scholarly journals Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Renal Cancer Brain Metastasis: Prognostic Factors and the Role of Whole-Brain Radiation and Surgical Resection

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska M. Ippen ◽  
Anand Mahadevan ◽  
Eric T. Wong ◽  
Erik J. Uhlmann ◽  
Soma Sengupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Additional Surgery

Background. Renal cell carcinoma is a frequent source of brain metastasis. We present our consecutive series of patients treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and analyse prognostic factors and the interplay of WBRT and surgical resection.Methods. This is a retrospective study of 66 patients with 207 lesions treated with the Cyberknife radiosurgery system in our institution. The patients were followed up with imaging and clinical examination 1 month and 2-3 months thereafter for the brain metastasis. Patient, treatment, and outcomes characteristics were analysed.Results. 51 male (77.3%) and 15 female (22.7%) patients, with a mean age of 58.9 years (range of 31–85 years) and a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 90 (range of 60–100), were included in the study. The overall survival was 13.9 months, 21.9 months, and 5.9 months for the patients treated with SRS only, additional surgery, and WBRT, respectively. The actuarial 1-year Local Control rates were 84%, 94%, and 88% for SRS only, for surgery and SRS, and for WBRT and additional SRS, respectively.Conclusions. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment option in patients with brain metastases from RCC. In case of a limited number of brain metastases, surgery and SRS might be appropriate.

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Early Mortality After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: a Single Institutional Retrospective Review

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Emily Bennett ◽  
Michael A Vogelbaum ◽  
Gene H Barnett ◽  
Lilyana Angelov ◽  
Samuel Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Prognostic Groups ◽  
Prior Surgery

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used commonly for patients with brain metastases (BM) to improve intracranial disease control. However, survival of these patients is often dictated by their systemic disease course. The value of SRS becomes less clear in patients with anticipated short survival. OBJECTIVE To evaluate prognostic factors, which may predict early death (within 90 d) after SRS. METHODS A total of 1427 patients with BM were treated with SRS at our institution (2000-2012). There were 1385 cases included in this study; 1057 patients underwent upfront SRS and 328 underwent salvage SRS. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality within 90 d after first SRS. Multivariate analyses were performed to develop prognostic indices. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-six patients (19%, 95% confidence interval 17%-21%) died within 90 d after SRS. Multivariate analysis of upfront SRS patients showed that Karnofsky Performance Status, primary tumor type, extracranial metastases, age at SRS, boost treatment, total tumor volume, prior surgery, and interval from primary to BM were independent prognostic factors for 90-d mortality. The first 4 factors were also independent predictors in patients treated with salvage SRS. Based on these factors, an index was defined for each group that categorized patients into 3 and 2 prognostic groups, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 5% to 7% in the most favorable cohort and 36% to 39% in the least favorable. CONCLUSION Indices based on readily available patient, clinical, and treatment factors that are highly predictive of early death in patients treated with upfront or salvage SRS can be calculated and used to define well-separated prognostic groups.

scholarly journals Cyberknife® hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (CK-hSRS) as salvage treatment for brain metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergej Telentschak ◽  
Daniel Ruess ◽  
Stefan Grau ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Niklas von Spreckelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Large Tumor ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract Purpose The introduction of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) extended the treatment modalities beyond the well-established single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and side effects of hSRS using Cyberknife® (CK-hSRS) for the treatment of patients with critical brain metastases (BM) and a very poor prognosis. We discuss our experience in light of current literature. Methods All patients who underwent CK-hSRS over 3 years were retrospectively included. We applied a surface dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Rates of local control (LC), systemic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment-related complications were rated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results We analyzed 34 patients with 75 BM. 53% of the patients had a large tumor, tumor location was eloquent in 32%, and deep seated in 15%. 36% of tumors were recurrent after previous irradiation. The median Karnofsky Performance Status was 65%. The actuarial rates of LC at 3, 6, and 12 months were 98%, 98%, and 78.6%, respectively. Three, 6, and 12 months PFS was 38%, 32%, and 15%, and OS was 65%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly associated with higher KPS, which was the only significant factor for survival. Complications CTCAE grade 1–3 were observed in 12%. Conclusion Our radiation schedule showed a reasonable treatment effectiveness and tolerance. Representing an optimal salvage treatment for critical BM in patients with a very poor prognosis and clinical performance state, CK-hSRS may close the gap between surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, conventional radiotherapy, and palliative care.

