scholarly journals The Effect of Rapid Response Teams on End-of-Life Care: A Retrospective Chart Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 302-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Tam ◽  
Mary Salib ◽  
Alison Fox-Robichaud
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Rapid Response Teams ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND: A subset of critically ill patients have end-of-life (EOL) goals that are unclear. Rapid response teams (RRTs) may aid in the identification of these patients and the delivery of their EOL care.OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of RRT discussion on EOL care, and to examine how a preprinted order (PPO) set for EOL care influenced EOL discussions and outcomes.METHODS: A single-centre retrospective chart review of all RRT calls (January 2009 to December 2010) was performed. The effect of RRT EOL discussions and the effect of a hospital-wide PPO set on EOL care was examined. Charts were from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Critical Care Information Systemic database, and were interrogated by two reviewers.RESULTS: In patients whose EOL status changed following RRT EOL discussion, there were fewer intensive care unit (ICU) transfers (8.4% versus 17%; P<0.001), decreased ICU length of stay (5.8 days versus 20 days; P=0.08), increased palliative care consultations (34% versus 5.3%; P<0.001) and an increased proportion who died within 24 h of consultation (25% versus 8.3%; P<0.001). More patients experienced a change in EOL status following the introduction of an EOL PPO, from 20% (before) to 31% (after) (P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS: A change in EOL status following RRT-led EOL discussion was associated with reduced ICU transfers and enhanced access to palliative care services. Further study is required to identify and deconstruct barriers impairing timely and appropriate EOL discussions.

scholarly journals Disparities in access to palliative care facilities for patients with and without cancer: A retrospective review

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110073
Author(s):  
Christine Lau ◽  
Christopher Meaney ◽  
Matthew Morgan ◽  
Rose Cook ◽  
Camilla Zimmermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Low Performance ◽  
Electronic Referral

Background: To date, little is known about the characteristics of patients who are admitted to a palliative care bed for end-of-life care. Previous data suggest that there are disparities in access to palliative care services based on age, sex, diagnosis, and socioeconomic status, but it is unclear whether these differences impact access to a palliative care bed. Aim: To better identify patient factors associated with the likelihood/rate of admission to a palliative care bed. Design: A retrospective chart review of all initiated palliative care bed applications through an electronic referral program was conducted over a 24-month period. Setting/participants: Patients who apply and are admitted to a palliative care bed in a Canadian metropolitan city. Results: A total of 2743 patients made a total of 5202 bed applications to 9 hospice/palliative care units in 2015–2016. Referred and admitted cancer patients were younger, male, and more functional than compared to non-cancer patients (all p < 0.001). Referred and admitted patients without cancer were more advanced in their illness trajectory, with an anticipated prognosis <1 month and Palliative Performance Status of 10%–20% (all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, a diagnosis of cancer and a prognosis of <3 months were associated with increased likelihood and/or rate of admission to a bed, whereas the presence of care needs, a longer prognosis and a PPS of 30%–40% were associated with decreased rates and/or likelihood of admission. Conclusion: Patients without cancer have reduced access to palliative care facilities at end-of-life compared to patients with cancer; at the time of their application and admission, they are “sicker” with very low performance status and poorer prognoses. Further studies investigating disease-specific clinical variables and support requirements may provide more insights into these observed disparities.

Hospitalization burden and end-of-life (EOL) care in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 31-31
Author(s):  
Laura Donovan ◽  
Donna Buono ◽  
Melissa Kate Accordino ◽  
Jason Dennis Wright ◽  
Andrew B. Lassman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Remaining Life ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Eol Care

