scholarly journals Chinese Herbal Bath Therapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Chen ◽  
Hongsheng Zhan ◽  
Mei Chung ◽  
Xun Lin ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Chinese Herbs ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Chinese Herbal ◽  
Effectiveness Rate ◽  
Bath Therapy

Objective. Chinese herbal bath therapy (CHBT) has traditionally been considered to have analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. We conducted the first meta-analysis evaluating its benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).Methods. We searched three English and four Chinese databases through October, 2014. Randomized trials evaluating at least 2 weeks of CHBT for knee OA were selected. The effects of CHBT on clinical symptoms included both pain level (via the visual analog scale) and total effectiveness rate, which assessed pain, physical performance, and wellness. We performed random-effects meta-analyses using mean difference.Results. Fifteen studies totaling 1618 subjects met eligibility criteria. Bath prescription included, on average, 13 Chinese herbs with directions to steam and wash around the knee for 20–40 minutes once or twice daily. Mean treatment duration was 3 weeks. Results from meta-analysis showed superior pain improvement (mean difference = −0.59 points; 95% confidence intervals [CI], −0.83 to −0.36;p<0.00001) and higher total effectiveness rate (risk ratio = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.28;p<0.00001) when compared with standard western treatment. No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion. Chinese herbal bath therapy may be a safe, effective, and simple alternative treatment modality for knee OA. Further rigorously designed, randomized trials are warranted.

scholarly journals Acupotomy Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Jigao Sun ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Ruizheng Zhu ◽  
Qianglong Chen ◽  
Mengge Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Womac Pain ◽  
Womac Pain Score ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Effectiveness Rate ◽  
And Function

Background and Purpose. Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major public health problem, and currently, few effective medical treatments exist. Chinese acupotomy therapy has been widely used for the treatment of knee OA in China. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of Chinese acupotomy in treating knee OA to inform clinical practice. Methods. We performed a comprehensive search on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and four Chinese databases for articles published prior to June 2020. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used acupotomy therapy as the major intervention in adults with knee OA, were published in either Chinese and English, included more than 20 subjects in each group, and included pain and function in the outcome measures. Knee OA was defined by the American College of Rheumatology or Chinese Orthopedic Association criteria in all studies. We extracted the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score, the total effectiveness rate, the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) activities of daily living score, and Lysholm’s score. We calculated the mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) for all relevant outcomes. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models when appropriate. Results. We identified 1317 potentially relevant studies, thirty-two of which met the eligibility criteria and were conducted in China between 2007 and 2020. A total of 3021 knee OA patients (62.96% female, median age: 57 years, and median disease duration: 33 months) were included. The treatment duration ranged from 1 week to 5 weeks (median: 3 weeks). The typical acupotomy treatment involved releasing soft tissue adhesions and was performed once a week for 1–5 weeks until the pain was relieved. The control group treatments included acupuncture (8 studies), electroacupuncture (10 studies), sodium hyaluronate (8 studies), radiofrequency electrotherapy (1 study), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, 5 studies). The results from the meta-analysis showed that acupotomy led to superior improvements in the VAS pain score (MD = −1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), −1.51 to −0.71; p  < 0.00001) and WOMAC pain score (MD = −2.32; 95% CI, −2.94 to −1.69; p  < 0.00001), a higher total effectiveness rate (RR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09–1.21; p  < 0.00001), and superior improvements in the JOA score (MD = 6.39; 95% CI, 4.11–9.76; p  < 0.00001) and Lysholm’s score (MD = 12.75; 95% CI, 2.61–22.89; p  = 0.01) for overall pain and function. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion. Chinese acupotomy therapy may relieve pain and improve function in patients with knee OA. Furthermore, rigorously designed and well-controlled RCTs are warranted.

