scholarly journals Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastasis from Biopsy Associated Hematoma Disruption during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Caputo ◽  
Ziho Lee ◽  
Andrew Harbin ◽  
Daniel Eun

We describe a case in which a patient with a past medical history of ovarian cancer received a diagnostic renal biopsy for an incidentally discovered renal mass. During left robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), a perinephric hematoma was encountered. The hematoma was not present on preoperative imaging and was likely a result of the renal biopsy. The renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the associated hematoma were widely excised with negative surgical margins. On follow-up imaging at five months postoperatively, a recurrent renal mass at the surgical resection bed and several new nodules in the omentum were detected. During completion left robotic total nephrectomy and omental excision, intraoperative frozen sections confirmed metastatic RCC. We believe that a hematoma seeded with RCC formed as a result of the renal biopsy, and subsequent disruption of the hematoma during RPN caused contamination of RCC into the surrounding structures.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C Harbin ◽  
Brett A Styskel ◽  
Viren Patel ◽  
He Wang ◽  
Daniel D Eun

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare and aggressive form of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising from the principal cells of the collecting duct.  One third of cases present with metastatic disease, but many present in a manner similar to conventional RCC or urothelial carcinoma (UC).  We discuss a case of CDC which presented as a small mass at the cortico-medullary junction, and was discovered at robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) to be grossly involving the collecting system. A 62-year-old man presented with a small renal mass suspicious for RCC, which was found on computed tomography (CT) after an episode of gross hematuria.  After thorough workup, RPN was attempted; however, intraoperatively the mass was found to be involving the collecting system.  Radical nephroureterectomy was performed, and the pathology report revealed CDC.  CDC is a rare and aggressive form of RCC.  While many cases are metastatic at diagnosis, most patients present with the incidental finding of a small renal mass.  There are no reports of a CDC involving the collecting system at RPN after negative ureteroscopy preoperatively.  The adjuvant therapeutic options for CDC are limited, and long term survival is poor.    


Urology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 737-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kutikov ◽  
Lindsay K. Fossett ◽  
Parvati Ramchandani ◽  
John E. Tomaszewski ◽  
Evan S. Siegelman ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
pp. 913-914
Author(s):  
J. JONES ◽  
J. SHAH ◽  
S. MORRIS ◽  
E. M. GORDON ◽  
U. PATEL ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 913-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. JONES ◽  
J. SHAH ◽  
S. MORRIS ◽  
E.M. GORDON ◽  
U. PATEL ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Gong ◽  
Chuanjun Du ◽  
David Y. Josephson ◽  
Timothy G. Wilson ◽  
Rebecca Nelson

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A149-A149
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Gara Rico ◽  
Ronald Innerfied

Abstract Background: Adrenal incidentaloma are masses that are found coincidentally on radiologic imaging usually performed for indications other than evaluation for adrenal disease. Pheochromocytomas are rare, usually sporadic catecholamine-producing adrenal tumors and represent 5% of adrenal incidentalomas. While pheochromocytomas can present on their own, they can also present as part of a spectrum of disease found in certain familial syndromes. We present a case of pheochromocytoma found in a patient with a history of renal cell carcinoma and fallopian tube leiomyoma. Case Presentation: A 67 year old female with a past medical history of diabetes mellitus type II, end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, hypertension, skin cancer, right fallopian tube leiomyoma, and right renal mass suspected for renal cell carcinoma presented to the clinic for evaluation of a left adrenal mass. Left adrenal mass was incidentally found 3 years ago on CT abdomen for evaluation for renal transplant and noted to be 2.2 cm in diameter. There were also incidental findings of a 1.3cm right renal mass and a 5.6x4.8cm right adnexal mass. Patient underwent robot assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy and surgical pathology results showed leiomyoma of the myometrium. Surveillance CT imaging done 3 years after showed the left adrenal mass and right renal mass increased in size with the adrenal mass increasing to 4.3 cm in diameter with central necrosis and right renal mass increasing to 3.2 x 1.3 cm. Screening biochemical test were done, and initial test and confirmatory test confirmed pheochromocytoma. Dexamethasone suppression test and aldosterone/renin ratio results were normal. Surgical pathology confirmed pheochromocytoma and biopsy of the right renal mass 8 months later confirmed renal cell carcinoma. Conclusion: Majority of pheochromocytomas are sporadic but up to 40% have been identified as inherited in origin due germline mutations. They have been known to present as a part of a spectrum of disease pathologies specific for certain familial syndromes such as Neurofibromatosis Type 1, Von Hippel Lindau Syndrome, Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2, and Familial Paragangliomas. One relatively uncommon syndrome, Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer Syndrome due to a mutation in the fumarate hydratase gene, has been known to present with pheochromocytoma in rare cases. Our patient presented with pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma, and uterine leiomyoma which is suspicious for Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer Syndrome. The diagnosis was not confirmed as genetic testing was not done. Due to a high rate of inherited patterns of pheochromocytoma, routine genetic testing should be done as identification of gene mutations may lead to diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients and their relatives.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S61-S61
Author(s):  
S Arora ◽  
C G Rogers ◽  
K Arora ◽  
R Abou Shaar ◽  
B Kezlarian ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction/Objective Renal mass biopsy is known to have a low but unavoidable diagnostic error rate. However, the occurrence of multiple adjacent masses mimicking one mass clinically has been minimally studied. Methods We report a series of four patients who were radiologically presumed to have a single renal mass and treated with partial nephrectomy, yet who were found to have multiple demarcated renal cell carcinoma histologies at pathologic evaluation. Results All were men aged 63–70 years. Grossly, tumors were red brown with scant, bright yellow foci in one of them. Dominant tumors followed by smaller tumors were: patient 1 - clear cell renal cell carcinoma (5.0 cm), clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (0.5 cm), and papillary adenoma (0.6 cm); patient 2 - clear cell renal cell carcinoma (1.5 cm) and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (0.5 cm); patient 3 - papillary renal cell carcinoma (5.0 cm) and eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (1.0 cm); patient 4 - chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (4.0 cm) and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (0.6 cm). Immunohistochemical studies for cytokeratin 7, carbonic anhydrase IX, high molecular weight cytokeratin, CD10, and alpha-methyl acyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) confirmed the separate components in all. Conclusion This series adds to the spectrum of causes that may contribute to discordant results of renal mass biopsy and resection specimens. Secondary smaller tumors appear to be predominantly nonaggressive histologies, enriched for clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma. Pathologists and urologists should be aware of this occurrence when considering the role of renal mass biopsy and interpreting the results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document