scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs about Chronic Noncancer Pain in Primary Care: a Canadian Survey of Physicians and Pharmacists

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyne Lalonde ◽  
Vincent Leroux-Lapointe ◽  
Manon Choinière ◽  
Elisabeth Martin ◽  
David Lussier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Noncancer Pain

BACKGROUND: Primary care providers’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs (KAB) regarding chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) are a barrier to optimal management.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and identify the determinants of the KAB of primary care physicians and pharmacists, and to document clinician preferences regarding the content and format of a continuing education program (CEP).METHOD: Physicians and pharmacists of 486 CNCP patients participated. Physicians completed the original version of the KnowPain-50 questionnaire. Pharmacists completed a modified version. A multivariate linear regression model was developed to identify the determinants of their KAB.RESULTS: A total of 137 of 387 (35.4%) physicians and 110 of 278 (39.5%) pharmacists completed the survey. Compared with the physicians, the pharmacists surveyed included more women (64% versus 38%) and had less clinical experience (15 years versus 26 years). The mean KnowPain-50 score was 69.3% (95% CI 68.0% to 70.5%) for physicians and 63.8% (95% CI 62.5% to 65.1%) for pharmacists. Low scores were observed on all aspects of pain management: initial assessment (physicians, 68.3%; pharmacists, 65.4%); definition of treatment goals and expectations (76.1%; 61.6%); development of a treatment plan (66.4%; 59.0%); and reassessment and management of longitudinal care (64.3%; 53.1%). Ten hours of reported CEP sessions increased the KAB score by 0.3 points. All clinicians considered a CEP for CNCP to be essential. Physicians preferred an interactive format, while pharmacists had no clear preferences.CONCLUSION: A CEP to improve primary care providers’ knowledge and competency in managing CNCP, and to reduce false beliefs and inappropriate attitudes regarding CNCP is relevant and perceived as necessary by clinicians.

Do pain specialists meet the needs of the referring physician? A survey of primary care providers

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane R. Wilkens, MD ◽  
Miles J. Belgrade, MD
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Psychological Issues ◽  
Pain Specialist ◽  
Noncancer Pain

Objective: To study the factors that influence the use of opioids in the management of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) by primary care providers (PCPs) for patients returning from a pain specialist.Design: A survey of PCPs.Setting: Two physician groups in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area.Participants: Two seventy-six PCPs surveyed and 80 surveys returned. Main outcome measures: Participants rated the importance of specific concerns regarding the role of pain specialists and the use of opioids in the management of CNCP. Past experience with pain specialists, comfort using opioids, and opinions regarding a trilateral opioid agreement were also examined.Results: The top concerns for PCPs were as follows: the use of opioids in patients with chemical dependency or psychological issues, the escalation of opioid dosing, and the use of opioids in pain states without objective findings. They also ranked highly the importance of coordinating the return of patients from a pain specialist with explicit opioid instructions and the availability of consultation by phone or a timely follow-up visit. PCPs were supportive of the concept of a trilateral opioid agreement.Conclusions: PCPs have significant concerns regarding the prescribing of opioids in CNCP. They desire closer collaboration with pain specialists, including more explicit plans of care when patients are transferred back to them. The trilateral agreement may provide one framework for better collaboration.

Factors associated with participation and nonparticipation in a VA Whole Health Primary Care Pain Education and Opioid Monitoring Program (PC-POP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-188
Author(s):  
Amber Martinson, PhD ◽  
Amanda Kutz, PhD ◽  
William Marchand, MD ◽  
Julie Carney, RN ◽  
Jamie Clinton-Lont, MS, CNP
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Pain Education ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Medical Diagnoses ◽  
Noncancer Pain

Objective: As part of the evaluation of the Whole Health Primary Care Pain Education and Opioid Monitoring Program (PC-POP), we compared demographic and health characteristics between participants and nonparticipants drawn from the same defined population.Design/Methods: Retrospective chart review comparing participants and nonparticipants in terms of two categories of variables: (1) demographic characteristics and (2) physical/mental health characteristics.Setting: VA Primary Care.Subjects: Adult veterans with chronic noncancer pain receiving opioid therapy 3 months being managed in primary care.Results: A total of 749 veterans (424 participants in PC-POP and 325 nonparticipants) were included in the final analysis. Results showed that nonparticipation was associated with more widespread musculoskeletal pain, low back pain, anxiety, higher mortality, and rural areas. Participation was associated with more medical diagnoses overall, hypertension, sleep apnea, fibromyalgia, peripheral nerve pain, depression, and female gender. Other demographic and physical/mental health variables did not significantly differ between the groups.Conclusions: Given that primary care is the dominant healthcare setting in which opioids are prescribed for chronic noncancer pain, programs are needed to assist primary care providers to meet the rigorous requirements of guideline concordant care. The current study examined participation factors in such a program and found that certain veterans were less likely to participate than others. Identifying such veterans at the outset, in combination with intentional recruitment efforts and individualized interventions, may promote entry into PC-POP.