31 Background: GBM is associated with a poor prognosis and early death in elderly patients. Prior studies have demonstrated a high burden of hospitalization in this population. We sought to evaluate and examine trends in hospitalizations and EOL care in GBM survivors. Methods: Using SEER-Medicare linked data, we performed a retrospective observational cohort study of patients aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with GBM from 2005-2017 who lived at least 6 months from the time of diagnosis. Aggressive EOL care was defined as: chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 14 days of death (DOD), surgery within 30 DOD, > 1 emergency department visit, ≥ 1 hospitalization or intensive care unit admission within 30 DOD; in-hospital death; or hospice enrollment ≤ 3 DOD. We evaluated age, race, ethnicity, marital status, gender, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, prior treatment and percentage of time hospitalized. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with aggressive end of life care. Results: Of 5827 patients, 2269 (38.9%) survived at least 6 months. Among these, 1106 (48.7%) survived 6-12 months, 558 (24.6%) survived 12-18 months, and 605 (26.7%) survived > 18 months. Patients who survived 6-12 months had the highest burden of hospitalization and spent a median of 10.6% of their remaining life in the hospital compared to those surviving 12-18 months (5.4%) and > 18 months (3%) (P < 0.001). 10.1% of the cohort had claims for palliative care services; 49.8% of initial palliative care consults occurred in the last 30 days of life. Hospice claims existed in 83% with a median length of stay 33 days (IQR 12, 79 days). 30.1% of subjects received aggressive EOL care. Receiving chemo at any time (OR 1.510, 95% CI 1.221-1.867) and spending ≥ 20% of life in the hospital after diagnosis (OR 3.331, 95% CI 2.567-4.324) were associated with aggressive EOL care. Women (OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.624-0.922), patients with higher socioeconomic status (OR 0.533, 95% CI 0.342-0.829), and those diagnosed ≥ age 80 (OR 0.723, 95% CI 0.528-0.991) were less likely to receive aggressive EOL care. Race, ethnicity, marital status, and extent of initial resection were not associated with aggressive EOL care. Conclusions: A minority of elderly patients with GBM in the SEER-Medicare database survived ≥ 6 months; hospitalizations were common and patients spent a significant proportion of their remaining life hospitalized. Although hospice utilization was high in this cohort, 30% of patients received aggressive EOL care. Despite the aggressive nature of GBM, few patients had palliative care consults during their illness. Increased utilization of palliative care services may help reduce hospitalization burden and aggressive EOL care in this population.

Impact of palliative care on end-of-life management of cancer patients dying in the hospital.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20613-e20613
Author(s):  
Syed Mustafa Karim ◽  
Jamal M Zekri ◽  
Ehab Mosaad Abdelghany ◽  
Azhar Rizvi ◽  
Aboelkhair Al-Gahmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Time Of Death ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Eol Care

e20613 Background: A substantial number of cancer patients receive inpatient care at the end-of-life (EoL). Involvement of palliative care teams during the course of cancer treatment has been shown to improve quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. In this study, we compare the EoL care of cancer patients dying in the hospital under medical oncology (MO) and palliative care (PC) services. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of adult cancer patients who received chemotherapy during their illness and died in our hospital between January 2010 and January 2012 was conducted. The quality metrics measured as endpoints were: chemotherapy given within 21 days of death, death in the ICU, CPR at time of death, and time from last chemotherapy to death (TLCD). These endpoints were compared between patients who died under the MO service (cohort A) and those dying under PC service (cohort B). Chi-square test and T-test were used to compare the endpoints between the two cohorts. Results: Of the 106 cancer patients who died in the hospital, 40 and 66 were in cohorts A and B respectively. 30% of all patients were 65 years of age or older, and were equally distributed between the two cohorts. Patients in cohort A were more likely to receive chemotherapy within last 3 weeks of life (27.5% versus 7.5%, p=0.012, 95% CI 4.16-37.15), to have CPR at time of death (15% versus 0%, p=0.005, 95% CI 4.2-29.8) and to die in the ICU (52.5% versus 1.5%, p=<0.001, 95% CI 33.3-67.1) as compared to patients in cohort B. The average time from last chemotherapy to death was significantly longer (221 days) for cohort B patients as compared to cohort A patients (96 days), p=0.01. Patients in cohort A who had PC consultation during their hospitalization had no differences in the measured endpoints when compared to patients in cohort B. Conclusions: Cancer patients who die in the hospital while under MO service without PC involvement tend to have more aggressive EoL care. This may impact negatively on some QoL features. Early referral to palliative care services may facilitate better understanding and fulfillment of the needs of cancer patients and their caregivers by the healthcare-providers.

