scholarly journals Silicone Breast Implants: A Rare Cause of Pleural Effusion

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam H. Shaik ◽  
Bindu Gandrapu ◽  
Fernando Gonzalez-Ibarra ◽  
David Flores ◽  
Jyoti Matta ◽  
...  

Pleural effusions are one of the rarest complications reported in patients with silicone gel filled breast implants. The silicone implants have potential to provoke chronic inflammation of pleura and subsequent pulmonary complications such as pleural effusion. Herein, we report a 44-year-old female who presented with left sided pleural effusion, six weeks after a silicone breast implantation surgery. The most common infectious, inflammatory, and malignant causes of pleural effusion were excluded with pleural fluid cytology and cultures. With recurrent effusion in the setting of recent surgery, the chemical reaction to silicone breast implants was sought and exploration was performed which revealed foreign body reaction (FBR) to silicone material. The symptoms dramatically improved after the explantation.

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Kazi Shihab Uddin ◽  
Md Mahbub Rashid Sarker ◽  
Md Abdur Razzaque ◽  
Md Zulfikar Ali

Background: Adenosine deaminase (ADA) level in pleural fluid study has gained popularity for quick diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion in tuberculosis burden countries. Studies have confirmed high sensitivity and specificity across the world. Pleural fluid cytology, biochemistry and malignant cell examinations are already in use and widely available.Objectives: Diagnostic approach to quickly differentiate between tubercular and non tubercular pleural effusions by analyzing cytology, biochemistry and ADA level.Materials & Methods: This study was carried out on 85 patients who were admitted or visited outpatient department with pleural effusion. The pleural fluid study was including measurement of ADA level was done.Results: 41 cases were diagnosed as tubercular pleural effusion. Among the low ADA group, 9 cases were diagnosed as malignant pleural effusion with positive malignant cell and 13 cases were transudative effusion.7 cases were diagnosed as parapneumonic effusion with exudative fluid, neutrophilic cell distribution and mixed ADA activity.Conclusion: ADA was found positive with a mean value of 88.3 U/L in tubercular pleural effusions. Non tubercular pleural effusion showed low ADA level. However the cytological and biochemical examination of pleural fluid was also found to be important in differentiating tubercular from non tubercular causes.KYAMC Journal Vol. 9, No.-1, April 2018, Page 28-31


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 569-571
Author(s):  
Amit Frenkel ◽  
Yair Binyamin ◽  
Ohad Gabai ◽  
Yoav Bichovsky ◽  
Evgeni Brotfain ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
William B. Greene ◽  
Lyle G. Walsh ◽  
Richard M. Silver ◽  
Joann Allen ◽  
John C. Maize

Electron probe microanalysis of biopsies from two patients who had received silicone gel breast implants has revealed silicon (Si) in macrophages in an arthritic finger joint synovium (Fig. 1) and in a sclerodermatous skin lesion as well as in the fibrous capsule surrounding the implants in both patients (Fig. 2). The silastic envelope has been reported to be semipermeable with substances passing freely into and out of the implant. The polymer usually contains silica filler with a particle size of 30μm to impart added firmness, however, these sharp pointed crystals have not been fully characterized by Electron Microscopy. Silicone has been thought to be relatively inert, eliciting little or no tissue reaction. The substance has been injected or surgically placed into the human body as liquid, joints or in the form of breast augmentation prostheses. Recent reports have indicated that there is more than sufficient reason to change our thinking regarding this chemical and it's significance in biological reactions. There are 100,000 patients who undergo breast augmentation each year in the United States alone with over one million reported silicone implants. One clinical group reported that 4.4% of all new scleroderma patients had silicone breast implants. The patients reported in the study had implants from 2 to 21 years duration. The latency period may mean that scleroderma will increase parallel to the increase in breast augmentation over the last decade.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 444A
Author(s):  
Imam Shaik ◽  
Bindu Gandrapu ◽  
Fernando Gonzalez ◽  
Amer Syed ◽  
Jyoti Matta

