scholarly journals Diabetic Macular Edema Pathophysiology: Vasogenic versus Inflammatory

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Romero-Aroca ◽  
Marc Baget-Bernaldiz ◽  
Alicia Pareja-Rios ◽  
Maribel Lopez-Galvez ◽  
Raul Navarro-Gil ◽  
...  

Diabetic macular edema (DME) can cause blindness in diabetic patients suffering from diabetic retinopathy (DR). DM parameters controls (glycemia, arterial tension, and lipids) are the gold standard for preventing DR and DME. Although the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to play a role in the development of DME, the pathological processes leading to the onset of this disease are highly complex and the exact sequence in which they occur is still not completely understood. Angiogenesis and inflammation have been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of this disease. However, it still remains to be clarified whether angiogenesis following VEGF overexpression is a cause or a consequence of inflammation. This paper provides a review of the data currently available, focusing on VEGF, angiogenesis, and inflammation. Our analysis suggests that angiogenesis and inflammation act interdependently during the development of DME. Knowledge of DME etiology seems to be important in treatments with anti-VEGF or anti-inflammatory drugs. Current diagnostic techniques do not permit us to differentiate between both etiologies. In the future, diagnosing the physiopathology of each patient with DME will help us to select the most effective drug.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Cindy Ung ◽  
Kareem Moussa ◽  
Yoshihiro Yonekawa

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is considered the first-line treatment option in the management of DME with corticosteroids used as second-line therapy. The DRCR.net Protocol U study was a Phase II trial that sought to compare the combination of a steroid and anti-VEGF therapy to anti-VEGF monotherapy regarding visual acuity and anatomic outcomes. This review highlights the strengths, weaknesses, and clinical implications of this study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 134 (12) ◽  
pp. 1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee M. Jampol ◽  
Adam R. Glassman ◽  
Neil M. Bressler ◽  
John A. Wells ◽  
Allison R. Ayala ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 239 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 94-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Koyanagi ◽  
Shigeo Yoshida ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Yuki Kubo ◽  
Takahito Nakama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document