scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Microvessel Density Determining by Endoglin in Stage II Rectal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeljko Martinovic ◽  
Drazen Kovac ◽  
Mia Martinovic
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Normal Mucosa ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Adjacent Mucosa ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. The role of endoglin in the Dukes B rectal cancer is still unexplored. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of endoglin (CD105) in resected rectal cancer and to evaluate the relationship between microvessels density (MVD), clinicopathological factors, and survival rates.Methods. The study included 95 primary rectal adenocarcinomas, corresponding to 67 adjacent and 73 distant normal mucosa specimens from surgical resection samples. Tumor specimens were paraffin-embedded and immunohistochemical staining for the CD105 endothelial antigen was performed to count CD105-MVD. For exact measurement of the CD105-MVD used a computer-integrated system Alphelys Spot Browser 2 was used.Results. The intratumoral CD105-MVD was significantly higher compared with corresponding adjacent mucosa (P<0.0001) and distant mucosa specimens (P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the CD105-MVD according to patients age, gender, tumor location, grade of differentiation, histological type, depth of tumor invasion, and tumor size. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in the low CD105-MVD group of patients than in the high CD105-MVD group of patients (log-rank test,P=0.0406).Conclusion. CD105-assessed MVD could help to identify patients with possibility of poor survival in the group of stage II RC.

Effect of postoperative chemotherapy (CT) on survival in patients (pts) with resected rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14535-e14535
Author(s):  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Katherine Glass ◽  
John Wilson ◽  
Sherif Abdel-Misih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Significant Difference

e14535 Background: Pts with stage II/III rectal cancers are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection followed by adjuvant CT per practice guidelines. It is unclear whether adjuvant CT provides survival benefit, and the purpose of this study was to measure outcome in pts who did and did not receive adjuvant CT. Methods: We used a prospectively collected database for pts treated at The Ohio State University and analyzed overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), pt characteristics, tumor features, and treatments. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Age was compared using the Wilcoxon test, and other categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Between August, 2005 to July, 2011, 110 pts were identified and 71 pts had received adjuvant CT. There was no significant difference in sex, race, pathologic tumor (T) stage, and pathologic complete response between the two groups. Pts receiving adjuvant CT were significantly younger (median age 54.3 vs. 62 years, p=0.01) and had more advanced pathologic nodal (N) stage (43 vs. 19% N1 or N2, p=0.02). Median OS was 72.6 months with CT vs. 36.4 months without CT (p=0.0003). Median TTR has not yet been reached. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, adjuvant CT was associated with a longer OS despite more advanced pathologic nodal staging. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine whether adjuvant CT provides a survival benefit for pts across the spectrum of stage II and III rectal cancer. [Table: see text]

Survival differences in patients (pts) with resected rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy with or without postoperative chemotherapy (CT).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Katherine Glass ◽  
John Wilson ◽  
Sherif Abdel-Misih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Significant Difference

518 Background: Pts with stage II/III rectal cancers are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection followed by adjuvant CT per practice guidelines. It is unclear whether adjuvant CT provides survival benefit, and the purpose of this study was to measure outcome in pts who did and did not receive adjuvant CT. Methods: We used a prospectively collected database for pts treated at The Ohio State University, and analyzed overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), pt characteristics, tumor features, and treatments. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Age was compared using the Wilcoxon test, and other categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Between August 2005 to July 2011, 110 pts were identified and 71 pts had received adjuvant CT. There was no significant difference in sex, race, pathologic tumor (T) stage, and pathologic complete response between the two pt groups. Pts receiving adjuvant CT were significantly younger (median age 54.3 vs. 62 years, p=0.01) and had more advanced pathologic nodal (N) stage (43 vs. 19%, p=0.02). Median OS was 72.6 months with CT vs. 36.4 months without CT (p=0.0003). Median TTR has not yet been reached. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, adjuvant CT was associated with a longer OS despite more advanced pathologic nodal staging. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine whether adjuvant CT provides a survival benefit for pts across the spectrum of stage II and III rectal cancer. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Hua Gao ◽  
Bai Zhi Zhai ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Jean Luc Tshibangu Kabemba ◽  
Hai Feng Gong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Definition Of

