scholarly journals Familial Discoid Medial Meniscus Tear in Three Members of a Family: A Case Report and Review of Literature

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raheel Ahmed Ali ◽  
Scott McKay

Background. A discoid meniscus is a thickened variant of the normal C-shaped meniscus prone to injury. Discoid medial meniscal tears have rarely been reported within families and may suggest familial or developmental origins.Methods. We report the cases of two Caucasian brothers with symptomatic discoid medial meniscus tears. A literature review was conducted addressing discoid medial meniscus and cases of familial meniscus tears.Case Presentation. Physically active brothers presented with progressively worsening knee pain. MRI revealed medial meniscus tears in both brothers. The family history of medial meniscus tears in their mother and the discoid medial meniscus injuries found on arthroscopy suggested evidence for familial discoid medial meniscus tears.Conclusions. Discoid medial meniscus tears within a family have not been previously reported. Two cases of families with discoid lateral meniscus tears have been reported. Discoid medial meniscus is rare relative to the discoid lateral meniscus and predisposes children to symptomatic tears.

1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1303-1305
Author(s):  
Kazutoshi Nomura ◽  
Jiro Mizuoka ◽  
Terumi Sakae ◽  
Hikaru Tajima

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0036
Author(s):  
Karen Briggs ◽  
Stephanie Petterson ◽  
Kevin Plancher

Objectives: Recent studies have described increased risk of OA following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Systematic reviews have suggested that meniscal pathology, which occurs in up to 60% of patients with ACL injury, increases this risk. The literature reports a 50% incidence of OA following medial meniscectomy, two times the risk compared to lateral meniscectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of meniscal pathology on the incidence of OA following ACLR. Methods: All patients who underwent primary autograft or allograft BPTB transtibial ACLR by a single surgeon between 1999-2015 were identified. Revision ACLR, multi-ligamentous reconstructions, and patients with less than 2-year imaging follow-up were excluded. Meniscus pathology and treatment were recorded. OA was defined at follow-up as Kellgren-Lawrence grade III-IV on plain radiographs. Chi-square tests assessed differences in incidence rates (p<0.05). Results: A consecutive series of 103 patients (56 males, 47 females; age 36.1±11.4 years) with BPTB ACLR with an average follow-up of 8.81±4.96 (range 2-20 years) were included. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears at the time of ACL injury was 47.6% (49/103) and prevalence of lateral meniscus tears was 56.3% (58/103) (p=0.166). Medial compartment OA was seen in 9.7% (10/103) of patients. Prevalence of medial compartment OA was greater in patients with medial meniscus tear (14.3%; 7/49) compared to those without a medial meniscus tear (5.6%; 3/54); however, this was not significant (p=0.135). Of the 7 patients with medial meniscal tear and medial compartment OA, 5 underwent partial medial meniscectomy and 2 underwent repair. Lateral compartment OA was seen in 14.6% (15/103). The prevalence of lateral compartment OA was greater in patients with a lateral meniscus tear (22.4%; 13/58) compared to patients without lateral meniscus tears (4.4%; 2/45) (p=0.01). Patients with lateral meniscus tear were 5.04 [95%CI: 1.2 to 21.2] times more likely to develop OA. Thirteen of the 47 (28%) patients that underwent partial lateral meniscectomy developed lateral OA compared to 0% of patients (0/10) that underwent lateral meniscal repair (p=0.068). Conclusion: While studies with multiple surgeons and rehabilitation protocols have shown the development of OA following ACLR is increased with medial meniscal pathology, we found that the prevalence of medial OA was not significantly higher in these patients with medial meniscal tear at an average of 8.81 years follow-up. Whereas, lateral meniscal repair dramatically reduced the development of knee OA compared to partial meniscectomy in this cohort of patients with ACLR. These findings can inform clinical practice as despite prior literature indicating a relationship between medial meniscal tear and osteoarthritis, we did not see a greater prevalence of OA amongst patients undergoing ACLR with a medial meniscal tear. Further, a lateral meniscal repair offers superior protection against OA when compared to partial lateral meniscectomy in treating lateral meniscal tears and is essential in the treatment of these complex patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e236150
Author(s):  
Evelyn Patricia Murphy ◽  
Patrick J O'Toole

