scholarly journals Growth Hormone Therapy Benefits Pituitary Stalk Interruption Syndrome Patients with Short Stature: A Retrospective Study of 75 Han Chinese

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Zhi Wang ◽  
Ling-Ling Guo ◽  
Bai-Yu Han ◽  
An-Ping Wang ◽  
Hong-Yan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
Final Height ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Pituitary Stalk ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Height Gain ◽  
The Impact

Objective. We aim to investigate the long-term benefits of growth hormone (GH) therapy in short stature adolescents and adults with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS), which would be beneficial for future clinical applications.Design and Methods. In this study, initial height, final height, total height gain, and GH treatment history were retrospectively investigated in 75 Chinese PSIS patients. We compared height gain between the GH treated cohort and untreated cohort and explored the impact of different GH therapy duration on height gain.Results. For GH treated patients, their final height (SDS) increased from-1.99±1.91(−6.93~2.80) at bone age (BA) of 11.2 (5.0~17.0) years to-1.47±1.64(−7.82~1.05) at BA of 16.6 (8.0~18.0) years (P=0.016). And GH treated patients had more height gain than the untreated patients (P<0.05). There was a significant difference between the different GH therapy duration groups (P=0.001): GH 0 versus GH 3,P=0.000; GH 1 versus GH 3,P=0.028; GH 2 versus GH 3,P=0.044.Conclusion. Adult Chinese PSIS patients with short stature benefited the most from at least 12 months of GH therapy. Although patient diagnosis age was lagged behind in the developing countries, GH treatment was still effective for them and resulted in a higher final height and more height gain.

scholarly journals Delayed Bone Age Might Accelerate the Response to Human Growth Hormone Treatment in Small for Gestational Age Children with Short Stature

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jung-Eun Moon ◽  
Cheol Woo Ko
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Human Growth ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Pediatric Endocrinology ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Purpose. Growth hormone (GH) treatment is recommended to improve growth and psychosocial problems in short stature children born small for gestational age (SGA). Although GH therapy in these patients has been extensively studied, the impact of therapy according to delays in bone age (BA) is not known well. Objective. To investigate the effects of GH therapy in SGA patients with short stature according to BA delay. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed changes in height SD score (SDS) and BA/chronological age (CA) after 6 and 12 months of GH therapy in patients grouped according to BA delay. We studied 27 SGA children with short stature in the pediatric endocrinology clinic of Kyungpook National University Children’s Hospital. Results. Of the 27 patients, 9 had <2 years of BA delay, while 18 had >2 years of delay. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gestational age and weight at birth, height SDS, IGF-1 SDS, and growth hormone dosage at the beginning of therapy. However, height SDS increased significantly in the group with >2 years of BA delay after 6 months of GH therapy (−2.50 ± 0.61 vs −1.87 ± 0.82; p=0.037) and 12 months (−2.27 ± 0.70 vs −1.63 ± 0.65; p=0.002). When height SDS was compared between with and without GHD, there were no significant differences. Conclusions. Delayed BA (>2 years) may impact the response to GH treatment in SGA children with short stature.

Efficacy of long-term growth hormone therapy in short non-growth hormone-deficient children

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Schena ◽  
Cristina Meazza ◽  
Sara Pagani ◽  
Valeria Paganelli ◽  
Elena Bozzola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Final Height ◽  
Standard Deviation Score ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Short Children ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Height Gain ◽  
The Cost

AbstractBackground:In recent years, several studies have been published showing different responses to growth hormone (GH) treatment in idiopathic short stature children. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether non-growth-hormone-deficient (non-GHD) short children could benefit from long-term GH treatment as GHD patients.Methods:We enrolled 22 prepubertal children and 22 age- and sex-matched GHD patients, with comparable height, body mass index (BMI), bone age, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) circulating levels. The patients were treated with recombinant human GH (rhGH) and followed until they reach adult height.Results:During GH treatment, the two groups grew in parallel, reaching the same final height-standard deviation score (SDS) and the same height gain. On the contrary, we found significantly lower IGF-I serum concentrations in non-GHD patients than in GHD ones, at the end of therapy (p=0.0055).Conclusions:In our study, the response to GH treatment in short non-GHD patients proved to be similar to that in GHD ones. However, a careful selection of short non-GHD children to be treated with GH would better justify the cost of long-term GH therapy.

