scholarly journals Canonical PSO Based K-Means Clustering Approach for Real Datasets

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lopamudra Dey ◽  
Sanjay Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Air Pollution ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Cluster Validity ◽  
Validity Assessment ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Clustering Approach ◽  
Validity Measure

“Clustering” the significance and application of this technique is spread over various fields. Clustering is an unsupervised process in data mining, that is why the proper evaluation of the results and measuring the compactness and separability of the clusters are important issues. The procedure of evaluating the results of a clustering algorithm is known as cluster validity measure. Different types of indexes are used to solve different types of problems and indices selection depends on the kind of available data. This paper first proposes Canonical PSO based K-means clustering algorithm and also analyses some important clustering indices (intercluster, intracluster) and then evaluates the effects of those indices on real-time air pollution database, wholesale customer, wine, and vehicle datasets using typical K-means, Canonical PSO based K-means, simple PSO based K-means, DBSCAN, and Hierarchical clustering algorithms. This paper also describes the nature of the clusters and finally compares the performances of these clustering algorithms according to the validity assessment. It also defines which algorithm will be more desirable among all these algorithms to make proper compact clusters on this particular real life datasets. It actually deals with the behaviour of these clustering algorithms with respect to validation indexes and represents their results of evaluation in terms of mathematical and graphical forms.

A Hard C-Means Clustering Algorithm Incorporating Membership KL Divergence and Local Data Information for Noisy Image Segmentation

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850012 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Gharieb ◽  
G. Gendy ◽  
H. Selim
Keyword(s):  
Image Segmentation ◽  
Membership Function ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Cluster Center ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Cluster Membership ◽  
Kl Divergence ◽  
Clustering Approach ◽  
Center Distance

In this paper, the standard hard C-means (HCM) clustering approach to image segmentation is modified by incorporating weighted membership Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence and local data information into the HCM objective function. The membership KL divergence, used for fuzzification, measures the proximity between each cluster membership function of a pixel and the locally-smoothed value of the membership in the pixel vicinity. The fuzzification weight is a function of the pixel to cluster-centers distances. The used pixel to a cluster-center distance is composed of the original pixel data distance plus a fraction of the distance generated from the locally-smoothed pixel data. It is shown that the obtained membership function of a pixel is proportional to the locally-smoothed membership function of this pixel multiplied by an exponentially distributed function of the minus pixel distance relative to the minimum distance provided by the nearest cluster-center to the pixel. Therefore, since incorporating the locally-smoothed membership and data information in addition to the relative distance, which is more tolerant to additive noise than the absolute distance, the proposed algorithm has a threefold noise-handling process. The presented algorithm, named local data and membership KL divergence based fuzzy C-means (LDMKLFCM), is tested by synthetic and real-world noisy images and its results are compared with those of several FCM-based clustering algorithms.

A Clustering Algorithm in Stream Data Using Strong Coreset

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manmohan Singh ◽  
Rajendra Pamula ◽  
Alok Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Local Optimum ◽  
Reduction Algorithm ◽  
Stream Data ◽  
Stream Data Mining ◽  
Clustering Approach ◽  
Approximation Guarantee ◽  
Competitive Algorithms ◽  
Learning Data

There are various applications of clustering in the fields of machine learning, data mining, data compression along with pattern recognition. The existent techniques like the Llyods algorithm (sometimes called k-means) were affected by the issue of the algorithm which converges to a local optimum along with no approximation guarantee. For overcoming these shortcomings, an efficient k-means clustering approach is offered by this paper for stream data mining. Coreset is a popular and fundamental concept for k-means clustering in stream data. In each step, reduction determines a coreset of inputs, and represents the error, where P represents number of input points according to nested property of coreset. Hence, a bit reduction in error of final coreset gets n times more accurate. Therefore, this motivated the author to propose a new coreset-reduction algorithm. The proposed algorithm executed on the Covertype dataset, Spambase dataset, Census 1990 dataset, Bigcross dataset, and Tower dataset. Our algorithm outperforms with competitive algorithms like Streamkm[Formula: see text], BICO (BIRCH meets Coresets for k-means clustering), and BIRCH (Balance Iterative Reducing and Clustering using Hierarchies.

scholarly journals Towards Expert-Inspired Automatic Criterion to Cut a Dendrogram for Real-Industrial Applications

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shikha Suman ◽  
Ashutosh Karna ◽  
Karina Gibert
Keyword(s):  
Hierarchical Clustering ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Industrial Applications ◽  
Underlying Structure ◽  
Cluster Validity ◽  
Cluster Validity Index ◽  
Number Of Clusters