Primary care survey of the value and effectiveness of the Washington State Opioid Dosing Guideline

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josiah S. Morse, MPH ◽  
Hal Stockbridge, MD, MPH ◽  
Kathleen B. Egan, MPH ◽  
Jaymie Mai, PharmD ◽  
Thomas Wickizer, PhD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Drug Testing ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Washington State ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Administrative Leaders ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
And Function

Purpose: To evaluate the acceptability and usefulness of the Washington State Opioid Dosing Guideline (Guideline) developed for primary care providers for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain. The Guideline contains innovative tools, such as an online dosing calculator, and recommendations to assist providers, including a “yellow flag” threshold of 120 mg/d morphine equivalent dose (MED) at which specialty consultation is recommended.Methods: Using a convenience sample, an anonymous web-based survey was conducted among primary care providers in Washington (WA) state. Physician/administrative leaders in four regional and two statewide healthcare systems and associations distributed the electronic links to primary care providers in their organizations.Results: Six hundred fifty-five (n) providers completed the survey representing 20 percent of the total number contacted. The majority (89 percent) of providers in this sample treat chronic pain patients, and more than half (54 percent) have frequent concerns about addiction, tolerance, and diversion. Forty-five percent had read and applied the Guideline in their practice. The majority of these providers found the Guideline to be helpful and 86 percent find the threshold of 120 mg/d MED dose reasonable or too high. Some key best practices such as tracking pain and function using structured instruments and use of urine drug testing are infrequently used.Conclusions: Results from this survey suggest that the recommendations and tools given in the Guideline, including the threshold of 120 mg/day MED dose, are acceptable and useful to a large majority of primary care providers in WA state. Substantial additions to the Guideline based on needs identified in this survey were added in June 2010 and wider dissemination is planned.

scholarly journals Teaching Family Nurse Practitioner Students to Provide Mental Health Care to Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Victoria Grando ◽  
Roy Grando
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Neurocognitive Disorders ◽  
Mental Condition ◽  
Care Providers

Abstract In recent years, FNPs have been challenged to deliver mental health services in the primary care setting. Over half of mental health services are provided in primary care, and one-quarter of all primary care patients have a mental disorder. Moreover, 20% of older adults have a mental or neurological disorder often not diagnosed. Nationally, it is estimated that 17% of older adults commit suicide, 15% have a mental condition, 11% have dementia, and 5% have a serious mental condition. There is a paucity of adequately prepared primary care providers trained in geropsychiatric treatment. A didactic course was developed to instruct FNP students in the skills needed to provide mental health treatment in primary care. We discuss mental illness in the context of culture to ensure that treatment is congruent with a patient’s unique cultural background and experiences. This shapes the patients’ beliefs and behaviors that influence the way they view their condition and what they perceive as acceptable solutions. We then go into detail about the common mental conditions that older adults exhibit. Through the case study method, students learn to identify the presenting problem, protocols for analyzing the case, which includes making differential diagnoses and a treatment plan including initial medications, non-medical treatments, and referral. Students are introduced to the DMS-5 to learn the criteria for mental health diagnosis with an emphasis on suicide, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorders, substance use disorders, and neurocognitive disorders. We have found that students most often misdiagnose neurocognitive disorders.

scholarly journals Online Ratings of Primary Care Physicians: Comparison of Gender, Training, and Specialty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110077
Author(s):  
Daliah Wachs ◽  
Victoria Lorah ◽  
Allison Boynton ◽  
Amanda Hertzler ◽  
Brandon Nichols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Female Physicians ◽  
Online Ratings ◽  
And Gender

The purpose of this study was to explore patient perceptions of primary care providers and their offices relative to their physician’s philosophy (medical degree [MD] vs doctorate in osteopathic medicine [DO]), specialty (internal medicine vs family medicine), US region, and gender (male vs female). Using the Healthgrades website, the average satisfaction rating for the physician, office parameters, and wait time were collected and analyzed for 1267 physicians. We found female doctors tended to have lower ratings in the Midwest, and staff friendliness of female physicians were rated lower in the northwest. In the northeast, male and female MDs were rated more highly than DOs. Wait times varied regionally, with northeast and northwest regions having the shortest wait times. Overall satisfaction was generally high for most physicians. Regional differences in perception of a physician based on gender or degree may have roots in local culture, including proximity to a DO school, comfort with female physicians, and expectations for waiting times.

