scholarly journals Early-Onset Neutropenia Induced by Rituximab in a Patient with Lupus Nephritis and Hemolytic Anemia

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariangelí Arroyo-Ávila ◽  
Ruth M. Fred-Jiménez ◽  
Luis M. Vilá

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has been used to treat several complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) including nephritis, cerebritis, and hematological disorders. Neutropenia is among the adverse events associated with rituximab; this usually occurs several weeks after therapy. However, early-onset neutropenia has been reported only in a few cases. Herein, we describe a 36-year-old Hispanic SLE woman who developed severe early-onset neutropenia (0.3 × 109/L) after the second weekly rituximab infusion (375 mg/m2weekly × 4) given for nephritis and hemolytic anemia. She also had early-onset thrombocytopenia after rituximab therapy. Both hematological disorders resolved 12 days after the fourth and final dose. This case, together with few others, suggests that early-onset neutropenia may occur during rituximab therapy. Even though rituximab-induced neutropenia seems to be transient, it may predispose SLE patients to severe complications such as infections.

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Kalunian ◽  
Richard Furie ◽  
Jai Radhakrishnan ◽  
Vandana Mathur ◽  
Joel Rothman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Lupus nephritis (LN) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. T cells are believed to play a central role in the pathogenesis of both SLE and LN. CD6 is a co-stimulatory receptor, predominantly expressed on T cells, that binds to activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM), a ligand expressed on antigen presenting cells and various epithelial and endothelial tissues. The CD6-ALCAM pathway plays an integral role in modulating T cell activation, proliferation, differentiation and trafficking, and is central to immune mediated inflammation. Itolizumab (EQ001) is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds CD6, blocks the interaction between CD6 and ALCAM, and inhibits both the activation and trafficking of T cells. Inhibiting the CD6-ALCAM pathway with itolizumab potentially represents a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of LN. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of subcutaneously administered itolizumab in patients with SLE with and without active proliferative lupus nephritis (apLN). Method This cohort-based dose escalation study includes two types of patients: The Type A cohort will enroll ∼24 patients with SLE without apLN (all treated with itolizumab) and the Type B cohort will randomize in a blinded manner ∼36 patients (3:1, itolizumab:placebo) with biopsy-proven ISN/RPS class III or IV (+ V) apLN who have had inadequate response to induction and/or post-induction maintenance treatment, exhibiting urine protein to creatinine ratio [UPCR] ≥1 g/g and active serology. Within both the Type A and Type B cohorts, up to 4 dose groups will be tested (Figure). Background treatments for SLE or LN are allowed. Following 4 weeks of treatment in a new higher dose Type A cohort and recommendation by an independent safety data review committee (DRC), the dose studied in the Type A cohort may then be studied in a Type B Cohort for a 12-week treatment duration (Figure). The primary endpoint is the safety and tolerability of itolizumab. Efficacy endpoints (in the Type B cohorts) include UPCR, estimated glomerular filtration rate, prednisone dose requirements, renal response, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), FACIT Fatigue Scale, serologic markers, and other patient reported outcomes. In Type A cohort patients, clinical responses and pharmacologic activity will be assessed based on changes in serologic markers, SLEDAI-2K, FACIT Fatigue Scale. Pharmacodynamic markers, including markers that may allow future risk stratification, urinary ALCAM and CD6, will be examined in both cohort types. Results The study is ongoing. Six patients have been enrolled in Type A Cohort 1 (0.4 mg/kg dose) and completed both treatment and 4 weeks of post-treatment follow-up. The mean age was 59.5 (12.9) years, 100% were female; 67% were Hispanic/Latino; and 50% were White, and 50% were Black. Duration of SLE ranged from 3 years to 31 years. Concomitant medications for lupus included prednisone (83%, dose range 2.5 mg – 10 mg), methotrexate (33%), and anti-malarials (33%). Baseline SLEDAI-2K (mean 7.5 [2.2]) was based on findings of alopecia (83%); arthritis (67%); mucosal ulcers and rash (50% each); fever, increased dsDNA, and low complement (17% each). There were no adverse events. Additional data from this ongoing study will be presented. Conclusion Itolizumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking the CD6-ALCAM pathway, is a novel experimental treatment for LN. This is the first trial of itolizumab in patients with SLE and apLN. Data from the first cohort of patients suggest that the drug is safe and well-tolerated at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg over a 4-week treatment period. Additional cohorts of patients with SLE and apLN are currently being enrolled.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Athanassiou ◽  
Lambros Athanassiou ◽  
Ifigenia Kostoglou-Athanassiou

