scholarly journals Cartilage Repair Surgery: Outcome Evaluation by Using Noninvasive Cartilage Biomarkers Based on Quantitative MRI Techniques?

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia M. Jungmann ◽  
Thomas Baum ◽  
Jan S. Bauer ◽  
Dimitrios C. Karampinos ◽  
Benjamin Erdle ◽  
...  

Background. New quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are increasingly applied as outcome measures after cartilage repair.Objective. To review the current literature on the use of quantitative MRI biomarkers for evaluation of cartilage repair at the knee and ankle.Methods. Using PubMed literature research, studies on biochemical, quantitative MR imaging of cartilage repair were identified and reviewed.Results. Quantitative MR biomarkers detect early degeneration of articular cartilage, mainly represented by an increasing water content, collagen disruption, and proteoglycan loss. Recently, feasibility of biochemical MR imaging of cartilage repair tissue and surrounding cartilage was demonstrated. Ultrastructural properties of the tissue after different repair procedures resulted in differences in imaging characteristics. T2 mapping, T1rho mapping, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) are applicable on most clinical 1.5 T and 3 T MR scanners. Currently, a standard of reference is difficult to define and knowledge is limited concerning correlation of clinical and MR findings. The lack of histological correlations complicates the identification of the exact tissue composition.Conclusions. A multimodal approach combining several quantitative MRI techniques in addition to morphological and clinical evaluation might be promising. Further investigations are required to demonstrate the potential for outcome evaluation after cartilage repair.

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1167-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Bowers ◽  
N. Trinh ◽  
G.A. Tung ◽  
J.J. Crisco ◽  
B.B. Kimia ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 243-243
Author(s):  
P. Sewerin ◽  
L. Dötsch ◽  
D. Truhm ◽  
D. Abrar ◽  
S. Nebelung

