scholarly journals Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers: A Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Alves Vale ◽  
Maria Stella Moreira ◽  
Fernanda Campos Souza de Almeida ◽  
Karen Muller Ramalho
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Inflammatory Responses ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Specific Protocol ◽  
Aphthous Ulcers ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers

Recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs) are the most common lesion found in the oral cavity. There is no definitive cure for RAUs and current treatments are aimed at minimizing symptoms. Since low-level laser therapy (LLLT) modulates inflammatory responses, and promotes pain reduction and cellular biostimulation, LLLT can be suggested as an alternative treatment for RAUs. The literature concerning the potential of LLLT in the treatment of RAUs was evaluated. A systematic literature review identified 22 publications, of which only 2 studies were adopted. The eligibility criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Both RCTs achieved significant results concerning LLLT and pain-level reductions and reduced healing times. Despite the variance in irradiation conditions applied in both studies, very similar wavelengths were adopted. There is accordingly strong evidence that wavelength plays an important role in RAU treatment. Taking into account the different parameters applied by selected RCTs, it is not possible to suggest that a specific protocol should be used. However, in light of the significant results found in both studies, LLLT can be suggested as an alternative for RAU treatment. Additional RCTs should be performed in order to reach a clinical protocol and better understand the application of LLLT in RAU treatment.

scholarly journals Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Charu Mohan Marya ◽  
Jiksha Mehlawat ◽  
Ruchi Nagpal ◽  
Sakshi Kataria ◽  
Pratibha Taneja
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Aphthous Ulcers ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background. The present study aimed to assess and compare the pain perception and ulcer sizes before and after applying low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and Amlexanox + lidocaine. Methods. Twenty-six patients referring to the out-patient department of the institution and diagnosed with recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) were assigned to two groups to receive either LLLT or Amlexanox + lidocaine. In group 1, the patients were provided with amlexanox + lidocaine to apply topically four times daily. In group 2, the patients underwent LLLT with no tissue contact in inward circular motions for two cycles for 30 seconds. This study was registered in "the Clinical Trials Registry- India" (CTRI), with the registration number CTRI/2019/09/028222. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16. Results. The intergroup comparison was performed using Mann-Whitney U test, and intragroup comparisons were made using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The level of significance was set at P<0.05. The results showed that pain perception and ulcer size were significantly lower in group 2 subjects than group 1 subjects (P<0.05). Conclusion. LLLT was more effective than amlexanox + lidocaine in the management of RAU. It is a cost-effective therapy for treating RAU.

scholarly journals Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the Effective Management of Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers (RAU): Clinical Case Reporting 3 Patients: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. CR4-CR8
Author(s):  
CM Marya ◽  
Jiksha Mehlawat ◽  
Ruchi Nagpal ◽  
Pratibha Taneja
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Aphthous Ulcers ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Reduction Of Pain ◽  
Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers

Low-Level Laser therapy (LLLT) was employed for the  treatment of three patients diagnosed with recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU’s). The patients presented with recurrent aphthous ulcers in the region of floor of the mouth and buccal mucosa. The three patients with RAU’s were provided with a wavelength of946nm starting the use at 320µm  fibre optic at a distance of 1-3 mm, peak power of 2W, frequency 10 Hz with no tissue contact in circular motion from outside to inside for 2 cycles with 100% duty for 30s for 3 consecutive days. The LLLT made possible an effective improvement in the reduction of pain and size associated with ulcers. It proved to be a safe and cost effective therapy in the management of recurrent aphthous ulcers.

scholarly journals Low-Level Laser Therapy and Topical Medications for Treating Aphthous Ulcers: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1595-1605
Author(s):  
Mohammed Khaleel Ahmed ◽  
Mohammed Jafer ◽  
Maryam Nayeem ◽  
Ibtisam Hussain Moafa ◽  
Mir Furruq Ali Quadri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Aphthous Ulcers ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Topical Medications

scholarly journals Effects of low-level laser therapy on the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Girlane Sousa Albuquerque Brandão ◽  
Maria Aline Moreira Ximenes ◽  
Aline de Oliveira Ramalho ◽  
Vivian Saraiva Veras ◽  
Lívia Moreira Barros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Wound Healing Process ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

Objective: Identify the effects of low-level laser therapy on the healing of diabetic foot. Method: Systematic review of the PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Scopus databases, in which 92 articles were identified and six were included in the final sample after the eligibility criteria. Results: The articles pointed out as effects of laser therapy the effectiveness in the progression of the tissue repair process of the diabetic foot, pain relief, anti-inflammatory action, increased tissue perfusion of the lesion and improvement of the vascular response and the nervous system. Conclusion: Laser is an adjuvant therapy that can accelerate the wound healing process, relieve pain, improve neovascularization, and thus minimize the risk of complications, such as lower limb amputation and improvement of quality of life for people with diabetes and impaired skin integrity.

Low-level laser therapy versus 5% amlexanox: a comparison of treatment effects in a cohort of patients with minor aphthous ulcers

2016 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mekkadath Jayakrishnan Jijin ◽  
Mangala Rakaraddi ◽  
Jagadish Pai ◽  
Hombarvali Puttabuddi Jaishankar ◽  
Rangaswamy Krupashankar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Aphthous Ulcers ◽  
Level Laser

Assessment of healing of dental implant surgical site following Low-Level Laser Therapy using Bio-Clinical parameters: An Exploratory Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
VARSHA PALLED ◽  
DR. JITENDRA RAO ◽  
DR. RAGHUWAR DAYAL SINGH ◽  
DR. SHUCHI TRIPATHI ◽  
DR. KALPANA SINGH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Implant Stability Quotient ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) improves the healing of the implant surgical site with clinical and biochemical parameters.Thirty patients with an edentulous space spanning a single tooth were selected. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups - the control group and the test group. The test group received laser energy at a power of 2J/cm 2 with a total of 4-6J energy over each implant. Clinical parameters (Implant Stability Quotient, probing index, modified sulcus bleeding index)and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were assessed at baseline and follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months).The test group showed significantly higher implant stability quotient compared to thecontrol group at 2 weeks(57.93±3.95 and 35.67±3.08; p&lt;0.01) and 3months(58.86±3.75 and 67.06±3.78; p&lt;0.01). A significant rise in OPG levels of the test group(686.30±125.36pg/ml at baseline and 784.25±108.30pg/ml at 3months;p&lt;0.01) was seen contrary to significant decline in the control group (839.50±249.08pg/ml at baseline,415.30±78.39pg/ml at 3months;p&lt;0.01). Within the limitations of the study, the study suggests that the healing of peri-implant hard and soft tissues may be enhanced with the use of LLLT as an explicit modality during the post-operative period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document