scholarly journals Traditional Chinese Medications for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (04) ◽  
pp. 677-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Chen ◽  
Hongsheng Zhan ◽  
Jolanta Marszalek ◽  
Mei Chung ◽  
Xun Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Characteristics ◽  
Chinese Herbs ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Subscale ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Traditional Chinese medication (TCM) has analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). We conducted the first systematic review of the best quantitative and qualitative evidence currently available in order to evaluate the effectiveness of TCM in relieving pain in knee OA. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using three English and four Chinese biomedical databases from their inception through March 1, 2015. We included randomized controlled trials of TCM for knee OA with intervention durations of at least two weeks. The effects of TCM on pain and other clinical symptoms were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The total effectiveness rate, which was used to assess overall pain, physical performance and wellness, was also measured. Two researchers independently extracted data on study design, population characteristics, duration, intervention, outcomes, risk of bias, and primary results. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis when appropriate. We also explored factors that could explain the heterogeneity by conducting subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Twenty-three studies, totaling 2362 subjects, met the eligibility criteria. Treatments were formulated with an average of 8 Chinese herbs and were prescribed based on the traditional Chinese diagnostic method of syndrome differentiation. The mean treatment duration was seven weeks, with oral administration occurring one to three times a day. Compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and intra-articular hyaluronate injections, 18 of the studies showed significantly improved VAS pain scores (Mean Difference [MD] [Formula: see text] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.94; [Formula: see text]), six of the studies showed significantly improved WOMAC pain subscale scores (MD [Formula: see text] 2.23; 95% CI, 0.56 to 3.91; [Formula: see text]), and 16 of the trials showed significantly improved total effectiveness rates (risk ratio [Formula: see text] 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.19; [Formula: see text] 0.0003). In addition, TCM showed a lower risk of adverse events than standard western treatments. This evidence suggests that TCM is safe and effective for improving pain, function, and wellness in treatments of knee OA. However, there is inherent clinical heterogeneity (diverse TCM formulations, controls, and treatment regimens) among the included trials. Despite these limitations, the potential analgesic effects of TCM warrant further methodologically rigorous research to determine the clinical implications of TCM on pain management in knee OA.

scholarly journals Effects of mechanical interventions in the management of knee osteoarthritis: protocol for an OA Trial Bank systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e043026
Author(s):  
Erin M Macri ◽  
Michael Callaghan ◽  
Marienke van Middelkoop ◽  
Miriam Hattle ◽  
Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Broad Class ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Individual Participant Data ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
International Regulations ◽  
Individual Participant ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Mechanical Intervention

IntroductionKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and disabling musculoskeletal condition. Biomechanical factors may play a key role in the aetiology of knee OA, therefore, a broad class of interventions involves the application or wear of devices designed to mechanically support knees with OA. These include gait aids, bracing, taping, orthotics and footwear. The literature regarding efficacy of mechanical interventions has been conflicting or inconclusive, and this may be because certain subgroups with knee OA respond better to mechanical interventions. Our primary aim is to identify subgroups with knee OA who respond favourably to mechanical interventions.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic review to identify randomised clinical trials of any mechanical intervention for the treatment of knee OA. We will invite lead authors of eligible studies to share individual participant data (IPD). We will perform an IPD meta-analysis for each type of mechanical intervention to evaluate efficacy, with our main outcome being pain. Where IPD are not available, this will be achieved using aggregate data. We will then evaluate five potential treatment effect modifiers using a two-stage approach. If data permit, we will also evaluate whether biomechanics mediate the effects of mechanical interventions on pain in knee OA.Ethics and disseminationNo new data will be collected in this study. We will adhere to institutional, national and international regulations regarding the secure and confidential sharing of IPD, addressing ethics as indicated. We will disseminate findings via international conferences, open-source publication in peer-reviewed journals and summaries posted on websites serving the public and clinicians.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020155466.