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease. It is characterized by a variable clinical course ranging from mild to fatal disease. It can affect the kidneys. The aim of treatment in SLE is the prevention of flares and the prevention of accumulation of damage to the main organs affected as well as the prevention of drug side effects. The cornerstone of SLE treatment is hydroxychloroquine. Corticosteroids are used both as induction treatment in disease flares as well as in small doses as maintenance treatment. Immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are used as steroid sparing agents. Calcineurin inhibitors, namely tacrolimus and cyclosporin A may also be used as immunosuppressants and steroid sparing agents. Pulse methylprednisolone, along with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide are used as induction treatment in lupus nephritis. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 biologic agent may be used in non-renal SLE. In patients insufficiently controlled with hydroxychloroquine, low dose prednisone and/or immunosuppressive agents, belimumab may be used with beneficial effects in non-renal disease and lupus nephritis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Faria Miguel ◽  
◽  
Maria Teresa Terreri ◽  
Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira ◽  
Eloisa Bonfá ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Le Thuan Nguyen ◽  
Bui Bao Hoang

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organ systems. The kidney appears to be the most commonly affected organ, especially nephrotic is a serious kidney injury. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathology are very useful for diagnosis, provide the means of predicting prognosis and guiding therapy in nephrotic patients with lupus nephritis. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of nephrotic patients with lupus treated in the Department of Nephrology Trung Vuong Hospital and Cho Ray Hospital between May/2014 and May/2017. Renal histopathological lesions were classified according to International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society - ISN/RPS ’s 2003. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathological features were described. Results: Of 32 LN with nephritic range proteinuria cases studied, 93.7% were women. The 3 most common clinical manifestations were edema (93.8%), hypertension (96.8%) and pallor (68.9%), musculoskeletal manifestions (46.9%), malar rash (40.6%). There was significant rise in laboratory and immunological manifestions with hematuria (78.1%), Hb < 12g/dL (93.5%), increased Cholesterol (100%), and Triglycerid (87.5%), Creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL (87.5%), increased BUN 71.9%, ANA (+) 93.8%, Anti Ds DNA(+) 96.9%, low C3: 96.9%, low C4: 84.4%. The most various and severe features were noted in class IV with active tubulointerstitial lesions and high activity index. Conclusion: Lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria has the more severity of histopathological feature and the more severity of the more systemic organ involvements and laboratory disorders were noted. Key words: Systemic lupus, erythematosus (SLE) lupus nepphritis, clinical


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Ivan Gamez-Nava ◽  
Valeria Diaz-Rizo ◽  
Edsaul Emilio Perez-Guerrero ◽  
Jose Francisco Muñoz-Valle ◽  
Ana Miriam Saldaña-Cruz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To date, the association of serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and serum adipokines with lupus nephritis is controversial. Objective To assess the utility of serum MIF, leptin, adiponectin and resistin levels as markers of proteinuria and renal dysfunction in lupus nephritis. Methods Cross-sectional study including 196 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 52 healthy controls (HCs). Disease activity was assessed by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Renal SLE involvement was investigated by renal-SLEDAI. MIF, adiponectin, leptin and resistin levels were quantified by ELISA. We assessed the correlations of quantitative variables by Spearman correlation (rs). Multivariable linear regression adjusted the variables associated with the severity of proteinuria. Results SLE patients had higher MIF (p = 0.02) and adiponectin (p < 0.001) than HCs. Patients with renal SLE involvement (n = 43) had higher adiponectin (19.0 vs 13.3 μg/mL, p = 0.002) and resistin (10.7 vs 8.9 ng/mL, p = 0.01) than patients with non-renal SLE (n = 153). Proteinuria correlated with high adiponectin (rs = 0.19, p < 0.009) and resistin (rs = 0.26, p < 0.001). MIF (rs = 0.27, p = 0.04). Resistin correlated with increased creatinine (rs = 0.18, p = 0.02). High renal-SLEDAI correlated with adiponectin (rs = 0.21, p = 0.004). Multiple linear regression showed that elevated adiponectin (p = 0.02), younger age (p = 0.04) and low MIF (p = 0.02) were associated with the severity of proteinuria. Low MIF and high adiponectin levels interacted to explain the association with the severity of proteinuria (R2 = 0.41). Conclusions High adiponectin combined with low MIF concentrations int+eract to explain the severity of proteinuria in renal SLE. These findings highlight the relevance of adiponectin, resistin and MIF as markers of LN.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1048.1-1048
Author(s):  
W. Hu

