scholarly journals Regulation of Melanopsins andPer1byα-MSH and Melatonin in PhotosensitiveXenopus laevisMelanophores

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Nathália de Carvalho Magalhães Moraes ◽  
Luciane Rogéria dos Santos ◽  
Nathana Mezzalira ◽  
Maristela Oliveira Poletini ◽  
Ana Maria de Lauro Castrucci
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Circadian System ◽  
Time Of Application ◽  
Intracellular Signaling Pathways ◽  
Peripheral Clocks ◽  
Internal Signal

α-MSH and light exert a dispersing effect on pigment granules ofXenopus laevismelanophores; however, the intracellular signaling pathways are different. Melatonin, a hormone that functions as an internal signal of darkness for the organism, has opposite effects, aggregating the melanin granules. Because light functions as an important synchronizing signal for circadian rhythms, we further investigated the effects of both hormones on genes related to the circadian system, namely,Per1(one of the clock genes) and the melanopsins,Opn4xandOpn4m(photopigments).Per1showed temporal oscillations, regardless of the presence of melatonin orα-MSH, which slightly inhibited its expression. Melatonin effects on melanopsins depend on the time of application: if applied in the photophase it dramatically decreasedOpn4xandOpn4mexpressions, and abolished their temporal oscillations, opposite toα-MSH, which increased the melanopsins’ expressions. Our results demonstrate that unlike what has been reported for other peripheral clocks and cultured cells, medium changes or hormones do not play a major role in synchronizing theXenopusmelanophore population. This difference is probably due to the fact thatX. laevismelanophores possess functional photopigments (melanopsins) that enable these cells to primarily respond to light, which triggers melanin dispersion and modulates gene expression.

scholarly journals Circadian Clock and The Cardiometabolic Risk

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Anna Meiliana ◽  
Andi Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Cardiometabolic Risk ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Circadian System ◽  
Temporal Organization ◽  
Liver Fat ◽  
Peripheral Tissues ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Rotation Of The Earth

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data reveal parallel trends of decreasing sleep duration and increases in metabolic disorders such as obesity, diabetes and hypertension. There is growing evidence that these trends are mechanistically related.CONTENT: The circadian system orchestrates the temporal organization of many aspects of physiology, including metabolism, in synchrony with the 24 hours rotation of the Earth. The circadian system is a complex feedback network that involves interactions between the central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Circadian regulation is intimately linked to metabolic homeostasis and that dysregulation of circadian rhythms can contribute to disease. Conversely, metabolic signals also feed back into the circadian system, modulating circadian gene expression and behavior.SUMMARY: Both inter- and intraorgan desynchrony may be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic disease attributable to effects in brain and multiple metabolic tissues including heart, liver, fat, muscle, pancreas and gut. Efforts to dissect the molecular mediators that coordinate circadian, metabolic, and cardiovascular systems may ultimately lead to both improved therapeutics and preventive interventions.KEYWORDS: circadian rhythms, clock genes, nuclear receptor, sleep, obesity, cardiometabolic risk

scholarly journals Roles of Neuropeptides, VIP and AVP, in the Mammalian Central Circadian Clock

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Ono ◽  
Ken-ichi Honma ◽  
Sato Honma
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Cellular Networks ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Circadian System ◽  
Developmental Changes ◽  
Circadian Period ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Environmental Light

In mammals, the central circadian clock is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. Individual SCN cells exhibit intrinsic oscillations, and their circadian period and robustness are different cell by cell in the absence of cellular coupling, indicating that cellular coupling is important for coherent circadian rhythms in the SCN. Several neuropeptides such as arginine vasopressin (AVP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) are expressed in the SCN, where these neuropeptides function as synchronizers and are important for entrainment to environmental light and for determining the circadian period. These neuropeptides are also related to developmental changes of the circadian system of the SCN. Transcription factors are required for the formation of neuropeptide-related neuronal networks. Although VIP is critical for synchrony of circadian rhythms in the neonatal SCN, it is not required for synchrony in the embryonic SCN. During postnatal development, the clock genes cryptochrome (Cry)1 and Cry2 are involved in the maturation of cellular networks, and AVP is involved in SCN networks. This mini-review focuses on the functional roles of neuropeptides in the SCN based on recent findings in the literature.

scholarly journals Clock proteins regulate spatiotemporal organization of clock genes to control circadian rhythms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangbo Xiao ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Mariana Jimenez ◽  
Neeraj Soni ◽  
Swathi Yadlapalli
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Circadian Clocks ◽  
Spatiotemporal Organization ◽  
Clock Proteins ◽  
Expression Behavior ◽  
Clock Protein