Effectiveness of palliative care services: A population-based study of end-of-life care for cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1344-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana De Palma ◽  
Daniela Fortuna ◽  
Sarah E Hegarty ◽  
Daniel Z Louis ◽  
Rita Maria Melotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Administrative Databases ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
The Impact

Background: Multiple studies demonstrate substantial utilization of acute hospital care and, potentially excessive, intensive medical and surgical treatments at the end-of-life. Aim: To evaluate the relationship between the use of home and facility-based hospice palliative care for patients dying with cancer and service utilization at the end of life. Design: Retrospective, population-level study using administrative databases. The effect of palliative care was analyzed between coarsened exact matched cohorts and evaluated through a conditional logistic regression model. Setting/participants: The study was conducted on the cohort of 34,357 patients, resident in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy, admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of metastatic or poor-prognosis cancer during the 6 months before death between January 2013 and December 2015. Results: Patients who received palliative care experienced significantly lower rates of all indicators of aggressive care such as hospital admission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–0.06), emergency department visits (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.21–0.25), intensive care unit stays (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26–0.32), major operating room procedures (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.21–0.24), and lower in-hospital death (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.10–0.11). This cohort had significantly higher rates of opiate prescriptions (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.21–1.33) ( p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Conclusion: Use of palliative care at the end of life for cancer patients is associated with a reduction of the use of high-cost, intensive services. Future research is necessary to evaluate the impact of increasing use of palliative care services on other health outcomes. Administrative databases linked at the patient level are a useful data source for assessment of care at the end of life.

End-of-life cancer care: Health service delivery in the last 12 months of life in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 171-171
Author(s):  
Marc Kerba ◽  
Ayn Sinnarajah ◽  
M Sarah Rose ◽  
Lynn Nicholson ◽  
Barbara Wheler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Health Service Delivery ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
To Receive

171 Background: In Calgary, Alberta, the Calgary Zone Palliative Care Collaborative (CZPCC) undertook a study to examine the current state of cancer and palliative services and to recommend steps to address gaps in service delivery. We hypothesized that early access to palliative care services would reduce utilization of active cancer treatments and services for individuals nearing the end of life. Our study objectives were to determine the utilization and timing of acute, palliative and oncology-related services in Calgary. Methods: This retrospective study examined cancer registry and administrative data for patients > 18 years, who died in 2012. Measures of aggressive end of life care (EOL) were also collected. A combination of descriptive statistics, tests of association and multivariate regression analysis were conducted. Results: N = 1909 died of cancer in 2012: median age 73 years (IQR: 62-82 years) and median disease duration 364 days (IQR: 92-1114 days). 40.6% of patients received systemic treatment in last 12 months of life. 29.9% received radiotherapy and 13.0% received psychosocial/spiritual care. Palliative care contact was 80.7%, inclusive of 20.6% who had an intensive palliative care unit admission. 5.2% had EOL chemotherapy and 3.8% received EOL radiotherapy. Up to 10.4% of patients had one or more hospital admission. There was no significant effect of age on those who received aggressive EOL care. Men had an increased probability to receive aggressive EOL care (p = 0.015). Tumor group was also associated with receiving aggressive EOL (p < 0.001), with the highest utilization in Head and Neck and hematological malignancies. In patients with a disease duration of > 4 months those who received palliative care at least 2-3 months prior to death were less likely to receive aggressive EOL care (P < 0.001). Patients whose disease duration was < 1 month were less likely to receive aggressive EOL care if they received palliative care services (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The provision of palliative care services at the end of life is most needed among men and certain tumor groups who are the highest users of aggressive EOL care.

