scholarly journals Safety of Redo Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases after Selective Interarterial Radiation Therapy: A Case Report

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Kyriakos Neofytou ◽  
Harpreet Wasan ◽  
Satvinder Mudan

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative strategy in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Unfortunately, only about 10%–15% of patients are candidates for resection. Preoperative chemotherapy aims to increase the number of patients that may be eligible for liver resection by downsizing liver metastases. For patients with unresectable, chemotherapy refractory CLM the available treatment options are limited. Selective interarterial radiation therapy (SIRT) is one of the most promising treatment options for this group of patients. Although only a small number of these patients have been reported as becoming candidates for potentially curative hepatic resection following sufficient reduction in the volume of liver metastases, the question arises regarding the safety of liver resection in these patients. We report a case of a patient who presented unresectable liver relapse of CLM after previous right hepatectomy. He underwent SIRT which resulted in downsizing of the liver metastases making the patient candidate for left lateral sectionectomy. He underwent the redo hepatectomy without any complications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of redo hepatectomy after SIRT for CLM.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
B. Aussilhou ◽  
E. Ragot ◽  
S. Dokmak ◽  
S. J. Faivre ◽  
V. Paradis ◽  
...  

179 Background: Oxaliplatin is recognized to induce vascular lesions in the nontumoral liver parenchyma. Regenerative nodular hyperplasia (RNH), the ultimate state of the vascular lesions, is very rare. In some reported cases, RNH was associated with severe lethal postoperative complications after hepatic resection. This study aimed to compare the postoperative course after major hepatectomy, in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, with or without RNH in the resected specimen. Methods: Between 2001 and 2009, among 420 patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM, 17 (4%) patients had RNH lesions (RNH+ group) on the resected specimen after right hepatectomy. These 17 patients were compared to another group of 20 patients with similar clinicopathologic data but without RNH (RNH- group) who underwent right hepatectomy. The mean age of the RNH + and RNH- groups was 57 years (range: 37-71 years) and 60 years (range: 43-73 years), respectively. Preoperatively the patients were treated with a mean number of 7 cycles of oxaliplatin (range: 3-12 cycles). The peroperative blood loss (560 vs. 830 ml) and blood transfusion (18% vs. 20%) were similar in the two groups. Results: The mortality in the RNH+ group and the RNH- group (6% vs. 5%, respectively) were similar (p>0.005). The postoperative morbidity was 53% in the RNH+ group and 35% in RNH– group (p>0.005). The most frequent complications were biliary fistula (3 in the RNH+ group and 2 in the RNH- group) and pulmonary complications (6 in the RNH+ group and 5 in the RNH- group). However, the post operative ascites was significantly encountered in the RNH+ group with 70% of patients compared with 40% in the RNH- group. The number of patients who had a bilirubin level at day 5 superior to 50 was significantly higher in the RNH+ group (35%) compared with 15% in the RNH-group. Conclusions: RNH lesions allow major hepatectomy without increased mortality but with increased postoperative ascites and jaundice justifying preoperative liver biopsy to detect this lesion with subsequent portal embolisation or sparing liver resection in order to avoid major resections. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3521-3521 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Adam ◽  
T. Aloia ◽  
J. Figueras ◽  
L. Capussotti ◽  
G. Poston ◽  
...  

3521 Background: LiverMetSurvey is an international, internet-based registry designed to assess the efficacy of multimodality treatment options for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) by analyzing outcomes following hepatic resection (HR) in a large number of patients. Methods: Data were analyzed for the 2,122 patients entered into LiverMetSurvey by six hepatobiliary centers from inception to August 2004 (HR: 1974 to 2004; 1,306 men: 816 women; mean age: 61 years). The distributions of potential prognostic factors including age, sex, primary tumor site, timing of metastasis diagnosis, tumor number, diameter of the largest metastasis, bilaterality, and treatment with chemotherapy were compared to survivals using univariate and multivariate statistics. Results: Metastases originated in the colon in 69% of patients and were synchronous (diagnosed within 3 mo of primary tumor treatment) in 49% of patients. 34% of patients had ≥ 3 metastases and tumors were distributed bilaterally in 43% of cases. The mean size of the largest metastasis was 41.8 mm. 55% of patients were treated with preoperative systemic chemotherapy. Following resection, 60-day mortality was 1.2% and median, 5-year, and 10-year overall survivals (OS) were 46 mo, 42%, and 26%, respectively. Variables independently associated with poor prognosis included number of metastases > 3 (p<0.0001), bilateral metastases (p=0.0002), and size of the largest metastasis > 5 cm (p=0.03). Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) did not appear to benefit patients with solitary CLM (5-yr OS: PC 45% vs. no PC 58%), but was associated with improved survival in patients with > 5 metastases (5-yr OS: PC 22% vs. no PC 12%). Conclusions: Assessment of outcomes for the first 2,122 registrants to LiverMetSurvey not only confirms the prognostic importance of intrahepatic tumor burden, but also indicates that the ability of preoperative systemic chemotherapy to improve survivals is limited to patients with multiple (> 5) metastases. In addition, this analysis demonstrates the potential for LiverMetSurvey, which is now prospectively enrolling patients from over 40 centers, to determine the therapeutic value of current and future treatment strategies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


