scholarly journals Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analyses of the Position and Course of the Mandibular Canal: Relevance to the Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Ercan Sekerci ◽  
Halil Sahman
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Dental Patients ◽  
The Third ◽  
Difficult Procedure ◽  
The Mean

Purpose. The aim of this study was to document the position and course of the mandibular canal through the region of the mandibular angle and body in dental patients, using cone beam computed tomographic imaging.Methods. The position and course of the mandibular canal from the region of the third molar to the first molar were measured at five specific locations in the same plane: at three different positions just between the first and second molars; between the second and third molars; and just distal to the third molar.Results. The study sample was composed of 500 hemimandibles from 250 dental patients with a mean age of 26.32. Significant differences were found between genders, distances, and positions. B decreased significantly from the anterior positions to the posterior positions in both females and males. The mean values of S and CB increased significantly from the posterior positions to the anterior positions in both females and males.Conclusion. Because the sagittal split ramus osteotomy is a technically difficult procedure, we hope that the findings of the present study will help the surgeon in choosing the safest surgical technique for the treatment of mandibular deformities.

scholarly journals Assessment of the Retromolar Canal in Taiwan Subpopulation: A Cross-Sectional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study in a Medical Center

Tomography ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-227
Author(s):  
Yen-Wen Shen ◽  
Wan-Chun Chang ◽  
Heng-Li Huang ◽  
Ming-Tzu Tsai ◽  
Lih-Jyh Fuh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Horizontal Distance ◽  
Taiwanese Population ◽  
Mandibular Bone ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
The Third ◽  
Retromolar Canal

The retromolar canal is an anatomical variation that occurs in the mandibular bone. The retromolar canal typically originates in the mandibular canal on the distal side of the third molar and extends forward and upward to the retromolar foramen (RMF), which contains the neurovascular bundle. Accidentally damaging the neurovascular bundle in the retromolar canal during the extraction of the third molar, dental implant surgery, or maxillofacial orthognathic surgery may lead to subsequent complications such as incomplete local anesthesia, paresthesia, and bleeding during operation. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the RMF in the Taiwanese population in a medical center by using dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to identify the position of the RMF in the mandibular bone. The dental CBCT images for the mandibular bone of 68 hemi-mandible were uploaded to the medical imaging software Mimics 15.1 to determine the prevalence of the RMF in the Taiwanese population and the three positional parameters of the RMF in the mandibular bone: (1) The diameter of the RMF, (2) the horizontal distance from the midpoint of the RMF to the distal cementoenamel junction of the second molar, and (3) the vertical distance from the midpoint of the RMF to the upper border of the mandibular canal. Seven RMFs were observed in the 68 hemi-mandibles. Thus, the RMF prevalence was 10.3%. In addition, the diameter of the RMF was 1.41 ± 0.30 mm (mean ± standard deviation), the horizontal distance from the midpoint of the RMF to the distal cementoenamel junction of the the second molar was 12.93 ± 2.87 mm, and the vertical distance from the midpoint of the RMF to the upper border of the mandibular canal below second molar was 13.62 ± 1.3487 mm. This study determined the prevalence of the RMF in the Taiwanese population in a medical center and its relative position in the mandibular bone. This information can provide clinicians with a reference for posterior mandible anesthesia and surgery to ensure medical safety.

scholarly journals Association between imaging and clinical findings in mandibular third molar surgeries

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Bonifácio da Silva Sampieri ◽  
Danilo Da Silva Correa ◽  
Francisca Lívia Parente Viana ◽  
Thaís Sumie Nozu Imada ◽  
Josfran Da Silva Ferreira Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Panoramic Radiograph ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
The Third ◽  
Close Relationship

Objective: it is important to evaluate the position andestablish the third molar relationship with the mandibularcanal to minimize the risk of nerve injury and assistin planning the extraction of this tooth. The panoramicradiograph is the standard diagnostic tool for this purpose.However, if it indicates a close relationship betweenthe third molar and the mandibular canal, furtherinvestigation using cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) may be recommended to check the three-dimensionalrelationship between the tooth and the mandibularcanal. Thus, this study aimed to correlate the clinicalfindings (observed in third molar surgeries) to imagingfindings (observed in panoramic radiographs andCBCT). Subjects and method: after the extraction of 20mandibular third molars, the panoramic radiograph andthe cone beam computed tomography were analyzed.Then, the surgical findings were correlated to the imagefindings. Results: It was observed that the radiographicfinding type 2 (darkening of roots) observed in the panoramicradiograph presented a greater relation to theabsence of cortical bone between the mandibular canaland the third molar (CBCT finding), with statistical significance(p

scholarly journals Incidence and Anatomical Properties of Retromolar Canal in an Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
N. Nikkerdar ◽  
A. Golshah ◽  
M. Norouzi ◽  
S. Falah-Kooshki
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Iranian Population ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anatomical Properties ◽  
Retromolar Canal