Psychiatric issues in palliative care: Recognition of delirium in patients enrolled in hospice care

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Irwin ◽  
Sanjai Rao ◽  
Kimberly A. Bower ◽  
Joanna Palica ◽  
Sanjay S. Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Interdisciplinary Teams ◽  
Significant Problem ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Prevalence Estimates ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Hospice And Palliative Care ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTObjectives:Delirium is prevalent, difficult to assess, under-recognized, and undertreated in hospice and palliative care settings. Furthermore, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Under-recognition of delirium results in under-treatment and increased suffering. The intent of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the recognition of delirium in a large cohort of hospice patients by interdisciplinary hospice care teams.Methods:A retrospective chart review of 2,716 patients receiving hospice care was conducted in order to determine the baseline rate of recognition of delirium in patients with advanced, life-threatening illnesses by front-line hospice clinicians. Documentation of “delirium” as either a diagnosis or problem was used as an estimate of how often these disorders were considered significant issues by the treating interdisciplinary team.Results:Of the patients receiving home/long-term care, 17.8% (386/2168) had delirium documented as a diagnosis or significant problem. The presence of recognized delirium in this setting was associated with significant differences in marital status, ethnicity, hospice diagnosis, and age. Total length of hospice care was also significantly longer. Of patients receiving inpatient care, 28.3% (614/548) had delirium documented as a diagnosis or significant problem. Recognized delirium in this setting was associated with significant differences in gender, ethnicity, hospice diagnosis, and length of inpatient stay.Significance of results:If documentation is representative of the care that the interdisciplinary teams provide, delirium of any kind appears to be under-recognized in this population. In fact, it is on the low end of prevalence estimates in the literature. Improved delirium assessment is needed in order to minimize the impact of delirium on patients living with advanced, life-threatening illnesses and their caregivers.

scholarly journals Benzodiazepine Use and Morbidity-Mortality Outcomes in a Geriatric Palliative Care Unit: A Retrospective Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Helen Senderovich ◽  
Sandra Gardner ◽  
Anna Berall ◽  
Michael Ganion ◽  
Dennis Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Benzodiazepine Use ◽  
Hospice And Palliative Care ◽  
Performance Scale ◽  
Overall Mortality

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients often experience delirium at the end of life. Benzodiazepine use may be associated with an increased risk of developing delirium. Alternate medications used in conjunction with benzodiazepines may serve as an independent precipitant of delirium. The aim is to understand the role of benzodiazepines in precipitating delirium and advanced mortality in palliative care population at the end of life. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective medical chart review was conducted at a hospice and palliative care inpatient unit between the periods of June 2017–December 2017 and October 2017–November 2018. It included patients in hospice and palliative care inpatient units who received a benzodiazepine and those who did not. Patient characteristics, as well as Palliative Performance Scale score, diagnosis, and occurrence of admission, terminal, and/or recurrent delirium, were collected and analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Use of a benzodiazepine was not significantly associated with overall mortality nor cause-specific death without terminal delirium rate. However, it was significantly associated with higher cause-specific death with terminal delirium rate and a higher recurrent delirium rate. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> This retrospective chart review suggests an association between benzodiazepine use and specific states of delirium and cause-specific death. However, it does not provide strong evidence on the use of this drug, especially at the end of life, as it pertains to the overall mortality rate. Suggested is a contextual approach to the use of benzodiazepines and the need to consider Palliative Performance Scale score and goals of care in the administration of this drug at varying periods during patient length of stay.