HPB Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irinel Popescu ◽  
Sorin Tiberiu Alexandrescu

Although the frontiers of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases have broadened in recent decades, approximately 75% of these patients present with unresectable metastases at the time of their diagnosis. In the past, these patients underwent only palliative treatment, without the chance of a cure. In the previous two decades, several therapeutic strategies have been developed that render resectable those metastases that were initially unresectable, thus offering the chance of long-term survival and even a cure to these patients. The oncosurgical modalities that are available include liver resection following portal vein ligation/embolization, “two-stage” liver resection, one-stage ultrasonically guided liver resection, hepatectomy following conversion chemotherapy, and liver resection combined with thermal ablation. Moreover, in recent years, certain authors have recommended the revisiting of the concept of liver transplantation in highly selected patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases and favorable prognostic factors. By employing such therapies, the number of patients with colorectal liver metastases who undergo a potentially curative treatment could increase to 40%. The safety profile of these approaches is acceptable (morbidity rates as high as 45%, mortality rates of less than 5%). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rates (approximately 30%) are significantly increased over those that were achieved with palliative treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  

Introduction: Radical liver resection is the only method for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, only 20–30% of patients with CLMs can be radically treated. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the possible methods of palliative treatment in such patients. Methods: RFA was performed in 381 patients with CLMs between 01 Jan 2001 and 31 Dec 2018. The mean age of the patients was 65.2±8.7 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Open laparotomy was done in 238 (62.5%) patients and the CT-navigated transcutaneous approach was used in 143 (37.5%) patients. CLMs <5 cm (usually <3 cm) in diameter were the indication for RFA. We used RFA as the only method in 334 (87.6%) patients; RFA in combination with resection was used in 36 (9.4%), and with multi-stage resection in 11 (3%) patients. We performed RFA in a solitary CLM in 170 (44.6%) patients, and in 2−5 CLMs in 211 (55.6%) patients. We performed computed tomography in each patient 48 hours after procedure. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. Complications were present in 4.8% of transcutaneous and in 14.2% of open procedures, respectively, in the 30-day postoperative period. One-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94.8, 66.8, 43.9 and 16.6%, respectively, in patients undergoing RFA, and 90.6, 69.1, 52.8 and 39.2%, respectively, in patients with liver resections. Disease free survival was 63.2, 30.1, 18.4 and 13.1%, respectively, in the same patients after RFA, and 71.1, 33.3, 22.8 and 15.5%, respectively, after liver resections. Conclusion: RFA is a palliative thermal ablation method, which is one of therapeutic options in patients with radically non-resectable CLMs. RFA is useful especially in a non-resectable, or resectable (but for the price of large liver resection) solitary CLM <3 cm in diameter and in CLM relapses. RFA is also part of multi-stage liver procedures.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Salah Khayat ◽  
Gianluca Cassese ◽  
François Quenet ◽  
Christophe Cassinotto ◽  
Eric Assenat ◽  
...  

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the major cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The cornerstone treatment of CRLM is surgical resection. Post-operative morbidity and mortality are mainly linked to an inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). Nowadays preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is the most widely performed technique to increase the size of the future liver remnant (FLR) before major hepatectomies. One method recently proposed to increase the FLR is liver venous deprivation (LVD), but its oncological impact is still unknown. The aim of this study is to report first short- and long-term oncological outcomes after LVD in patients undergoing right (or extended right) hepatectomy for CRLM. Seventeen consecutive patients undergoing LVD between July 2015 and May 2020 before an (extended) right hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed from an institutional database. Post-operative and follow-up data were analyzed and reported. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) and hepatic recurrence (HR). Postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (47%). No deaths occurred after surgery. HR occurred in 9 patients (52.9%). 1-year and 3-year OS were 87% (95% confidence interval [CI]: ±16%) and 60.3%, respectively (95% CI: ±23%). Median Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was 6 months (CI 95%: 4.7–7.2). With all the limitations of a retrospective study with a small sample size, LVD showed similar oncological outcomes compared to literature reports for Portal Vein Embolization (PVE).


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-249
Author(s):  
Yushen Qian ◽  
Kiran A. Kumar ◽  
Sara A. Dudley ◽  
Albert C. Koong ◽  
Daniel T. Chang

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 1180-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kobayashi ◽  
Toshimi Kaido ◽  
Yuhei Hamaguchi ◽  
Shinya Okumura ◽  
Hisaya Shirai ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1349-1349
Author(s):  
Georgios C. Sotiropoulos ◽  
Evangelos Tagkalos ◽  
Andreas Kreft ◽  
Vasiliy Moskalenko ◽  
Ursula Gönner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document