ABSTRACTCircadian clocks regulate ∼24 hour oscillations in gene expression, behavior, and physiology. While the molecular and neural mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well characterized, how cellular organization of clock components controls circadian clock regulation remains poorly understood. Here, we elucidate how clock proteins regulate circadian rhythms by controlling the spatiotemporal organization of clock genes. Using high-resolution live imaging techniques we demonstrate that Drosophila clock proteins are concentrated in a few discrete foci and are organized at the nuclear envelope; these results are in contrast to longstanding expectations that clock proteins are diffusely distributed in the nucleus. We also show that clock protein foci are highly dynamic and change in number, size, and localization over the circadian cycle. Further, we demonstrate that clock genes are positioned at the nuclear periphery by the clock proteins precisely during the circadian repression phase, suggesting that subnuclear localization of clock genes plays an important role in the control of rhythmic gene expression. Finally, we show that Lamin B receptor, a nuclear envelope protein, is required for peripheral localization of clock protein foci and clock genes and for normal circadian rhythms. These results reveal that clock proteins form dynamic nuclear foci and play a hitherto unexpected role in the subnuclear reorganization of clock genes to control circadian rhythms, identifying a novel mechanism of circadian regulation. Our results further suggest a new role for clock protein foci in the clustering of clock-regulated genes during the repression phase to control gene co-regulation and circadian rhythms.SIGNIFICANCEAlmost all living organisms have evolved circadian clocks to tell time. Circadian clocks regulate ∼24-hour oscillations in gene expression, behavior and physiology. Here, we reveal the surprisingly sophisticated spatiotemporal organization of clock proteins and clock genes and its critical role in circadian clock function. We show, in contrast to current expectations, that clock proteins are concentrated in a few discrete, dynamic nuclear foci at the nuclear envelope during the repression phase. Further, we uncovered several unexpected features of clock protein foci, including their role in positioning the clock genes at the nuclear envelope precisely during the repression phase to enable circadian rhythms. These studies provide fundamental new insights into the cellular mechanisms of circadian rhythms and establish direct links between nuclear organization and circadian clocks.

scholarly journals Clock proteins regulate spatiotemporal organization of clock genes to control circadian rhythms

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (28) ◽  
pp. e2019756118
Author(s):  
Yangbo Xiao ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Mariana Jimenez ◽  
Neeraj Soni ◽  
Swathi Yadlapalli
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Nuclear Periphery ◽  
Spatiotemporal Organization ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Clock Proteins ◽  
Spatial Reorganization

Circadian clocks regulate ∼24-h oscillations in gene expression, behavior, and physiology. While the genetic and molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well characterized, what remains poorly understood are the intracellular dynamics of circadian clock components and how they affect circadian rhythms. Here, we elucidate how spatiotemporal organization and dynamics of core clock proteins and genes affect circadian rhythms in Drosophila clock neurons. Using high-resolution imaging and DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, we demonstrate that Drosophila clock proteins (PERIOD and CLOCK) are organized into a few discrete foci at the nuclear envelope during the circadian repression phase and play an important role in the subnuclear localization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms. Specifically, we show that core clock genes, period and timeless, are positioned close to the nuclear periphery by the PERIOD protein specifically during the repression phase, suggesting that subnuclear localization of core clock genes might play a key role in their rhythmic gene expression. Finally, we show that loss of Lamin B receptor, a nuclear envelope protein, leads to disruption of PER foci and per gene peripheral localization and results in circadian rhythm defects. These results demonstrate that clock proteins play a hitherto unexpected role in the subnuclear reorganization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms, revealing how clocks function at the subcellular level. Our results further suggest that clock protein foci might regulate dynamic clustering and spatial reorganization of clock-regulated genes over the repression phase to control circadian rhythms in behavior and physiology.

scholarly journals Different Effects of Phase Advance and Delay in Rotating Light-Dark Regimens on Clock and Natriuretic Peptide Gene Expression in the Rat Heart

2014 ◽  
pp. S573-S584 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. HERICHOVÁ ◽  
J. AMBRUŠOVÁ ◽  
Ľ. MOLČAN ◽  
A. VESELÁ ◽  
P. SVITOK ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Circadian System ◽  
Daily Rhythm ◽  
Male Rats ◽  
Phase Advance ◽  
Peripheral Oscillators ◽  
Peptide Gene ◽  
Central Oscillator

Under physiological conditions the mammalian circadian system is synchronized to a cyclic environment. The central oscillator in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) responds predominantly to an external light (L) dark (D) cycle. Peripheral oscillators are more efficiently synchronized by metabolic cues. When the circadian system is exposed to opposing synchronizing cues, peripheral oscillators uncouple from the SCN. To consider influence of phase advances and delays in light regimens mimicking shift work, we analyzed the expression of clock genes (per2, bmal1) and natriuretic peptides (anp, bnp) in the heart of male rats. Experimental groups were exposed to a rotating LD regimen with either 8 h phase advance or delay for 11 weeks. Samples were taken for a 24 h cycle in 4 h intervals. Peripheral oscillators responded to rotating phase advance by decreasing rhythm robustness, while phase delay mostly influenced the phase angle between the acrophase of rhythmic gene expression and the external LD cycle. The expression of anp was arrhythmic in the heart of control rats and was not influenced by rotating LD regimens. The expression of bnp showed a daily rhythm with a nadir during the active phase. The daily rhythm in bnp expression diminished under rotating LD regimen conditions.

Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Anatomy, Physiology, and Neurochemistry

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rae Silver
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Electrical Activity ◽  
Suprachiasmatic Nucleus ◽  
Clock Gene ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Transgenic Animals ◽  
The Body ◽  
Network Activity ◽  
Over Time

We live in an approximately 24-hour world and circadian rhythms have evolved to adapt organisms to the opportunities presented by Earth’s 24-hour cycle of light and dark. A “master clock” located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the brain orchestrates daily rhythms in all manner of behavioral, endocrine, metabolic, autonomic, and homeostatic systems in our bodies. The SCN is comprised of about 20,000 neurons and about one third as many astroglia. How can so few neurons and astroglia guide so many rhythms? How do neurons time out an interval as long as a day? The answers are a case study in understanding how genes within cells, and cells within circuits, function together to perform complex activities and optimize bodily functions. While individual clock cells are found in virtually all bodily tissues, the unique connectome of the SCN, its specialized afferent inputs from the retinohypothalamic tract, and its neural and humoral outputs enable its “babel” of neuronal types to synchronize their activity and signal time to the rest of the body. At the molecular-cellular level, circadian rhythms are regulated by a 24-hour transcriptional–translational feedback loop. At the SCN tissue level, individual SCN neurons coordinate their gene expression and electrical activity, working together in circuits that sustain coherent rhythms. The SCN has many distinct cell types based on their neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and afferent and efferent connections. There has been much progress in unraveling the dynamic network organization that underlies the SCN network’s communications. Though the precise anatomical connections underlying interneuronal communication in the SCN are not completely understood, key signaling mechanisms that sustain the SCN’s intrinsic rhythmicity have been tackled using intersectional genomic tools. Transgenic animals that permit the visualization of clock gene–protein expression have enabled analysis of SCN network activity over time. Availability of animals bearing mutations in clock genes or proteins enable the determination of changes within neurons, among neurons in networks, and their impact on behavior. The use of continuous readouts of circadian activity that track behavior, or clock gene expression, or electrical activity changes over time, within an SCN or a single neuron, leads the way to unraveling mechanisms sustaining the circadian timing system. Because the results of circadian studies generate huge amounts of data, the entry of mathematical modelers and statisticians into the field has begun to yield useful and testable predictions on how these multiplexed systems work to adapt to our 24-hour world.

scholarly journals Does a Red House Affect Rhythms in Mice with a Corrupted Circadian System?

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 2288
Author(s):  
Menekse Öztürk ◽  
Marc Ingenwerth ◽  
Martin Sager ◽  
Charlotte von Gall ◽  
Amira A. H. Ali
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Neuronal Activity ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Plasma Corticosterone ◽  
Cellular Level ◽  
Circadian System ◽  
Targeted Deletion ◽  
Long Wavelength ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Time Information

The circadian rhythms of body functions in mammals are controlled by the circadian system. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the hypothalamus orchestrates subordinate oscillators. Time information is conveyed from the retina to the SCN to coordinate an organism’s physiology and behavior with the light/dark cycle. At the cellular level, molecular clockwork composed of interlocked transcriptional/translational feedback loops of clock genes drives rhythmic gene expression. Mice with targeted deletion of the essential clock gene Bmal1 (Bmal1−/−) have an impaired light input pathway into the circadian system and show a loss of circadian rhythms. The red house (RH) is an animal welfare measure widely used for rodents as a hiding place. Red plastic provides light at a low irradiance and long wavelength—conditions which affect the circadian system. It is not known yet whether the RH affects rhythmic behavior in mice with a corrupted circadian system. Here, we analyzed whether the RH affects spontaneous locomotor activity in Bmal1−/− mice under standard laboratory light conditions. In addition, mPER1- and p-ERK-immunoreactions, as markers for rhythmic SCN neuronal activity, and day/night plasma corticosterone levels were evaluated. Our findings indicate that application of the RH to Bmal1−/− abolishes rhythmic locomotor behavior and dampens rhythmic SCN neuronal activity. However, RH had no effect on the day/night difference in corticosterone levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document