scholarly journals Final Adult Height after Growth Hormone Treatment in Patients with Turner Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 373-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Min Ahn ◽  
Jung Hwan Suh ◽  
Ah Reum Kwon ◽  
Hyun Wook Chae ◽  
Ho-Seong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Adult Height ◽  
Final Height ◽  
Early Age ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Height Range ◽  
Final Adult Height ◽  
Height Gain

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate final adult height (AH) after recombinant human growth hormone (GH) treatment of girls with Turner syndrome (TS) and to elucidate the predicting factors for their growth response. Methods: We enrolled 73 patients with TS who underwent GH treatment and reached AH and 14 patients who did not undergo treatment. To assess the effectiveness of GH therapy, we evaluated final AH, height gain over the predicted AH, and height gain over the projected AH. In addition, to analyze the factors affecting final AH, we studied correlations between final AH (or height SDS, height gain) and treatment variables. Results: GH therapy was started at a mean age of 8.87 ± 3.73 years, and the treatment duration was 6.47 ± 3.02 years. The patients in the treated group reached a final AH of 152.03 ± 4.66 cm (final AH SDS for the general population: –1.93 ± 1.03) with a gain over projected AH at the start of treatment of 12.21 ± 4.33 cm. The untreated control subjects had a final AH of 143.57 ± 4.06 cm with a gain over projected AH at the first visit of 3.89 ± 3.80 cm. Final AH and AH SDS were positively correlated to height SDS at the start of treatment. Thirty-five patients out of the 73 GH-treated patients (47.9%) attained to a normal range of height for Korean girls. The patients having attained to a normal height range after GH treatment had shown a higher height SDS at the start of GH treatment, a higher mid-parental height SDS, and a younger age at initiation of estrogen. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that GH treatment at an early age is effective in improving the final height SDS and height SDS gain in TS patients. Therefore, GH administration at an early age is important for final height gain.

scholarly journals SAT-107 Improved Adult Height in Brazilian Turner Syndrome Patients Treated with Growth Hormone

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Da Cunha Scalco ◽  
Adriana Farrant Braz ◽  
Alexsandra C Malaquias ◽  
Sonir Roberto Rauber Antonini ◽  
Gil Guerra-Junior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Adult Height ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Referral Hospitals ◽  
Height Gain

Abstract Background: Short stature is the most frequent clinical manifestation in Turner syndrome (TS), occurring in 98% of these patients. Growth hormone was shown to improve adult height in TS patients from diverse genetic backgrounds. However, there are few studies on adult height in TS patients from developing countries, where the diagnosis is frequently delayed. Objective: To compare adult height between GH-treated and untreated TS patients. Patients and methods: 120 GH-treated and 109 GH-untreated TS patients from 3 referral hospitals in Brazil were evaluated. The most common reasons for not treating TS patients with GH were late diagnosis or GH unavailability. Data on karyotype, parents’ height, puberty development and GH treatment were obtained from their medical records. Adult height was determined when growth velocity was inferior to 1cm/year during a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Results: The frequency of 45,X karyotype was similar between the groups (48.7% vs. 41.9% in GH-treated vs. GH-untreated TS patients, respectively, P= 0.639). GH-treated TS patients started GH therapy at a chronological age (CA) of 11.2 ± 3.7 yr, bone age of 9.3 ± 3.1 yr, height SDS (British 1965 standards) -3.1 ± 1.1. GH mean dose was 48µg/kg.d and GH treatment duration was 5.4 ± 3.0 yr. Estrogen replacement was started late, at CA of 14.3 ± 2.0 yr in GH-treated and at 14.9 ± 1.9 yr in GH-untreated patients, and the rate of spontaneous puberty was similar between the groups (GH-treated 16.8% vs. GH-untreated 22,8%, P=0.304). Adult height was significantly higher after GH treatment (150.1 ± 5.8 cm vs. 143.3 ± 7.2 cm in GH-treated vs. untreated TS patients, respectively, P &lt; 0.001), even with a small but significant difference in target height between the groups (158.2 ± 4.8 vs. 159.8± 4.5 cm in GH-treated vs. untreated TS patients, respectively, P= 0.015). More than half of the TS GH-treated patients reached normal adult height (equal or higher than 150.2 cm), whereas only 15.6% of GH-untreated patients reached it. Conclusion: Despite the delayed diagnosis of TS patients in our cohort, GH treatment was associated with a significant height gain, and the TS GH-treated group was around 7 cm taller than the GH-untreated group.