A 7-year-old boy presented with a 1-week history of a limp, low grade temperature and mildly elevated inflammatory markers. He sustained a fall 2 weeks ago but was relatively symptom free for a week. The inital physical exam demonstrated a knee effusion clinically, radiographs did not demonstrate any overt pathology and biochemical testing demonstrated an elevated C reactive protein of 8 mg/L. An arthroscopy was conducted, with a plan for synovial biopsies to investigate for infective versus inflammatory arthritis as a cause for the effusion. An isolated lateral meniscal tear was discovered. This was repaired using all inside technique with Smith and Nephew’s FastFix 360 (R) suture anchors. It is quite uncommon to find isolated lateral meniscus tears in this population, but the learning point demonstrates it is important to arthroscopically examine the whole knee, even while performing synovial biopsies as there may be unexpected findings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0010
Author(s):  
Brett Heldt ◽  
Elsayed Attia ◽  
Raymond Guo ◽  
Indranil Kushare ◽  
Theodore Shybut

Background: Acute anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) rupture is associated with a significant incidence of concomitant meniscal and chondral injuries. However, to our knowledge, the incidence of these concomitant injuries in skeletally immature(SI) versus skeletally mature(SM) patients has not been directly compared. SI patients are a unique subset of ACL patients because surgical considerations are different, and subsequent re-tear rates are high. However, it is unclear if the rates and types of meniscal and chondral injuries differ. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare associated meniscal and chondral injury patterns between SI and SM patients under age 21, treated with ACL reconstruction for an acute ACL tear. We hypothesized that no significant differences would be seen. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of primary ACL reconstructions performed from January 2012 to April 2020. Patients were stratified by skeletal maturity status based on a review of records and imaging. Demographic data was recorded, including age, sex, and BMI. Associated intra-articular meniscal injury, including laterality, location, configuration, and treatment were determined. Articular cartilage injury location, grade, and treatments were determined. Revision rates, non-ACL reoperation rates, and time to surgery were also compared between the two groups. Results: 785 SM and 208 SI patients met inclusion criteria. Mean BMI and mean age were significantly different between groups. Meniscal tear rates were significantly greater in SM versus SI patients in medial meniscus tears(P<.001), medial posterior horn tears(P=.001), medial longitudinal tears configuration(P=.007), lateral Radial configuration(P=.002), and lateral complex tears(P=.011). Medial repairs(P<.001) and lateral partial meniscectomies(P=.004) were more likely in the SM group. There was a significantly greater number of chondral injuries in the SM versus SI groups in the Lateral(p=.007) and medial compartments(P<.001). SM patients had a significantly increased number of outerbridge grade 1 and 2 in the Lateral(P<.001) and Medial Compartments(P=.013). ACL revisions(P=.019) and Non-ACL reoperations(P=.002) were significantly greater in the SI patients compared to SM. No other significant differences were noted. Conclusion: SM ACL injured patients have a significantly higher rate of medial meniscus tears and medial longitudinal configurations treated with repair, and a significantly higher rate of radial and/or complex lateral meniscus tears treated with partial meniscectomy compared to the SI group. We also found a significantly higher rate of both medial and lateral compartment chondral injuries, mainly grades 1 and 2, in SM compared to SI patients. Conversely, SI ACL reconstruction patients had higher revision and subsequent non-ACL surgery rates.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Gyun Kim ◽  
Soo-Hyun Kim ◽  
Jung-Heum Baek ◽  
Jae-Gyoon Kim ◽  
Ki-Mo Jang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group recently reported that medial meniscus (MM) repairs are associated with more frequent re-operations when compared to lateral meniscus (LM) repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare the meniscal healing and the incidence of subsequent re-operation of medial and lateral meniscal tears that occurred concurrently with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) between June 2005 to December 2016. The healing of meniscal tears following repair or left in situ, and re-tear following partial meniscectomy, were evaluated via second-look arthroscopy and compared between medial and lateral meniscus. Moreover, the incidence of subsequent meniscal re-operation after the index ACLR were investigated and compared between medial and lateral meniscus. Subsequent meniscal re-operation was performed in cases of the following three symptomatic meniscus tears: re-tears at the meniscectomy site; new tears; and failed healing of repaired or left in situ meniscus. Results There were 148 meniscal tears in 121 patients at index ACLR. There were 62 MM tears, 38 LM tears, and 24 bilateral meniscus tears. At second-look arthroscopy, the “successful healing” rate for tears following repair was higher in LM tears (91.2%) compared to MM tears (80.0%), although it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the healing of left in situ tears or re-tear of meniscectomy site between medial and lateral meniscus. Patients with MM tears combined with ACL injuries had a higher incidence of subsequent meniscal re-operation compared to patients with LM tears (25.6% vs 16.1%, p = 0.025). Conclusions There was a trend for the successful healing rate to be higher in LM repairs than MM repairs. Subsequent meniscal re-operations after ACLR were more frequent in patients with medial meniscal tears concurrently with ACL injuries in comparison to patients with lateral meniscal tears. Level of study Level IV, retrospective case series.