Background:Classical lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by glomerular immune complex(IC) deposition with glomerular proliferation, basement membrane destruction and cell infiltration. Non-IC mediated renal injury with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was also reported in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE-renal TMA), but most studies were reported in patients with both LN and renal TMA.Objectives:In this study, clinical features and outcomes of SLE-renal TMA in absence of obvious IC in SLE patients were analyzed.Methods:Patients with glomerular TMA and/or vascular TMA in the absence of obvious subendothelial or epithelial immune deposits were screened out from 2332 biopsied in SLE patients who underwent first renal biopsy from January 2005 to August 2016. Their clinical, histological features and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.Results:In 2332 renal biopsies obtained from SLE patients, 257 (11.0%) showed renal TMA, of which 237 showed both renal TMA and LN, and 20 biopsies had only renal TMA (SLE-renal TMA). There were 2 males and 18 females with an average age of (25 ± 10) years. The median course of SLE and LN were 3.0(1.0, 6.0) and 0.8(0.5, 1.9) months. All 20 patients deserved acute kidney injury, of which 11 (55%) needed renal replacement therapy (RRT) and 12 (60%) were nephrotic syndrome. Blood system involvement was found in all cases, including 13 cases (65.0%) with TMA triad (microvascular hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and elevated lactate dehydrogenase).Pathological examination showed that 17 cases (85.0%) had both glomerular TMA and vascular TMA. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy showed that 8 cases (40%) had no IC deposition in glomerulus and 12 cases (60%) had only IC deposition in mesangium. Acute tubulointerstitial lesions in patients requiring RRT were more serious than those no needing for RRT((43.6±24.9) %vs(21.7±20.1) %,P=0.047). The fusion range of foot process was positively correlated with proteinuria (r2= 0.347,P=0.006).All patients received high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Four patients received plasma exchange and three patients received gamma globulin, respectively. Eleven patients requiring RRT all stop RRT in a median time of 16.0 (9.0, 30.0) days. During a median follow-up of 58.0 (36.0, 92.3) months, complete remission (CR) was obtained in 15 cases, partial remission in 4 cases and no remission in 1 case. Six cases (30%) relapsed. No case died or progressed to end stage renal disease.Conclusion:Renal injury characterized by TMA is not uncommon in SLE renal biopsy cases. The clinical manifestation is special and the renal injury is serious. The renal outcome is good by intensive immunosuppressive therapy. It should be considered as a unique type of renal injury in SLE.References:[1]Moake JL. Thrombotic microangiopathies. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347(8): 589-600.[2]Anders HJ, Weening JJ. Kidney disease in lupus is not always ‘lupus nephritis’. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013. 15(2): 108.[3]Song D, Wu LH, Wang FM, et al. The spectrum of renal thrombotic microangiopathy in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013. 15(1): R12.[4]Hu WX, Liu ZZ, Chen HP, Zhang HT, Li LS, Liu ZH. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis with thrombotic microangiopathy. Lupus. 2010. 19(14): 1591-8.[5]Tomov S, Lazarchick J, Self SE, Bruner ET, Budisavljevic MN. Kidney-limited thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with SLE treated with romiplostim. Lupus. 2013. 22(5): 504-9.[6]Li C, Yap D, Chan G, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Clinico-pathological Correlations in Lupus Nephritis with Kidney Biopsy Showing Thrombotic Microangiopathy. J Rheumatol. 2019 .[7]Chen MH, Chen MH, Chen WS, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study in North Taiwan. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011. 50(4): 768-75.[8]Park MH, AUID- Oho, Caselman N, Ulmer S, Weitz IC, AUID- Oho. Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy associated with lupus nephritis. Blood Adv. 2018. 2(16): 2090-2094.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document