to doses suggested in a commonly used dosing text.Results. Full pharmacokinetic data was available for 18, 31, and 40 agents using acute kidney injury, end stage renal disease, and normal patient data, respectively. On average, calculated doses differed by 30% or more from the doses recommended by the renal dosing text for >50% of the medications.Conclusion. Wide variability in dose recommendations for patients undergoing CRRT exists when these equations are used. Alternate, validated dosing methods need to be developed for this at-risk patient population.

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youn Kyung Kee ◽  
Eun Jin Kim ◽  
Kyoung Sook Park ◽  
Seung Gyu Han ◽  
In Mee Han ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S485-S485
Author(s):  
Douglas W Challener ◽  
Kianoush Kashani ◽  
John C O’Horo

Abstract Background Sepsis frequently leads to acute kidney injury. In severe cases, patients may require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) which involves placement of a dialysis catheter and an extracorporeal blood filtration circuit. CRRT is commonly considered to “mask” fever, though this phenomenon has not been investigated. Methods We queried an institutional database of all patients on CRRT from 2007 to 2015 for inpatient temperature data and antibiotic administration records. Receipts of piperacillin–tazobactam, a carbapenem, or a third or fourth-generation cephalosporin, indicating a serious infection, were considered intervention arm. We analyzed temperatures recorded in the intensive care unit before, during, and after CRRT. Patients were divided into groups that did not receive antibiotics as well as those who did. Temperature data were Winsorized to correct for outliers. We also performed descriptive statistics for each group. Results There were 237,988 temperature readings for 1,568 ICU patients on CRRT. 1,153 patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics in ICU. In patients who received antibiotics in ICU and were presumed to have an infection, the mean temperature was 37.2°C prior to initiation of CRRT, 36.8°C while on CRRT, and 37.2°C following discontinuation of CRRT. In the 415 patients who did not receive IV antibiotics, the mean temperature was 36.9°C prior to initiation of CRRT, 36.6°C while on CRRT, and 37.0°C following discontinuation of CRRT. During each of the periods before, during, and after CRRT, patients who received antibiotics had significantly higher temperatures than those who did not (P < 0.001). Patients receiving antibiotics were generally younger (mean 60 years vs. 64 years, P < 0.001), had longer ICU stays (mean 29 days vs. 12 days, P < 0.001) and spent more time being ventilated (mean 23 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.001). The mean SOFA score on day one was similar (mean 11.1 in the antibiotic group and 10.5 in the other group). Conclusion This investigation suggests that patients have slightly lower temperatures while on CRRT, by on average less than half a degree. A similar effect is seen in both patients with infections as well as those without. Further work will be needed to determine what constitutes a true febrile response in this population. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Author(s):  
Shahrzad Tehranian ◽  
Khaled Shawwa ◽  
Kianoush B Kashani

Abstract Background Fluid overload, a critical consequence of acute kidney injury (AKI), is associated with worse outcomes. The optimal fluid removal rate per day during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the ultrafiltration rate on mortality in critically ill patients with AKI receiving CRRT. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study where we reviewed 1398 patients with AKI who received CRRT between December 2006 and November 2015 at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. The net ultrafiltration rate (UFNET) was categorized into low- and high-intensity groups (&lt;35 and ≥35 mL/kg/day, respectively). The impact of different UFNET intensities on 30-day mortality was assessed using logistic regression after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, fluid balance from intensive care unit (ICU) admission to CRRT initiation, Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation III and sequential organ failure assessment scores, baseline serum creatinine, ICU day at CRRT initiation, Charlson comorbidity index, CRRT duration and need of mechanical ventilation. Results The mean ± SD age was 62 ± 15 years, and 827 (59%) were male. There were 696 patients (49.7%) in the low- and 702 (50.2%) in the high-intensity group. Thirty-day mortality was 755 (54%). There were 420 (60%) deaths in the low-, and 335 (48%) in the high-intensity group (P &lt; 0.001). UFNET ≥35 mL/kg/day remained independently associated with lower 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.37–0.59; P &lt; 0.001) compared with &lt;35 mL/kg/day. Conclusions More intensive fluid removal, UFNET ≥35 mL/kg/day, among AKI patients receiving CRRT is associated with lower mortality. Future prospective studies are required to confirm this finding.


Shock ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kengo Mayumi ◽  
Tetsushi Yamashita ◽  
Yoshifumi Hamasaki ◽  
Eisei Noiri ◽  
Masaomi Nangaku ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document