scholarly journals A Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm Based on Discrete Bacterial Colony Chemotaxis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Lu ◽  
Tao Feng ◽  
Zhaozheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Population Diversity ◽  
Transfer Mechanism ◽  
Bacterial Colony ◽  
Continuous Space ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Crowding Distance ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Definition Of

Bacterial colony chemotaxis algorithm was originally developed for optimal problem with continuous space. In this paper the discrete bacterial colony chemotaxis (DBCC) algorithm is developed to solve multiobjective optimization problems. The basic DBCC algorithm has the disadvantage of being trapped into the local minimum. Therefore, some improvements are adopted in the new algorithm, such as adding chaos transfer mechanism when the bacterium choose their next locations and the crowding distance operation to maintain the population diversity in the Pareto Front. The definition of chaos transfer mechanism is used to retain the elite solution produced during the operation, and the definition of crowding distance is used to guide the bacteria for determinate variation, thus enabling the algorithm obtain well-distributed solution in the Pareto optimal set. The convergence properties of the DBCC strategy are tested on some test functions. At last, some numerical results are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the results obtained by the new algorithm.

scholarly journals A multipopulation evolutionary framework with Steffensen’s method for dynamic multiobjective optimization problems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyu Liu ◽  
Lei Cao ◽  
Zhu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Population Diversity ◽  
Environment Changes ◽  
Steffensen’S Method ◽  
Diversity Maintenance ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Comprehensive Comparison ◽  
Dynamic Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Single Objective

AbstractDynamic multiobjective optimization problems (DMOPs) require the evolutionary algorithms that can track the moving Pareto-optimal fronts efficiently. This paper presents a dynamic multiobjective evolutionary framework (DMOEF-MS), which adopts a novel multipopulation structure and Steffensen’s method to solve DMOPs. In DMOEF-MS, only one population deals with the original DMOP, while the others focus on single-objective problems that are generated by the weighted summation of the original DMOP. Then, Steffensen’s method is used to control the evolving process in two ways: prediction and diversity-maintenance. Particularly, the prediction strategy is devised to predict the next promising positions for the individuals that handle single-objective problems, and the diversity-maintenance strategy is used to increase population diversity before the environment changes and reinitialize the multiple populations after the environment changes. This paper gives a comprehensive comparison of DMOEF-MS with some state-of-the-art DMOEAs on 14 DMOPs and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Combining Convergence and Diversity in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Laumanns ◽  
Lothar Thiele ◽  
Kalyanmoy Deb ◽  
Eckart Zitzler
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Baseline Algorithm

Over the past few years, the research on evolutionary algorithms has demonstrated their niche in solving multiobjective optimization problems, where the goal is to find a number of Pareto-optimal solutions in a single simulation run. Many studies have depicted different ways evolutionary algorithms can progress towards the Pareto-optimal set with a widely spread distribution of solutions. However, none of the multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) has a proof of convergence to the true Pareto-optimal solutions with a wide diversity among the solutions. In this paper, we discuss why a number of earlier MOEAs do not have such properties. Based on the concept of ɛ-dominance, new archiving strategies are proposed that overcome this fundamental problem and provably lead to MOEAs that have both the desired convergence and distribution properties. A number of modifications to the baseline algorithm are also suggested. The concept of ɛ-dominance introduced in this paper is practical and should make the proposed algorithms useful to researchers and practitioners alike.

Approximating the Nondominated Front Using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Knowles ◽  
David W. Corne
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Local Search ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Evolution Strategy ◽  
Basic Algorithm ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Candidate Solution ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems

We introduce a simple evolution scheme for multiobjective optimization problems, called the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy (PAES). We argue that PAES may represent the simplest possible nontrivial algorithm capable of generating diverse solutions in the Pareto optimal set. The algorithm, in its simplest form, is a (1+1) evolution strategy employing local search but using a reference archive of previously found solutions in order to identify the approximate dominance ranking of the current and candidate solution vectors. (1+1)-PAES is intended to be a baseline approach against which more involved methods may be compared. It may also serve well in some real-world applications when local search seems superior to or competitive with population-based methods. We introduce (1+λ) and (μ+λ) variants of PAES as extensions to the basic algorithm. Six variants of PAES are compared to variants of the Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm and the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm over a diverse suite of six test functions. Results are analyzed and presented using techniques that reduce the attainment surfaces generated from several optimization runs into a set of univariate distributions. This allows standard statistical analysis to be carried out for comparative purposes. Our results provide strong evidence that PAES performs consistently well on a range of multiobjective optimization tasks.