BackgroundIn most guidelines, upper rectal cancers (URC) are not recommended to take neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation. However, the definitions of URC vary greatly. Five definitions had been commonly used to define URC: 1) &gt;10 cm from the anal verge by MRI; 2) &gt;12 cm from the anal verge by MRI; 3) &gt;10 cm from the anal verge by colonoscopy; 4) &gt;12 cm from the anal verge by colonoscopy; 5) above the anterior peritoneal reflection (APR). We hypothesized that the fifth definition is optimal to identify patients with rectal cancer to avoid adjuvant radiation.MethodsThe data of stage II/III rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery without preoperative chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The height of the APR was measured, and compared with the tumor height measured by digital rectal examination (DRE), MRI and colonoscopy. The five definitions were compared in terms of prediction of local recurrence, survival, and percentages of patients requiring radiation.ResultsA total of 576 patients were included, with the intraoperative location of 222 and 354 tumors being above and straddle/below the APR, respectively. The median distance of the APR from anal verge (height of APR) as measured by MRI was 8.7 (range: 4.5–14.3) cm. The height of APR positively correlated with body height (r=0.862, P&lt;0.001). The accuracy of the MRI in determining the tumor location with respect to the APR was 92.1%. Rectal cancer above the APR had a significantly lower incidence of local recurrence than those straddle/below the APR (P=0.042). For those above the APR, there was no significant difference in local recurrence between the radiation and no-radiation group. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor location regarding APR was an independent risk factor for LRFS. Tumor height as measured by DRE, MRI and colonoscopy were not related with survival outcomes. Fewer rectal cancer patients required adjuvant radiation using the definition by the APR, compared with other four definitions based on a numerical tumor height measured by MRI and colonoscopy.ConclusionsThe definition of URC as rectal tumor above the APR, might be the optimal definition to select patients with stage II/III rectal cancer to avoid postoperative adjuvant radiation.

scholarly journals Treatment and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Armenia: A Real-World Experience From a Developing Country

2020 ◽  
pp. 1286-1297
Author(s):  
Samvel Bardakhchyan ◽  
Sergo Mkhitaryan ◽  
Davit Zohrabyan ◽  
Liana Safaryan ◽  
Armen Avagyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test

PURPOSE In Armenia, colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers. It is in the third place by incidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment and outcomes of CRC in Armenia during the last 9 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this retrospective hospital-based study, we have collected data from two main oncology centers in Armenia: National Oncology Center and “Muratsan” Hospital of Yerevan State Medical University. The information about patients with CRC who were treated at these two centers between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2018 was collected from the medical records. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 602 patients with CRC were involved in the final analysis. Median follow-up time was 37 months (range, 3-207 months). A total of 8.6% of patients had stage I, 32.9% stage II, 38.0% stage III, and 17.6% stage IV cancer; for 2.7% patients, the stage was unknown. The main independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were tumor stage, grade, and histology. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in stage II colon cancer and stage III rectal but not in stage II rectal cancer. Radiotherapy did not yield survival improvement in stage II or III rectal cancer. Three- and 5-year OS rates were 62.9% and 51.8% for all stages combined and 79.7% and 68.5% for stages I-II, 62.5% and 48.4% for stage III, and 24.4% and 17% for stage IV respectively. CONCLUSION As seen from our results, our survival rates are lower than those of the developed world. Additional research is needed to identify the underlying reasons and to improve patients’ treatment and outcomes in Armenia.

scholarly journals Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of cervical adenocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Wang ◽  
Bo Yuan ◽  
Zhen-huan Zhou ◽  
Wei-wei Han
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Cervical Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival

AbstractWe aimed to assess the clinicopathological features and to determine the prognostic factors of cervical adenocarcinoma (AC). Relevant data were extracted from surveillance, epidemiology and end results database from 2004 to 2015. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard analysis were subsequently utilized to identify independent prognostic factors. A total of 3102 patients were identified. The enrolled patients were characterized by higher proportion of early FIGO stage (stage I: 65.9%; stage II: 14.1%), low pathological grade (grade I/II: 49.1%) and tumor size ≤ 4 cm (46.8%). The 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates of these patients were 74.47% and 70.00%, respectively. Meanwhile, the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.52% and 65.17%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that married status, surgery as well as chemotherapy were independent favorable prognostic indicators. Additionally, aged > 45, tumor grade III/IV, tumor size > 4 cm, advanced FIGO stage and pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) were unfavorable prognostic factors (all P < 0.01). Stratified analysis found that patients without surgery could significantly benefit from chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In addition, chemotherapy could significantly improve the survival in stage II–IV patients and radiotherapy could only improve the survival in stage III patients (all P < 0.01). Marital status, age, grade, tumor size, FIGO stage, surgery, pelvic LNM and chemotherapy were significantly associated with the prognosis of cervical AC.

scholarly journals Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Implication of Gastric Carcinoma with Lymphoid Stroma

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jung-Soo Pyo ◽  
Nae Yu Kim ◽  
Byoung Kwan Son ◽  
Hyo Young Lee ◽  
Il Hwan Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Medullary Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Lymphatic Invasion ◽  
Clinicopathologic Characteristics ◽  
Lymphoid Stroma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prognostic Implications

Background/Objective. Gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (GCLS) has been referred to as lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma and medullary carcinoma. The present study aims at elucidating the clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications of GCLS through a meta-analysis. Methods. This study included 34 eligible studies and 1757 GCLSs. The clinicopathologic characteristics of GCLS were investigated from eligible studies, and the meta-analysis was performed. In addition, we compared the survival rates between GCLS and non-GCLS. Results. The estimated rate of GCLS was 0.062 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.040-0.097). GCLS was significantly correlated with the diffuse type of Lauren’s classification, proximal tumor location, less-frequent lymphatic invasion, and lower pTNM stage. However, there was no significant difference in age, sex, tumor differentiation, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, pT stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis between GCLS and non-GCLS patients. EBV positive rates in GCLS and non-GCLS patients were 0.723 (95% CI 0.643-0.791) and 0.064 (95% CI 0.039-0.103), respectively. HER2 expression in GCLS was significantly lower than that in non-GCLS. GCLS patients had a more favorable prognosis than that of non-GCLS patients (hazard ratio 0.500, 95% CI 0.305-0.821). Conclusion. GCLS comprised 6.2% of overall GC and more frequent in the proximal portion of the stomach. Since GCLS was associated with better prognosis, the histologic finding can be useful for predicting the patient’s prognosis.

Analysis of RGS2 expression and prognostic significance in stage II and III colorectal cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Jiang ◽  
Zhimin Wang ◽  
Ye Xu ◽  
Beilan Wang ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Clinicopathological Factors ◽  
Real Time Quantitative Pcr

The role of RGS2 (regulator of G-protein signalling 2) has been studied in several tumours. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the correlations between clinicopathological factors and patients' survival time and RGS2 expression in stage II and III CRC (colorectal cancer) patients. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed in 36 CRC tissues with recurrence and 28 without recurrence, and in three CRC-metastasis-derived cell lines (SW620, LoVo and Colo205) and 3 primary-CRC-derived ones (SW480, Caco-2 and HCT116) to examine RGS2 mRNA expression. In addition, to provide visualized evidence for RGS2 mRNA expression, random CRC samples were also performed with RT–PCR (reverse transcription–PCR). RGS2 protein was detected by immunostaining in 118 paraffin-embedded specimens, and the correlations between clinicopathological factors and survival time and RGS2 expression were analysed. We found that RGS2 mRNA was down-regulated both in CRC tissues with recurrence and metastasis-derived cell lines, and the expression level of RGS2 was unrelated to gender, age, tumour grade, or lymphovascular or perineural invasion. However, it was positively related to disease-free survival time (P<0.05). Furthermore, low RGS2 expression indicated a poorer survival rate (P<0.05, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis also showed that weak RGS2 protein expression was an independent adverse prognosticator in CRC (P<0.05). Taken together, we suggested that down-regulation of RGS2 might play an important role in CRC metastasis and predict poor prognosis in stage II and III CRC patients.

