scholarly journals The Impact of Arthroscopic Capsular Release in Patients with Primary Frozen Shoulder on Shoulder Muscular Strength

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Waszczykowski ◽  
Michał Polguj ◽  
Jarosław Fabiś
Keyword(s):  
Muscular Strength ◽  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Active Motion ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release ◽  
Limited Function ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of arthroscopic capsular release in patients with primary frozen shoulder on muscular strength of nonaffected and treated shoulder after at least two-year follow-up after the surgery. The assessment included twenty-seven patients, who underwent arthroscopic capsular release due to persistent limitation of range of passive and active motion, shoulder pain, and limited function of upper limb despite 6-month conservative treatment. All the patients underwent arthroscopic superior, anteroinferior, and posterior capsular release. After at least two-year follow-up, measurement of muscular strength of abductors, flexors, and external and internal rotators of the operated and nonaffected shoulder, as well as determination of range of motion (ROM) and function (ASES) in the operated and nonaffected shoulder, was performed. Measurement of muscular strength in the patient group did not reveal statistically significant differences between operated and nonaffected shoulder. The arthroscopic capsular release does not have significant impact on the decrease in the muscular strength of the operated shoulder.

scholarly journals Surgical versus Nonsurgical Multimodality Treatment in an Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Functional Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 5185
Author(s):  
Wojciech Satora ◽  
Roman Brzóska ◽  
Robert Prill ◽  
Paweł Reichert ◽  
Łukasz Oleksy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release ◽  
Group I ◽  
And Function

This retrospective study compared the clinical and functional outcomes of patients diagnosed with an idiopathic frozen shoulder with symptom onset of a maximum of six months, treated by arthroscopic capsular release followed by corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy to patients who received only corticosteroid injection followed by physiotherapy. The patients who underwent arthroscopic capsular release, intraoperative corticosteroid injection, and physiotherapy (Group I, n = 30) or received only corticosteroids injection and physiotherapy (Group II, n = 29) were examined in terms of shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain intensity, and function before a given treatment and three, six, and twelve months later. The groups were comparable pre-treatment in terms of ROM, pain, and functional outcome. Group I had statistically and clinically significantly better ROM and function at three and six months post-treatment than Group II. Despite being statistically significant, the between-group differences at twelve-month follow-up in ROM and function were too small to be considered clinically notable. The between-group comparison of pain revealed no significant differences at any post-treatment point of time. The early arthroscopic capsular release preceding corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy seemed more effective at three- and six-month follow-up; however, it brought a comparable result to corticosteroid injection and subsequent physiotherapy at twelve months follow-up.

scholarly journals Role of bicipital tenotomy in adhesive capsulitis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Aly
Keyword(s):  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Group B ◽  
Better Than

Purpose: To compare the results of arthroscopic capsular release of frozen shoulder with the tenotomy of the long head of biceps tendon versus capsular release without long head of biceps tenotomy. Methods: This is a prospective study that will include forty patients with resistant frozen shoulder presenting to El- Hadra University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt. Arthroscopic release will be performed on twenty patients with biceps tenotomy (group A), while the other twenty patients will undergo arthroscopic release without biceps tenotomy (group B). Patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 2 week and 6 weeks postoperatively as regard Constant and Murley score. Results: In group (A), at the end of the follow up period, the mean score was (84.55 ± 19.32) ranging from 68.0 – 164.0 according to the Constant and Murly shoulder score. (table 5) . In group (B), at the end of the follow up period, the mean score was (79.55 ± 6.85) ranging from 68.0 – 94.0 according to the Constant and Murly shoulder score. . The difference between the means of postoperative total score in both groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.718). Conclusion: Arthroscopic capsular release is an effective and safe method for treatment of refractory cases of frozen shoulder in which other treatment methods failed. Arthroscopic capsular release, achieves dramatic pain and motion improvement immediately postoperative, allowing very early postoperative rehabilitation. Circumferential capsular release is mandatory to achieve considerable range of shoulder motion in all directions. There are no significant differences between arthroscopic capsular release with biceps tenotomy and without biceps tenotomy regarding to final Constant and Murley score. Internal rotation is the slowest and most difficult motion to recover while gains in forward elevation are achieved the fastest.The improvement in range of external rotation is better than the improvement in the internal rotation. Diabetes mellitus is a bad prognostic risk factor, and the improvement in the range of motion in non-diabetic patients is better than the improvement in diabetic

scholarly journals MID-LONG TERM RESULTS OF MANIPULATION AND ARTHROSCOPIC RELEASE IN FROZEN SHOULDER

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 270-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
HALUK CELIK ◽  
MUSTAFA FAIK SECKIN ◽  
MEHMET AKIF AKCAL ◽  
ADNAN KARA ◽  
BEKIR ERAY KILINC ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Treatment Level ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release