Author(s):  
Alberto Grassi ◽  
Giacomo Dal Fabbro ◽  
Stefano Di Paolo ◽  
Federico Stefanelli ◽  
Luca Macchiarola ◽  
...  

ImportanceMeniscal tears are frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and the correct management of this kind of lesion during ACL-reconstruction procedure is critical for the restoration of knee kinematics. Although the importance of meniscus in knee biomechanics is generally accepted, the influence of medial and lateral meniscus in stability of ACL-deficient knee is still unclear.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to review literature, which analysed effects in cadaveric specimens of meniscal tear and meniscectomy of medial and lateral meniscus on laxity in the ACL-deficient knee.Evidence reviewAuthors performed a systematic search for cadaveric studies analysing the effect of medial and lateral meniscus tears or resection on kinematics of ACL-deficient knee. Extracted data included year of publications, number of human cadaver knee specimens, description of apparatus testing and instrumented kinematic evaluation, testing protocol and results.FindingsAuthors identified 18 studies that met inclusion and exclusion criteria of current review. The major finding of the review was that the works included reported a difference role of medial and lateral meniscus in restraining ACL-deficient knee laxity. Medial meniscus tear or resection resulted in a significant increase of anterior tibial displacement. Lateral meniscus lesions or meniscectomy on the other hand significantly increased rotation and translation under a coupled valgus stress and internal-rotation torque/pivot shift test.ConclusionsMedial and lateral meniscus have a different role in stabilising the ACL-deficient knee: while the medial meniscus functions as a critical secondary stabilisers of anterior tibial translation under an anterior/posterior load, lateral meniscus appears to be a more important restraint of rotational and dynamic laxity.Level of evidenceLevel IV, systematic review of level I–IV studies.


2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ö.Ahmet Atay ◽  
M.Nedim Doral ◽  
Gürsel Leblebicioğlu ◽  
Onur Tetik ◽  
Üstün Aydıngöz

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 807-810
Author(s):  
HONG CAO ◽  
YING ZHANG ◽  
WEI QIAN ◽  
XIN-HUA CHENG ◽  
YONG KE ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyun Ho Shin ◽  
Haseok Lee ◽  
Seonghyun Kang ◽  
You-Jin Ko ◽  
Seung-Yup Lee ◽  
...  

There are limited reports on the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on meniscus healing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) on potential healing of the horizontal medial meniscus tears in a rabbit model. A horizontal medial meniscus tear was created in both knees of nine skeletally mature adult rabbits. Left or right knees were randomly assigned to a L-PRP group, or a control group. 0.5 mL of L-PRP from 10 mL of each rabbit’s whole blood was prepared and injected into the horizontal tears in a L-PRP group. None was applied to the horizontal tears in a control group. The histological assessment of meniscus healing was performed at two, four, and six weeks after surgery. We found that there were no significant differences of quantitative histologic scoring between two groups at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after surgery (p>0.05). This study failed to show the positive effect of single injection of L-PRP on enhancing healing of the horizontal medial meniscus tears in a rabbit model. Single injection of L-PRP into horizontal meniscus tears may not effectively enhance healing of horizontal medial meniscus tears.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document