Surgical Indication Optimization of Brain Metastases Based on the Evolutionary Analysis of Karnofsky Performance Status

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Rasmussen ◽  
Pablo Ajler ◽  
Daniela Massa ◽  
Pedro Plou ◽  
Matteo Baccanelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Surgical Indication ◽  
Evolutionary Analysis ◽  
Survival Curves

Abstract Background and Objective Surgical resection of brain metastases (BM) offers the highest rates of local control and survival; however, it is reserved for patients with good functional status. In particular, the presence of BM tends to oversize the detriment of the overall functional status, causing neurologic deterioration, potentially reversible following symptomatic pharmacological treatment. Thus, a timely indication of surgical resection may be dismissed. We propose to identify and quantify these variations in the functional status of patients with symptomatic BM to optimize the indication of surgical resection. Patients and Methods Historic, retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients undergoing BM microsurgical resection, consecutively from January 2012 to May 2016, was conducted. The Karnofsky performance status (KPS) variation was recorded according to the symptomatic evolution of each patient at specific moments of the diagnostic–therapeutic algorithm. Finally, survival curves were delineated for the main identified factors. Results One hundred and nineteen resection surgeries were performed. The median overall survival was 243 days, while on average it was 305.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 250.6–360.9) days. The indication of surgical resection of 10% of the symptomatic patients in our series (7.5% of overall) could have been initially rejected due to pharmacologically reversible neurologic impairment. Survival curves showed statistically significant differences when KPS was stratified following pharmacological symptomatic treatment (p < 0.0001), unlike when they were estimated at the time of BM diagnosis (p = 0.1128). Conclusion The preoperative determination of the functional status by KPS as an evolutive parameter after the nononcologic symptomatic pharmacological treatment allowed us to optimize the surgical indication of patients with symptomatic BM.

Postoperative ischemic changes following brain metastasis resection as measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 1395-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Gempt ◽  
Julia Gerhardt ◽  
Vivien Toth ◽  
Stefanie Hüttinger ◽  
Yu-Mi Ryang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Brain Irradiation ◽  
Diffusion Weighted ◽  
The Mean

Object Brain metastases occur in 10% to 40% of patients harboring cancer. In cases of neurosurgical metastasis resection, all postoperative neurological deterioration should be avoided. Reasons for postoperative deficits can be direct tissue damage due to resection, hemorrhage, venous congestive infarcts, or arterial ischemic events leading to tissue infarction. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether postoperative ischemic infarctions occur in surgery for brain metastasis and to determine their influence on new postoperative neurological deficits. Methods Patients who underwent resection of brain metastases and had preoperative and early postoperative (within 48 hours) MRI scans, including diffusion-weighted imaging sequences and apparent diffusion coefficient maps, between January 2009 and May 2012 were included in this study. Clinical and histopathological data (histopathological results, pre- and postoperative neurological status, and previous tumor-specific therapy) were recorded. Results One hundred twenty-two patients (56 male, 66 female) who underwent resection of brain metastases were included. The patients' mean age was 60 years (range 21–89 years). The mean time span from initial tumor diagnosis to resection of brain metastasis was 44 months (range 0–338 months). The mean preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status was 80% (exact mean 76% ± 17% [SD]), and the mean postoperative value was 80% (exact mean 78% ± 17%). Twelve (9.8%) of the 122 patients had postoperative permanent worsening of a neurological deficit or a new permanent neurological deficit; 44 (36.1%) of the 122 patients had postoperative ischemic lesions. When comparing patients with and without previous brain irradiation, 53.8% of patients with previous brain irradiation had ischemic lesions on postoperative imaging compared with 31.3% of patients without previous brain irradiation (p = 0.033). There was a significant association between ischemia and postoperative neurological status deterioration (transient or permanent); 13 (29.5%) of 44 patients with ischemic lesions had deterioration of their neurological status compared with 7 (9%) of the 78 patients who did not have ischemic lesions (p = 0.003). Conclusions This study demonstrates a high prevalence of vascular incidents in patients undergoing resection for metastatic brain disease. Patients harboring postoperative ischemic lesions detected by MRI have a higher rate of neurological deficits (transient or permanent). Patients who had previous irradiation therapy are at higher risk of developing postoperative ischemic lesions. A large number of postoperative neurological deficits are caused by ischemic incidents.

scholarly journals Factors influencing the outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with five or more brain metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hamel-Perreault ◽  
D. Mathieu ◽  
L. Masson-Cote
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Treatment Volume ◽  
Extracranial Disease

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) for patients with 5 or more brain metastases (bmets) is a matter of debate. We report our results with that approach and the factors influencing outcome.Methods In the 103 patients who underwent srs for the treatment of 5 or more bmets, primary histology was nonsmall- cell lung cancer (57% of patients). All patients were grouped by Karnofsky performance status and recursive partitioning analysis (rpa) classification. In our cohort, 72% of patients had uncontrolled extracranial disease, and 28% had stable or responding systemic disease. Previous irradiation for 1–4 bmets had been given to 56 patients (54%). The mean number of treated bmets was 7 (range: 5–19), and the median cumulative bmets volume was 2 cm3 (range: 0.06–28 cm3).Results Multivariate analyses showed that stable extracranial disease (p < 0.001) and rpa (p = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (os). Moreover, a cumulative treated bmets volume of less than 6 cm3 (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; p = 0.006; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 4.99) was associated with better os. The total number of bmets had no effect on survival (p = 0.206). No variable was found to be predictive of local control. The rpa was significant (p = 0.027) in terms of distant recurrence.Conclusions Our study suggests that srs is a reasonable option for the management of patients with 5 or more bmets, especially with a cumulative treatment volume of less than 6 cm3.