Hierarchical clustering is one of the most preferred choices to understand the underlying structure of a dataset and defining typologies, with multiple applications in real life. Among the existing clustering algorithms, the hierarchical family is one of the most popular, as it permits to understand the inner structure of the dataset and find the number of clusters as an output, unlike popular methods, like k-means. One can adjust the granularity of final clustering to the goals of the analysis themselves. The number of clusters in a hierarchical method relies on the analysis of the resulting dendrogram itself. Experts have criteria to visually inspect the dendrogram and determine the number of clusters. Finding automatic criteria to imitate experts in this task is still an open problem. But, dependence on the expert to cut the tree represents a limitation in real applications like the fields industry 4.0 and additive manufacturing. This paper analyses several cluster validity indexes in the context of determining the suitable number of clusters in hierarchical clustering. A new Cluster Validity Index (CVI) is proposed such that it properly catches the implicit criteria used by experts when analyzing dendrograms. The proposal has been applied on a range of datasets and validated against experts ground-truth overcoming the results obtained by the State of the Art and also significantly reduces the computational cost.

scholarly journals Improved minimum-minimum roughness algorithm for clustering categorical data

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Truong et al. ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Data Mining ◽  
Hierarchical Clustering ◽  
Categorical Data ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm

Clustering is a fundamental technique in data mining and machine learning. Recently, many researchers are interested in the problem of clustering categorical data and several new approaches have been proposed. One of the successful and pioneering clustering algorithms is the Minimum-Minimum Roughness algorithm (MMR) which is a top-down hierarchical clustering algorithm and can handle the uncertainty in clustering categorical data. However, MMR tends to choose the category with less value leaf node with more objects, leading to undesirable clustering results. To overcome such shortcomings, this paper proposes an improved version of the MMR algorithm for clustering categorical data, called IMMR (Improved Minimum-Minimum Roughness). Experimental results on actual data sets taken from UCI show that the IMMR algorithm outperforms MMR in clustering categorical data.

A Data Distribution View of Clustering Algorithms

2011 ◽  
pp. 374-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjie Wu ◽  
Jian Chen ◽  
Hui Xiong
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Data Distribution ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Group Method ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Distribution Point

Cluster analysis (Jain & Dubes, 1988) provides insight into the data by dividing the objects into groups (clusters), such that objects in a cluster are more similar to each other than objects in other clusters. Cluster analysis has long played an important role in a wide variety of fields, such as psychology, bioinformatics, pattern recognition, information retrieval, machine learning, and data mining. Many clustering algorithms, such as K-means and Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), have been wellestablished. A recent research focus on clustering analysis is to understand the strength and weakness of various clustering algorithms with respect to data factors. Indeed, people have identified some data characteristics that may strongly affect clustering analysis including high dimensionality and sparseness, the large size, noise, types of attributes and data sets, and scales of attributes (Tan, Steinbach, & Kumar, 2005). However, further investigation is expected to reveal whether and how the data distributions can have the impact on the performance of clustering algorithms. Along this line, we study clustering algorithms by answering three questions: 1. What are the systematic differences between the distributions of the resultant clusters by different clustering algorithms? 2. How can the distribution of the “true” cluster sizes make impact on the performances of clustering algorithms? 3. How to choose an appropriate clustering algorithm in practice? The answers to these questions can guide us for the better understanding and the use of clustering methods. This is noteworthy, since 1) in theory, people seldom realized that there are strong relationships between the clustering algorithms and the cluster size distributions, and 2) in practice, how to choose an appropriate clustering algorithm is still a challenging task, especially after an algorithm boom in data mining area. This chapter thus tries to fill this void initially. To this end, we carefully select two widely used categories of clustering algorithms, i.e., K-means and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC), as the representative algorithms for illustration. In the chapter, we first show that K-means tends to generate the clusters with a relatively uniform distribution on the cluster sizes. Then we demonstrate that UPGMA, one of the robust AHC methods, acts in an opposite way to K-means; that is, UPGMA tends to generate the clusters with high variation on the cluster sizes. Indeed, the experimental results indicate that the variations of the resultant cluster sizes by K-means and UPGMA, measured by the Coefficient of Variation (CV), are in the specific intervals, say [0.3, 1.0] and [1.0, 2.5] respectively. Finally, we put together K-means and UPGMA for a further comparison, and propose some rules for the better choice of the clustering schemes from the data distribution point of view.