1995 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
John Michael Drever

Dermis fat grafts for body contouring have been used for over a century and extensively reported and researched, but since the advent of the more reliable silicone implants they have been dropped and neglected. As a consequence of the present controversy surrounding silicone breast implants, women are inquiring about augmentation with their own tissues. Healthy patients with good vascularity are the best candidates. These grafts are removed from the lower abdomen and placed with the dermis side facing the muscle, ‘take’ and then lose about 30 to 50% of their initial volume. Thirty-six cases were performed with this technique, and a two-and-a-half year follow-up with few complications and a high level of satisfaction is reported.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
Daniel WH Wong ◽  
Tai K Lam

Introduction: An increasing pool of literature proposes a link between silicone implants and autoimmune-related symptoms known colloquially as breast implant illness (BII). We describe the history of BII, reported symptoms, risk factors and previously published diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians in the diagnosis, investigations and management of patients presenting with symptoms that they attribute to their silicone breast implants. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE®, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect (DARE) and PubMed in September 2018. The search terms ‘autoimmune inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants’, ‘breast implants’ and ‘silicone’ were used alone and in combination. Results: Thirty-four studies were reviewed including three case reports, 12 case series, 14 retrospective cohort studies, four case control studies and one prospective cohort study. Within this cohort, 18 studies were found regarding the explantation of implants relating to BII. Conclusion: Studies have demonstrated no association between silicone breast implants and any known autoimmune diseases, but there exists a pool of literature suggestive of a relatively undefined condition colloquially known as BII. Serological testing and imaging play an important role in the assessment of patients to exclude other pathology, but these tests remain non-diagnostic for BII. Although medical treatment has shown promise, there is no established treatment for patients. The surgical explantation of implants appears to have positive outcomes for patients; however, the exact nature of the surgery required to achieve this remains unclear.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah J. Levine ◽  
Hun-Chi Lin ◽  
Merrill Rowley ◽  
Andrew Cook ◽  
Suzanne S. Teuber ◽  
...  

Objective. We determined systematically the prevalence of autoantibodies in children born to mothers with silicone breast implants and the relationships with clinical symptoms and methods of exposure. Methods. Autoantibody expression was determined in 80 children born to mothers with silicone implants and in 42 controls. A clinical assessment score was assigned to each patient. Antinuclear antibodies as well as antibodies to mitochondrial, smooth muscle, striational, myocardial, parietal cell, reticulin tissues, or subcellular compartments were measured by indirect fluorescent assay. Antibodies to nRNP (U1-RNP/snRNP); Sm; SS-A; SS-B; Scl-70; thyroid microsome; immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM, and IgA antibodies to cardiolipin; and antibodies to native and denatured human types I and II collagen were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum complement components C3 and C4 and IgM rheumatoid factor were measured by nephelometry. Results. Autoantibody prevalence was not significantly different between children born to mothers with silicone implants and controls. The presence of autoantibodies was not related to the children's clinical symptoms or to the method of exposure. Conclusions. Determination of autoantibody production is of limited clinical utility in the evaluation of children born to mothers with silicone breast implants.


1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristo Vojdani ◽  
Andrew Campbell ◽  
Nachman Brautbar