ABSTRACT Objective: Surgical treatment options should be discussed in cases of frozen shoulder, which is usually treated in a conservative manner. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of manipulation and arthroscopic release in cases of frozen shoulder which resisted conservative treatment. Methods: A total of 32 patients who underwent manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release in 34 shoulders were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 49.5 months (range: 24-90 months). No reason for onset could be found in 8 (25%) patients, who were classified as primary frozen shoulder; twenty-four (75%) patients were classified as secondary frozen shoulder due to underlying pathologies. The average pre-operative complaint period was 11 months (range: 3-24 months). After arthroscopic examination, manipulation was performed first, followed by arthroscopic capsular release. The range of motion in both shoulders was compared before the procedure and in the last follow-up visit. Constant and Oxford classifications were used to assess functional results, and the results were assessed statistically. Results: Patient values for passive elevation, abduction, adduction-external rotation, abduction-external rotation, and abduction-internal rotation increased in a statistically significant manner between the preoperative assessment and follow-up evaluation (p<0.01). The average change of 47.97±21.03 units observed in the patients’ values obtained in the control measurements against the pre-op Constant scores was determined to be statistically significant (p<0.01). According to the Oxford classification, 29 shoulders were sufficient. Conclusion: Successful results can be obtained with arthroscopic release performed after manipulation in patients with frozen shoulder resistant to conservative treatment. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Effectiveness of arthroscopic management of idiopathic shoulder stiffness: A meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ya-Dong Wang ◽  
Yu-Xiang Ming ◽  
Yong-Hua Pang ◽  
Wei-Nan Chen ◽  
Xu-Hua Zong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Shoulder Stiffness ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release ◽  
Shoulder Range

BACKGROUND: Persisting shoulder stiffness adversely affects quality of life by causing pain and motion restrictions especially in patients with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic capsular release in patients with idiopathic shoulder stiffness. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in electronic databases and studies were selected by following precise eligibility criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the changes at latest follow-up in scores of the Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and University of California at Los Angelis (UCLA) scales, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and shoulder range of motion. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. The follow-up duration was 42 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 32, 51]. Improvements in scores of the Constant, ASES, UCLA scales, and VAS were 48.3 [95% CI: 38.0, 58.6], 44.6 [95% CI: 24.6, 64.6], 19.3 [95% CI: 16.6, 22.0], and -6.1 [95% CI: -6.9, -5.4] respectively (P< 0.05 all). Improvements in the shoulder range of motion were: abduction 82.0 [95% CI: 65.0, 98.9]; forward flexion 75.9 [95% CI: 59.7, 92.1]; external rotation 43.2 [95% CI: 37.5, 49.0]; and internal rotation 25.4 [95% CI: 15.2, 35.5] degrees; P< 0.05 all). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic capsular release effectively improves shoulder function in patients with idiopathic shoulder stiffness.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Arthroscopic Capsular Release in the Beach-Chair Versus Lateral Decubitus Position: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711988817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darby A. Houck ◽  
John W. Belk ◽  
Armando F. Vidal ◽  
Eric C. McCarty ◽  
Jonathan T. Bravman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Lateral Decubitus ◽  
Beach Chair