A Dynamic Genetic Algorithm for Clustering Problems

2013 ◽  
Vol 411-414 ◽  
pp. 1884-1893
Author(s):  
Yong Chun Cao ◽  
Ya Bin Shao ◽  
Shuang Liang Tian ◽  
Zheng Qi Cai
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Adaptive Mutation ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Local Optima ◽  
Clustering Problems

Due to many of the clustering algorithms based on GAs suffer from degeneracy and are easy to fall in local optima, a novel dynamic genetic algorithm for clustering problems (DGA) is proposed. The algorithm adopted the variable length coding to represent individuals and processed the parallel crossover operation in the subpopulation with individuals of the same length, which allows the DGA algorithm clustering to explore the search space more effectively and can automatically obtain the proper number of clusters and the proper partition from a given data set; the algorithm used the dynamic crossover probability and adaptive mutation probability, which prevented the dynamic clustering algorithm from getting stuck at a local optimal solution. The clustering results in the experiments on three artificial data sets and two real-life data sets show that the DGA algorithm derives better performance and higher accuracy on clustering problems.

scholarly journals Adaptive Initialization Method for K-Means Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Yu-Kai Wang ◽  
Xin Yao ◽  
Chin-Teng Lin
Keyword(s):  
Time Complexity ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Local Optima ◽  
Initial Cluster ◽  
Higher Dimensional ◽  
Real World Datasets ◽  
Random Method

The K-means algorithm is a widely used clustering algorithm that offers simplicity and efficiency. However, the traditional K-means algorithm uses a random method to determine the initial cluster centers, which make clustering results prone to local optima and then result in worse clustering performance. In this research, we propose an adaptive initialization method for the K-means algorithm (AIMK) which can adapt to the various characteristics in different datasets and obtain better clustering performance with stable results. For larger or higher-dimensional datasets, we even leverage random sampling in AIMK (name as AIMK-RS) to reduce the time complexity. 22 real-world datasets were applied for performance comparisons. The experimental results show AIMK and AIMK-RS outperform the current initialization methods and several well-known clustering algorithms. Specifically, AIMK-RS can significantly reduce the time complexity to O (n). Moreover, we exploit AIMK to initialize K-medoids and spectral clustering, and better performance is also explored. The above results demonstrate superior performance and good scalability by AIMK or AIMK-RS. In the future, we would like to apply AIMK to more partition-based clustering algorithms to solve real-life practical problems.

scholarly journals Ensemble Hybrid K- Means and DBSCAN Clustering Algorithm – HDKA for Cancer Dataset

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 6036-6040
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Data Mining ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Cancer Dataset ◽  
Dbscan Clustering ◽  
Selection Of

Data Mining is the foremost vital space of analysis and is pragmatically utilized in totally different domains, It becomes a highly demanding field because huge amounts of data have been collected in various applications. The database can be clustered in more number of ways depending on the clustering algorithm used, parameter settings and other factors. Multiple clustering algorithms can be combined to get the final partitioning of data which provides better clustering results. In this paper, Ensemble hybrid KMeans and DBSCAN (HDKA) algorithm has been proposed to overcome the drawbacks of DBSCAN and KMeans clustering algorithms. The performance of the proposed algorithm improves the selection of centroid points through the centroid selection strategy.For experimental results we have used two dataset Colon and Leukemia from UCI machine learning repository.

scholarly journals A comparative analysis of selected clustering algorithms for criminal profiling

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-471
Author(s):  
J.A. Adeyiga ◽  
S.O. Olabiyisi ◽  
E.O. Omidiora
Keyword(s):  
Expectation Maximization ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Expectation Maximization Algorithm ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Criminal Activity ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Criminal Profiling ◽  
Hard Clustering ◽  
Membership Value

Several criminal profiling systems have been developed to assist the Law Enforcement Agencies in solving crimes but the techniques employed in most of the systems lack the ability to cluster criminal based on their behavioral characteristics. This paper reviewed different clustering techniques used in criminal profiling and then selects one fuzzy clustering algorithm (Expectation Maximization) and two hard clustering algorithm (K-means and Hierarchical). The selected algorithms were then developed and tested on real life data to produce "profiles" of criminal activity and behavior of criminals. The algorithms were implemented using WEKA software package. The performance of the algorithms was evaluated using cluster accuracy and time complexity. The results show that Expectation Maximization algorithm gave a 90.5% clusters accuracy in 8.5s, while K-Means had 62.6% in 0.09s and Hierarchical with 51.9% in 0.11s. In conclusion, soft clustering algorithm performs better than hard clustering algorithm in analyzing criminal data. Keywords: Clustering Algorithm, Profiling, Crime, Membership value

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document