Domination Measure: A New Metric for Solving Multiobjective Optimization

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Q. Hale ◽  
Helin Zhu ◽  
Enlu Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Performance Metric ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Global Optima ◽  
Benchmark Test Functions ◽  
Optimal Set

For general multiobjective optimization problems, the usual goal is finding the set of solutions not dominated by any other solutions, that is, a set of solutions as good as any other solution in all objectives and strictly better in at least one objective. In this paper, we propose a novel performance metric called the domination measure to measure the quality of a solution, which can be intuitively interpreted as the probability that an arbitrary solution in the solution space dominates that solution with respect to a predefined probability measure. We then reformulate the original problem as a stochastic and single-objective optimization problem. We further propose a model-based approach to solve it, which leads to an ideal version algorithm and an implementable version algorithm. We show that the ideal version algorithm converges to a set representation of the global optima of the reformulated problem; we demonstrate the numerical performance of the implementable version algorithm by comparing it with numerous existing multiobjective optimization methods on popular benchmark test functions. The numerical results show that the proposed approach is effective in generating a finite and uniformly spread approximation of the Pareto optimal set of the original multiobjective problem and is competitive with the tested existing methods. The concept of domination measure opens the door for potentially many new algorithms, and our proposed algorithm is an instance that benefits from domination measure.

scholarly journals An Evolutionary Algorithm with Clustering-Based Assisted Selection Strategy for Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization

Complexity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Naili Luo ◽  
Wu Lin ◽  
Peizhi Huang ◽  
Jianyong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Population Diversity ◽  
Selection Strategy ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Density Based Clustering ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Objective Space ◽  
Multiple Clusters

In multimodal multiobjective optimization problems (MMOPs), multiple Pareto optimal sets, even some good local Pareto optimal sets, should be reserved, which can provide more choices for decision-makers. To solve MMOPs, this paper proposes an evolutionary algorithm with clustering-based assisted selection strategy for multimodal multiobjective optimization, in which the addition operator and deletion operator are proposed to comprehensively consider the diversity in both decision and objective spaces. Specifically, in decision space, the union population is partitioned into multiple clusters by using a density-based clustering method, aiming to assist the addition operator to strengthen the population diversity. Then, a number of weight vectors are adopted to divide population into N subregions in objective space (N is population size). Moreover, in the deletion operator, the solutions in the most crowded subregion are first collected into previous clusters, and then the worst solution in the most crowded cluster is deleted until there are N solutions left. Our algorithm is compared with other multimodal multiobjective evolutionary algorithms on the well-known benchmark MMOPs. Numerical experiments report the effectiveness and advantages of our proposed algorithm.

scholarly journals Duality Theorems for (ρ,ψ,d)-Quasiinvex Multiobjective Optimization Problems with Interval-Valued Components

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 894
Author(s):  
Savin Treanţă
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Integral Functional ◽  
Multiple Integral ◽  
Control Problems ◽  
Duality Theorems ◽  
New Class ◽  
Duality Results ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Interval Valued

The present paper deals with a duality study associated with a new class of multiobjective optimization problems that include the interval-valued components of the ratio vector. More precisely, by using the new notion of (ρ,ψ,d)-quasiinvexity associated with an interval-valued multiple-integral functional, we formulate and prove weak, strong, and converse duality results for the considered class of variational control problems.

scholarly journals Robust neutrosophic programming approach for solving intuitionistic fuzzy multiobjective optimization problems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firoz Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Practical Implication ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Programming Approach ◽  
Solution Approach ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems

AbstractThis study presents the modeling of the multiobjective optimization problem in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. The uncertain parameters are depicted as intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, and the crisp version is obtained using the ranking function method. Also, we have developed a novel interactive neutrosophic programming approach to solve multiobjective optimization problems. The proposed method involves neutral thoughts while making decisions. Furthermore, various sorts of membership functions are also depicted for the marginal evaluation of each objective simultaneously. The different numerical examples are presented to show the performances of the proposed solution approach. A case study of the cloud computing pricing problem is also addressed to reveal the real-life applications. The practical implication of the current study is also discussed efficiently. Finally, conclusions and future research scope are suggested based on the proposed work.

scholarly journals Assessing the Performance of Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Bekir Afsar ◽  
Kaisa Miettinen ◽  
Francisco Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Decision Maker ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Interactive Methods ◽  
Value Functions ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Preference Information ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Human Decision

Interactive methods are useful decision-making tools for multiobjective optimization problems, because they allow a decision-maker to provide her/his preference information iteratively in a comfortable way at the same time as (s)he learns about all different aspects of the problem. A wide variety of interactive methods is nowadays available, and they differ from each other in both technical aspects and type of preference information employed. Therefore, assessing the performance of interactive methods can help users to choose the most appropriate one for a given problem. This is a challenging task, which has been tackled from different perspectives in the published literature. We present a bibliographic survey of papers where interactive multiobjective optimization methods have been assessed (either individually or compared to other methods). Besides other features, we collect information about the type of decision-maker involved (utility or value functions, artificial or human decision-maker), the type of preference information provided, and aspects of interactive methods that were somehow measured. Based on the survey and on our own experiences, we identify a series of desirable properties of interactive methods that we believe should be assessed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document