scholarly journals Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis for Treating Osteoarthritis in a Patient with Kashin-Beck Disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenjiro Iwasa ◽  
Noriyuki Kanzaki ◽  
Takaaki Fujishiro ◽  
Shinya Hayashi ◽  
Shingo Hashimoto ◽  
...  

Kashin-Beck disease (KBD) is an endemic degenerative osteoarthritis. Death of cartilage and growth plate is the pathologic feature; therefore, KBD involves skeletal deformity and often results in osteoarthritis. Deficiency of selenium, high humic acid levels in water, and fungi on storage gains are considered the cause of KBD. The most frequently involved joints are ankles, knees, wrists, and elbows and symptoms are pain and limited motions of those joints. The main treatments for KBD are rehabilitation and osteotomy to correct the deformities because preventive treatment has not been established. In this report, we present a case of ankle osteoarthritis due to KBD and first describe arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for treating osteoarthritis of KBD.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guiping Liu ◽  
Alexander C. Peterson ◽  
Kevin Wing ◽  
Trafford Crump ◽  
Alastair Younger ◽  
...  

Background: Significant ankle arthritis results in functional limitations and patient morbidity. There is a need to measure symptoms and the impact of interventions on patient’s quality of life using valid and reliable patient-reported measurement instruments. The objective of this research was to validate the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale instrument in the preoperative setting using factor analysis, item response theory, and differential item function methods. Methods: This research is based on secondary analysis of patients scheduled for ankle arthrodesis or total ankle replacement in Vancouver, Canada. Participants completed the instrument between September 2014 and August 2017. Item response theory was used to estimate item difficulty and discrimination parameters, controlling for study participants’ underlying level of ankle function. Differential item function was examined for sex, age group, and surgery. There were 88 participants. Results: Modification indices suggested that item 10, “walking around the house,” would better fit the pain domain rather than the disability domain. Items in the pain domain displayed a range of discrimination and difficulty. Items in the disability domain exhibited a range of discrimination, though the disability domain had low difficulty. Differential item functioning for sex, age group, and ankle arthrodesis or total ankle replacement appeared to be ignorable. Conclusion: This evaluation of the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale found the instrument to be a strong measure of the effect of pain and dysfunction among patients with end-stage ankle arthritis, even when removing items 7 and 8, supporting its prior use in numerous clinical studies. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Amaha ◽  
Satoshi Yamaguchi ◽  
Atsushi Teramoto ◽  
Tetsuro Kokubo ◽  
Hiroyuki Seki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis in patients aged ≥75 years and compare the outcomes with those of patients aged <75 years. Methods A total of 148 patients, including 65 post-total ankle arthroplasty and 83 post-ankle arthrodesis patients, were surveyed retrospectively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot hindfoot scale and the self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, radiographic severity, and follow-up period, were also assessed. Patients were divided into the older age group (≥75 years) and the younger age group (<75 years). Improvements in outcomes were then compared between the age groups using univariate analysis and analysis of covariance adjusted for patient characteristics. Post-total ankle arthroplasty and post-ankle arthrodesis were analyzed separately. Results All clinical outcome scores improved postoperatively in the older age group for both post-total ankle arthroplasty and post-ankle arthrodesis. For example, scores for pain and pain-related subscale of the self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire improved by 37 points (p < 0.001) for post-total ankle arthroplasty patients and by 35 points for post-ankle arthrodesis (p < 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the improvements observed in all scores were not different between the older and younger age groups for both post-total ankle arthroplasty and post-ankle arthrodesis patients, except for the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire physical functioning subscale score for post-ankle arthrodesis patients. Conclusions Clinical outcomes improved significantly in post-total ankle arthroplasty and post-ankle arthrodesis patients aged ≥75 years. Moreover, the improvements were similar to those in patients aged <75 years. Therefore, surgical treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis can be a viable treatment option, even in elderly patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 58-59
Author(s):  
K. Mikhaylov ◽  
A. Bulatov ◽  
V. Emelyanov ◽  
D. Pliev ◽  
M. Guatsaev ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0041
Author(s):  
Bailey J. Ross ◽  
Ian Savage-Elliott ◽  
Victor Wu ◽  
Ramon F. Rodriguez