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of MUC2, CDX2 and SOX2 in stage II colorectal cancer patients

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ribeirinho-Soares ◽  
Diana Pádua ◽  
Ana Luísa Amaral ◽  
Elvia Valentini ◽  
Daniela Azevedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Low Expression

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a serious health concern worldwide. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, about 15 to 30% of stage II CRC patients subjected to tumor resection with curative intent, develop disease relapse. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy adopted after surgery is not consensual for these patients. This supports the imperative need to find new prognostic and predictive biomarkers for stage II CRC. Methods For this purpose, we used a one-hospital series of 227 stage II CRC patient samples to assess the biomarker potential of the immunohistochemical expression of MUC2 mucin and CDX2 and SOX2 transcription factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival curves that were compared using the log-rank test, in order to determine prognosis of cases with different expression of these proteins, different mismatch repair (MMR) status and administration or not of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results In this stage II CRC series, none of the studied biomarkers showed prognostic value for patient outcome. However low expression of MUC2, in cases with high expression of CDX2, absence of SOX2 or MMR-proficiency, conferred a significantly worst prognosis. Moreover, cases with low expression of MUC2 showed a significantly clear benefit from treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion In conclusion, we observe that patients with stage II CRC with low expression of MUC2 in the tumor respond better when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This observation supports that MUC2 is involved in resistance to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and might be a promising future predictive biomarker in stage II CRC patients.

Benefit of fluorouracil and folinic acid adjuvant in colon cancer elderly patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13564-13564 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lonardi ◽  
M. Stefani ◽  
A. Jirillo ◽  
C. Ghiotto ◽  
L. M. Pasetto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tnm Stage ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Unselected Population

13564 Background: Retrospective analyses on elderly people enrolled in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer indicated the maintenance of the efficacy in that subset of patients (pts). However, data on the benefit of the routinely used adjuvant treatment in an unselected population of pts aged more than 65 years are few. Methods: All the charts of pts radically operated for colon cancer from 1996–2001 at Medical Oncology, Padua Hospital, were retrospectively analysed. 147 out of 330 pts consecutively treated with fluorouracil (FU)-based chemotherapy was aged 65 years or more at the time of diagnosis. Kaplan-Meyer progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of stage II and III pts were calculated. Results: Pts characteristics were: males/females: 87/60, median age 71 (range 65–87), ECOG PS 0/1: 124/23, right/left colon primary tumor: 62/85, TNM stage: 24/63/60. 86 out of 147 pts were treated with the following regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy: FU 370 mg/mq + leucovorin (LV) 20 mg/mq day 1–5 q 28 for 6 cycles (Machover regimen, n=69), or FU 500 mg/mq + LV 250 mg/mq weekly × 6 q 56 for 4 cycles (Roswell Park regimen, n=17). Treated pts were staged as follows: TNM stage I/II/III: 1/38/47. No toxic death were observed and only nine of 86 pts (10.4%) stopped the treatment due to acute grade III gastrointestinal toxicity. At a median follow-up of 73.2 months, 19 out of 86 pts (22%) developed cancer recurrence (3-y PFS: 82.2%, 5-y PFS: 80.3%). Seventeen pts (19.7%) died, 13 (15.1%) due to tumor progression, 3 (3.4%) due to acute heart failure, and 1 (1.1%) due to chronic pulmonary disease (3-y OS: 88.8%, 5-y OS: 82.4%). No statistically significant difference in survival was observed comparing pts aged 65–70 (n=41) with pts more than 70 years old (n=45): 5-y OS 84.1% vs 77.8%, respectively (p=2.23, log rank test). A separate survival analysis on stage II pts was performed (n=63). 5 of 38 (13.1) treated pts dead, compared to 9 of 25 (36%) non treated pts; 5-y survival in the two groups were 86.6% and 60.8%, respectively (p= 0.03, log-rank test). Conclusions: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy appears maintained in an unselected population of elderly pts. Surprisingly, our retrospective analysis suggest that even stage II pts may benefit of a fluorouracil-based well tolerated chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document