Are primary care physicians aware of peripheral artery disease risk reduction and management in the Saudi healthcare transformation era? A health cluster observational study

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110443
Author(s):  
Sultan Alsheikh ◽  
Hesham AlGhofili ◽  
Omar A Alayed ◽  
Abdulkareem Aldrak ◽  
Kaisor Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are often underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of the recommended target levels of blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin A1C, and knowledge and attitude about PAD risk reduction therapies among physicians working in primary care settings in Saudi Arabia. Methods This observational cross-sectional study included family medicine consultants, residents, and general practitioners working in a health cluster in the capital city of Saudi Arabia using a self-administered questionnaire. Results Of the 129 physicians who completed the survey, 55% had completed PAD-related continuing medical education hours within the past 2 years. Despite this, the knowledge score of the recommended target levels was high in only 13.2% of the participants. Antiplatelet therapy was prescribed by 68.2% of the participants. Conclusion Here we identified the knowledge and action gaps among primary care providers in Saudi Arabia. Physicians had an excellent attitude about screening for and counseling about risk factors. However, they showed less interference in reducing these risk factors. We recommend addressing these knowledge gaps early in medical school and residency programs.

scholarly journals Barriers to and solutions for addressing insufficient professional interpreter use in primary healthcare

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabienne N. Jaeger ◽  
Nicole Pellaud ◽  
Bénédicte Laville ◽  
Pierre Klauser
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Interpreter Use ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
Professional Interpreter ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care

Abstract Background The aim of this nationwide study was to investigate barriers to adequate professional interpreter use and to describe existing initiatives and identify key factors for successful interpreter policies in primary care, using Switzerland as a case study. Methods Adult and paediatric primary care providers were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. All accredited regional interpreter agencies were contacted first by email and, in the absence of a reply, by mail and then by phone. Local as well as the national health authorities were asked about existing policies. Results 599 primary care physicians participated. Among other reasons, physicians identified cumbersome organization (58.7%), absent financial coverage (53.7%) and lack of knowledge on how to arrange interpreter interventions (44%) as main barriers. The odds of organising professional interpreters were 6.6-times higher with full financial coverage. Some agencies confirmed difficulties providing professional interpreters for certain languages at a timely manner. Degrees of coverage of professional interpreter costs (full coverage to none) and organization varied between regions resulting in different levels of unmet needs. Conclusions Professional interpreter use can be improved through the following points: increase awareness and knowledge of primary care providers on interpreter use and organization, ensure financial coverage, as well as address organizational aspects. Examples of successful interventions exist.

scholarly journals Effect of a Cooperation Strategy between Primary Care Physicians and Hospital Liver Units on HBV Care in Campania, Italy

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Zampino ◽  
Nicolina Capoluongo ◽  
Adriana Boemio ◽  
Margherita Macera ◽  
Martina Vitrone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Endemic Area ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Hbv Infection ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Financial Difficulties ◽  
Liver Disease Progression ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Cooperation Strategy

Aims. This study is aimed at assessing the efficacy of an active search and treat strategy for HBV-infected subjects in an endemic area (Campania, Italy). To do this, we created a cooperation bundle between 24 General Practitioners (GPs) and 3 Hospital Liver Units (HLU). We assessed whether this strategy improved the detection of HBV infection in patients at risk and the overall quality of care, with the aim of reducing liver disease progression. Methods. We estimated that, among about 20,000 patients cared for by the 24 GPs, approximately 280 patients unaware of or underestimating HBV infection would be found. Identified patients were to be referred to the HLU for clinical evaluation and treatment from February 2016 for 12 months. Results. Unexpectedly, screening and enrolment were poor (48 patients only). GP workloads, patient financial difficulties, and patients' refusal were the major causes of enrolment failure according to GPs. All patients referred to HLU completed the program; most of them were HBV inactive carriers. Conclusions. This program failed to scavenge chronic HBV-infected patients in an endemic area and establish a successful clinical collaboration between GPs and HLU. Underlying reasons are diverse and call for new strategies to implement cooperation between primary care providers and hospital specialists.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document