scholarly journals Intra-Articular Injection of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fractions for the Cartilage Repair of Grade 2 and 3 Knee Osteoarthritis: A Confirmatory Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Qing Bi ◽  
Taihen Yu ◽  
Zheping Hong ◽  
Yu Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Cartilage Regeneration ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundCartilage defect remains one of the most important reasons for the rapid development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Numerous reports have confirmed the safety and clinical efficacy of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fractions (SVF), which has recently been used clinically to treat patients with knee OA. However, there is still no consensus as to whether SVF can promote cartilage regeneration. Herein, we purposed to evaluate the effectiveness of SVF in cartilage regeneration by developing cartilage model based on the 3D-FS-SPGR sequence.MethodsPatients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 knee OA were recruited in our research. Then, we monitored patients and subsequently scored symptoms using WOMAC, VAS, and range of motion (ROM) before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The WORMS and MOCART were recorded by magnetic resonance imaging. The cartilage model of the patient was established using the 3D-FS-SPGR sequence, while the relevant parameters of the model were counted at baseline, 6, and 12 months.ResultsWe enrolled 47 patients (53 knees) with knee OA in this study, of which 29 knees were classified as grade 2, while 24 were assigned grade 3. No treatment-related adverse event was observed in our study. Notably, WOMAC, VAS, and ROM showed a significant improvement at 12 months. We further found that the thickness, volume, and surface of the cartilage defect decreased, while the volume of healthy cartilage increased in all regions, particularly in the medial femoral and tibia condyle. Moreover, the scores of WORMS and MOCART revealed a substantial improvement of cartilage repair at 12 months. ConclusionsTaken together, this study shows that intra-articular injection of SVF into the knee markedly improved the clinical symptoms of patients without the occurrence of adverse events, thereby repairing the damaged articular cartilage through cartilage regeneration.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered. Chinses Clinical Trial Registry with identifier ChiCTR2100042930. Registered 28 January 2021.

Intra-articular Injection of Culture-Expanded Mesenchymal Stem Cells Without Adjuvant Surgery in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 2839-2849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Hwan Kim ◽  
Yoshi Pratama Djaja ◽  
Yong-Beom Park ◽  
Jung-Gwan Park ◽  
Young-Bong Ko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Adjuvant Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Standardized Mean Difference ◽  
And Cartilage

Background: Although many clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in knee osteoarthritis, evidence on their efficacy remains unclear owing to heterogeneity of cell entity and concomitant procedures. Purpose: To determine the efficacy of culture-expanded MSCs in knee osteoarthritis in terms of clinical outcome and cartilage repair via meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without adjuvant surgery. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 31, 2018. RCTs with culture-expanded MSCs for treating knee osteoarthritis were included. Studies with adjuvant surgery or cell concentrate were excluded. Quality was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. For meta-analysis, data on clinical outcomes were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and data on cartilage repair were measured using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS); categorization related to improvement was extracted. Results: Six RCTs (203 patients) were included. Two studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias. In pooled analysis, the only significant difference was in the VAS score (mean difference, –13.55; 95% CI, –22.19 to −4.9). In cumulative pain analysis with VAS and WOMAC pain scores, there was significant improvement after treatment (standardized mean difference, –0.54; 95% CI, –0.85 to −0.23). There was no significant difference in cartilage repair assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (standardized mean difference, 0.11; 95% CI, –0.51 to 0.73), WORMS (standardized mean difference, 1.68; 95% CI −14.84 to 18.21), or categorical results (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.32-7.59). Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of culture-expanded MSCs without adjuvant surgery can improve pain for patients experiencing knee osteoarthritis at short-term follow-up (6-12 months). However, evidence regarding function and cartilage repair remains limited.

Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-BIG to improve motor function in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 607-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle N McDonnell ◽  
Briony Rischbieth ◽  
Tenille T Schammer ◽  
Chantel Seaforth ◽  
Alex J Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Lee Silverman Voice Treatment ◽  
Voice Treatment

