scholarly journals Reestablishment of Active Immunity against HBV Graft Reinfection after Liver Transplantation for HBV-Related End Stage Liver Disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Chun Lu ◽  
Tao Jiang ◽  
Wei Lai ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
...  

Background. The aim of this study was to establish a hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination protocol among orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients under the coverage of a low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) combined with an antiviral agent prophylaxis protocol.Method. Two hundred OLT recipients were included in this study. The vaccine was injected at months 0, 1, 2, and 6. Low-dose HBIG combined with antiviral agent prophylaxis protocol was continued before reestablishment of active immunity against HBV in order to maintain a steady anti-HBs titer.Results. Active immunity against HBV was reestablished in 50 patients, for an overall response rate of 25%. Of the 50 patients, 24 discontinued HBIG without any HBV graft reinfection during a follow-up period of 26.13 ± 7.05 months. 21 patients discontinued both HBIG and antiviral agents during a follow-up period of 39.86 ± 15.47 months, and 4 patients among them appeared to be HBsAg positive. There was no recipient death or graft loss because of HBV reinfection.Conclusions. Vaccination preventing HBV reinfection for OLT recipients is feasible. The strategy withdrawal of HBIG with induction of active immunity against hepatitis B is reasonable for long-term survivors of OLT; however, discontinuation nucleoside analogues should be cautious.

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 904
Author(s):  
Ramin Raul Ossami Saidy ◽  
Irina Sud ◽  
Franziska Eurich ◽  
Mustafa Aydin ◽  
Maximilian Paul Postel ◽  
...  

Patients after LT due to combined HBV/HDV infection are considered to be high-risk patients for recurrence of hepatitis B and D. To date, life-long prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and replication control with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) remains standard. We examined the course of 36 patients that underwent liver transplantation from 1989 to 2020 for combined HBV/HDV-associated end-stage liver disease in this retrospective study. Seventeen patients eventually discontinued HBIG therapy for various reasons. Their graft function, histopathological findings from routine liver biopsies and overall survival were compared with those that received an unaltered NA-based standard regimen combined with HBIG. The median follow-up was 204 and 227 months, respectively. The recurrence of HBV was 25% and did not differ between the groups of standard reinfection prophylaxis NA/HBIG (21.1%) and HBIG discontinuation (29.4%); (p = 0.56). No significant differences were found regarding the clinical course or histopathological aspects of liver tissue damage (inflammation, fibrosis, steatosis) between these two groups. Overall, and adjusted survival did not differ between the groups. Discontinuation of HBIG in stable patients after LT for combined HBV/HDV did not lead to impaired overall survival or higher recurrence rate of HBV/HDV infection in this long-term follow-up. Therefore, the recommendation of the duration of HBG administration must be questioned. The earliest time of discontinuation remains unclear.


2020 ◽  
pp. 3100-3107
Author(s):  
John G. O’Grady

Liver transplantation is an established treatment for liver conditions that broadly fall into the categories of acute liver failure, end-stage chronic liver disease, primary hepatic malignancy, and metabolic disease. The expected 1-year survival rate is over 90% and some patients are alive more than 40 years after transplantation. Disease severity scores for cirrhosis heavily influence selection of patients with cirrhosis for transplantation. The prototype is the MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) score, based on serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and INR: a score of 16 is considered the threshold that confers benefit from liver transplantation. Hepatocellular carcinoma accounts for most of the malignancy group and selection is largely determined by tumour bulk assessed by the number and size of lesions. Immunosuppression strategies based on tacrolimus, with or without other drugs including mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitors, antiproliferative agents, or prednisolone, are highly effective in preventing loss of the graft through classical rejection processes. Recurrence of original disease is the main cause of loss of graft function, with recurrence of hepatitis C a particularly challenging problem, although new direct-acting antiviral agents are likely to radically improve outcomes. Technical problems can also result in graft loss due to hepatic artery thrombosis or diffuse ischaemic cholangiopathy, especially in livers harvested from donors after cardiac death. Anastomotic biliary strictures are the commonest technical complication, with 15 to 20% of patients requiring some form of endoscopic or surgical intervention. There is a considerably increased risk of myeloproliferative disease and skin cancers in transplant recipients, as well as aetiology-specific risk. Many patients die having achieved a normal life expectancy, and death with a functioning graft is the commonest terminal scenario.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Tanaka ◽  
Eberhard L Renner ◽  
Nazia Selzner ◽  
George Therapondos ◽  
Leslie B Lilly