Background:In OA, there is a close association of meniscus and cartilage pathologies. Meniscus degeneration and lesioning are critical risk factors for development of early OA. Hence, thisex-vivostudy assessed the responses to standardized loading of human meniscus samples as a function of degeneration and based on changes in their T1, T2 and T1ρ maps (as surrogate parameters of the tissue’s functionality).Objectives:Can meniscus functionality be visualized by serial quantitative MRI mapping technics?Methods:During total knee replacements, 45 meniscus samples of variable degeneration were harvested from the center of the lateral meniscus body (Fig. 1a1-a3). After preparation to standard, samples were subject to force-controlled loading using an MRI-compatible lever device that created compressive loading by torque ((Fig. 1a4-a5). For each sample and loading position, MRI measurements (as detailed below) were performed in the unloaded (δ0) and loaded configurations, i.e. loaded to 2 bar (δ1, 37.1 N compressive force, 0.67 Nm torque) and to 4 bar (δ2, 69.1 N, 1.24 Nm). Throughout all loading positions, morphological and quantitative imaging was performed using Proton Density-weighted and T1, T1ρ, and T2 mapping sequences (3.0 T, Achieva, Philips) based on standard turbospin-echo, inversion-recovery, spin-lock multi-gradient-echo, and multi-spin-echo sequences. For reference purposes, histological (i.e. Pauli classification) and biomechanical measures (i.e. Elastic Modulus) were obtained for each sample. Based on Pauli sum scores, samples were trichotomized as grossly intact, (n=14), mildly degenerated (n=16), and moderate-to-severely degenerated (n=15).Figure 1.Preparation of meniscus samples and details of the MRI-compatible loading device. The lateral meniscus (a1) was cut to standard size by use of a dedicated cutting block (a2) to eventually obtain lateral meniscus samples (from the body region) of standard dimensions (a3). These samples were then placed in a dedicated MRI-compatible loading device for pressure-controlled, quasi-static and torque-induced loading under simultaneous MR imaging (a4). Two parallel support beams allowed standardized positioning in the MRI scanner‘s bore (a5).Results:Morphologically, loading induced deformation and flattening in all samples (Fig. 2a). For T1, homogeneous loading-induced decreases in all samples were found, irrespective of degeneration (Fig. 2b). For T1ρ, increases in the apical zones of intact samples were observed, and decreases in degenerated samples (Fig. 2c). For T2, changes were ambiguous and incoherent (Fig. 2d).Figure 2.Serial morphological images and functional maps of histologically moderately degenerative human meniscus as a function of force-controlled loading. Serial PDw (a), T1 (b), T1ρ (c), and T2 maps (d) are displayed at increasing loading intensity (δ0: unloaded [a1-d1]; δ1: loaded to 2 bar [a2-d2]; δ2: loaded to 4 bar [a3-d3]). Histologically, this sample demonstrated signs of severe surface desintegration and disruption. Pauli sum score 12, i.e. moderate to severe degeneration (Pauli Grade III). In b – d, color-coded parameter value maps are overlaid onto the corresponding morphological images. Histological sections are stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (e1) and Safranin O (e2).Conclusion:Meniscus functionality may be visualized using serial quantitative MRI mapping techniques. T1ρ may provide an imaging biomarker of relevant intra-tissue adaptations that seem to be associated with histological degeneration. The perspective evaluation of meniscus functionality may be indicative of incipient or manifest load transmission failure to the adjacent cartilage layer.Disclosure of Interests:Philipp Sewerin Grant/research support from: AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KGBristol-Myers Squibb Celgene GmbHLilly Deutschland GmbHNovartis Pharma GmbH Pfizer Deutschland GmbHRheumazentrum Rhein-Ruhr, Consultant of: AMGEN GmbH AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG Biogen GmbHBristol-Myers Squibb Celgene GmbH Chugai Pharma arketing Ltd. / Chugai Europe GmbHHexal Pharma Janssen-CilagGmbH Johnson & Johnson Deutschland GmbHLilly Deutschland GmbH / Lilly Europe / Lilly Global Novartis Pharma GmbH Pfizer Deutschland GmbH Roche Pharma Rheumazentrum Rhein-Ruhr Sanofi-Genzyme Deutschland GmbH Swedish Orphan Biovitrum GmbH UCB Pharma GmbH, Speakers bureau: AMGEN GmbH AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG Biogen GmbHBristol-Myers Squibb Celgene GmbH Chugai Pharma arketing Ltd. / Chugai Europe GmbHHexal Pharma Janssen-CilagGmbH Johnson & Johnson Deutschland GmbHLilly Deutschland GmbH / Lilly Europe / Lilly Global Novartis Pharma GmbH Pfizer Deutschland GmbH Roche Pharma Rheumazentrum Rhein-Ruhr Sanofi-Genzyme Deutschland GmbH Swedish Orphan Biovitrum GmbH UCB Pharma GmbH, Lisa Dötsch: None declared, Daniel Truhm: None declared, Daniel Abrar: None declared, Sven Nebelung: None declared


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0132717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Lareau-Trudel ◽  
Arnaud Le Troter ◽  
Badih Ghattas ◽  
Jean Pouget ◽  
Shahram Attarian ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dirk Vandermeulen ◽  
Frederik Maes ◽  
Koen Van Leemput

Radiology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 197 (1) ◽  
pp. 301-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
B C Vande Berg ◽  
P J Schmitz ◽  
J M Scheiff ◽  
B J Filleul ◽  
J L Michaux ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 277 (3) ◽  
pp. 784-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaou Liu ◽  
Yunyun Duan ◽  
Jing Huang ◽  
Zhuoqiong Ren ◽  
Jing Ye ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 217 (2) ◽  
pp. 527-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix W. Wehrli ◽  
Jeffrey A. Hopkins ◽  
Scott N. Hwang ◽  
Hee Kwon Song ◽  
Peter J. Snyder ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 241 (2) ◽  
pp. 510-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Patrick van der Voorn ◽  
Petra J. W. Pouwels ◽  
Augustinus A. M. Hart ◽  
Judith Serrarens ◽  
Michèl A. A. P. Willemsen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document