scholarly journals Multiobjective Optimization Involving Quadratic Functions

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Brito Augusto ◽  
Fouad Bennis ◽  
Stephane Caro
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Pareto Set ◽  
Quadratic Functions ◽  
Pareto Optimum ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Biobjective Optimization ◽  
Engineering Projects

Multiobjective optimization is nowadays a word of order in engineering projects. Although the idea involved is simple, the implementation of any procedure to solve a general problem is not an easy task. Evolutionary algorithms are widespread as a satisfactory technique to find a candidate set for the solution. Usually they supply a discrete picture of the Pareto front even if this front is continuous. In this paper we propose three methods for solving unconstrained multiobjective optimization problems involving quadratic functions. In the first, for biobjective optimization defined in the bidimensional space, a continuous Pareto set is found analytically. In the second, applicable to multiobjective optimization, a condition test is proposed to check if a point in the decision space is Pareto optimum or not and, in the third, with functions defined inn-dimensional space, a direct noniterative algorithm is proposed to find the Pareto set. Simple problems highlight the suitability of the proposed methods.

scholarly journals One-exact approximate Pareto sets

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Herzel ◽  
Cristina Bazgan ◽  
Stefan Ruzika ◽  
Clemens Thielen ◽  
Daniel Vanderpooten
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Polynomial Time ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Auxiliary Problem ◽  
Constant Factor ◽  
Pareto Set ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Annual Ieee Symposium ◽  
Biobjective Optimization ◽  
Approximation Guarantee

AbstractPapadimitriou and Yannakakis (Proceedings of the 41st annual IEEE symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp 86–92, 2000) show that the polynomial-time solvability of a certain auxiliary problem determines the class of multiobjective optimization problems that admit a polynomial-time computable $$(1+\varepsilon , \dots , 1+\varepsilon )$$ ( 1 + ε , ⋯ , 1 + ε ) -approximate Pareto set (also called an $$\varepsilon $$ ε -Pareto set). Similarly, in this article, we characterize the class of multiobjective optimization problems having a polynomial-time computable approximate $$\varepsilon $$ ε -Pareto set that is exact in one objective by the efficient solvability of an appropriate auxiliary problem. This class includes important problems such as multiobjective shortest path and spanning tree, and the approximation guarantee we provide is, in general, best possible. Furthermore, for biobjective optimization problems from this class, we provide an algorithm that computes a one-exact $$\varepsilon $$ ε -Pareto set of cardinality at most twice the cardinality of a smallest such set and show that this factor of 2 is best possible. For three or more objective functions, however, we prove that no constant-factor approximation on the cardinality of the set can be obtained efficiently.

A Novel Multiobjective Memetic Algorithm Based on IWO-DE and its Application in Nutrition Decision Making Problem

2014 ◽  
Vol 989-994 ◽  
pp. 1849-1852
Author(s):  
Gao Ping Wang ◽  
Meng Zhang ◽  
Wei Wei Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Memetic Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Memetic Algorithms ◽  
Pareto Optimum ◽  
Invasive Weed Optimization ◽  
Invasive Weed ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Decision Making Problem

In this paper ,we discuss multiobjective optimization problems solved by Memetic algorithms. We present A novel multiobjective memetic algorithm based on invasive weed optimization and differential evolution (IWO-DE) to solve this class of problems .We present the Nutrition Prescription Model for Meals.the IWO-DE is applied to solve the nutrition decision making problem to map the Pareto-optimum front. The results in the problem show its effectiveness.

scholarly journals From a Pareto Front to Pareto Regions: A Novel Standpoint for Multiobjective Optimization

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
pp. 3152
Author(s):  
Carine M. Rebello ◽  
Márcio A. F. Martins ◽  
Daniel D. Santana ◽  
Alírio E. Rodrigues ◽  
José M. Loureiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Particle Swarm Optimizer ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Pressure Swing ◽  
Novel Concept

This work presents a novel approach for multiobjective optimization problems, extending the concept of a Pareto front to a new idea of the Pareto region. This new concept provides all the points beyond the Pareto front, leading to the same optimal condition with statistical assurance. This region is built using a Fisher–Snedecor test over an augmented Lagragian function, for which deductions are proposed here. This test is meant to provide an approximated depiction of the feasible operation region while using meta-heuristic optimization results to extract this information. To do so, a Constrained Sliding Particle Swarm Optimizer (CSPSO) was applied to solve a series of four benchmarks and a case study. The proposed test analyzed the CSPSO results, and the novel Pareto regions were estimated. Over this Pareto region, a clustering strategy was also developed and applied to define sub-regions that prioritize one of the objectives and an intermediary region that provides a balance between objectives. This is a valuable tool in the context of process optimization, aiming at assertive decision-making purposes. As this is a novel concept, the only way to compare it was to draw the entire regions of the benchmark functions and compare them with the methodology result. The benchmark results demonstrated that the proposed method could efficiently portray the Pareto regions. Then, the optimization of a Pressure Swing Adsorption unit was performed using the proposed approach to provide a practical application of the methodology developed here. It was possible to build the Pareto region and its respective sub-regions, where each process performance parameter is prioritized. The results demonstrated that this methodology could be helpful in processes optimization and operation. It provides more flexibility and more profound knowledge of the system under evaluation.