Do gender and race influence survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases? An outcomes study utilizing the RTOG RPA class stratification

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7153-7153
Author(s):  
G. M. Videtic ◽  
C. A. Reddy ◽  
S. T. Chao ◽  
T. W. Rice ◽  
D. J. Adelstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Gender And Race ◽  
Class Stratification

7153 Background: To explore gender, race and their interactions in the setting of NSCLC brain metastases only, a single-institution brain database was analyzed, using the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) brain metastases classification. Methods: From 1/82 to 9/04, 831 NSCLC pts with brain metastases were registered. RPA criteria for analysis were: class I- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70, age<65 years, primary tumor controlled, no extracranial metastases; class III- KPS<70; class II- all others. Results: Median follow-up was 5.4 months (m) (range 0–122.9). Median age was 62.4 (range 25–90). Median KPS was 80 (range 20–100). There were 485 males [M] (58.4%) and 346 females [F] (41.6%). 824 pts (99%) were either African-American (AA; n = 142[17%]) or White (W; n = 682[83%]). Pts characteristics were balanced when stratified by RPA class and by treatments. Median survival (MS) in months from time of brain metastasis diagnosis for all pts was 5.8. MS in months by gender [F vs. M] and race [W vs. AA] was: 6.3 vs. 5.5, p = 0.013; 6.0 vs. 5.2, p = 0.08, respectively. By RPA class for gender, MS trends (in months) favored F over M in classes I and II but not III: 17.1 vs. 9.5 (p = 0.11); 6.8 vs. 6.0 (p = 0.09), 2.7 vs. 2.5 (p = 0.42), respectively. By RPA class for gender and race, MS trends (in months) favored AAF over AAM in classes I and II but not III: 30.0 vs. 12.4, p = 0.50; 11.2 vs. 4.6, p = 0.021; 3.2 vs. 3.2, p = 0.64, respectively; and WF over WM in classes I but not II or III: 14.4 vs. 9.5, p = 0.11; 6.6 vs. 6.3, p = 0.38; 2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.49, respectively. On multivariable analysis, significant variables were gender (p = 0.041; RR 0.83); RPA class (p < 0.0001; RR 0.28, for I vs. III; p < 0.0001; RR 0.51, for II vs. III). Conclusions: Gender significantly influences NSCLC brain metastasis survival while race trends to significance. MS trends by RTOG RPA class suggest race may interact with genderprimarily in class I but pt numbers limited significance. Further characterization of these factors is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Outcome Predictors of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1232-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
Aditya Iyer ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
Ajay Niranjan ◽  
John C. Flickinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Tumor Control

Abstract BACKGROUND Although whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been a standard palliative management for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma, its benefit has been elusive because of radiobiological resistance. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. METHODS We reviewed records from 158 consecutive patients (men = 111, women = 47) who underwent SRS for 531 brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. The median patient age was 61 years (range, 38-83 years), and the median number of tumors per patient was 1 (range, 1–10). Seventy-nine patients (50%) had solitary brain metastasis. Fifty-seven patients (36%) underwent prior WBRT. The median total tumor volume for each patient was 3.0 cm3 (range, 0.09-47 cm3). RESULTS The overall survival after SRS was 60%, 38%, and 19% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, with a median survival of 8.2 months. Factors associated with longer survival included younger age, longer interval between primary diagnosis and brain metastases, lower recursive partitioning analysis class, higher Karnofsky performance status, smaller number of brain metastases, and no prior WBRT. Median survival for patients with &gt; 2 brain metastases, higher Karnofsky performance status (&gt; 90), and no prior WBRT was 12 months after SRS. Sustained local tumor control was achieved in 92% of patients. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects occurred in 7%. Overall, 70% of patients improved or remained neurologically stable. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery is an especially valuable option for patients with higher Karnofsky performance status and smaller number of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

scholarly journals Melanoma brain metastasis: the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery, BRAF mutational status, and targeted and/or immune-based therapies on treatment outcome