Background: Arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder can be performed in either the beach-chair (BC) or lateral decubitus (LD) position. Purpose: To determine the clinical outcomes and recurrence rates after ACR in the BC versus LD position. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ACR in either the BC or LD position. All English-language literature from 1990 through 2017 reporting on clinical outcomes after ACR with a minimum 3-month follow-up were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Recurrence rates, range of motion (ROM) results, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores were collected. Study methodological quality was evaluated using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Results: A total of 30 studies (3 level 1 evidence, 2 level 2 evidence, 4 level 3 evidence, 21 level 4 evidence) including 665 shoulders undergoing ACR in the BC position (38.1% male; mean age, 52.0 ± 3.9 years; mean follow-up, 35.4 ± 18.4 months) and 603 shoulders in the LD position (41.8% male; mean age, 53.0 ± 2.3 years; mean follow-up, 37.2 ± 16.8 months) were included. There were no significant differences in overall mean recurrence rates between groups (BC, 2.5%; LD, 2.4%; P = .81) or in any PRO scores between groups ( P > .05). There were no significant differences in improvement in ROM between groups, including external rotation at the side (BC, 36.4°; LD, 42.8°; P = .91), forward flexion (BC, 64.4°; LD, 79.3°; P = .73), abduction (BC, 77.8°; LD, 81.5°; P = .82), or internal rotation in 90° of abduction (BC, 40.8°; LD, 45.5°; P = .70). Significantly more patients in the BC group (91.6%) underwent concomitant manipulation than in the LD group (63%) ( P < .0001). There were significantly more patients with diabetes in the LD group (22.4%) versus the BC group (9.6%) ( P < .0001). Conclusion: Low rates of recurrent shoulder stiffness and excellent improvements in ROM can be achieved after ACR in either the LD or BC position. Concomitant manipulation under anesthesia is performed more frequently in the BC position compared with the LD position.

Assessment of the impact of nanoparticles on the activity of biomimetic membrane

2021 ◽  
Vol XXXVII (1) ◽  
pp. 89-100
Author(s):  
Dorota Kondej
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Safety ◽  
Biological Membranes ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Lipid Monolayer ◽  
Biomimetic Membranes ◽  
Safety And Health ◽  
Biomimetic Membrane ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Impact

This paper presents basic information on a structure and function of biological membranes. Types of biomimetic membranes modelling properties of biological membranes were introduced. The method of testing surface properties of a lipid monolayer, which is the basic type of biomimetic membranes, was described. The presented method makes it possible to evaluate the effect of nanoparticles on the surface activity of biomimetic membranes based on the determination of the surface index MA. This article discusses the problems of occupational safety and health, which are covered by health sciences and environmental engineering.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic capsular release for idiopathic frozen shoulder with intra-articular injection and a controlled manipulation

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
CD Smith ◽  
P Hamer ◽  
TD Bunker
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Oxford Shoulder Score ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release ◽  
Good Pain Relief ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Shoulder Score

INTRODUCTION The aim of this prospective study was to assess the immediate and long-term effectiveness of arthroscopic capsular release in a large cohort of patients with a precise and isolated diagnosis of stage II idiopathic frozen shoulder. METHODS All patients underwent a preoperative evaluation. Patients with secondary frozen shoulder and those with concurrent pathology at arthroscopy were excluded. This left 136 patients with a stage II arthroscopically confirmed idiopathic frozen shoulder. At each postoperative attendance, a record was made of pain, function and range of motion. At 12 months, the Oxford shoulder score was calculated, and pain and range of motion were assessed. RESULTS Fifty per cent achieved good pain relief within a week and eighty per cent within six weeks of arthroscopic capsular release. The mean preoperative visual analogue scale pain score was 6.6 and the mean postoperative score was 1.0. The mean time to achieving good pain relief was 16 days following surgery. No patient could sleep through the night prior to surgery while 90% reported having a complete night’s sleep at a mean of 12 days after surgery. The mean postoperative Oxford shoulder score was 38/48 and the mean improvement was 19.2. CONCLUSIONS This large series demonstrates that arthroscopic capsular release is a safe procedure, with rapid improvement in pain and a marked improvement in range of motion.

The Associations of Frozen Shoulder in Patients Requiring Arthroscopic Capsular Release

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris D. Smith ◽  
William J. White ◽  
Tim D. Bunker
Keyword(s):  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release

scholarly journals Do diabetic patients have different outcomes after arthroscopic capsular release for frozen shoulder?

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldine Lei Yanlei ◽  
Mak Wai Keong ◽  
Denny Lie Tijauw Tjoen
Keyword(s):  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Capsular Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Capsular Release
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document