scholarly journals Abdominal Pain in the Female Patient: A Case of Concurrent Acute Appendicitis and Ruptured Endometrioma

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Martine A. Louis ◽  
Amanda R. Doubleday ◽  
Elizabeth Lin ◽  
Ji Yoon Baek ◽  
Alda Andoni ◽  
...  

General surgeons are often asked to evaluate acute abdominal pain which has an expanded differential diagnosis in women of childbearing age. Acute appendicitis accounts for many surgical emergencies as a common cause of nongynecologic pelvic pain. In some rare instances, acute appendicitis has been shown to occur simultaneously with a variety of gynecologic diseases. We report a case of concurrent acute appendicitis and ruptured ovarian endometrioma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
João Paulo Nunes Drumond ◽  
André Luis Alves de Melo ◽  
Demétrius Eduardo Germini ◽  
Alexander Charles Morrell

Endometriosis in the vermiform appendix is a rare condition that affects women of childbearing age. The clinical picture can simulate inflammatory acute abdominal pain, especially acute appendicitis. Laboratory and imaging tests may assist in the diagnosis but are not conclusive. This article reports a case of acute appendicitis caused by appendiceal endometriosis for which laparoscopic appendectomy and diagnostic confirmation were performed after histopathological analysis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 1528-1530
Author(s):  
Danielle J. Feldhaus ◽  
Rachel K. Harris ◽  
Saraswati D. Dayal

Background Endometriosis is endometrial tissue located outside of the uterus. Endometriosis is rarely found in the appendix and can present very similar to acute appendicitis and is often indistinguishable on physical exam and imaging. The diagnosis is typically made after an appendectomy on pathology. Case Summary A 45-year-old female presented with right sided abdominal pain and CT revealed a possible cecal or appendiceal lesion. Colonoscopy revealed a submucosal non-obstructing cecal mass. In the operating room, the appendix was completely adherent to the cecum and a laparoscopic ileocecectomy was performed. Pathology revealed endometriosis of the appendix and cecum. Discussion Endometriosis of the appendix is a rare condition reported in less than 1% of females that is diagnosed after an appendectomy is performed for suspected appendicitis or other pathology. This diagnosis is made based on the finding of endometrial glands and stroma in the appendix. This can present as acute appendicitis or appendiceal or peri-appendiceal mass on imaging. When symptomatic, pain can align with the menstrual cycle and hemoperitoneum may be encountered intra-operatively. Treatment can be appendectomy, ileocecectomy, or right hemicolectomy if malignancy is suspected. In the patient we described, an ileocecectomy was performed with the intention of converting to a right hemicolectomy if the frozen section pathology had revealed malignancy. This case illustrates the importance of having a broad differential when diagnosing patients with abdominal pain, especially in women of childbearing age. Conclusion Appendiceal endometriosis should be considered in females of childbearing age with abdominal pain or cecal/appendiceal mass on imaging.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-203
Author(s):  
P Upadhyaya ◽  
C S Agarwal ◽  
A K Karak ◽  
S Karki ◽  
A Pradhan ◽  
...  

Background: Appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention. Objective: To determine the relative prevalence of histologically proven acute appendicitis in surgically respected specimens with clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and also to find out the rate of occurrence of characinoid tumour as an incidental histologic finding.Methods: It is a retrospective study involving all gross specimens received in the department of pathology over a period of twenty months (1.1.2006 to 31.8.2007). Histologic data on 515 appendicectomy samples (clinically diagnosed as appendicitis) of the total 7295 specimens received over a period of twenty months were retrieved from the archives of department of pathology, with exclusion of appendectomy incidental to another surgical procedure.Results: Appendectomy specimens constituted 7.0% (n=515; M:F 1.1:1) of all surgical pathologic specimens (n=7295) at B.P.K.I.H.S. The breakups of histologic diagnoses are: acute appendicitis with or without periappendicitis and gangrenous change (93.6%, n=482), “receding appendicitis” (5.4%, n=28), and normal histology (1.0%, n= 5). Carcinoid tumours were detected incidentally in three cases (0.58%) out of all appendectomy specimens.Conclusion: Analysis of data revealed a prevalence of 6.99% of histologically proven acute appendicitis in this tertiary health care set up. The rate of occurrence of carcinoid tumour was 0.58%.Health Renaissance 2014;12(3): 197-203