Interpreting in palliative care: A systematic review of the impact of interpreters on the delivery of palliative care services to cancer patients with limited English proficiency.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milagros Silva ◽  
Margaux Genoff ◽  
Alexandra Zaballa ◽  
Stacy Marie Stabler ◽  
Francesca Gany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Limited English Proficiency ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
The Impact

123 Background: According to the 2011 U.S. Census 60% of people living in the U.S. speak a language other than English at home, and of these approximately 40% have limited English proficiency (LEP). Language barriers can affect the health outcomes of LEP patients and the use of trained interpreters can improve patient-physician communication. Since effective communication is the cornerstone of delivering adequate palliative care, a systematic review was conducted to determine the impact of interpreters on the delivery of palliative care services to LEP patients with cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature search in all available languages of 6 databases from 1966 and 2013. Studies evaluated interpreter interventions for LEP patients receiving palliative care services. Of 38 references, 11 articles were found by multiple reviewers to meet inclusion criteria. Data were collected on the study design, size, comparison groups, outcomes, and interpreter characteristics. Results: A total of 6 qualitative and 5 quantitative studies assessed the use of interpreters. All studies found that the quality of care provided to LEP patients receiving palliative services is affected by communication. Most studies showed that when no trained interpreters were used, LEP patients and families had inadequate understanding about their diagnosis or prognosis during goals of care conversations, and worse symptom management at end of life including pain and anxiety. Half of the studies concluded that trained interpreters are not utilized adequately and several suggested that pre-meetings between clinicians and interpreters are important to discuss topics and terminology to be used during goals of care conversations. Conclusions: Published studies show worse outcomes during end of life care and goals of care discussions when trained interpreters are not used. Moreover, trained interpreters are not being used appropriately in the field. More clinically relevant studies are needed to improve the quality of care provided to LEP patients and families receiving palliative services.

Impact of specialist palliative care delivered over three months prior to death on a colorectal cancer patient’s risk of experiencing aggressive end-of-life care.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6614-6614
Author(s):  
Aynharan Sinnarajah ◽  
Madalene Earp ◽  
Pin Cai ◽  
Andrew Fong ◽  
Kelly Blacklaws ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Short Disease Duration ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
The Impact

6614 Background: More patients are experiencing aggressive end-of-life (EOL) care. This is concerning as aggressive EOL care, on a population level, is associated with poor quality care. Specialist palliative care (PC) has been shown to help relieve EOL symptoms, improve patient quality of life, and reduce aggressive EOL care. This study aimed to estimate the impact of the timing of specialist PC, specifically PC delivered at least 3 months prior to death, on a colorectal cancer (CRC) patient’s risk experiencing aggressive care in the last 30 days of life. Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study of adult patients who died from CRC in Alberta, Canada from 2011-2015. The Alberta Cancer Registry was used to identify the cohort, which was linked to healthcare resource use data in local, provincial, and national databases. Individuals who died < 30 days from CRC diagnosis were excluded. Patients who accessed any of the provinces specialist PC services were deemed exposed to specialist PC (includes PC consult team, intensive PC unit, palliative home care, hospice). Aggressive EOL care was defined as having experienced at least one of: hospital death, > 1 emergency department visit, > 1 hospital admission, > 14 days of hospitalization, ≥1 intensive care unit admission, ≥1 new chemotherapy program (or any treatment in the last 14 days of life). Logistic regression was used to model factors (specialist PC timing and clinical characteristics) associated with aggressive EOL care. Results: The cohort comprised 2979 patients. Most patients received specialist PC before death (58%); 60% had ≥1 indicator of aggressive EOL care. Relative to patients who received specialist PC > 3 months before death, patients who received specialist PC < 3 months before death were 1.5 times more likely to experience aggressive EOL care (CI: 1.2-1.9). Patients who received no specialist PC were 2.1 times more likely to experience aggressive EOL care (CI: 1.7-2.8). Short disease duration ( < 1 year from diagnosis to death), younger age at death, living in a rural area, and male sex, were also associated with higher odds of experiencing aggressive EOL care. Conclusions: Specialist PC delivered > 3 months before death reduces a CRC patient’s risk of experiencing aggressive EOL care over PC delivered < 3 months before death.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document