scholarly journals Value and Efficacy of Foley Catheter Removal of Blunt Pediatric Esophageal Foreign Bodies

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasin Abdurehim ◽  
Yalkun Yasin ◽  
Qu Yaming ◽  
Zhang Hua
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Catheter Removal ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Background Current ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Related Literature ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

Objective. To discuss the safety and efficacy of Foley catheter removal of blunt pediatric esophageal foreign bodies. Methods. Analyzing our first 17 cases of pediatric esophageal foreign bodies removed by Foley catheter method in respect of the efficacy, removal methods, and complications. We also reviewed related literature and discussed the background, current status, and technical matters that need attention of this method. Results. In three-year period between May 2010 and May 2013, in 16 out of 17 children blunt radiopaque foreign bodies impacted in the esophagus were successfully removed by a Foley catheter. There were no complications. In one patient, the foreign body was advanced into stomach and came out with stool 2 days later. Conclusions. The technique is safe, rapid, and cost-effective procedure and applicable for blunt, flat foreign bodies impacted in the esophagus.

Foley catheter removal of blunt esophageal foreign bodies. Experience with 100 consecutive children

1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Campbell ◽  
F. L. Quattromani ◽  
L. C. Foley
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Catheter Removal ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

Use of Foley Catheter for Removal of Esophageal Foreign Bodies a Survey

1982 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Frederick McGuirt
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Esophageal Disease ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Trained Personnel ◽  
Barium Esophagogram ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

A survey was conducted among otolaryngologists, thoracic surgeons, pediatric surgeons and pediatric radiologists to determine the frequency of removal of esophageal foreign bodies with a Foley catheter. The 245 physicians responding reported 1,512 cases, 96% of which were treated with this technique by radiologists and pediatric surgeons. Although no deaths or serious complications were reported, the author warns that increasing use of this procedure by nonendoscopists carries the risk of serious complications unless certain safeguards are taken. These include trained personnel, use of fluoroscopy, a cooperative patient with a single, smooth, radiopaque foreign body lodged in the esophagus and a barium esophagogram with negative results for total obstruction and underlying esophageal disease.

Letters to the Editor

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-791
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Conners ◽  
James M. Chamberlain ◽  
Daniel W. Ochsenschlager
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Letters To The Editor ◽  
Catheter Technique ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

We enjoyed reading the paper by Schunk et al1 regarding the removal of esophageal foreign bodies using the fluoroscopic Foley catheter technique. We feel, however, that their sentence "Because of the potential for serious complications all impacted foreign bodies should be removed" deserves further clarification. Impacted is defined as "pressed firmly together so as to be immovable."2 Therefore, a foreign body that is impacted in the esophagus is one that will not pass to the stomach without an intervention.

CLINICAL AND PARACLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND RESULTS FROM TREATMENT OF FOREIGN BODIES INGESTION

2016 ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
Hoang Cuong Vo ◽  
Thanh Dang ◽  
Phuong Nam Tran ◽  
Thanh Thai Le
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Rigid Esophagoscopy ◽  
Flexible Esophagoscopy ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

Background: Foreign bodies ingestion is a emergency in otology, knowledge of people about foreign bodies ingestion is not enough. Objective: To study the clinical characteristics, paraclinical characteristics and results of treatment from foreign bodies ingestion in Hue Central Hospital and Hue University Hospital. Methods and patiens: A cross descriptive and prospective study over the period from 6/2014 to 5/2016, total are 137 patients come to be diagnosised and treatmented. Results: the average age is 35 years old. Gender: male (51.8%) and women (48.2%). Adults (84.7%) having more than children (15.3%). Age group from 16-30 years is highest (32.8%). There are 95.7% of organic foreign bodies, 4.3% are inorganic foreign bodies. There are 90.5% of patients on diagnosis and treatment in stages less inflammation, arthritis 8.0% in the period and 1.5% in the period complications. Foreign body in the throat problems (73.7%), esophageal foreign bodies (26.3%). Pick up directly foreign bodies 54%, indirectly by the mirror 11.7% and endoscopy 8%, rigid esophagoscopy is 17.5%, flexible esophagoscopy is 7.3%, cervicotomy is 1.5%. Conclusion: Practing direction with in the oropharynx foreign body, using the larynx mirror or endoscopy with in the laryngopharynx for the esophagus foreign bodies, rigid esophagoscopy is better. Key words: Foreign bodies ingestion

Aerodigestive Tract Foreign Bodies in the Older Child and Adolescent

1996 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Lemberg ◽  
David H. Darrow ◽  
Lauren D. Holinger
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Distinct Group ◽  
Aerodigestive Tract ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

This study was undertaken in order to establish the incidence of aerodigestive tract foreign body accidents among older children and adolescents, and to investigate the circumstances surrounding these events. A review of patients treated over a 5-year period identified 367 children from whom aerodigestive tract foreign bodies were removed. Seventeen percent of these patients were 5 years of age or older. Among these children, 88% aspirated nonfood items, half of which were school supplies; 78% of the group 5 years old and under aspirated food items. Among older children with esophageal foreign bodies, 31 % had food impactions, compared with 7% in the younger group; 70% of these children had a history of some anatomic abnormality of the esophagus. These data suggest that older children and adolescents represent a distinct group of patients at risk for foreign body accidents. Pediatricians and parents of children in this age group should discourage the practice of using the oral cavity as a repository for school supplies, and should stress the need for adequate preparation and mastication of food, particularly among children with esophageal abnormalities.

Catheter removal of blunt esophageal foreign bodies in children

1989 ◽  
Vol 19 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 361-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Campbell ◽  
V. R. Condon
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Catheter Removal ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

scholarly journals Hoarseness of Voice: Presentation of Neglected Denture Esophagus

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-32
Author(s):  
Sunil Kumar ◽  
Devendra Bahadur Singh
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Esophageal Foreign Bodies

ABSTRACT Aspiration or ingestion of a foreign body is well-known in the pediatric as well as in the adult population. The majority of esophageal foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract without causing complications. However, large sharp foreign bodies like dentures and meat bones can get deeply embedded in the wall leading to life-threatening complications. We report a case of a neglected denture in a 55-year-old patient who presented with an unusual complaint as hoarseness of voice and was removed with the help of rigid esophagoscope. How to cite this article Kumar S, Singh DB. Hoarseness of Voice: Presentation of Neglected Denture Esophagus. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2013;3(1):30-32.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document