Height Increment and Laboratory Profile of Boys Treated With Aromatase Inhibitors With or Without Growth Hormone

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 778-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludmila Pedrosa ◽  
Joice de Oliveira ◽  
Paula Thomé ◽  
Cristiane Kochi ◽  
Durval Damiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Adult Height ◽  
Final Height ◽  
Recombinant Human Growth Hormone ◽  
Human Growth ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Height Loss ◽  
Retrospective Data Analysis ◽  
Height Gain

AbstractAromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been used to recover height loss due to their capacity to delay growth plate closure. Long-term studies describing final heights are needed to determine the efficacy and safety profiles of these drugs for the treatment of impaired growth. This study aims to identify the therapeutic efficiency of AIs in improve growth and to describe potential adverse effects during treatment. Retrospective data analysis of 96 adolescents, among which 22 patients already attained near-final height, were followed at outpatient clinics of two referral centers. Patients were all in puberty and present idiopathic decrease in predicted adult height. Patients were treated with Anastrozole (ANZ: 1 mg/day) or Letrozole (LTZ: 2.5 mg/day) with/without recombinant human growth hormone (0.05 mg/kg/day) for 1.0 to 3.5 years (2.1±1.2 years). Height gain, body mass index, lipid, liver enzyme, gonadotropins and testosterone levels were described before and at the end of treatment. Predicted adult height (PAH) and NF height were compared with the TH. The height SDS (adjusted to bone age) significantly increased (p<0.05) in all groups [0.8±0.7 (ANZ), 0.7±0.7 (ANZ+GH), 0.3±0.5 (LTZ), and 1.2±0.8 (LTZ+GH)]; the latter group exhibited the highest increment of PAH and growth recovery to the TH (p<0.004). No significant side effects were observed. AI treatment, especially when used in association with GH was able to improve growth and the attainment of familial target height.

Height Gain and Safety Outcomes in Growth Hormone-Treated Children with Idiopathic Short Stature: Experience from a Prospective Observational Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Child ◽  
Charmian A. Quigley ◽  
Gordon B. Cutler, Jr ◽  
Wayne V. Moore ◽  
Kupper A. Wintergerst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
International Study ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Idiopathic Short Stature ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Height Gain ◽  
Over Time

Background/Objectives: Growth hormone (GH) treatment of idiopathic short stature (ISS) received US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2003. We assessed height gain and safety in 2,450 children with ISS treated with GH in US clinical practice. Methods: Short-term height gain, near-adult height (NAH), and safety outcomes were investigated using Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study data. Results: Compared to children with isolated idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD), those with ISS were shorter at baseline but had similar age and GH dose. Mean ± SD height SD score (SDS) increase was similar for ISS and IGHD, with 0.6 ± 0.3 (first), 0.4 ± 0.3 (second), 0.3 ± 0.3 (third), and 0.1 ± 0.3 (fourth year) for ISS. Girls with ISS (27% of subjects) were younger and shorter than boys but had similar height gain over time. At NAH in the ISS group (n = 467), mean ± SD age, GH duration, and height SDS were 17.3 ± 2.3 years, 4.6 ± 2.7 years, and –1.2 ± 0.9, respectively. Height gain from baseline was 1.1 ± 1.0 SDS and was greater for boys than girls (1.2 ± 1.0 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9), but boys were treated longer (5.1 ± 2.8 vs. 3.6 ± 2.5 years). Adverse events were reported for 24% with ISS versus 20% with IGHD – most were common childhood conditions or previously reported in GH-treated patients. Conclusions: GH-treated children with ISS achieved substantial height gain, similar to patients with IGHD. Fewer GH-treated girls were enrolled than boys, but with similar height SDS gain over time. No ISS-specific safety issues were identified. Thus, GH treatment of ISS appears to have a safety/effectiveness profile similar to that of IGHD.

scholarly journals Significance of Direct Confirmation of Growth Hormone Insensitivity for the Diagnosis of Primary IGF-I Deficiency

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
Joanna Smyczyńska ◽  
Urszula Smyczyńska ◽  
Maciej Hilczer ◽  
Renata Stawerska ◽  
Andrzej Lewiński
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Final Height ◽  
Standard Deviation Score ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Growth Hormone Insensitivity ◽  
Stimulation Tests ◽  
Direct Confirmation