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Jacob A. Miller ◽  
Vyshak A. Venur ◽  
Alireza M. Mohammadi ◽  
Samuel T. Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Melanoma Brain Metastasis ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEThe goal of this study was to investigate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), BRAF status, and targeted and immune-based therapies on the recurrence patterns and factors associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM).METHODSA total of 366 patients were treated for 1336 MBMs; a lesion-based analysis was performed on 793 SRS lesions. The BRAF status was available for 78 patients: 35 had BRAFmut and 43 had BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) lesions. The Kaplan-Meier method evaluated unadjusted OS; cumulative incidence analysis determined the incidences of local failure (LF), distant failure, and radiation necrosis (RN), with death as a competing risk.RESULTSThe 12-month OS was 24% (95% CI 20%–29%). On multivariate analysis, younger age, lack of extracranial metastases, better Karnofsky Performance Status score, and fewer MBMs, as well as treatment with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), anti–PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy, or cytokine therapy were significantly associated with OS. For patients who underwent SRS, the 12-month LF rate was lower among those with BRAFmut lesions (6%, 95% CI 2%–11%) compared with those with BRAF-WT lesions (22%, 95% CI 13%–32%; p < 0.01). The 12-month LF rates among lesions treated with BRAFi and PD-1/CTLA-4 agents were 1% (95% CI 1%–4%) and 7% (95% CI 1%–13%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, BRAF inhibition within 30 days of SRS was protective against LF (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.55; p = 0.01). The 12-month rates of RN were low among lesions treated with BRAFi (0%, 95% CI 0%–0%), PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors (2%, 95% CI 1%–5%), and cytokine therapies (6%, 95% CI 1%–13%).CONCLUSIONSPrognostic schema should incorporate BRAFi or immunotherapy status and use of targeted therapies. Treatment with a BRAF inhibitor within 4 weeks of SRS improves local control without an increased risk of RN.

scholarly journals Is Function-Based Resection Using Intraoperative Awake Brain Mapping Feasible and Safe for Solitary Brain Metastases Within Eloquent Areas?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Pelletier ◽  
Alessandro Moiraghi ◽  
Marc Zanello ◽  
Alexandre Roux ◽  
Sophie Peeters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Solitary Brain Metastasis ◽  
Neurological Condition ◽  
Eloquent Areas ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status Score ◽  
Status Score ◽  
Performance Status Score

Abstract ObjectiveTo assess feasibility and safety of function-based resection under awake conditions for solitary brain metastasis patients.MethodsRetrospective, observational, single-institution case-control study (2014-2019). Inclusion criteria: adult patients, solitary brain metastasis, supratentorial location within eloquent areas, function-based awake resection. Case matching (1:1) criteria between metastasis group and control group (high-grade gliomas): sex, tumor location, tumor volume, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score, age, educational level.ResultsTwenty patients were included. Intraoperatively, all patients were cooperative, no obstacles precluded procedure from being performed. A positive functional mapping was achieved at both cortical and subcortical levels, allowing for a function-based resection in all patients. The case-matched analysis showed that intraoperative and postoperative events were similar, except for a shorter duration of the surgery (p<0.001) and of the awake phase (p<0.001) in the metastasis group. A total resection was performed in 18 cases (90%, including 10 supramarginal resections), and a partial resection was performed in two cases (10%). At three months postoperative months, none of the patients had worsening of their neurological condition or uncontrolled seizures, three patients had an improvement in their seizure control, and seven patients had a Karnofsky Performance Status score increase ≥10 points.ConclusionsFunction-based resection under awake conditions preserving the brain connectivity is feasible and safe in the specific population of solitary brain metastasis patients and allows for high resection rates within eloquent brain areas while preserving the overall and neurological condition of the patients. Awake craniotomy should be considered to optimize outcomes in brain metastases in eloquent areas.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing the Outcome of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Five or More Brain Metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hamel-Perreault ◽  
D. Mathieu ◽  
L. Masson-Cote
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Treatment Volume ◽  
Extracranial Disease

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with 5 or more brain metastases (BMets) is a matter of debate. We report our results with that approach and the factors influencing outcome. Methods: In the 103 patients who underwent SRS for the treatment of 5 or more BMets, primary histology was non-small-cell lung cancer (57% of patients). All patients were grouped by Karnofsky performance status and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification. In our cohort, 72% of patients had uncontrolled extracranial disease, and 28% had stable or responding systemic disease. Previous irradiation for 1–4 BMets had been given to 56 patients (54%). The mean number of treated BMets was 7 (range: 5–19), and the median cumulative BMets volume was 2 cm3 (range: 0.06–28 cm3). Results: Multivariate analyses showed that stable extracranial disease (p < 0.001) and RPA (p = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Moreover, a cumulative treated BMets volume of less than 6 cm3 (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; p = 0.006; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 4.99) was associated with better OS. The total number of BMets had no effect on survival (p = 0.206). No variable was found to be predictive of local control. The RPA was significant (p = 0.027) in terms of distant recurrence. Conclusions: Our study suggests that SRS is a reasonable option for the management of patients with 5 or more BMets, especially with a cumulative treatment volume of less than 6 cm3.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document