Silicone, previously thought to be a biologically inert and harmless material, has now been reported to elicit antibody response and to be responsible for adjuvant disease in humans. The present study was designed to evaluate the immune function of forty individuals who had undergone silicone breast augmentation for a period of longer than ten years and who were compared with 40 sex and age-matched controls. The following immunological functions were studied: lymphocyte subset analysis, lymphocyte mitogenic response, NK cytotoxic activity and markers for autoimmunity such as ANA, rheumatoid factor immune complexes such as smooth muscle, myelin, and thyroid, and tissue antibodies. Results of lymphocyte subpopulation analysis showed significantly elevated T helper/suppressor ratio in 60% and significantly decreased T helper/suppressor ratio in 7.5% of the silicone implant group, while the control group showed increased helper/suppressor ratio only in 10% of tested individuals and no significant decrease in the T helper/suppressor ratio. There was 20% inhibition in T cell mitogenic responses in the silicone implant group, which is significant when compared to the controls. When NK cytotoxic activity was compared between the two groups, significant inhibition in the ability of lymphocytes to kill tumor target cells was observed in the silicone implant group. This inability of target cell lysis was attributed to the demonstrated lack of granularity of NK cells from the silicone implant group. There was significant increase in: immune complexes, anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-thyroid antibodies, anti-striated muscle cell antibody, and anti-myelin basic protein antibodies. These immunological abnormalities in individuals who underwent silicone breast augmentation indicate a mechanism of tissue injury to these patients, causing autoimmune diseases or syndromes. Since autoimmunity in some other conditions is associated with abnormalities in the HLA serotyping system, and since some collagen vascular diseases have been associated with a higher incidence of the HLA serotyping system, it is recommended that HLA studies be included in future investigations of immune-mediated abnormalities associated with silicone breast augmentation. Our findings here show definite abnormalities of the T helper/suppressor ratio, increased autoimmunity, as well as increased production of immune complexes. Silicone implants have been used in cosmetic and reconstructive surgery more than 30 years (Brown et al., 1960). The gel used in the implant is produced from silicone, reduced to form silicone, which is then reacted with methyl chloride and polymerized to form stable polydimethylsiloxane (Brown et al., 1960). There have been a number of reports describing the occurrence of connective tissue disease in patients after the implantation of silicone. This includes scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, polyarthritis, and Sjögren's syndrome which became clinically apparent 2–21 years after implantation of silicone (Yoshida, 1973; Van Nunen et al., 1983; Fack et al., 1984; Okano et al., 1984; Sergott et al., 1986; Endo et al., 1987; Spiera, 1988; Varga et al., 1989; Varga and Jimenez, 1990; Silverstein, 1992). Routine laboratory tests showed normal findings for red and white blood cell counts, platelets, liver and renal functions, urine analysis, thyroid function tests, serum enzymes, and immunoglobulins (Kaiser et al., 1990). Immunopathological findings were reported for complement cascade, rheumatoid factor immune complexes, and anti-nuclear antibody (Kaiser et al., 1990). After removal of the silicone implants, the clinical symptoms improved along with improvement in laboratory parameters (Kaiser et al., 1990). Despite these reported signs and symptoms of connective tissue disease (Yoshida, 1973; Van Nunen et al., 1983; Fack et al., 1984; Okano et al., 1984; Sergott et al., 1986; Endo et al., 1987; Spiera, 1988; Varga et al., 1989; Kaiser et al., 1990; Varga and Jimenez, 1990; Silverstein, 1992), and reported higher percentage of breast cancer in patients with silicone breast implants (Silverstein, 1992), immune functional studies were not reported in these patients. In this study, we examined the immune function in women with clinical symptoms following silicone breast implants.


Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 1226-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Levy ◽  
P. Rotman-Pikielny ◽  
M. Ehrenfeld ◽  
Y. Shoenfeld

Since the early 1980s, case reports and case series describe an association between silicon breast implants and the appearance of autoimmune diseases, particularly scleroderma. The publication of those cases led to a large number of studies to investigate this association. The conclusion of those studies is that most probably there has not been an increased incidence of autoimmune diseases in women with silicon breast implants. Nevertheless, the US Food and Drug Administration determined that silicone gel breast implants are not completely safe, only that they are ‘reasonably safe.’ The debate continues regarding this association. In this article we present new cases of silicon breast implant-induced scleroderma and review the literature on this subject. Lupus (2009) 18, 1226—1232.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yamen Homsi ◽  
John Andrew Carlson ◽  
Samer Homsi

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a rare systemic necrotizing vasculitis of small and medium sized arteries. We report a case of a 49-year old woman who presented with PAN following exposure to silicone breast implants. Although the relationship between silicone implants and connective tissue diseases has been investigated in the literature, no prior reports were found documenting PAN after silicone mammoplasty. While the pathogenesis of idiopathic PAN is not known yet, responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapy may suggest an immunologic mechanism. More robust research is needed to understand the connection between silicone breast implants and autoimmunity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document