Primary insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) deficiency is a synonym of growth hormone (GH) insensitivity (GHI), however the necessity of direct confirmation of GH resistance by IGF-I generation test (IGF-GT) is discussed. GHI may disturb intrauterine growth, nevertheless short children born small for gestational age (SGA) are treated with GH. We tested the hypothesis that children with appropriate birth size (AGA), height standard deviation score (SDS) <−3.0, GH peak in stimulation tests (stimGH) ≥10.0 µg/L, IGF-I <2.5 centile, and excluded GHI may benefit during GH therapy. The analysis comprised 21 AGA children compared with 6 SGA and 20 GH-deficient ones, with height SDS and IGF-I as in the studied group. All patients were treated with GH up to final height (FH). Height velocity, IGF-I, and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) concentrations before and during first year of treatment were assessed. Effectiveness of therapy was better in GHD than in IGF-I deficiency (IGFD), with no significant difference between SGA and AGA groups. All but two AGA children responded well to GH. Pretreatment IGF-I and increase of height velocity (HV) during therapy but not the result of IGF-GT correlated with FH. As most AGA children with apparent severe IGFD benefit during GH therapy, direct confirmation of GHI seems necessary to diagnose true primary IGFD in them.

scholarly journals ACAN Gene Mutations in Short Children Born SGA and Response to Growth Hormone Treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 1458-1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manouk van der Steen ◽  
Rolph Pfundt ◽  
Stephan J.W.H. Maas ◽  
Willie M. Bakker-van Waarde ◽  
Roelof J. Odink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Midface Hypoplasia ◽  
Short Children ◽  
Hormone Analog

Abstract Background: Some children born small for gestational age (SGA) show advanced bone age (BA) maturation during growth hormone (GH) treatment. ACAN gene mutations have been described in children with short stature and advanced BA. Objective: To determine the presence of ACAN gene mutations in short SGA children with advanced BA and assess the response to GH treatment. Methods: BA assessment in 290 GH-treated SGA children. ACAN sequencing in 29 children with advanced BA ≥0.5 years compared with calendar age. Results: Four of 29 SGA children with advanced BA had an ACAN gene mutation (13.8%). Mutations were related to additional characteristics: midface hypoplasia (P = 0.003), joint problems (P = 0.010), and broad great toes (P = 0.003). Children with one or fewer additional characteristic had no mutation. Of children with two additional characteristics, 50% had a mutation. Of children with three additional characteristics, 100% had a mutation. All GH-treated children with a mutation received gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) treatment for 2 years from onset of puberty. At adult height, one girl was 5 cm taller than her mother and one boy was 8 cm taller than his father with the same ACAN gene mutation. Conclusion: This study expands the differential diagnosis of genetic variants in children born SGA and proposes a clinical scoring system for identifying subjects most likely to have an ACAN gene mutation. ACAN sequencing should be considered in children born SGA with persistent short stature, advanced BA, and midface hypoplasia, joint problems, or broad great toes. Our findings suggest that children with an ACAN gene mutation benefit from GH treatment with 2 years of GnRHa.

scholarly journals Influence of growth hormone therapy on the occurrence of a second neoplasm in survivors of childhood cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 183 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Thomas-Teinturier ◽  
Isabelle Oliver-Petit ◽  
Helene Pacquement ◽  
Brice Fresneau ◽  
Rodrigue Sétchéou Allodji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Second Neoplasm ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Survivors Of Childhood Cancer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Control Study

Context: Growth hormone (GH) deficiency is a common late effect of cranial irradiation. However, concerns have been raised that GH treatment might lead to an increased risk of a second neoplasm (SN). Objective: To study the impact of GH treatment on the risk of SN in a French cohort of survivors of childhood cancer (CCS) treated before 1986. Design and setting: Cohort study and nested case–control study. Participants: Of the 2852 survivors, with a median follow-up of 26 years, 196 had received GH therapy (median delay from cancer diagnosis: 5.5 years). Main outcome measures: Occurrence of SN Results: In total, 374 survivors developed a SN, including 40 who had received GH therapy. In a multivariate analysis, GH treatment did not increase the risk of secondary non-meningioma brain tumors (RR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.2–1.5, P = 0.3), secondary non-brain cancer (RR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4–1.2, P = 0.2), or meningioma (RR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.9–4, P = 0.09). Nevertheless, we observed a slight non-significant increase in the risk of meningioma with GH duration: 1.6-fold (95% CI: 1.2–3.0) after an exposure of less than 4 years vs 2.3-fold (95% CI: 0.9–5.6) after a longer exposure (P for trend = 0.07) confirmed by the results of a case–control study. Conclusion: This study confirms the overall safety of GH use in survivors of childhood cancer, which does not increase the risk of a SN. The slight excess in the risk of meningioma in patients with long-term GH treatment is non-significant and could be due to difficulties in adjustment on cranial radiation volume/dose and/or undiagnosed meningioma predisposing conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document