Objectives. Retromolar canal (RC) is an anatomic structure, and due to increasing demand for surgical procedure in the retromolar area of the mandible, the identification of the retromolar canal has become an issue of clinical concern. It can innervate the third molar and some of the muscles around the posterior segment of the mandible, complicating surgical procedures in the retromolar area and root canal treatment of third molars. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and anatomical properties of RC in a western Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods. Two hundred bilateral CBCT images were collected and screened in the three spatial planes for the presence of an RC. Anatomical properties and location of the RCs were assessed according to their course and distance from the surrounding structures. The relationship between the presence of RC and age, sex, side, and presence of second and third molars was also evaluated. Independent samples t-test, ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, paired t-test, and chi-square were used to compare groups. Results. At least one RC was observed in 22% of the mandibles. Its bilateral incidence was 5.5%. Two major types of canals were detected, namely, type I, following a straight or curved course from the mandibular canal (MC) to the retromolar area (47.3%), and type II, coursing from the retromolar area to the radicular part of the third molar (52.7%). Regarding linear measurements, the mean RC diameter and the mean distance to the MC, second, and third molars were 0.68 ± 0.31, 13.7 ± 2.8, 15.3 ± 3.0, and 7.3 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, RC was found in 22% of the cases; thus, it should be considered as a normal anatomical variation in the Iranian population rather than a rare finding.

scholarly journals Prediction of nerve damage by comparing periapical radiographic signs of impacted mandibular third molars in close proximity to inferior alveolar nerve with their true tomographic relationship – An observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-130
Author(s):  
Srujana Daniella Remulla ◽  
Jyothirmai Koneru ◽  
Sudhakara Reddy ◽  
Ramesh Tatapudi ◽  
Geetanjali Darna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Iatrogenic Complications

The purpose of the study was to correlate the accuracy of Roods and Shehab signs in an intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPAR) with Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings to indicate Cone-beam computed tomography only in high-risk conditions.70 impacted mandibular third molar teeth in 58 patients above 18 years with intraoral periapical radiographs presenting with one or more root and canal signs of Rood and Shehab criteria were included in the study. Winter's classification was recorded, and the patients were exposed to a Cone-beam computed tomographic scan. True canal – tooth relationship was assessed in the sectional images. Pearson Chi-square test was used to correlate periapical radiograph and tomographic findings, and an unpaired t-test was applied for descriptive analysis.Rood and Shehab canal criteria in the periapical radiographs were significantly correlated to direct contact of an impacted lower third molar with the canal (p< 0.05) and loss of cortication of Mandibular canal (p< 0.05) on the cone-beam computed tomography. Cone-beam computed tomography is recommended to assess the periapical radiographs with canal risk markers pre-operatively to help avoid iatrogenic complications.

Position of the mandibular canal before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a cone beam computed tomography study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Chiguti Yamashita ◽  
Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki ◽  
Amanda Lury Yamashita ◽  
Elen de Souza Tolentino ◽  
Vinicius Eduardo de Oliveira Verginio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy ◽  
Before And After

scholarly journals Height difference between the vestibular and palatal walls and palatal width: a cone beam computed tomography approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. López-Jarana ◽  
C. M. Díaz-Castro ◽  
A. Falcão ◽  
C. Falcão ◽  
J. V. Ríos-Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Bone Thickness ◽  
Height Difference ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Maxilla And Mandible ◽  
Palatal Bone ◽  
Two Parameters

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to measure two parameters involved in tri-dimensional implant planning: the position of the buccal and palatal bone wall and the palatal thickness. Methods Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images (Planmeca ProMax 3D) of 403 teeth (208 upper teeth and 195 lower teeth) were obtained from 49 patients referred to the Dental School of Seville from January to December 2014. The height difference between the palatal and buccal walls was measured on the most coronal point of both walls. The thickness of the palatal wall was measured 2 mm from the most coronal point of the palatal wall. Results The mean values in the maxilla were 1.7 ± 0.9 mm for central and lateral incisors, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for canines, 1.6 ± 0.9 mm for premolars and 1.9 ± 1.5 mm for molars. In the lower jaw, the mean values were 1.3 ± 0.8 mm for incisors, 1.7 ± 1.2 mm for canines, 2.3 ± 1.3 mm for premolars, and 2.6 ± 1.7 mm for molars. In the upper jaw, more than 55% of maxillary teeth (excluding second premolars and molars) presented mean height differences greater than 1 mm. In the mandible, more than 60% of incisors showed a buccal bone thickness of 1 mm from the apical to lingual aspect. All teeth except the second premolar presented a buccal wall located more than 1 mm more apically than the lingual bone wall. Conclusions The buccal bone wall is located more apically (greater than 1 mm) than the palatal or lingual table in most of the cases assessed. The thickness of the palatal or lingual table is also less than 2 mm in the maxilla and mandible, except in the upper canines and premolars and the lower molars.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document