2021 ◽  
pp. 22-31
Author(s):  
V.G. Vakulchyk ◽  
◽  
A.V. Kapytski ◽  

Acute nonspecific abdominal pain in children is the most common problem requiring differential diagnosis with acute appendicitis. Scales for integrated assessment of individual symptoms and their combinations have been proposed and are constantly being developed that allow predicting the likelihood of acute appendicitis. Purpose to assess diagnostic value of Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) in groups of children in different ages. Materials and methods. 374 children aged 4 to 15 years with acute abdominal pain were evaluated in prospective randomized blinded study. Statistical analysis: ROC – curves, specificity and sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values; Kullback criteria; logistic regression analysis; discriminant analysis. Results. Detection frequency and diagnostic significance of the PAS scale predictors as well as obtained results by using the Pediatric Appendicitis Score depend on children age significantly. In terms of diagnosis of acute appendicitis, the PAS scale shows the best results in older children. Conclusions. Results of Pediatric Appendicitis Score depend on children ages due to different diagnostic value of predictors used in the PAS scale. Pediatric surgeons should keep in your mind these data. Modification of the scale is required taking into account the patient’s age. Further analysis of the issue of PAS using is needed. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of these Institutes. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. The authors declare no conflicts of interests. Key words: acute appendicitis, children, diagnosis, PAS scale.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 309-313
Author(s):  
Viktor G. Vakulchyk

Introduction. Current trends in the diagnostics of acute appendicitis have the following main objectives: to improve the diagnostic accuracy in destructive forms; to reduce the number of negative appendectomies and diagnostic laparoscopies. Purpose. To compare the effectiveness of Alvarado and PAS scales and to find out which of them is more appropriate in the differential diagnostics of acute abdominal pain in children. Material and Methods. A prospective randomized blind clinical trial was performed. 326 children aged 5-17 years with abdominal pain were examined. Results. No significant advantages of any of the analyzed scales were found in the differential diagnostics of acute abdominal pain in children aged 5-17 years. Both scales can be used in the primary stratification of patients. With the conclusion “Acute appendicitis is likely possible,” the level of non-diagnosed cases of acute appendicitis will not exceed 3%. Conclusions. Further assessment of various scales for the diagnostics of acute appendicitis in children has to be done in order to select the optimal one. The obtained results urge to make scales’ modification so as to improve the diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the number of negative appendectomies and diagnostic laparoscopies.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-577
Author(s):  
Jer-Shoung Lin ◽  
Ramon Rodriguez-Torres

Clinical and laboratory data on five patients with appendectomy, later proved to have acute rheumatic fever, are presented in detail. The findings indicate that abdominal pain simulating acute appendicitis can be presented as the only initial symptom in acute rheumatic fever. Awareness and knowledge of the presence of clues-high fever, rapid sedimentation rate, prolonged P-R interval, and 4 plus C-reactive protein-usually help to make the differential diagnosis. However, if doubt remains, the right approach is to go ahead with surgery since these patients tolerate anesthesia and laparotomy very well.


Author(s):  
Satish Keshav ◽  
Alexandra Kent

Acute abdominal pain is pain which is below the chest and above the pelvic brim and which has been present for ≤4 weeks. However, typically, patients present within hours of the onset of pain. The differential diagnosis does not differ much in primary and secondary care, although patients in hospital are probably more likely to be prone to iatrogenic illnesses such as pancreatitis, intestinal ischaemia, and Clostridium difficile-associated colitis. This chapter covers the approach to diagnosis, key diagnostic tests, therapies, prognosis, and dealing with uncertainty.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina Kambouri ◽  
Stefanos Gardikis ◽  
Alexandra Giatromanolaki ◽  
Aggelos Tsalkidis ◽  
Efthimios Sivridis ◽  
...  

Primary omental infarction (POI) has a low incidence worldwide, with most cases occurring in adults. This condition is rarely considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in childhood. Herein, we present a case of omental infarction in an obese 10-year-old boy who presented with acute abdominal pain in the right lower abdomen. The ultrasound (US) examination did not reveal the appendix but showed secondary signs suggesting acute appendicitis. The child was thus operated on under the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis but the intraoperative finding was omental infarct. Since the omental infarct as etiology of acute abdominal pain is uncommon, we highlight some of the possible etiologies and emphasize the importance of accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of omental infarction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document