scholarly journals Approximation Analysis for a Common Fixed Point of Finite Family of Mappings Which Are Asymptoticallyk-Strict Pseudocontractive in the Intermediate Sense

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
H. Zegeye ◽  
N. Shahzad

We introduce an iterative process which converges strongly to a common fixed point of a finite family of uniformly continuous asymptoticallyki-strict pseudocontractive mappings in the intermediate sense fori=1,2,…,N. The projection ofx0onto the intersection of closed convex setsCnandQnfor eachn≥1is not required. Moreover, the restriction that the interior of common fixed points is nonempty is not required. Our theorems improve and unify most of the results that have been proved for this important class of nonlinear mappings.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
H. Zegeye ◽  
N. Shahzad

We provide an iterative process which converges strongly to a common fixed point of finite family of asymptoticallyk-strict pseudocontractive mappings in Banach spaces. Our theorems improve and unify most of the results that have been proved for this important class of nonlinear operators.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habtu Zegeye ◽  
Naseer Shahzad

We introduce an iterative process for finding an element of a common fixed point of a finite family of Bregman weak relatively nonexpansive mappings. Our theorems improve and unify most of the results that have been proved for this important class of nonlinear operators.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habtu Zegeye

We introduce an iterative process for finding an element in the common fixed point sets of two continuous pseudocontractive mappings. As a consequence, we provide an approximation method for a common fixed point of a finite family of pseudocontractive mappings. Furthermore, our convergence theorem is applied to a convex minimization problem. Our theorems extend and unify most of the results that have been proved for this class of nonlinear mappings.


2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyit Temir ◽  
Goknur Aykanat

AbstractWe prove that an implicit iterative process converges weakly and strongly to a common fixed point of a finite family of


Filomat ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-42
Author(s):  
G.S. Saluja

Let K be a nonempty closed convex nonexpansive retract of a real uniformly convex Banach space E with P as a nonexpansive retraction. Let T1 , T2 , ... , TN : K ? E be N asymptotically nonexpansive nonself mappings with sequences {rin} such that ??(n=1) rin < ?, for all 1 ? i ? N and n n=1 n F = ?N(i-1) F (Ti) ? ?. Let {?in}, {?in} and {?in} are sequences in [0, 1] with i=1 ?in + ?in + ?in = 1 for all i = 1, 2, ... , N . From arbitrary x1 ? K , define the sequence {xn} iteratively by (6), where {uin} are bounded sequences in K with ??(n=1) uin < ?. (i) If the dual E*of E has the Kadec-Klee property, then {xn} converges weakly to a common fixed point x*? F ; (ii) if {T1 , T2 , ... , TN} satisfies condition (B), then {xn} converges strongly to a common fixed point x*? F. .


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
G. C. Ugwunnadi ◽  
Bashir Ali

We introduce an iterative process for finding common fixed point of finite family of quasi-Bregman nonexpansive mappings which is a unique solution of some equilibrium problem.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Daman ◽  
H. Zegeye

It is our purpose, in this paper, to prove strong convergence of Halpern-Ishikawa iteration method to a common fixed point of finite family of Lipschitz pseudocontractive mappings. There is no compactness assumption imposed either onCor onT. The results obtained in this paper improve most of the results that have been proved for this class of nonlinear mappings.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-250
Author(s):  
Feng Gu

The purpose of this paper is to study the weak and strong convergence of implicit iteration process to a common fixed point for a finite family of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. The results presented in this paper extend and improve the corresponding results of [1,2,4–9,11–15].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document