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) given in combination with a nucleos(t)ide analogue has reduced the rate of recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection following liver transplantation (LT); however, the most effective protocol remains unclear.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in combination with one year of low-dose HBIG.METHODS: Twenty-four adults who underwent LT for HBV-related liver disease at the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario) and received TDF (± lamivudine) and one year of HBIG to prevent recurrent HBV infection from June 2005 to June 2011 were evaluated.RESULTS: The median length of follow-up post-LT was 29.1 months. Three patients died during the follow-up period. Patient survival was 100% and 84.1% at one and five years, respectively. None of the patients developed recurrent HBV infection. No significant adverse event was observed due to TDF administration; renal function pre- and post-LT were also acceptably preserved.CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that a short, finite course of low-dose HBIG combined with maintenance of long-term TDF staring before LT is cost-effective and safe. However, further prospective study involving a larger patient cohort with a longer followup period is required to confirm the results.


2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110234
Author(s):  
Angela Sickels ◽  
Keyur B. Shah ◽  
Brianna Ruch ◽  
Adrian Cotterell ◽  
Inna Tchoukina ◽  
...  

Background Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is the only curative option for patients with concomitant pathology affecting the heart and liver. In some cases, the native livers of familial amyloidosis (FA) patients may be suitable for domino transplantation into other recipients. Methods Retrospective analysis (2013 to 2019) of all CHLT at our center was performed. Continuous data were presented as mean with standard deviation and discrete variables as percentages. Results Familial amyloidosis was the indication for CHLT in 5 out of 6 patients. The mean recipient age was 55 ± 5.62 years. Two patients were bridged with total artificial heart. The mean model for end-stage liver disease score at transplant was 17.17 ± 3.7. Two explanted livers were used for transplantation in a domino fashion. The median intensive care and hospital stays were 5.5 and 19 days, respectively. Complications included renal failure (1), groin abscess (1), pulmonary embolism (1), and cardiac rejection (1). Patient and graft survival for both organs was 100% at a median follow-up of 59 (range 20-76) months. Discussion Combined heart-liver transplantation for FA achieves excellent outcomes. The possible use of livers explanted from patients with FA for domino liver transplantation can contribute to the liver donor pool.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 855-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solange Bresson-Hadni ◽  
Oleg Blagosklonov ◽  
Jenny Knapp ◽  
Frédéric Grenouillet ◽  
Yasuhito Sako ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei‐Chen Lee ◽  
Hong‐Shiue Chou ◽  
Tsung‐Han Wu ◽  
Chih‐Hsien Cheng ◽  
Chen‐Fang Lee ◽  
...  

Organ transplantation is now a well-established therapy for patients with end-stage organ failure. Over the last 20 years, the results of transplantation have improved incrementally for many reasons, including better recipient selection, improved anaesthetic and surgical techniques, the introduction of more effective antiviral agents, and better post-transplant immunosuppressive management. The problem of early graft loss from acute rejection is now uncommon, and the main challenges today are chronic allograft rejection and the side effects of non-specific suppression of the immune response. Randomized clinical trials continue to inform and further improve clinical practice. Because transplantation today is largely successful, the traditional endpoints of 1-year patient and graft survival are no longer sufficient, and more sophisticated endpoints are needed that reflect graft function and quality of life after transplantation. This chapter brings together studies which recognize this need for clinical trials which improve practice and focus on more broadly defined endpoints.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document