scholarly journals On Vertex Covering Transversal Domination Number of Regular Graphs

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vasanthi ◽  
K. Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Simple Graph ◽  
Regular Graphs ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Cubic Graph ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Covering

A simple graphG=(V,E)is said to ber-regular if each vertex ofGis of degreer. The vertex covering transversal domination numberγvct(G)is the minimum cardinality among all vertex covering transversal dominating sets ofG. In this paper, we analyse this parameter on different kinds of regular graphs especially forQnandH3,n. Also we provide an upper bound forγvctof a connected cubic graph of ordern≥8. Then we try to provide a more stronger relationship betweenγandγvct.

On the minimum vertex covering transversal dominating sets in graphs and their classification

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 1750069 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vasanthi ◽  
K. Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Covering ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Covering Set ◽  
Simple Connected Graph

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple and connected graph. A dominating set [Formula: see text] is said to be a vertex covering transversal dominating set if it intersects every minimum vertex covering set of [Formula: see text]. The vertex covering transversal domination number [Formula: see text] is the minimum cardinality among all vertex covering transversal dominating sets of [Formula: see text]. A vertex covering transversal dominating set of minimum cardinality [Formula: see text] is called a minimum vertex covering transversal dominating set or simply a [Formula: see text]-set. In this paper, we prove some general theorems on the vertex covering transversal domination number of a simple connected graph. We also provide some results about [Formula: see text]-sets and try to classify those sets based on their intersection with the minimum vertex covering sets.

scholarly journals ON THE ROOTS OF TOTAL DOMINATION POLYNOMIAL OF GRAPHS, II

2019 ◽  
pp. 659
Author(s):  
Saeid Alikhani ◽  
Nasrin Jafari
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Simple Graph ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Polynomial

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple graph of order $n$. A  total dominating set of $G$ is a subset $D$ of $V$, such that every vertex of $V$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in  $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is  minimum cardinality of  total dominating set in $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_t(G)$. The total domination polynomial of $G$ is the polynomial $D_t(G,x)=\sum_{i=\gamma_t(G)}^n d_t(G,i)$, where $d_t(G,i)$ is the number of total dominating sets of $G$ of size $i$. In this paper, we study roots of the total domination polynomial of some graphs.  We show that  all roots of $D_t(G, x)$ lie in the circle with center $(-1, 0)$ and radius $\sqrt[\delta]{2^n-1}$, where $\delta$ is the minimum degree of $G$. As a consequence, we prove that if $\delta\geq \frac{2n}{3}$,  then every integer root of $D_t(G, x)$ lies in the set $\{-3,-2,-1,0\}$.

Some results for the two disjoint connected dominating sets problem

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950065
Author(s):  
Xianliang Liu ◽  
Zishen Yang ◽  
Wei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Cubic Graph ◽  
Connected Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Dominating Set Problem

As a variant of minimum connected dominating set problem, two disjoint connected dominating sets (DCDS) problem is to ask whether there are two DCDS [Formula: see text] in a connected graph [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], and if not, how to add an edge subset with minimum cardinality such that the new graph has a pair of DCDS. The two DCDS problem is so hard that it is NP-hard on trees. In this paper, if the vertex set [Formula: see text] of a connected graph [Formula: see text] can be partitioned into two DCDS of [Formula: see text], then it is called a DCDS graph. First, a necessary but not sufficient condition is proposed for cubic (3-regular) graph to be a DCDS graph. To be exact, if a cubic graph is a DCDS graph, there are at most four disjoint triangles in it. Next, if a connected graph [Formula: see text] is a DCDS graph, a simple but nontrivial upper bound [Formula: see text] of the girth [Formula: see text] is presented.

scholarly journals On autographix conjecture regarding domination number and average eccentricity

Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Dan Pei ◽  
Xiang-Feng Pan ◽  
Jing Tian ◽  
Gui-Qin Peng
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Maximal Distance ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Average Eccentricity

The eccentricity of a vertex is the maximal distance from it to another vertex and the average eccentricity ecc(G) of a graph G is the mean value of eccentricities of all vertices of G. A set S ? V(G) is a dominating set of a graph G if NG(v) ? S ? 0 for any vertex v ? V(G)\S. The domination number (G) of G is the minimum cardinality of all dominating sets of G. In this paper, we correct an AutoGraphiX conjecture regarding the domination number and average eccentricity, and present a proof of the revised conjecture. In addition, we establish an upper bound on ?(T)-ecc(T) for an n-vertex tree T.

Outer-convex domination in graphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonecis A. Dayap ◽  
Enrico L. Enriquez
Keyword(s):  
Convex Set ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Simple Graph ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Convex Domination Number ◽  
Domination In Graphs

Let [Formula: see text] be a connected simple graph. A set [Formula: see text] of vertices of a graph [Formula: see text] is an outer-convex dominating set if every vertex not in [Formula: see text] is adjacent to some vertex in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is a convex set. The outer-convex domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum cardinality of an outer-convex dominating set of [Formula: see text]. An outer-convex dominating set of cardinality [Formula: see text] will be called a [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]. In this paper, we initiate the study and characterize the outer-convex dominating sets in the join of the two graphs.