Objective: The technique called Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-LOUD has previously been used to improve voice quality in people with Parkinson’s disease. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an alternate intervention, LSVT-BIG (signifying big movements), to improve functional mobility. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials. Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AgeLine, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to September 2017 using multiple search terms related to Parkinson’s disease and LSVT-BIG. Review method: Two researchers searched the literature for studies of the LSVT-BIG intervention of 16 sessions, delivered by a certified instructor over four weeks, to any other intervention. Outcomes related to functional ability were included. Study quality was appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Four studies were included, reporting on three randomized trials of 84 participants with mild Parkinson’s disease. Compared to physiotherapy exercises, or a shorter training protocol, there was a significant improvement in motor function assessed with the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (mean difference = −3.20, 95% confidence interval = −5.18 to −1.23) and a trend towards faster Timed Up and Go performance (mean difference = −0.47, 95% confidence interval = −0.99 to 0.06) and 10-metre walk test (mean difference = −0.53, 95% confidence interval = −1.07 to 0.01). Conclusion: Compared to shorter format LSVT-BIG or general exercise, LSVT-BIG was more effective at improving motor function. This provides preliminary, moderate quality evidence that amplitude-oriented training is effective in reducing motor impairments for people with mild Parkinson’s disease.

scholarly journals Mesenchymal stem cells - a promising strategy for treating knee osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 719-728
Author(s):  
Jiaqian Wang ◽  
Liang Zhou ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Lixin Huang ◽  
Qin Shi
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cartilage Regeneration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
P Values ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Primary Evaluation

Aims The purpose of our study was to determine whether mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are an effective and safe therapeutic agent for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), owing to their cartilage regeneration potential. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, with keywords including “knee osteoarthritis” and “mesenchymal stem cells”, up to June 2019. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored the use of MSCs to treat knee OA. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), adverse events, and the whole-organ MRI score (WORMS) were used as the primary evaluation tools in the studies. Our meta-analysis included a subgroup analysis of cell dose and cell source. Results Seven trials evaluating 256 patients were included in the meta-analysis. MSC treatment significantly improved the VAS (mean difference (MD), –13.24; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) –23.28 to –3.20, p = 0.010) and WOMAC (MD, –7.22; 95% CI –12.97 to –1.47, p = 0.010). The low-dose group with less than 30 million cells showed lower p-values for both the VAS and WOMAC. Adipose and umbilical cord–derived stem cells also had lower p-values for pain scores than those derived from bone marrow. Conclusion Overall, MSC-based cell therapy is a relatively safe treatment that holds great potential for OA, evidenced by a positive effect on pain and knee function. Using low-dose (25 million) and adipose-derived stem cells is likely to achieve better results, but further research is needed. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(10):719–728.

scholarly journals Association between the polymorphism of IL-17A and IL-17F gene with knee osteoarthritis risk: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifan Lu ◽  
Pei Liu ◽  
Qidong Zhang ◽  
Weiguo Wang ◽  
Wanshou Guo
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Gene Polymorphisms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Bone Changes

Abstract Background Knee osteoarthritis is a joint disease which is characterized by degeneration of articular cartilage and subsequent subchondral bone changes. Polymorphisms of IL-17A/F gene were the recognized candidate genes associated with knee osteoarthritis risk although the results were conflicting. The aim of this study was to determine whether IL-17A(rs2275913) and IL-17F(rs763780) polymorphisms confer susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis. Method Literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of science, Embase, and Google Scholar (last search was updated on June 20, 2019), and assessing this association was performed by calculating odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical heterogeneity was quantitatively evaluated by using the Q statistic with its p value and I2 statistic. Result Six case-control based studies were included involving IL-17A(rs2275913) (2134 cases and 2306 controls) and IL-17F(rs763780) (2134 cases and 2426 controls). The overall analysis suggested that the A allele of the rs2275913 polymorphism, and the C allele of the rs763780 polymorphism in the IL-17 gene may increase the risk of OA. However, subgroup analysis revealed that no association between IL-17A(rs2275913) gene and knee OA risk was found in Caucasian population. Conclusions This meta-analysis revealed that the IL-17A(rs2275913) gene polymorphisms may increase the risk of knee OA in Asians, and the IL-17F(rs763780) gene polymorphisms may increase the risk of knee OA both in Asians and Caucasians. However, because of the limitations of the present study, additional larger studies are needed to confirm our findings in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document