Biobjective Optimization of Well Placement: Algorithm, Validation, and Field Testing

SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Faruk Alpak ◽  
Vivek Jain ◽  
Yixuan Wang ◽  
Guohua Gao
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Objective Function ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Efficient Implementation ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Biobjective Optimization ◽  
Single Objective

Summary We describe the development and validation of a novel algorithm for field-development optimization problems and document field-testing results. Our algorithm is founded on recent developments in bound-constrained multiobjective optimization of nonsmooth functions for problems in which the structure of the objective functions either cannot be exploited or are nonexistent. Such situations typically arise when the functions are computed as the result of numerical modeling, such as reservoir-flow simulation within the context of field-development planning and reservoir management. We propose an efficient implementation of a novel parallel algorithm, namely BiMADS++, for the biobjective optimization problem. Biobjective optimization is a special case of multiobjective optimization with the property that Pareto points may be ordered, which is extensively exploited by the BiMADS++ algorithm. The optimization algorithm generates an approximation of the Pareto front by solving a series of single-objective formulations of the biobjective optimization problem. These single-objective problems are solved using a new and more efficient implementation of the mesh adaptive direct search (MADS) algorithm, developed for nonsmooth optimization problems that arise within reservoir-simulation-based optimization workflows. The MADS algorithm is extensively benchmarked against alternative single-objective optimization techniques before the BiMADS++ implementation. Both the MADS optimization engine and the master BiMADS++ algorithm are implemented from the ground up by resorting to a distributed parallel computing paradigm using message passing interface (MPI) for efficiency in industrial-scaleproblems. BiMADS++ is validated and field tested on well-location optimization (WLO) problems. We first validate and benchmark the accuracy and computational performance of the MADS implementation against a number of alternative parallel optimizers [e.g., particle-swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), and simultaneous perturbation and multivariate interpolation (SPMI)] within the context of single-objective optimization. We also validate the BiMADS++ implementation using a challenging analytical problem that gives rise to a discontinuous Pareto front. We then present BiMADS++ WLO applications on two simple, intuitive, and yet realistic problems, and a model for a real problem with known Pareto front. Finally, we discuss the results of the field-testing work on three real-field deepwater models. The BiMADS++ implementation enables the user to identify various compromise solutions of the WLO problem with a single optimization run without resorting to ad hoc adjustments of penalty weights in the objective function. Elimination of this “trial-and-error” procedure and distributed parallel implementation renders BiMADS++ easy to use and significantly more efficient in terms of computational speed needed to determine alternative compromise solutions of a given WLO problem at hand. In a field-testing example, BiMADS++ delivered a workflow speedup of greater than fourfold with a single biobjective optimization run over the weighted-sumsobjective-function approach, which requires multiple single-objective-function optimization runs.

scholarly journals MultiObjective Genetic Modified Algorithm (MOGMA)

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-33
Author(s):  
Elica Vandeva
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problem ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Modified Algorithm

Abstract Multiobjective optimization based on genetic algorithms and Pareto based approaches in solving multiobjective optimization problems is discussed in the paper. A Pareto based fitness assignment is used − non-dominated ranking and movement of a population towards the Pareto front in a multiobjective optimization problem. A MultiObjective Genetic Modified Algorithm (MOGMA) is proposed, which is an improvement of the existing algorithm.

scholarly journals Performances Assessment of MOMA-Plus Method on Multiobjective Optimization Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-68
Author(s):  
Alexandre Som ◽  
Kounhinir Some ◽  
Abdoulaye Compaore ◽  
Blaise Some
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multiobjective Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Non Linear

This work is devoted to evaluate the performances of the MOMA-plus method in solving multiobjective optimization problems. This assessment is doing on the complexity of its algorithm, the convergence and the diversity of solutions in relation to the Pareto front. All these parameters were evaluated on non-linear multiobjective test problems and obtained solutions are compared with those provided by the NSGA-II method. This comparative study made it possible tohighlight the performances of MOMA-plus method for solving non-linear multiobjective problems.

scholarly journals A New Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition of the Objective Space for Multiobjective Optimization

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Dai ◽  
Yuping Wang
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Evolutionary Process ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Objective Space

In order to well maintain the diversity of obtained solutions, a new multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition of the objective space for multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) is designed. In order to achieve the goal, the objective space of a MOP is decomposed into a set of subobjective spaces by a set of direction vectors. In the evolutionary process, each subobjective space has a solution, even if it is not a Pareto optimal solution. In such a way, the diversity of obtained solutions can be maintained, which is critical for solving some MOPs. In addition, if a solution is dominated by other solutions, the solution can generate more new solutions than those solutions, which makes the solution of each subobjective space converge to the optimal solutions as far as possible. Experimental studies have been conducted to compare this proposed algorithm with classic MOEA/D and NSGAII. Simulation results on six multiobjective benchmark functions show that the proposed algorithm is able to obtain better diversity and more evenly distributed Pareto front than the other two algorithms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document