A note on improved upper bounds on the transversal number of hypergraphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950004
Author(s):  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Nader Jafari Rad
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Size ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Isolated Vertex ◽  
Transversal Number

A subset [Formula: see text] of vertices in a hypergraph [Formula: see text] is a transversal if [Formula: see text] has a nonempty intersection with every edge of [Formula: see text]. The transversal number of [Formula: see text] is the minimum size of a transversal in [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] of vertices in a graph [Formula: see text] with no isolated vertex, is a total dominating set if every vertex of [Formula: see text] is adjacent to a vertex of [Formula: see text]. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set in [Formula: see text] is the total domination number of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we obtain a new (improved) probabilistic upper bound for the transversal number of a hypergraph, and a new (improved) probabilistic upper bound for the total domination number of a graph.

scholarly journals New Bounds on the Double Total Domination Number of Graphs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cabrera-Martínez ◽  
F. A. Hernández-Mira
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set

AbstractLet G be a graph of minimum degree at least two. A set $$D\subseteq V(G)$$ D ⊆ V ( G ) is said to be a double total dominating set of G if $$|N(v)\cap D|\ge 2$$ | N ( v ) ∩ D | ≥ 2 for every vertex $$v\in V(G)$$ v ∈ V ( G ) . The minimum cardinality among all double total dominating sets of G is the double total domination number of G. In this article, we continue with the study of this parameter. In particular, we provide new bounds on the double total domination number in terms of other domination parameters. Some of our results are tight bounds that improve some well-known results.

scholarly journals Distance Domination and Distance Irredundance in Graphs

10.37236/953 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Dirk Meierling ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Distance Domination

A set $D\subseteq V$ of vertices is said to be a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set of $G$ if the distance between each vertex $u\in V-D$ and $D$ is at most $k$ (and $D$ induces a connected graph in $G$). The minimum cardinality of a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set in $G$ is the (connected) distance $k$-domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma_k(G)$ ($\gamma_k^c(G)$, respectively). The set $D$ is defined to be a total $k$-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$ other than itself. The minimum cardinality among all total $k$-dominating sets of $G$ is called the total $k$-domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_k^t(G)$. For $x\in X\subseteq V$, if $N^k[x]-N^k[X-x]\neq\emptyset$, the vertex $x$ is said to be $k$-irredundant in $X$. A set $X$ containing only $k$-irredundant vertices is called $k$-irredundant. The $k$-irredundance number of $G$, denoted by $ir_k(G)$, is the minimum cardinality taken over all maximal $k$-irredundant sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we establish lower bounds for the distance $k$-irredundance number of graphs and trees. More precisely, we prove that ${5k+1\over 2}ir_k(G)\geq \gamma_k^c(G)+2k$ for each connected graph $G$ and $(2k+1)ir_k(T)\geq\gamma_k^c(T)+2k\geq |V|+2k-kn_1(T)$ for each tree $T=(V,E)$ with $n_1(T)$ leaves. A class of examples shows that the latter bound is sharp. The second inequality generalizes a result of Meierling and Volkmann and Cyman, Lemańska and Raczek regarding $\gamma_k$ and the first generalizes a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $ir_1$. Furthermore, we shall show that $\gamma_k^c(G)\leq{3k+1\over2}\gamma_k^t(G)-2k$ for each connected graph $G$, thereby generalizing a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $k=1$.

Pitchfork domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050025
Author(s):  
Manal N. Al-Harere ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdlhusein
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Undirected Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
New Model ◽  
Domination In Graphs

In this paper, a new model of domination in graphs called the pitchfork domination is introduced. Let [Formula: see text] be a finite, simple and undirected graph without isolated vertices, a subset [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a pitchfork dominating set if every vertex [Formula: see text] dominates at least [Formula: see text] and at most [Formula: see text] vertices of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are non-negative integers. The domination number of [Formula: see text], denotes [Formula: see text] is a minimum cardinality over all pitchfork dominating sets in [Formula: see text]. In this work, pitchfork domination when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is studied. Some bounds on [Formula: see text] related to the order, size, minimum degree, maximum degree of a graph and some properties are given. Pitchfork domination is determined for some known and new modified graphs. Finally, a question has been answered and discussed that; does every finite, simple and undirected graph [Formula: see text] without isolated vertices have a pitchfork domination or not?

scholarly journals On the Total Outer k-Independent Domination Number of Graphs

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera-Martínez ◽  
Juan Carlos Hernández-Gómez ◽  
Ernesto Parra-Inza ◽  
José María Sigarreta Almira
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Np Hard Problem ◽  
Independent Domination ◽  
Independent Dominating Set ◽  
Computational Properties

A set of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to at least one vertex in such a set. We say that a total dominating set D is a total outer k-independent dominating set of G if the maximum degree of the subgraph induced by the vertices that are not in D is less or equal to k − 1 . The minimum cardinality among all total outer k-independent dominating sets is the total outer k-independent domination number of G. In this article, we introduce this parameter and begin with the study of its combinatorial and computational properties. For instance, we give several closed relationships between this novel parameter and other ones related to domination and independence in graphs. In addition, we give several Nordhaus–Gaddum type results. Finally, we prove that computing the total outer k-independent domination number of a graph G is an NP-hard problem.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document