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Ankle arthrodesis (AA) has historically been the gold standard for operative management of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA). Recent increases in utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAR) have been observed secondary to new implant designs, improved surgical technique, and favorable functional outcomes. However, there is minimal data comparing clinical complications between the two procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare incidences of postoperative joint and systemic complications for patients that received primary AA vs. TAR for primary ankle osteoarthritis between 2007-2017 using a comprehensive Medicare database. Methods: A retrospective review of patients that received primary AA or TAR was performed using the PearlDiver database (Fort Wayne, IN). All patients and associated complications were identified using ICD-9/ICD-10 and CPT codes. Patients with a history of ankle fracture, prior AA/TAR, or active ankle infection during the index procedure were excluded. Demographic data and overall joint complication rates were compared at 90-days, 1-year, and 2-years postoperatively using a Chi-Square test. Postoperative rates of subtalar fusion, prosthetic joint infection, hardware removal, periprosthetic fracture, and systemic complications were compared using logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 1,580 patients received operative management of primary ankle OA: 1,100 (70%) patients received AA and 480 (30%) patients received TAR. The overall joint complication rate was higher in the AA group at 90-days (30% vs. 17%, p < 0.001), 1-year (36% vs. 21%, p < 0.001), and 2-years (38% vs. 22%, p < 0.001) post-discharge. AA patients were more likely to have a subsequent subtalar fusion at 90-days (OR 4.49), 1-year (OR 5.10), and 2-years (OR 5.36) post-discharge, as well as periprosthetic fracture at 1-year (OR 1.69) and 2-years (OR 1.77). Hardware removal was less likely for AA patients at 90-days (OR 0.43), 1-year (OR 0.41), and 2-years (OR 0.43). Neither group was more likely to develop systemic complications postoperatively. Conclusion: The present study found that AA patients have higher incidences of major joint complications in both the short- term and mid-term. Patients that received AA were more likely to have a subsequent subtalar fusion and sustain a periprosthetic fracture. Relative to TAR patients, a greater proportion of these patients were under the age of 65, obese, had diabetes, and used tobacco. TAR patients were more likely to have hardware removal post-discharge. Further study is warranted to better quantify patient selection for AA vs. TAR and trend the long-term complications of these procedures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 683-688
Author(s):  
Kenta Saiga ◽  
Suguru Yokoo ◽  
Hideki Ohashi ◽  
Masahiro Horita ◽  
Takayuki Furumatsu ◽  
...  

Background: Recently, arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has been performed for moderate-to-severe varus-deformed ankle osteoarthritis. However, the effect of osteophyte resection in the lateral gutter in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has not been clarified. We hypothesized that a varus-deviated ankle with lateral gutter osteophytes can be corrected by osteophyte resection. Methods: Thirty-nine ankles of 38 patients were included. The mean age of patients was 70.0 (45-83) years. The patients were divided into the following groups: group with an osteophyte in the lateral gutter (osteophyte) and group with no osteophytes (nonosteophyte). Preoperative and postoperative tibiotalar angle, tibial plafond angle, and tibiotalar angle under valgus stress, as well as the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle/hindfoot scale, were recorded. Twelve ankles underwent lateral gutter osteophyte resection, whereas the other 27 ankles did not require osteophyte resection. Results: Preoperative tibiotalar angle was higher in the osteophyte group than in the nonosteophyte group (21.8 vs 11.2 degrees, P = .01). The tibiotalar angle in the preoperative valgus stress imaging was higher in the osteophyte group (12.9 vs 5.7, P < .01). However, the postoperative tibiotalar angle was similar between the 2 groups (7.1 vs 5.4, P = .183). JSSF ankle/hindfoot scale improved in both groups. Conclusion: Lateral gutter osteophyte resection enabled correction of the varus malalignment in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 6797-6804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Wąsik ◽  
Tomasz Stołtny ◽  
Jarosław Pasek ◽  
Karol Szyluk ◽  
Michał Pyda ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. e33
Author(s):  
Isabelle Loiret ◽  
Noël Martinet ◽  
Jean Paysant ◽  
Guillaume Bokobza ◽  
Anne-Gabrielle François

Author(s):  
Zeinab Imani ◽  
Nesa Milan ◽  
Hossein Nematian ◽  
Leila Aghaghazvini ◽  
Mojtaba Sedaghat ◽  
...  

Background: This study was designed to achieve a new method as a preventive treatment for complications of growth plate fractures. In this study, we investigate the effect of intra-articular injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibody bevacizumab on the repair process of articular cartilage in a type 4 Salter Harris injury model. Methods: A Salter Harris injury was created on the proximal tibial growth plate of 14 rats by a 1.8 mm drill. The rats were randomly classified into two groups: group LD, administration of high-dose intra-articular injection of bevacizumab (250 μg), and group HD, administration of low-dose intra-articular injection of bevacizumab (50 μg) after injury. The rats were killed 2 months postoperatively and their tibia underwent micro-computed tomography (CT) analysis, histological assessment, and measurement of tibial bone length. Results: Bony bar formation was observed in 71% of the samples in the high-dose group and in 100% of the low-dose group. Relative increase in physeal cartilage thickness (P = 0.007) and decrease in bony bar formation (P = 0.029) were observed significantly in the high dose group. There was no significant difference in tibia length between the two groups (P = 0.150). Conclusion: Intra-articular administration of bevacizumab demonstrated positive restorative effects. We suggest this method of treatment due to its potential of improving cartilage repair and capability to be used as a main or adjacent treatment in osteochondral defects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document